Home / Michigan / West Bloomfield
6800 West Maple, West Bloomfield, MI 48322 · Oakland County · (248) 788-5300
155 certified beds, about 123 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235288 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 18, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 47 health citations since October 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $49,228 in the last three years; the largest was $49,228, and the latest is dated December 14, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
54.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Preferred Care, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 47 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate call button was provided for use and placed within reach of one resident (R74) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needsFindings include:On 3/16/2026 at approximately 8:42 a.m., R74 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R74 was asked if they had any concerns with the care and they reported they wanted their bed raised up. R74 was asked if they could use the call button to call for help and they reported they could not find it. R74's call button was observed to be unclipped and hanging off the site of the bed on the floor. R74 was asked if they had the ability to use the call button and they reported they did not think so because they had trouble with their hands. R74 was asked how they get help from staff and they reported the did not know. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, homelike environment for one (R71) of four residents reviewed for the environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R8) of one resident reviewed for restraints had appropriate clinical justification/assessments for the use of a seatbelt.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding was documented correctly and administered according to the Physician's order for one resident (R3) of one resident reviewed for enteral feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was in safe operating condition for one (R116) of four residents reviewed for environment concerns.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary healthcare environment amongst residential common areas including a shared shower room, flooring, training bathroom and rehabilitation equipment, and shared Hoyer lift (lift device used to transfer residents). This deficient practice has potential to affect all residents that utilize these areas and equipment.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake MI00149648. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent to search personal belongings from one resident (R801) of one resident reviewed for Rights to Privacy and Confidentiality.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00150488. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with dressing and getting out of bed in a timely manner to one (R806) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00149894. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly identify a new skin impairment and implement interventions to prevent reoccurrence for one (R806) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake MI00149894 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent pressure ulcer formation and ensure accurate skin assessments for one (R807) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in R807 developing a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI - persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration) to the left medial (inside) heel .
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for for five residents, (R#'s 105, 46, 16, 17, 58, 84, and 30) of five residents reviewed for a homelike environment, and for 11 residents (who wished to remain anonymous) from the group meeting, resulting in verbalized complaints regarding the environment, housekeeping, and laundry services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication were administered and documented per professional standards for two residents, (R#'s 47 and 104) of five residents reviewed for professional standards with medication administration and documentation resulting in verbalized complaints of not receiving as needed pain medications on time and inaccurate medical record keeping.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Hospice services were provided per plan of care for one resident, (R4) of one resident reviewed for Hospice, resulting in R4 not receiving Hospice services per the provisions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for four of four medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain an assessment and physician's order for self-administration of medications for one (R98) of one resident reviewed for self-administration of medication/treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely and accurate advanced directives information was in place and ensure resident wishes were timely implemented for two R66 and R2 out of four residents reviewed for Advanced Directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident for alternative or augmentative communication methods to ensure functional communication for one Resident (R91) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an order for supplemental oxygen for one resident (R17) of one resident reviewed for oxygen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions to prevent triggers for one Resident (R8) of one resident reviewed for trauma-informed care and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent when three medication errors were identified from a total of 41 opportunities for one resident (R104) of five residents observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.32%.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00146798. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced residents' dignity for three (R805, R806 and R807) of seven residents reviewed for dignity and respect.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake: MI00145092. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to timely implement effective wound interventions/treatments and ensure physician follow-up, assessment, and monitoring of a worsening wound for one (R502) of two residents reviewed for skin concerns.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00145236 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from physical restraints for one resident (R503), of one resident reviewed for restraints, resulting in staff reported observations of the resident's feet and legs tied in a knot with blankets and multiple staff reports of having received an in-service education on restraints.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00145236 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure abuse was immediately reported to the abuse coordinator and reported to the State Agency for one resident, (R503) of two residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00142694 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an oxygen dependent resident was provided continuous oxygen per Physicians order for one resident (R802) of one residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00134966 and MI00141309. This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1 Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to implement an order to obtain daily blood sugar (BS) levels upon admission, failed to identify and report to the physician abnormal lab results, and failed to timely report to the physician a change of condition for one (R104) of one resident reviewed for an expired closed record sample, resulting in a delay of care and services and the prompt intervention to transfer the resident to a higher level of care.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #'s MI00138332 and MI00135446. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to implement adequate preventive interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, failed to complete accurate skin assessments, failed to ensure implemented preventive interventions were consistently completed and treatment orders were consistently completed as ordered by the physician for two residents, (R's 44 & 27) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the development of a facility acquired unstageable pressure ulcer with slough identified to the right heel of R44 within five weeks after being admitted to the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1 This citation pertains to intake #MI00141309 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper amount of staff were utilized for bed mobility for one resident (R75), of one resident reviewed for bed mobility, resulting in a fall with multiple fractures requiring a transfer to the emergency room.