1455 Suncrest Drive, Lapeer, MI 48446 · Lapeer County · (810) 664-8571
202 certified beds, about 166 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235058 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 1, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 41 health citations since December 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $68,445 in the last three years; the largest was $68,445, and the latest is dated December 19, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.67 of those hours.
40.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 41 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent two unstageable pressure ulcers (a severe wound with full-thickness tissue loss, fully covered by slough or eschar, making its true depth hidden) for one resident (Resident #164) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in bilateral heel pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Follow care-planned interventions for one resident (Resident #12) , 2) Ensure supervision for one resident (Resident #164), and 3) Ensure safety with hot liquids for one resident (Resident #91) out of five residents sampled for safety, resulting in blisters from a hot liquid and the inability to propel freely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to eliminate dead end plumbing and ensure appropriate backflow prevention was installed at plumbing fixtures, resulting in the potential for contamination to the water supply, affecting all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a respectful and dignified manner to ensure toileting assistance for one resident (Resident #162), and provide dining assistance in the 1-South dining room, resulting in Residents having soiled briefs due to call lights not being answered timely, the potential for weight loss, and residents' feelings of frustration. Dining Observation: Residents in the 1st Floor South Dining Room On 3/30/2026 at 12:09 PM, during an observation in the 1st floor South dining room, a group of 10 residents were observed sitting in the dining room, for the lunch meal. Per Nurse Q, the meal usually started at 12:00 PM. Two Nurse Aides R and S were delivering the drinks to the residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident (#56) of 1 resident reviewed for smoking, resulting in Resident #56 lacking a care plan to identify where to store the resident's smoking materials including a lighter. Findings Include: Resident #56:Smoking A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, left sided weakness, history of traumatic brain injury, COPD, Nicotine dependence, with withdrawal. Anxiety, Depression, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pain syndrome. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 15/15, needed some assistance with care and used a motorized wheelchair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for psychotropic medications for one resident (R2) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications resulting in an inaccurate care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed with the assessment, monitoring, documentation and timely physician notification of a medication error for one resident (Resident 131) who had been administered in error a Norco 5mg/325 mg (an opioid pain medication of a combination of acetaminophen and hydrocodone), of one resident reviewed for a change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an Enteral nutrition (tube feeding/nutrition through a feeding tube into the stomach or intestines) formula was identified when ordered for one resident (Resident #23) of 1 resident reviewed for enteral nutrition, resulting in the potential for Resident #23 to not receive the appropriate Enteral formula. Findings Include: Tube Feeding Resident #23: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of a traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, quadriplegia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy tube (feeding tube into the stomach), and hearing loss. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a memory problem and needed assistance with all care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an oxygen administration and care plan was updated for one resident (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for oxygen administration, resulting in an empty oxygen tank and low oxygen saturations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize care-planned interventions for behaviors for one resident (Resident #74) who wandered through the unit propelling their wheelchair, going into other residents' rooms, and displacing items of other residents, of one resident reviewed for mood/behaviors.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake Number 2661843. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided during mealtime for two residents (#1 and 2), who had safe swallow instructions during meals, of four Residents reviewed for dining and assistance with meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and responded to in a timely manner for 11 residents (R3, R16, R22, R36, R46, R52, R61, R63, R80, R116, R138) and a confidential group of residents, resulting in long call light wait times, delayed assistance and call lights not being accessible.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to update and reviews care plans for psychotropic meds, pain, skin care and respiratory care for 4 Residents (R#3, R#32, R#47, & R#90) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and monitored environment to prevent falls and injuries for 4 Residents (# 21, #103, #126, #127) of 13 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in residents having multiple falls and Resident's #'s 126 and #127 sustaining large bruises on their faces. Findings Include: Resident #21 Accidents A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Alzheimer's dementia, History of a stroke, heart disease, hypertension, , orthostatic hypotension, history of repeated falls, anxiety, kidney disease, and arthritis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a consistently operational call light system affecting three residents (Resident #46, Resident #63 and Resident #74) and a resident census of 158, resulting in extended call light times, unmet needs, and inconsistent tablet operability.