Home / Massachusetts / Revere
204 Proctor Avenue, Revere, MA 02151 · Suffolk County · (781) 286-3100
123 certified beds, about 116 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225297 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 20, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since February 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $48,790 in the last three years; the largest was $48,790, and the latest is dated February 20, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.70 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.12 of those hours.
26.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's environment was free from accident hazards, for one Resident #126, out of a sample of 30 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a fall care plan intervention which led to Resident #126 falling and sustaining a fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of practice for one Resident (#31) out of a total sample of 30 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #31 the facility failed to administer medications timely and in accordance with physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two Residents (#11 and #14) out of a total of 30 sampled residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #11 the facility failed to provide assistance to shave unwanted facial hair. 2. For Resident #14 the facility failed to provide assistance to cut fingernails.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers from developing for one Resident (#40) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40's heels were elevated off the mattress.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#132) with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line (a long, flexible catheter inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large central vein near the heart to deliver medications, fluids, or nutrition and to draw blood) out of a total sample of 30 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to change the PICC line dressing on admission as indicated in the physician's orders or when the PICC line dressing was lifting on the edges.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed provide for one Resident (#79) the necessary respiratory care and services that is in accordance with professional standards of practice and the Resident's care plan out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #79's oxygen was administered according to physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the entire reporting period, Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 4 2024 (July 1 - September 30), in accordance with the schedule specified by CMS.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of potential abuse (injuries of unknown, and an allegation of neglect) to the State Agency for three Residents (#87, #118, and #55) out of a sample of 30 Residents. 1. For Resident #87, the facility failed to report an X-ray (X-radiation-images created inside of a body by passing beams of radiation through the body) positive for a fracture from an unknown origin to the State Agency within two hours. 2. For Resident #118 the facility failed to notify the state agency of an injury of unknown within 2 hours once the Director of Nursing became of a new fracture (an acute right intertrochanteric [thigh bone] fracture) of unknown origin. 3. For Resident #55 the facility failed to notify the state agency of an allegation of neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews for three Residents (#22, #376 and #70) out of four residents observed, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5%. Three out of four nurses observed made 3 errors out of 33 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 9.09%. Specifically, 1.) For Resident #22, Nurse #1 administered the incorrect dose of a medication spray (Fluticasone, medication used for allergies) 2.) For Resident #376, Nurse #4 did not follow manufacture's recommendations and crushed a medication (metoprolol extended-release tablet, cardiac medication that once crushed becomes immediate release) which indicated do not crush. 3.) For Resident #70, Nurse #5 administered the incorrect medication (calcium with vitamin D) that was also expired.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice. Specifically: 1. Nursing failed to secure the medication carts on 2 of 3 units. 2. Nursing failed to ensure medication was stored in the packaging containers or other dispensing system in which it was received. 3. Nursing failed to ensure medications were dated once opened, and stored according to manufacturer's guidelines, in two of three medication carts observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff dated resident food and drinks in three of three unit kitchenette refrigerators.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Nursing staff completed the required 12 hours (no less than ) of annual training, which at minimum includes dementia training for 4 out of 5 employee records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for one Resident (#110) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically: For Resident #110, who is dependent on staff for feeding, the staff stood beside the bed, looking down at Resident #110, rather than seated at eye level while feeding him/her meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident protected health information (PHI) was secure and not visible to others on two of three nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete an assessment for an air mattress with bolsters for one Resident #87 out of a sample of 30 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a restraints assessment before applying an air mattress with bolsters in the Resident's bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin to facility administration for two Residents (#87 and #118) out of a sample of 30 Residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #87, the facility failed to report an X-ray (X-radiation-images created inside of a body by passing beams of radiation through the body) positive for a fracture from an unknown origin. 2. For Resident #118 the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and notify facility administration of a new fracture (an acute right intertrochanteric [thigh bone] fracture) of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin (a fracture), for one Resident (#118) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically for Resident #118 who on 1/4/25 experienced pain which was new and on 1/5/25 Resident #118 was found to have an acute right intertrochanteric (thigh bone) fracture, the facility failed to conduct interviews from staff members (on all shifts) who had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for one Resident (#113) out of a total of sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Resident #113, the facility failed to ensure nursing clarified a physician's orders for two different suprapubic (SPT) catheter flushes.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the recapitulation of the Resident's stay that included his/her course of illness/treatment for one Resident (#123), of two closed records
