Home / Florida / Boynton Beach
7900 Venture Center Way, Boynton Beach, FL 33437 · Palm Beach County · (561) 736-6000
99 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105146 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 30, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since August 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.00 of those hours.
22.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, an affiliated group of 79 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that meet the residents' nutritional needs, for 5 of 5 sampled residents that has the potential to affect 29 residents on Fortified foods observed during lunch; failed to follow the approved menu for lunch on 04/27/25 that has the potential to affect 93 residents who eat orally, Resident #53, Resident #25, Resident #40, Resident #13, and Resident #61; and failed to provide foods that meet the residents' needs or preferences, for 7 of 7 sampled residents observed during dining, Resident #18, Resident #65, Resident #67, Resident #64, Resident #15, and Resident #68.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care services and reasonable accommodations for 2 of 2 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to keep the call light within reach of Resident #66 and failure to ensure the call light was secured and within reach of Resident #12.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene as part of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and failed to accurately identify a resident's personal hygiene kit for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #62.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow the physician ordered blood pressure (BP) parameters for one of 5 sampled residents, for Resident #52; and failed to meet the professional standards of medication administration via enteral tubing for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #52; and failed to administer the medications timely for 1 of 5 sampled residents for Resident #52.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered wound care was provided as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #61, who had a facility acquired pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow the physician ordered splints for one resident on one sampled resident reviewed for splints, Resident #48.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to address residents' weight loss in a timely manner, for 3 of 10 sampled residents, reviewed for nutrition, Resident #40, Resident #13, Resident #28.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it obtained current physician's orders for Oxygen therapy administration for 2 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #75 and Resident #289; failed to obtain orders for changing and dating the oxygen tubing; failed to document the oxygen administration in Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 2 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #75 and Resident #37; failed to initiate a care plan for Oxygen therapy for Resident #289; failed to obtain current physician orders for a nebulizing treatment and failed to date and change the nebulizing tubing for 1 of 3 sampled residents for Resident #75.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to adhere to physician ordered fluid restrictions for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, Residents #24 and 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Residents #2, #24, and #28.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to submit required staffing information based on payroll based journal.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately document the discharge status for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed as closed records, Resident #87; and the facility failed to document the Hospice status for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed, Resident #73.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing hours were posted for the correct day for 1 of 4 days of the survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare, store and serve food in a sanitary manner; and failed to provide an appropriate cooling medium for a dialysis meal for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, Resident #55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate baseline care plans that included provisions for Foley catheter care for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for Foley catheter care, Resident #300.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to utilize necessary care and services to ensure the residents' ability to communicate did not diminish for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hearing, Resident #89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in a timely manner for 1 of 19 sampled residents, (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for catheter care for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for catheter care, Resident #300.
Inspectors wrote2. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident #65 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident had no impairments to upper extremities, and was able to eat independently with setup and clean up assistance. Resident #65's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to dispose of expired medication in 1 of 2 medication rooms, 100 Unit, reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide diets as ordered for 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #89; and failed to provide supplements as ordered for 2 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Residents #69, and #89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive eating equipment for 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accuracy of medical records for 5 of 19 sampled residents, Residents #87, #1, #300, #250, and #39.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services necessary to maintain or improve dining-eating and to prevent significant weight loss for 2 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #43 and #128); and failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition and prevent weight loss for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #15) who required total assistance with eating.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide pain medication associated with wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #223).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standard for food service safety that included: maintenance of refrigeration units, maintenance of air-conditioning systems, ensure only dietary staff in food preparation and serving area, proper covering of garbage and trash, and proper equipment to be used for food storage and clean dishware.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility to have a properly functioning call system affecting the 1 of 2 wings (100 wing), which included 34 rooms consisting of 60 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to feed residents in a dignified manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dining (Resident #28 and #223).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #221).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to obtain physicians' orders for oxygen for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #20 and Resident #34) and failed to obtain physicians' orders for insulin for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident # 20).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services necessary to maintain or improve foot care for 1 of 1 sampled resident, reviewed for and requiring podiatry care (Resident #43).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative care for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #58, reviewed for range of motion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent falls and perform post fall evaluations for 1 of 5 sampled residents, reviewed for falls (Resident #331).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide medication as scheduled on dialysis days for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident # 50).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to secure medications for 1 of 24 sampled residents reviewed for medications located at the bedside (Resident #10).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that therapeutic diets (Fluid Restriction) were followed as per physician order for 1 of 1 sampled resident, (Resident #50), reviewed for dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered special eating equipment for 1 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #28).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide contact precautions for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for transmission-based precautions (Resident #30).
2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 11, 2024, 1 on August 25, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.56 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.15 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.51 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 22.1% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 26.1% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.72 on weekdays and 3.15 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 3.56 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 1.00 | 3.72 | 3.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 91 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.54 | 0.97 | 3.66 | 3.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.54 | 1.03 | 3.67 | 3.21 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.59 | 1.05 | 3.71 | 3.27 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 91 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.4 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.3 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.8 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.6 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ventura Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 222 eligible stays.
13.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 243 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.
70.2% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 204 residents counted.
2.8% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 204 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VENTURA OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, a group of 79 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lilac SNF Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Ppg Gc Opcos II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Ventura Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Masterson, John | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/03/2020 | |
| Gorelick, Batya | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Florida inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.