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to validate and update the care plan for DNR status for one resident (R#47) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one resident (R32) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for two residents (#46 and #78) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1). Ensure coordination of Hospice Services for one resident (#151) reviewed for Hospice service. Findings Include: Resident #151: Hospice and End of Life A review of the Face sheet and MDS/Minimum Data Set assessment indicated Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Seizures, history of falls with fractures: fourth cervical vertebra, nasal bones, maxilla, Dementia, anxiety, depression and hypertension. The resident wore a neck brace for the cervical fracture. A review of the physician orders indicated the resident was admitted to Hospice services on 1/21/2025 on admission. On 2/18/2025 at 12:17 PM, Resident #151 was observed sitting in a chair in his room watching TV. He was talkative and tried to answer question. He said he did not think he was receiving Hospice services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor pain levels and update a care plan for pain for one resident (Resident #3) with a diagnosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the skin of scalp and neck requiring comfort in positing and wound care treatment of 3 residents reviewed for pain management.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that clinical staff received completed yearly Performance Evaluations and competencies for 2 of 2 nurses (N and O) and Performance Reviews for 2 of 2 Nurse Aides (L and M), Findings Include: FACILITY Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing: On 2/24/2025 at 9:11 AM, during a review of the Nurse and Nurse Aide competency reviews for Nurses N (Charge Nurse) and O and Certified Nursing Assistants L and M, it was identified there were no yearly Performance reviews. The nurses' yearly competencies had not been completed. Nurse N's competencies were last completed 1/26/2024: greater than 1 year prior. Nurse O's competencies were last completed 1/22/2024: greater than 1 year prior. On 2/25/2025 at 10:30 AM, Staff Education Nurse C was interviewed about the yearly clinical staff Performance reviews. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication had arrived timely to the facility and that medication was administered following physicians' orders and professional standards of care for one resident (Resident #358) of six residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in Resident #358 not receiving the medication Renvela and Cholestyramine as ordered and the medication Cholestyramine given with other medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Infection Prevention and Control standards of practice were followed for 1) Personal Protection Equipment/PPE use during wound care for one resident (Resident #90) in Enhanced Barrier Precaution. Findings Include: Resident #90: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment for Resident #90 indicated an admission date of 3/12/2020 with diagnoses: Alzheimer's dementia, depression, arthritis, hypertension, heart disease, and anxiety. An unstageable pressure ulcer on the right heel was identified on 1/13/2025. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident had severe cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 5/15 and the resident needed assistance with all care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure warm water availability in residents' rooms and that sink drainage was adequate for three residents (#23, #25 and #70), of a sample of 17 reviewed for environmental concerns.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145825. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly apply restraints in a transportation van and operationalize facility policy for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for incident and accidents resulting in the resident falling out of their rolling walker during transportation and getting assisted off the floor of the van before being assessed by a license nurse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place and supervision was provided to prevent a fall with injury for one resident (Resident # 401) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and falls, resulting in Resident #401 experiencing multiple falls and sustaining several fractures. Findings Include: Resident #401: Accidents: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #401 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, depression, arthritis, and history of urinary tract infections. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive decline with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 and Resident #401 needed assistance with all care. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00136997 and MI00139597. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified and respectful treatment for three residents (Resident #33, Resident #49, and Resident #106) reviewed and nine of nine Confidential Group Residents, resulting in Resident #106's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag being exposed and not contained/covered, meals being served on aluminum foil, call lights not being answered in a timely manner, a lack of available staff, staff speaking to staff in a rude manner, and resident verbalizations of feeling unimportant and unvalued.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care plan interventions were evaluated/revised for effectiveness and updated with changes/interventions for two resident (Residents #7, and Resident #403) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in in the lack of care plan revision, implementation of appropriate interventions and the potential for unmet care needs relating to activities of daily living, weights and call bell use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care for four residents (Resident #7, Resident #127, Resident #134, and Resident #135) of four residents reviewed for changes in condition, resulting in a delay in treatment of skin infestation for Resident #127 and Resident #135 with the potential of worsening, itching, pain and infection; a delay in assessment and potential treatment of rectal pain for Resident #134, and a failure to assess and monitor a 10 pound weight gain in seven days for Resident #7 with the potential adverse health conditions to go undetected and untreated.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses (RN's-Registered Nurses and LPN's-Licensed Practical Nurses) received yearly evaluations/competencies to assure resident care and safety, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of residents in accordance with the facility assessment and residents' plans of care for five nurses of five nurses reviewed for education and competencies, affecting all 152 residents residing in the facility, resulting in the potential nursing staff lacking necessary training, skills, and competencies to adequately care for the needs of the residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00141186. