8380 Virginia St., Merrillville, IN 46410 · Lake County · (219) 769-9009
100 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155650 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 24, 2025, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 57 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $3,418 in the last three years; the largest was $3,418, and the latest is dated February 6, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.26 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
CMS links it to Casa Consulting, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 57 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician and responsible party (RP) were notified of low blood sugars, behaviors, a transfer to a behavioral hospital, and change of condition, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Residents C and D)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received laboratory services as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Residents C and D)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented related to treatment of low blood sugars for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for low blood sugars. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the required information and documents to the resident or their representative at the time of discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharges. (Resident G)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to the timeliness of assistance with a breakfast meal for 1 of 3 residents observed for meal intake assistance. (Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcer treatment was provided as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records were completed in a timely manner related to nutritional assessments for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medical records. (Residents B and C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served under sanitary conditions related to touching food with bare hands, glove use, beard restraints, dirty food equipment, ice on the freezer floor, food spillage in the walk in cooler, and food brought in by visitors or resident's food that was not labeled for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 2 wings. (The main kitchen and the A Wing)Findings incude:1. During the Brief Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 11/17/2025 at 9:56 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM) the following was observed:a. Dietary [NAME] 1 was observed with a disposable glove on her left hand and her right hand was bare. She was observed using her bare right hand reaching into the pan of the cheese and cracker crumbs and was putting it on top of the turkey noodle casserole she had in front of her. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen and residents' environment clean and in good repair related to dirty walls, ceilings, floor tile, ceiling vents and adhered dirty against the baseboard for 1 of 1 kitchen (The main kitchen); marred and water-damaged walls, grab bar not secured to the wall, and uncontained basins (Resident Rooms A02, B01, B08)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment to a surgical incision was completed as ordered, areas of bruising and scabbing were assessed and monitored, and interventions were in place for areas of dry scaly skin for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. (Residents D, H, J, F, and G)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage related to insulin pens not labeled when opened, and loose pills observed in the medication carts for 1 of 2 units (A Wing) and medications at the bedside for residents who did not self-administer medications. (Residents G, 71)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the recipe for pureed spinach. This had the potential to affect the 5 residents who received a pureed diet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications and had a physician's order to self-administer medications, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 59)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach for 1 of 14 active residents reviewed who were able to use the call light. (Resident 71)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was accurately completed related to visual impairment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for sensory / communication. (Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to nail care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for ADL's. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received foot care and had routine visits with a podiatrist related to long and thick toenails for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for ADL's (activities of daily living). (Residents C, 33, and G)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment for limited range of motion related to splints not in place and lack of instructions for use of a splint for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Residents 1, E, and F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 60)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an urinary indwelling catheter collection bag was maintained below the level of the bladder for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 71)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was positioned with their head elevated while a tube feeding was infusing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feedings. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an intravenous (IV) access site was assessed upon admission and removed in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for parenteral/IV fluids. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen administration for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 1 and 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure monitoring was completed for residents receiving blood pressure medications with parameters for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents H and D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a clean and homelike environment, related to a resident lying on soiled bottom sheet on the bed for 1 random observation. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was implemented for a resident with a skin condition for 1 of 4 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to the timeliness of incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments for pressure ulcers were in place as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received blood sugar monitoring, insulin and hypoglycemic medications as ordered by the Physician for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for diabetes management. (Residents B, C and D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in form to meet individual needs related to not following a recipe for pureed food and not making pureed food the correct consistency. This had the potential to affect all 5 residents who received a pureed diet. (Main Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were in place and implemented related to lack of a clothing protector used when sorting soiled laundry, incorrect signage posted for a resident on contact isolation, and not cleaning a shared blood pressure cuff between uses. (Laundry Aide 1, QMA 1, and Resident 23)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had physician's orders for a medication, physician's orders for self-administration of medications, and a self-administration of medications assessment completed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the family/representative of new orders for medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care plan meetings were completed and/or family representatives were invited for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for care planning. (Residents D, E and B)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care for activities of daily living (ADLs) related to the lack of documentation of incontinence care and residents with long, dirty fingernails and toenails for 3 of 11 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents 10, 4 and C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment, related to administering a blood pressure medication out of the prescribed parameters, the lack of assessment and a treatment order for a resident with a bandage, and a resident not wearing preventative heel protectors as ordered, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 28) and 2 of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Residents 39 and C)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with impaired hearing received the necessary services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hearing. