1700 Northwest Fort Sill Blvd, Lawton, OK 73507 · Comanche County · (580) 355-1616
95 certified beds, about 82 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375510 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 28, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since April 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $124,185 in the last three years; the largest was $124,185, and the latest is dated April 28, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.
52.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions on care plans to prevent falls for 1 (#47) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #47 had 7 falls with 2 which resulted in fractures. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. On 04/27/26, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls resulting in fractures for a resident who sustained seven falls in five months. On 04/27/26 at 10:44 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 04/27/26 at 12:48 p.m., the administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided the IJ template. On 04/27/26 at 4:52 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. ensure adequate supervision was provided and exit doors and perimeter fences were secure to prevent an elopement for 1 (#92) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement risk. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified six residents in the facility at risk for elopement. An elopement evaluation for Resident #92, dated 02/28/26, showed the resident was at risk for elopement and wandering. The evaluation showed the resident wandered around the facility into rooms. The evaluation showed Resident #92 was a new admit. A baseline care plan for Resident #92, dated 02/28/26, showed no interventions for wandering or a risk for elopement. Resident #92 was last seen in the facility on 03/07/26 at 11:10 a.m. The resident was not observed in their room at 11:20 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician and family were notified when a resident had a significant change of condition for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a change of condition which resulted in death. Resident #96 was on the toilet and bleeding. ACMA #2 stated they contacted LPN #1 about the residents' condition, and they had left the blood in the toilet for LPN #1 to observe. LPN #1 came to observe the resident; however, LPN #1 told them to continue to monitor the resident since they had refused to go to the ER. The physician or family was not notified of the serious change in condition of Resident #96. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly assess, identify, and intervene when a resident experienced an acute new onset of profuse bleeding from an unknown source for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a change in condition when facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of a critical hemoglobin lab value of 6.3 with a normal reference range was 13.7 to 17.5, and identify the new onset of profuse bleeding from an unknown source on a resident with a recent repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm resulting in an attempted transfer to the acute care hospital and subsequent death in the ambulance while in the facility parking lot. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Identify, monitor, intervene, and provide continuing assessments for Resident #96 who was admitted with a recent history of an abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. b. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient/competent staff to assess, monitor, and intervene for a resident with profuse bleeding for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a change in condition when facility staff failed to assess, monitor, intervene for significant change in condition when a resident experienced an acute onset of profuse bleeding and failed to notify the medical provider of a critical hemoglobin lab value of 6.3 with a normal reference range of 13.7 to 17.5, and the onset of profuse bleeding on a resident with a known history of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system and the presences of an aortocoronary bypass graft resulting in the subsequent death of Resident #96. Specifically, the facility failed to:a. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, in that;The facility failed to:a. Ensure wandering residents did not elope and ensure residents at risk for wandering and elopement had not eloped for 1 (#92) of 6 residents at risk for wandering and elopement. Resident #92 was at risk for wandering and elopement. A baseline care plan, dated [DATE], showed no risk for elopement. Resident #92's care plan did not have interventions for wandering or elopement until [DATE]. ADON #1 stated they were not aware Resident #92 was found to be an elopement risk due to not communicating with the nurse that completed the assessment. ADON #1 stated there were no interventions implemented. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was completed annually to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently, during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends), and emergencies. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed and monitored by a licensed nurse for a significant change of condition and profuse bleeding for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for neglect. LPN #1 was notified on [DATE] at 1:15 a.m. of Resident #96 with bleeding from an unknown source and failed to complete an assessment. EMS was notified at 3:12 a.m., left the building with Resident #96 at 3:35 a.m. and the resident ultimately expired in the ambulance at 3:40 a.m. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a resident assessment for hospice for 1 (#80) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure loose medications were not kept in the bottom of the medication cart drawers for 1 (North hall) of 1 medication cart observed. The administrator identified two medication carts in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and distribute food and ice in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for 1 (#96) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for death. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were initiated and maintained during the provision of care to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (#42) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for catheter care. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 21 residents were on EBP.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper PPE (personal protective equipment) was used for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The director of nursing reported that 19 residents required enhanced barrier precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set was coded accurately for Legionella for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled discharged resident from the hospital with Legionella. The administrator reported one resident tested positive for Legionella at the hospital and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to update a care plan for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident with a new diagnosis of Legionella. The administrator reported one resident tested positive for Legionella at the hospital and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish consistent protocol and follow facility policy for BiPAP therapy for two (#3 and #4) of two sampled residents reviewed for BiPAP therapy. The RN/DON identified two residents with BiPAP therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls with serious injury for one (#56) of one sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The lack of intervention development and implementation resulted in Res #56 suffering a broken hip. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate advanced directives for three (#19, 42 and #55) of four sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to anticoagulant therapy, chronic pain and opioid medication for one (#26) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. 1. Resident #26 had diagnosis which included cerebrovascular accident and chronic pain medication. A care plan, dated 05/20/24, documented no care areas related to anticoagulant therapy, chronic pain, or opioid use. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/22/24, documented severly impaired cognition. The assessment documented anticoagulant and opioid medication use. Resident #26's order summary report, dated 06/05/24, documented Eliquis oral tablet 2.5 mg give by mouth two times a day .Norco oral tablet 7.5-325 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure communication between the dialysis center and facility, and failed to obtain a physician order for dialysis for one (#14) of one sampled residents reviewed for dialysis. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician's orders for two (#14 and #69) of eight sampled residents whose orders were reviewed. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during wound care for Res #19, and failed to conduct infection surveillance and tracking. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program to monitor antibiotic use for residents. The Administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for, offered, and received pneumococcal immunizations upon admission or when needed for seven (#6, 12, 18, 23, 26, 28, and #44) of eight residents reviewed for immunizations. The Administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a SNF ABN for two (#226 and #227) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a level 1 pre-screening assessment for one (#56) of two sampled residents reviewed for pre-screening assessments. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of dislodgement of PEG tube per policy for one (#48) of one sampled residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure daily staffing was posted and contained the required information. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a MRR was responded to in a timely manner for one (#56) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. physician orders were obtained for oxygen therapy for two residents (#1 and #18), and; b. oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were labeled with a date for one (#45) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/26/23, documented 13 residents with respiratory treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 vaccine had been offered, education provided, and declination signed by residents or resident representatives for five (#50, 52, 53, 60 and #63) of five residents reviewed for compliance with COVID-19 immunizations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/26/23, documented 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent the presence of pests. The Facility Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/26/23, documented a total of 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care for one (#60) of two residents sampled for infection control during pressure ulcer treatments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/26/23, documented two residents with pressure ulcers and a total resident census of 63.
13 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 28, 2026, 5 on June 7, 2024, 5 on April 27, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 28, 2026 | Fine | $124,185 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.94 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.29 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.95 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.71 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.7% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.21 on weekdays and 3.29 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.77 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.94 | 0.28 | 4.21 | 3.29 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 82 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.68 | 0.29 | 3.85 | 3.24 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 80 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.98 | 0.29 | 4.16 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 73 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.77 | 0.22 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 77 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.4 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.4 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.9 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.0 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lawton Post Acute & Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (37.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.7% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.
13.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
9.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.
46.9% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 129 residents counted.
3.9% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 129 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LAWTON POST ACUTE & REHAB,LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawton Post Acute & Rehab,llc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/02/2024 |
| Family Tk5 Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Pratt, Kylene | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Bokf,na | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Galbasini, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Lamb, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Pratt, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| 1700 Nw Fort Sill Blvd LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Bokf,na | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/07/2025 | |
| Family Tk5 Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/07/2025 | |
| K & Jg Holdings 2 LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| K & Jg Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Kopian Property 2 LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Kopion Healthcare Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/07/2025 | |
| Lamb Living Trust May 25, 2018 | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Lawton Post Acute & Rehab,llc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/12/2024 | |
| Galbasini, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Lamb, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Pratt, Todd | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/12/2024 | |
| Pratt, Todd | General partnership interest | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Lamb, Mark | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| 1700 Nw Fort Sill Blvd LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| K & Jg Holdings 2 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| K & Jg Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/07/2025 | |
| Kopian Property 2 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Kopion Healthcare Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/07/2025 | |
| Lamb Living Trust May 25, 2018 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/02/2024 | |
| Lawton Post Acute & Rehab,llc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/12/2024 | |
| Pratt, Kylene | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/12/2024 | |
| Pratt, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/07/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.