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00138332 and MI00138733. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (R20, R21, R62 and R81) of six residents reviewed for dignity were treated in a dignified manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure equal choices of dining for seven of nine residents that attended the confidential resident council, and two (R42 and R55) of six residents reviewed for resident rights, resulting in expressions of frustration, feelings of isolation, and decreased fulfillment of personal autonomy and personal choices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect Protected Health Information (PHI) for four (R4, R17, R79 and R102) residents from being displayed in a manner viewable to anyone that passed by the nursing station.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00134994 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, safe and home-like environment to ensure that hallways, ceilings, lights, shower rooms, and equipment used for multiple residents were clean and in good repair affecting multiple residents (including R57, R86 and R63) as well as seven of nine that attended the confident resident council meeting, resulting in an unclean physical environment, resident dissatisfaction and complaints regarding the lack of cleanliness and upkeep.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage, labeling, and discarding of drugs and biologicals, resulting in the potential for misuse, contamination, and medication administration errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food items were labeled, dated, and discarded when expired, and failed to maintain the resident popcorn machine in the activity room in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that store food in the resident refrigerator and consume popcorn from the activity room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to consistently provide translator services in a language that could be understood for two residents (R7 and R99) of two residents reviewed for communication and understanding, resulting in the potential for inaccurate assessments, unmet care needs and the potential for the resident to not participate in their care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two (R31 and R84) of two residents reviewed for medication were assessed for the safe self-administration of medication and to have medication kept at bedside.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00138733 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to private and confidential mail delivery for one resident (R62) of one residents reviewed for private communications, resulting in resident mail being opened by the facility prior to delivery to the resident and violation of their privacy.
Inspectors wroteThis Deficient practice is linked to intake MI00140318. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's(R255) right to be free from physical abuse by R99.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring an allegation of neglect/mistreatment was reported to the State Agency in accordance with section1150B of the Act for one resident (R62) of one residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of neglect/mistreatment for one resident (R62) of one residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment resulting in the increased potential for retaliation and continued mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician for one (R44) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to ensure accurate guardianship/legal representation for two (R7 and R99) of two residents reviewed, resulting in a residents with cognitive impairment not having a guardian/legal representative in place to assist in medical decisions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5% when two medication errors were observed from a total 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. This deficient practice affected two (R19 and R319) of three residents observed during medication administration.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00135446 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician Ordered Occupational Therapy services were provided for one resident (R62) of two residents reviewed for Specialized Rehabilitation Services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staff postings were updated daily and reflected the staffing at the facility potentially affecting all residents and visitors at the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake: MI00139857. Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure adequate and resident specific fall interventions were implemented in an attempt to prevent further falls for two (R's 802 & 804) of two residents reviewed for accidents.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake: MI00139857. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to timely complete a STAT (immediate) X-ray as ordered by the physician for one (R802) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition.
7 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 18, 2026, 2 on January 9, 2025, 4 on December 14, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 14, 2023 | Fine | $49,228 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.71 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.30 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.10 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.02 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.7% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 27.8% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.60 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.87 on weekdays and 3.30 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.69 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.71 | 0.58 | 3.87 | 3.30 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 123 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.91 | 0.56 | 4.03 | 3.60 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.87 | 0.53 | 3.96 | 3.62 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.69 | 0.55 | 3.83 | 3.36 | 0.2% | 0 of 91 | 120 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.7 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.3 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.3 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Marvin & Betty Danto Health Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 169 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 167 eligible stays.
8.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.
67.2% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 157 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 157 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 69 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WB OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Preferred Care, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wb Opco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2023 |
| Green, Dov | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 35% | 06/01/2023 |
| Klein, Yoni | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 06/01/2023 |
| Schnell, David | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 06/01/2023 |
| Wb Propco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Klein, Yoni | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Ottensoser, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Rubinfeld, Eli | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| P&m Holding Group LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Preferred Care at Lansing Mngt LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Wb Propco Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Zigdon & Associates PC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Green, Dov | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Klein, Yoni | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Mishulin, Svetlana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Ottensoser, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Schnell, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.