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary treatment to prevent decreased range of motion, related to a splint not in place as recommended for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) received adaptive equipment as ordered during meals for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care related to oxygen administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available and administered to a resident per the physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by a staff members (CNA 1), when providing care to a resident who was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 of 3 residents observed who were in EBP. (Resident D) This had the potential to affect 34 residents who resided on 1 of 2 Units. (A-Unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to the timeliness of incontinence care, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents B and C)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This had the potential to affect 64 of 64 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was sanitary and comfortable, related to cob webs, dirt and debris on the floor, liquid feeding dried on IV/feeding pump poles, a feeding pump, and floors, cable and outlet covers loose or off, a soiled over the bed table, an over the bed table with a gouge, a cracked floor mat, a wedge pillow stored on the floor, and an accumulation of dust on a bathroom fan, for rooms on 2 of 2 Units. (B-Unit and A-Unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was being transferred in a bus to an appointment was secured appropriately in the bus to prevent the wheelchair from tipping over and also failed to ensure a Physician's Order and Care Planned intervention was in place to prevent falls, related to anti-roll back device was not located on a wheelchair for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents K and G)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted Nurse Staffing Information was up-to-date and current, related to call-offs, no shows, and replacements not updated every shift. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who resided in the facility for the month of November, 2023.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient dietary staff available to effectively serve meals in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect 65 residents who received meals from the kitchen. (Main Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the residents' environment clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, damaged walls, peeling non-skin strips, a running toilet, and broken furniture on 2 of 2 units. (The A and B Units)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds at all times for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for personal funds. (Resident 67)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, resident-centered Care Plans related to activities, antidepressant medications, diabetes and anticoagulant medications for 2 of 17 resident Care Plans reviewed. (Residents 44 and 34)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing activity program was implemented for dependent residents for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for activities. (Residents 44, 34 and 40)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services related to the monitoring and assessment of a resident with a possible change in condition for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for change in condition, monitoring and assessment of skin discolorations for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions, and an improper length of a bed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for positioning. (Residents 63, 43 and 13)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, related to the lack of a timely treatment put into place for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 40)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify or act on an irregularity in a resident's medication regimen related to an unnamed medication being administered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed during medication pass. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with abnormal urine in the indwelling catheter was assessed timely and a resident with a colostomy received daily colostomy care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters, bowel and bladder care. (Residents 66 and 12)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to have accurate and complete daily nurse staffing postings. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility.
25 fire safety citations on file: 14 on November 24, 2025, 7 on July 12, 2024, 4 on July 28, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 6, 2024 | Fine | $3,418 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.26 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.93 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 4.18 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.89 in April to June 2025 to 3.26 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.44 | 3.50 | 2.67 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 81 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.23 | 0.34 | 3.47 | 2.61 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.89 | 0.36 | 3.09 | 2.38 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.2 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.8 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lincolnshire Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.
34.6% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
5.4% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MAJOR HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Casa Consulting, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claxton, Ryan | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/27/2025 | |
| Lincolnshire Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2023 | |
| Alzeidan, Fadi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Biel, Natalie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/18/2025 | |
| Claxton, Ryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/27/2025 | |
| Siegal, Moshe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Kurtz, Elisheva | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/23/2025 | |
| Rothner, Daniel | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2025 | |
| Rothner, Eric | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2025 | |
| Rothner, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2025 | |
| Rudolph, Kimberly | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2025 | |
| Vales, Adam | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2025 | |
| Casa Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Lincolnshire Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2023 | |
| Lincolnshire Healthcare Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2023 | |
| Alzeidan, Fadi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Biel, Natalie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/18/2025 | |
| Claxton, Ryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/27/2025 | |
| Everett, Alisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Gaffney, Alisha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Hines, Ashley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Macapagal, Giankarlo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Ritchie, Rebecca | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Seip, Chris | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Siegal, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Tipton, Angela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Trend, Christy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| White Jones, Tamara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.