17781 Thelma Ave, Jupiter, FL 33458 · Palm Beach County · (561) 746-2998
120 certified beds, about 87 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105555 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 10, 2025, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 38 health citations since December 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.51 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
58.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wrote*Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that was prepared, stored and served in a sanitary manner in accordance with standards for food safety professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services and linens in a manner to provide a clean, sanitary and homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to file a grievance in a timely manner, for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for grievances. As evidenced by failure of staff to respond to Resident #46's grievance regarding her missing blankets for almost 2 weeks.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #39, related to antipsychotic use, and for 1 of 10 sampled residents, Resident #37, related to weights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan to address Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Behavior, Resident #61; The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #63.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for 2 of 28 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to ensure that the diet orders were care planned for Resident #50 and failure to ensure the antianxiety medication care plan for Resident #63 was updated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin rash received further treatment as evidenced by Resident #35 remained symptomatic after the initial treatment for a skin rash.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for treatment of a facility acquired pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, as evidenced by not changing the dressing, as ordered for Resident #13 pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services, and supervision to prevent falls, for 1 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by Resident #39 having had eight falls since 05/01/25, with six being from her chair. The three most recent falls occurred while Resident #39 was in her Broda chair, the newest of intervention as of 06/19/25. The facility also failed to ensure the provision of two neurology consults for increased involuntary movements related to Huntington's Disease, which was care planned as part of the resident's risk for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of foods to address nutritional concerns for 2 of 10 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to include fortified foods as ordered for Resident #37 and Resident #50 , and failure to provide ordered meals for Resident #63. All three sampled residents had weight loss concerns or were underweight.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication errors for 3 of 7 sampled residents, as evidenced by a medication error rate of 15.6% with 32 opportunities due to failure to ensure that Resident #7 received medications ordered and was available for him, failure to ensure Resident #5 received medications that are prescribed to him, failure to notify the physician prior to holding blood pressure medications for Resident #27. The finding Included:The facility policy titled Medication Administration documented in part Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 8. Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medications for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. 12. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a laboratory test for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for laboratory testing. (Resident #8).
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices for 3 of 30 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to abide by Transmission Based Precaution (TBP) guidelines, Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP guidelines, and failure to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during direct care, for Resident #75, #288 and #71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the nursing staff failed to follow prescribed parameters including blood sugar and blood pressure results for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate medication administration times with dialysis services for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #6). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the completion of dialysis communication records to validate continuity of care for Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were able to demonstrate competency related to following physician's orders for medication administration and documentation for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1).
Inspectors wrote4) A medication pass observation with a random resident, who asked to remain confidential, was made on 03/27/24. Upon entering the room, the surveyor introduced herself and explained she was observing the nurse. The resident stated, The nurses are great, but you need to check up on the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants). On 03/27/24 in the afternoon, when asked what was meant by check up on the CNAs, the random resident stated, Some are great, but some have such attitudes. They don't care. I treat them with respect and expect the same from them, but don't always get it. The resident stated, Some act as if they don't want to be here. I know it's a tough job, but it is their job. And they don't let us know they are the CNA for the shift. The resident explained that the nurses come around at the beginning of each shift and let them know they will be the nurse for the shift. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident council group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the group concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility for 9 of 9 sampled residents interviewed during the Resident Council meeting (Resident #47, #45, #8, #10, #58, #63, #33, #70, and #7). This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as the resident council represents all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 3 of 4 units (100 Unit, 300 Unit and 400 Unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure that all voiced grievances made by residents to staff are put in writing on a grievance form and submitted to the appropriate person for resolution for 9 of 9 resident council members interviewed; 2) Ensure all written grievances include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued for 9 of 9 resident council members interviewed; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve foods in a sanitary manner, in accordance with professional standards for food safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor preferences for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #159, #161 and #74). The facility failed to respond to a verbal request for side rails to assist with bed mobility for Resident #159. Shower preferences and schedules were not followed for Resident #161 and #74.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to update care plans related to nutrition interventions for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #60), and Hospice status for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #43).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #13) reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling catheter bags remained off the floor for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #61, #83, and #50); and failed to ensure staff documented the monitoring of input and output of fluids, as per physician orders, for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #50).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper care and services for a peripheral intravenous (IV) line for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #61).
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct respiratory assessment with nebulizer treatment per facility policy for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory concerns (Resident #29)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of blood sugars as evidenced by the failure to notify the physician of blood sugar levels greater than 250, as per physician order, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #13).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident's food preference for 1 of 10 sampled residents reviewed for food concerns (Resident #25).
Inspectors wrote4) Review of the record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating he was cognitively intact. This MDS also revealed Resident #32 needed extensive to total assistance of one to two persons for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). During an interview on 12/13/22 at 11:33 AM, Resident #32 was asked about the food at the facility and explained he had been asking for cold cereal for breakfast and the nurses said it's too far away (for them to get it). During this continued interview at 11:38 AM, when asked if he was treated with respect and dignity, Resident #32 stated, The CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are lazy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide hot water for showers for 3 Residents (#82, #84 and #52); failed to maintain resident room doors for 3 Residents (#71, #19, and #52); and failed to ensure a clean and comfortable environment on 3 of 4 resident units (unit 200, unit 300 and unit 400).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the MDS assessment for 3 of 5 sampled residents. This concern involved Resident #98, #21, and #52.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality of care for 6 of 29 sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to investigate conflicting medication orders on admission for Resident #92, failed to obtain stool for occult blood for Resident #82, failed to obtain consults in a timely manner for Resident #84 and #20, failed to maintain and utilize an indwelling blood sugar monitoring device as ordered for Resident #71, and failed to ensure diabetic ulcer wound care for Resident #93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the family of a significant change of 1 of 1 sampled residents, Resident #75.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided, failed to ensure an accurate activity care plan was completed, which the resident's may have benefited from one-on-one activities for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities (Resident #55 and Resident #75).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the provision of podiatry services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #52).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional service (supplements and weight monitoring), as ordered by the physician and as recommended by the Registered Dietitian for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed. This involved Resident #97 and #16.
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 10, 2025, 1 on June 11, 2025, 2 on March 28, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.51 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.22 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.04 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.4% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 75.0% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.14 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.57 in April to June 2025 to 3.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.51 | 0.78 | 3.62 | 3.22 | 2.4% | 0 of 90 | 87 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.57 | 0.86 | 3.66 | 3.33 | 5.1% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.81 | 0.85 | 3.99 | 3.37 | 10.5% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.57 | 0.69 | 3.68 | 3.29 | 14.6% | 0 of 91 | 101 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.1 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.1 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Jupiter Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
12.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 111 eligible stays.
8.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 58 eligible stays.
56.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 84 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 171 residents counted.
3.4% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 170 residents counted.
98.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: JUPITER FL REHAB LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jupiter Fl Rehab Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/13/2025 |
| Wf Jupiter LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Wf Jupiter VA LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Amoyelle, Yechezkel | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Fogel, Joshua | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Weiss, Naftali | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Wf Tps LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Amoyelle, Yechezkel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Fogel, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Weiss, Naftali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Cypress Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Jupiter Fl Realty Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Jupiter Fl Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Jupiter Jv Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Prospective Wb LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Wf Tps LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/13/2025 | |
| Amoyelle, Yechezkel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Fogel, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Weiss, Naftali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.