Home / Washington / Lynnwood
5821 188th Street Southwest, Lynnwood, WA 98037 · Snohomish County · (425) 776-5512
67 certified beds, about 61 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505434 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 8, 2025, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).
None of its 50 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.64 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.75 of those hours.
41.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Washington average 45.1%).
CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 50 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigations. Resident 2 walked over to Resident 1 and placed their hands and pushed inward around Resident 1's neck. This failure placed residents at increased risk of injury, emotional distress, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey binder included the recertification and complaint survey results that resulted in citations for 2 of 3 years (2024 & 2025), reviewed for availability of survey reports. This failure prevented residents, residents' representatives and visitors from exercising their right to review past survey results and the facility's plan of corrections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for 4 of 10 residents (Residents 22, 7, 2 & 5) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop and/or follow care plans for conducting an assessment, medication use, and splint usage placed the residents at risk of not receiving needed care, decline in condition, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate pharmacy services for medication administration and/or disposal for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 40, 6, 162, & 36), reviewed for medication administration and storage. The failure to follow physician's orders and disposal of controlled substances (a drug or other substance that is tightly controlled as it may be abused or cause addiction) placed the residents at risk for medication errors, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was conducted for use of insulin (medication that lowers the level of glucose [a type of sugar] in the blood) and/or diuretic (medication that reduces fluid buildup in the body and increases urine output) for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 2, 23 & 7), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, related complications, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and/or dispose expired medications in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 3 medication carts (Sound Medication Cart & [NAME] Medication Cart) and for 1 of 1 Medication Storage Room, reviewed for medication storage and labeling. In addition, the facility failed to properly store drugs or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 50). These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a dignified manner for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for dignity. The failure to ensure staff to resident interaction occurred in a respectful and dignified manner placed the resident at risk for diminished self-worth, self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure evaluation and assessment for safe administration of medications were conducted for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 50), reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for inaccurate and unsafe medication administration, adverse side effects, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney [DPOA] for health care [a document delegating to an agent the authority to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating the authority subsequently becomes incapable to do so]) was obtained for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 37), reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive or refuse/discontinue care according to their choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a notice before transfer/discharge to the resident and their representative describing the reason for transfer in writing for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 43), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for not having an opportunity to make an informed decision about transfers and discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately for 2 of 10 residents (Residents 23 & 46), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments were coded on the MDS regarding medication use and dialysis (a process of removing excess water and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys [organs that filter blood, remove waste and balance fluids in the body] can no longer perform these functions) placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) Level I form was completed accurately and Level II PASARR referrals were made for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 108), reviewed for PASARR screening. These failures placed the resident at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services for their needs and/or lacking access to specialized services for individuals with identified mental health diagnoses or disabilities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents (Residents 109), reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to obtain accurate oxygen orders placed the residents at risk of respiratory related complications and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than five percent (%). The failure to properly administer 3 of 25 medications for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 40 & 6), observed during medication administration resulted in a medication error rate of 12%. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the correct form, dose, and/or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medications and possible adverse effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-precaution to protect residents from multidrug-resistant organism [a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) practices were followed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 39) and failed to discard a laboratory sample for 1 of 1 discharged resident (Resident 164), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review of room size measurement, two single resident rooms (Rooms 17 & 18) failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet (sq ft - unit of measurement) for a single resident room. The failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or their representative about a high carbon dioxide (C02-a form of natural waste produced by the body and breathe out by the lungs) blood test level for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for change in condition. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of not being provided adequate information to make informed decisions about their medical condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) was free from a significant medication error. The failure to provide a medication (Apixaban - used to prevent blood clots) placed Resident 1 at risk for complications with heart disease, a decline in medical condition, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was accurately completed for the number of staff worked, actual hours worked and included the census for 30 of 30 days, reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. The failure to post a complete and accurate form daily placed the residents, family members and visitors, at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the residents and/or representatives for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 45, 47 & 46), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decision about transfers/discharges.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold (the opportunity to pay for the bed the resident currently occupied while out of the facility in order to ensure their bed/room was available when they are ready to return) notices were offered to residents and /or their representatives for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 45, 47 & 46), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for unwanted, avoidable room changes upon readmission, and frustration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (an alerting device for staff to assist residents in need) was within reach for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 102), reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed care, accidents/falls, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney [DPOA] for health care) was obtained from the resident and/or their representative and ensure a copy was readily available in the medical records for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 37 & 102), reviewed for advance directives. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to refuse/discontinue medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 253). These failures placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive or refuse/discontinue care according to their choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, initiate, thoroughly investigate, and promptly resolve a grievance for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 17), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the residents and/or their representatives for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 49 & 102), reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice to ensure 2 of 2 licensed staff (Staff P & Staff F) observed for medication administration followed medication administration practices regarding unlabeled and undated medication at a resident's bed side and pain medication patch application. These failures placed the residents at risk for possible medication errors, potential negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required annual performance evaluations for 1 of 3 staff (Staff J), whose personnel files were reviewed for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performance evaluations. Failure to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews, placed residents at risk for receiving care from underqualified nursing staff and unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medication was disposed of timely in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 medication carts (Cascade Hall Cart) and the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 20) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and infection control practices were followed during meal tray pass for 2 of 7 staff (Staff O and Staff G), failed to ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-special equipment worn to protect from germs) protocols were followed for 1 of 3 staff (Staff G), and failed to ensure medical equipment was disinfected between resident use for 1 of 2 staff (Staff H) reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine (used to prevent pneumonia [a lung infection]) and influenza vaccine (used to prevent influenza [an infection of the nose, throat, and lungs]) were provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 34) reviewed for immunizations and infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from pneumococcal and/or influenza disease.