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for three dependent Residents (#61, #15 and #48) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Provide assistance with grooming for Resident #61. 2) Provide supervision with meals for Resident #15. 3) Provide assistance with grooming for Resident #48. Findings Include: Review of the undated facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised in March 2018, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to ensure one Resident (#15) out of a total sample of 30 Residents, was able to effectively communicate his/her needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure interventions to treat contracture management were implemented for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure palm protectors were in place.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement a physician ordered intervention to mitigate injury from an accident for one Resident (#110) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a fall mat was in place when Resident #110 was in bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for Foley catheter care for two residents (#38 and #133) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #38, the facility failed to ensure they obtained physician's orders for the correct indwelling catheter size. 2. For Resident #133, the facility failed to ensure Nurse #8 inserted the correct size suprapubic tube (SPT) into his/her bladder.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview for one Resident (#375) of a total sample of 30 residents, the facility failed to provide sufficient fluid intake as ordered by the physician. Specifically, for Resident #375 the facility failed to ensure nursing provided free water bolus' (FWB) consistently as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#38), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Resident #38, the facility failed to ensure that nursing changed Resident #38's oxygen tubing as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing was competent and had the required skill set to provide necessary care for residents' needs. Specifically, for Resident #60, the facility failed to ensure that nursing prepared medications in a safe manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the medical record for two Residents (#110 and #13) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #110 the staff inaccurately documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) regarding a resident fall mat. 2. For Resident #13 staff inaccurately documented that blood pressure readings were taken using the Resident's left arm when they were not.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and reviews of the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS-State Agency reporting system), the facility failed to provide written notice to the State Agency of a change in the Administrator as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience in the dining room of the third floor unit, and for three Residents (#36, #96, and #102) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that residents seated at the same table were served meals at the same time, that staff did not refer to residents as feeds or feeders in the presence of residents, that staff did not refer to clothing protectors as bibs, and that staff did not stand while providing feeding assistance to three Residents (#36, #96, and #102).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, unpasteurized eggs were cooked thoroughly, and that ready to eat food was not handled using contaminated gloves.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control standards of practice for the prevention of infections were implemented. Specifically: 1. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff appropriately discarded contaminated personal protective equipment (PPE) and performed hand hygiene after caring for a Resident on contact precautions. 2. For the Director of Housekeeping, the facility failed to ensure he wore gloves and cleaned his hands after handling soiled clothing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that concerns addressed by the Resident Council Group ha sufficient follow-up to address and prevent recurrence.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment on one out of three units. Specifically, the facility served meals on plastic trays and did not use table linens during mealtimes in the dining room of the third floor unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, record review and interviews for two Residents (#92 and #24) out of a total sample of 28 residents, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Specifically: 1. For Resident #92, the facility failed to provide the needed supervision and assistance with eating. 2. For Resident #24, the facility failed to assist with grooming, specifically removal of chin hair.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to offer services to maintain vision for one Resident (#42) out of a total of 28 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, policy review, and records reviewed for one Resident (#27), out of 28 total sampled residents, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent the development and promote healing of pressure ulcers. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a physician's order to offload the heels of Resident #27, who was assessed by nursing to be at high risk for skin breakdown.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, records reviewed and interviews for two Residents (#72 and #21) of 28 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to the physicians' orders. Specifically: 1. For Resident #72, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the continuous use of oxygen. 2. For Resident #21, the facility failed to administer the correct amount of oxygen, based on the physician's order.
13 fire safety citations on file: 1 on February 20, 2026, 9 on February 14, 2025, 3 on February 20, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 20, 2026 | Fine | $48,790 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.70 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.12 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.30 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.09 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 26.5% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.7% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.87 on weekdays and 3.30 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.63 in April to June 2025 to 3.70 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.70 | 1.12 | 3.87 | 3.30 | 1.8% | 0 of 90 | 116 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.60 | 0.99 | 3.74 | 3.24 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.78 | 1.02 | 3.94 | 3.38 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.63 | 0.92 | 3.78 | 3.26 | 0.3% | 0 of 91 | 114 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $21.32 to $23.94 | 38,130 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.57 | $34.91 to $40.66 | 13,210 |
| Registered nurses | $50.27 | $42.05 to $65.44 | 88,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.4 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.5 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.9 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.3 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lighthouse Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.0% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 213 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 230 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 119 eligible stays.
66.4% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 150 residents counted.
3.2% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 150 residents counted.
98.4% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 62 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LIGHTHOUSE OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Popular Bank | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Doyle, Stephen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Harman, Dina | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Veiga, Carly | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Doyle, Stephen | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Healthcare Services Group Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/23/2025 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/22/2025 | |
| Doyle, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Nisar, Saira | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Flagler, Osher | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Kahanow, Aviva | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Levovitz, Tzvi | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Rokeach, Fraide | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Rokowsky, Yitzchok | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Healthcare Services Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/23/2025 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/04/2025 | |
| Nfr 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/22/2025 | |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Sk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Doyle, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Harman, Dina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Nisar, Saira | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Veiga, Carly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.