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and invite a resident and the resident's representative to regularly scheduled care conferences for one resident (Resident #403) of one resident reviewed for care conferences (meeting to discuss residents' plans of care), resulting in the resident and the residents' representatives being uninformed and not involved in their plan of care or able to make choices for care at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate documentation, consent, assessment, a physician's order, evaluation, and re-evaluation of a restraint for one resident (Resident #33 [R33]) of two residents reviewed from a total sample of 27 residents, resulting in a resident confined in a Broda chair without a consent, evaluation for appropriateness, physician's order, and re-evaluation for appropriateness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure completion of comprehensive investigations for injuries of unknown origin for one resident (Resident #64) of one resident reviewed resulting in a lack of completion and documentation of a thorough investigation to identify a cause of injury, lack of reporting to the State Agency, and the potential for further injury and unidentified abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents (Resident #27 and Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for care plans pertaining to the use of Broda chair R33 and use of supportive device for positioning R27's Right Upper Extremity (RUE) and Right Lower Extremity (RLE) from a total sample of 27 residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in not having an active and comprehensive care plan to ensure safety and appropriate care for positioning was followed and to ensure range of motion (ROM) was maintained and prevent further decline in functional abilities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care per care plan for two residents (Resident #53 and Resident #128), resulting in unkept facial hair, long dirty nails, missed showers, unchanged clothing and dirty hair with the likelihood of decreased moods.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen tubing was stored appropriately and turn off wall-mounted oxygen while not in use for one resident (Resident #68), resulting in a cross-contamination of oxygen tubing and unsafe oxygen storage with the possibility of combustion causing a fire.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor Vancomycin blood trough levels and hold IV (intravenous) antibiotic medication, Vancomycin, according to abnormal trough laboratory levels for one resident (Resident #7), of two residents reviewed for antibiotic medication administration, resulting in Resident #7 receiving IV Vancomycin when Vancomycin trough levels were high with the potential for adverse drug consequences and side effects of the medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication had a 14-day stop date for one resident (Resident #74), resulting in the lack of physician follow up of the needed PRN antipsychotic medication with the likelihood of side effects going unnoticed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility 1) Failed to store and handle medications in accordance with acceptable pharmaceutical standards of practice for one of 2 medication rooms, 2) Failed to ensure that medication refrigerators were clean and temperatures outside of acceptable parameters were addressed, 3) Failed to ensure that controlled medications had administration orders, and 4) Failed to ensure that medications were stored according to professional standards of practice, including vaccinations, resulting in the potential for contamination of medications, incorrect administration of medications, a lack of therapeutic benefits necessary to promote healing for residents, increase the potential for adverse effects. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely treatment and care for a contagious rash for two residents (Resident #127 and Resident #135), resulting in the potential worsening of symptoms, a decline in condition and spread of infection. Findings Include: Resident #127: A review of Resident #127 revealed an admission into the facility on 8/31/22 and re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, dementia, heart disease, diabetes, psychotic disorder, mood disorder, Alzheimer's disease and atopic dermatitis. A review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed the Resident had severely impaired cognition and needed substantial/maximal assistance with most ADL's. A review of Resident #127's progress notes included the following: [...]
15 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 1, 2026, 6 on February 25, 2025, 6 on December 19, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 19, 2023 | Fine | $68,445 |
| December 19, 2023 | Payment Denial | 3 days from January 23, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.72 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.12 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.55 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.4% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 34.2% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.96 on weekdays and 3.12 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.48 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.72 | 0.67 | 3.96 | 3.12 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 166 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.28 | 0.92 | 4.57 | 3.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 162 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.34 | 0.97 | 4.67 | 3.50 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 165 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.48 | 1.08 | 4.81 | 3.65 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 159 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.8 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.3 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.3 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lapeer County Medical Care Facility's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 63 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.
40.7% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
15.4% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LAPEER COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FACILITY.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of Lapeer | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/1971 |
| Baker, Shea | Corporate director | Individual | 09/28/2020 | |
| Weber, Mary Sue | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2013 | |
| Baker, Shea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/28/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.