9370 Union Cemetery Road, Loveland, OH 45140 · Clermont County · (513) 677-4900
120 certified beds, about 109 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365889 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since April 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,924 in the last three years; the largest was $15,924, and the latest is dated December 4, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.54 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
57.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Caring Place Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner to prevent spoliage and protect against a foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility except for the three residents (#6, #13 and #15) with diet orders of nothing by mouth. The facility census was 117. Observation on 04/06/2026 at 9:05 A.M. revealed a red plastic bucket with a liquid inside being stored in the food preparation sink. Interview with Dietary Director (DD) # 446 revealed that the red bucket contained sanitizer and that it should not be stored in the food preparation sink. Observation on 04/06/2026 at 9:05 A.M. revealed two cracked eggs were stored in a small pastic bowl on ice in the kitchen. Further observation revealed that the ice was almost completely melted. Observation on 04/06/2026 9:07 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity. This affected two (#8 and #11) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 114. 1. Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of base of tongue, general anxiety disorder, and delusional disorders. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 04/06/2026 at approxiamately 12:15 P.M. revealed Resident #11 was standing in her door way and visibly agitated. Resident #11 was being argumentative with staff while they were attempting to assist her. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff received adequate activities of daily living (ADL) care. This affected three (#29, #65, and #115) of four residents reviewed ADL's. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive psychiatric services in a timely manner. This affected one (#11) of one resident reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 117. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of base of tongue, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, and delusional disorders. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 has moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #11 has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process. Interventions include keeping family and care giver informed of Resident #11's capabilities and needs. [...]
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled:24Number of residents cited:2 Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were appropriately locked while nurses administered medications. The facility identified one (Resident #31) resident residing on the Central Unit who was cognitively impaired with mobility. Additionally the facility failed to ensure eye drops were stored according to manufacturer's recommendations. This affected one (Resident #17) of one residents receiving eye drops from the Shelter-Even medication cart. The facility census was 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident's fall and failed to implement new fall interventions to prevent future falls. This affected one (#42) out of three Residents reviewed. The facility census was 102.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were accurately reconciled. This affected two (Residents #64 and #404) of 19 residents with narcotics medications stored on the Shelter Hall and East Hall odd-side medication carts. The facility census was 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure record of meal intakes were consistently documented. This affected four (Residents #1, #3, #36, and #92) of five residents reviewed for meal consumption. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on observations, closed medical record review, review of the facility investigation and witness statements, staff interviews, review of the police incident report, review of the hospital report, review of the local weather report, and review of the facility policy addressing elopement, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from eloping from the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the main laundry room dryers were free of lint build up. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. Facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide privacy to residents while in their rooms regarding the use of a video monitoring device and the facility failed to ensure private medical information was secured and kept confidential. This affected four (#3, #72, #74 and #233) out of four residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to document a count/reconciliation of controlled substances each shift. This had the potential to affect ten (#14, #23, #29, #48, #50, #55, #59, #69, #79 and #195) residents with controlled substance medications stored on the Shelter Unit Odd Cart. The census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, review of online resources, and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected one resident (#240) of seven residents observed for medication administration. In addition the facility failed to ensure a nurse completed appropriate infection control techniques after she provided direct care to a resident in transmission based precautions/quarantined for COVID-19. This affected two residents (#196 and #245) of 24 reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident's medical record accurately reflected the resident's advanced directive for a selected code status. This affected one (#8) of one residents reviewed for advanced directives. The census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify resident physician of elevated resident blood sugar. This affected one (#3) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Additionally, the facility failed failed to ensure the facility physician or advanced provider was notified when a resident had a weight gain of five pounds. This affected one (#241) of three residents reviewed. Facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to send a copy of the transfer or discharge notice to the Ombudsman for a resident that discharged to the hospital. This affected one (#73) out of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were weighed according to physician orders. This affected two (#1 and #241) of the three residents reviewed. Facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and resident and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents wore splints as ordered by the physician to treat contractures. This affected one (#25) of three residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place in accordance with a resident's fall care plan. This affected one (#73) out of 19 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews, review of facility policy, review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description and review of online resources from Ohio Board of Nursing, the facility failed to ensure resident received ordered intravenous (IV) medications and accommodating IV flushes via peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure an LPN was appropriately licensed to administer IV medications when she recorded medications administered through a PICC line. This also affected one (#61) out of one residents reviewed for IV medications. The facility identified only one resident in the facility on IV medications. Facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to timely respond to and implement pharmacist drug regimen recommendations. This affected one (#3) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of facility policy and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility discontinued a residents blood pressure medication without a physician's order to do so resulting in a significant medication error . This affected one (#3) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to discard expired medications and failed to ensure medication carts were free of loose unidentified pills in the drawers of the carts. This had the potential to affect the following 17 (#8, #14, #19, #23, #24, #28, #29, #43, #48, #59, #55, #59, #60, #69, #70, #79 and #192) residents who received medication from the Shelter Unit Odd Cart and the following 13 (#1, #61, #232, #233, #234, #235, #236, #237, #238, #239, #240, #241 and #242) residents who received medications from the East Odd Cart. In addition, the facility failed to store controlled substance medication under double lock. This had the potential to affect Resident #74. The census was 86.
3 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 9, 2026, 1 on May 16, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 4, 2023 | Fine | $15,924 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.54 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.12 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.99 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.3% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.71 on weekdays and 3.12 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.79 in April to June 2025 to 3.54 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.54 | 0.52 | 3.71 | 3.12 | 0.9% | 0 of 90 | 109 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.68 | 0.53 | 3.83 | 3.31 | 10.7% | 0 of 92 | 108 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.63 | 0.55 | 3.81 | 3.18 | 14.6% | 0 of 92 | 107 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.79 | 0.58 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 21.3% | 0 of 91 | 105 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.4 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.1 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lodge Nursing & Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.5% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 212 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 218 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.
56.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 159 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 159 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BOYKO MANAGEMENT, INC.. CMS links this home to Caring Place Healthcare Group, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irrevocable Trust Agreement of Barry a. Kohn | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/15/2024 |
| Kohn, Patsy | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 10/11/2023 |
| Kohn, Chase | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Kohn, Chase | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2013 | |
| Payne, Matt | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Caring Place Healthcare Group, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/08/2014 | |
| Concept Rehab, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Bort, Thaddeus | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/02/2025 | |
| Gates, Tammy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/19/2025 | |
| Huebner, Katie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/02/2025 | |
| Kohn, Chase | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Lewis, Stevie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/20/2015 | |
| Tracey, Judith | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/1999 | |
| Caring Place Healthcare Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/05/2025 | |
| Concept Rehab, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/02/2025 | |
| Engage Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Kohn Family Holdings Limited Liability Company | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/18/2024 | |
| Ln&r Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/18/2024 | |
| Bort, Thaddeus | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/02/2025 | |
| Gates, Tammy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/19/2025 | |
| Huebner, Katie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/02/2025 | |
| Kohn, Chase | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Kohn, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Lewis, Stevie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/15/2021 | |
| Rudowski, Elizabeth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/02/2025 | |
| Schuman, Lauryn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Tracey, Judith | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/1999 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.