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review of room size measurement, two single resident rooms (Rooms 17 & 18) failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet (sq ft) for a single resident room. The failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used personal protective equipment (PPE - gloves, N95 respirator/mask, gown and face shield/goggles), perform hand hygiene, and follow infection control precautions during COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) outbreak in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for 2 of 10 staff (Staff E & F), and failed to report COVID-19 outbreaks to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) as required for 2 of 3 COVID-19 outbreaks (August 2023 and December 2023), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk of infection and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance for bathing/showering for 1 of 5 residents (Residents 3), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor hygiene, skin impairment, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written abuse policies and procedures related to allegations of abuse for 1of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience on-going abuse, harm, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse was reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse allegations. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified abuse and lack of protection from abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigation. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were followed according to professional standards of practice for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 3, 2 & 4) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to transcribe and/or follow physician's orders for respiratory care, routinely change oxygen tubing, and initiate/review respiratory care plans placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs, respiratory infections, and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission to ensure continuity of care and/or to ensure a summary/copy of the baseline care plan was provided to the residents and/or their representatives for 5 of 9 residents (Residents 412, 112, 562, 312 & 313) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure resulted in the residents not being informed of their initial plan for delivery of care services and placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and store medications (no open date or not dating medications after opening it) and failed to ensure expired medical supplies were disposed of timely in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 2 medication carts (Sound & Cascade Medication Carts) and 1 of 1 medication storage room observed. These failures placed the residents at risks of receiving compromised medical supplies and experience adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen thermometer was properly sanitized between use for 1 of 1 kitchen. This failure placed the residents at risk for cross contamination, food borne illnesses [an illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages], and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's order and complete a self-medication administration assessment for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident 112) reviewed for medication at the bedside. The failure to complete a self-administration assessment and obtain a physician's order placed the resident at risk for medication errors and adverse medication interactions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the Advance Directive (AD) was obtained from the residents/representatives who have an AD in place and ensure a copy was readily available in the medical records for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18) reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the resident at risk of losing their right to have their preferences and choices honored regarding emergent and end-of-life care situations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a timely significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 9 residents (Residents 47) reviewed for significant change in status assessment. The failure to complete a significant change in status assessment within 14 days placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 15 residents (Resident 313) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The failure to ensure accurate assessments for pressure injury placed the resident at risks for unidentified or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received bathing/shower and personal hygiene per their plan of care for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 4 and 112) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This failure placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care and treatment were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility staff failed to do skin evaluations, implement monitoring and interventions for skin care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 25) reviewed for skin conditions. Additionally, the facility failed to assess and maintain weight-bearing restrictions for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 44) reviewed for limited mobility and positioning. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care of nebulizer tubing/mouthpiece (a type of equipment used to deliver a medicine into a fine mist that is breathed in) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to ensure nebulizer tubing/mouthpiece were replaced and/or stored properly when not in use placed the resident at risk for respiratory infections and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was accurately posted and updated with actual hours worked for each shift for 30 out of 30 days reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This failure placed the residents, the residents' representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and census information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccination policy and procedures and failed to implement their policy for 1 of 2 staff (Staff N) reviewed for COVID 19 vaccination. In addition, the facility failed to have a process for documenting for whom the facility had granted, an exemption from the staff COVID-19 vaccination requirements. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at risk for COVID-19 and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review of room size measurements, 2 single resident rooms failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet (Sqft2) for a single resident room. These rooms were room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER].
10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 8, 2025, 2 on July 22, 2024, 5 on April 12, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Washington | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.64 | 4.36 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.75 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.32 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.78 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.9% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 45.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.78 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.99 in April to June 2025 to 3.64 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.75 | 3.78 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 61 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.70 | 0.75 | 3.83 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 62 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.90 | 0.81 | 4.07 | 3.46 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.99 | 1.05 | 4.21 | 3.44 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 60 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Washington, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.21 | 0.90 | 4.44 | 3.66 | 3.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.65 | $22.59 to $27.85 | 30,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $39.98 | $36.98 to $45.18 | 6,780 |
| Registered nurses | $59.71 | $49.57 to $64.54 | 69,260 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Washington | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.3 | 14.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.5 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 15.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.8 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.9 | 13.4 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lynnwood Post Acute Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Washington: 71 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 156 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Washington: 7 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 138 eligible stays.
8.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Washington: 4 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 87 eligible stays.
61.0% this home
Median of homes: Washington61.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 59 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Washington0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Washington1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Washington98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LYNNWOOD HEALTH SERVICES, INC.. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caretrust Gp LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2006 | |
| Caretrust Gp LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2006 |
| Burnam, Soon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/09/2024 | |
| Holmes, Nathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Stolarczyk, Lisa | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/21/2024 | |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Burnam, Soon | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/09/2024 | |
| Holmes, Nathan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Keetch, Chad | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2006 | |
| Port, Barry | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/26/2018 | |
| Sato, Ami | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2006 | |
| Ensign Services Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2006 | |
| Tempay LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2006 | |
| Fisher, Tonya | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Stolarczyk, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/21/2024 | |
| Caretrust Gp LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2006 | |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2006 | |
| Ensign Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/25/2025 | |
| Snohomish Health Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2006 | |
| Fisher, Tonya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/05/2025 | |
| Stolarczyk, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/05/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.