3000 Bethel Rd, Columbus, OH 43230 · Franklin County · (614) 889-6320
99 certified beds, about 84 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365410 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 21, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 58 health citations since February 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.66 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.95 of those hours.
39.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Life Care Centers of America, an affiliated group of 194 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 58 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to wear proper hair and beard restraints when serving and preparing food , practice safe storage of utensils when preparing beverages and practice safe handling of food to prevent cross contamination. This had the potential to affect all but 10 residents the facility identified as receiving enteral feeding. The census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of reported sexual abuse for two (Resident #41and #61) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to conduct an investigation when there was a report of suspected sexual abuse. This affected two residents (#41 and #61) of five reviewed for abuse. The census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents (Resident #04, Resident #56, and Resident #61) of 22 residents reviewed. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to revise resident care plans. This deficient practice effected three (Residents #16, Resident #28, and Resident #62) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 83. Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #28's medical records revealed an admission date of 2/27/26 and medical diagnosis of parkinsonism, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, abnormal gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, dysarthria and anarthria, dysphagia, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #28's minimum data set (MDS) last updated 02/27/26 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was offered activities and had a detailed activities assessment and care plan. This affected one resident (#11) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner when a resident had behavior and mood changes. This afffected one resident (#41) of two residents reviewed for behavioral, mental and emotional health care and services. The census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to timely address Resident #79's Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). This affected one resident (#79) of two residents reviewed for UTI. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #85's blood pressure medication was administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#85) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure opioid medication was approved for the resident to take during a leave of absence for Resident #61. This resulted in an unobserved significant medication error for Resident #61. This affected one resident (#61) of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for a resident requiring enhanced barrier precautions this affected one (#04) and the facility failed to ensure staff followed neutropenic precautions which affected one (#42) . Five residents were reviewed for infection control procedures. The facility census was 82. Findings Include: 1. Resident #04 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that include obstructive uropathy, chronic kidney disease (stage IIIA), and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent or less. This affected one resident (#45) of six residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for Resident #45. This affected one of five residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to properly label and store medications. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive medications from the facility. The census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing and shaving. This affected (Residents #42 and #44) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 80. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute embolism and thrombosis of left iliac vein, pulmonary embolism, severe protein-calorie deficiency, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, depression, and bipolar. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed it was very important for Resident #42 to choose the type of bathing. A care plan for activities of daily living dated 01/26/24 revealed Resident #42 required supervision with bathing/showering. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess a resident after a fall and timely notify the physician. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's pain was timely and appropriately addressed. This affected one resident (#3) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical record review, hospital record review, toxicology report review, review of the facility admission policy, review of the facility assessment and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #82 received adequate, timely and appropriate treatment and continuity of care following admission to the facility resulting in a situation of neglect. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm/subsequent death beginning on [DATE] at 8:30 P.M. when Resident #82, who had been hospitalized prior to admission, arrived at the facility for placement and staff failed to obtain physician orders for medications/treatments or contact the physician/medical director regarding the resident's admission. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed ensure care plans were comprehensive and addressed problems as stated in a self-reported incident (SRI). This affected one resident (#43) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care related to tracheostomy care. This affected two (Resident #65 and #66) of three resident records reviewed for tracheostomy care. The census was 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured to prevent unauthorized access. This had the potential to affect seven (Residents #35, #42, #43, #48, #50, #56 and #58) of 24 residents on 300 hallway identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The census was 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control guidelines were maintained during tracheostomy care. This affected one (Resident #65) of two residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The census was 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to protect the privacy of medical information for a resident. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for privacy. The current census is 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide resident dignity with use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice affected two (#5 and #27) of four residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date 05/14/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, high blood pressure, and obstructive uropathy. Resident #5 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks, and was assessed as cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were maintained when a medication ordered for one (#74) was administered to another (#33) resident. This deficient practice affected two (#33 and #74) of two residents reviewed for staff borrowing medications. The facility census was 81. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 08/01/19 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #74 had impaired cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and medication administration. Review of the physician orders for Resident #74 revealed a one-time order dated 08/07/24 for the antipsychotic medication Zyprexa 10 milligrams (mg) to be given via intramuscular (IM) injection. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to prevent the administration of an unnecessary antipsychotic medication. This deficient practice affected one (#33) out of two resident reviewed for antipsychotic medication use. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date for 09/09/22 with a readmission date 08/31/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, high blood pressure, schizoaffective disorder, and traumatic brain injury. Resident #33 was assessed with impaired cognition, impaired decision making, and physical behaviors towards others. Review of the physician orders for Resident #33 revealed a one-time order dated 08/12/24 for the antipsychotic medication Zyprexa 10 milligrams (mg) to be given via intramuscular (IM) injection for increased agitation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to have a carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen with a gas stove present. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Observation on 08/05/24 at 9:30 A.M. revealed in the facility main kitchen, there was a gas stove within the kitchen area. There was no carbon monoxide detector in this area. Interview with Food Service Director #195 on 08/05/24 at 9:32 A.M. confirmed they did not have a carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen with a permanently installed fuel burning appliance (stove). She confirmed there is a designated spot in place to have a carbon monoxide detector, but it was not in place. She confirmed she did not know how long it had not been in place.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain smoking products. This affected one (Resident #20) of one reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect the privacy of Resident #18 and Resident #12's medical records. This affected two of twenty-two medical records reviewed for the annual survey. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents were completed as required. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 90. Findings Include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypotension, muscle weakness, mood disorder, dysphagia, catatonic disorder due to known physiological condition, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, altered mental status, post traumatic stress disorder. anxiety disorder, hypertension, suicidal ideations, acute kidney failure, hypothyroidism, and encephalopathy. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, medical record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to create a care plan related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for residents. This affected one (Resident #7) of two residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, policy review, and resident interview, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. This affected three (Residents #4, #40 and #65) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to properly monitor and accurately document skin abnormalities. This affected one (Resident #56) out of the one reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, medical record review and facility policy review, the facility did not effectively assess residents for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, family interviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to assist with discharge planning. This affected one (Resident #82) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. Additionally, the facility failed to document discharge planning efforts and include the residents in discharge planning. This affected three (Residents #82, #31, and #50) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, family interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with oxygen as ordered at discharge. This affected one (Resident #82) of three reviewed for oxygen. Facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's preference for bathing time. This affected one (#74) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 74.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike manner. This affected three residents (#11, #47, and #48) out of five residents reviewed for the environment. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to accommodate residents cultural preferences for meals. This affected one (Resident #11) out of three residents reviewed for meals. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the surety bond remained adequate to cover all resident account totals. This had the potential to affect all 30 Residents (#1, #7, #9, #11, #16, #17, #18, #21, #22, #23, #30, #34, #35, #36, #39, #42, #48, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #61, #66, #67, #68, #69, #74) who had an open resident fund account. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: Review of the surety bond dated 05/15/20 revealed the surety bond capacity was $30,000. Review of monthly balance information revealed the Resident account balances totaled over $30,000 each month since 05/2020. In 05/2020, the balance was $45,762.70. In 06/2020, the balance was $46,477.93. In 07/2020, the balance was $41,722.65. In 08/2020, the balance was $43,836.74. In 09/2020, the balance was $38,335.02. In 10/2020, the balance was $36,022.80. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean, homelike environment, and the room, furniture, and privacy curtain were clean and in good repair. This affected eight (Resident #4, #5, #6, #11, #25, #38, #46 and #432) out of 77 residents residing in the facility. The census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of resident transfers and discharges. This affected four (Resident #32, #40, #46, and #330) of five residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 11/16/21. Resident #32's diagnoses included diabetes type two, COVID-19, and fractured nasal bones. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed Resident #32 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence to indicate the Ombudsman was notified of Resident #32's discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 02/05/21. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and review of facilty policy, the facility failed to ensure nail care and oral care was provided for dependent residents. This affected five (Residents #5, #12, #56, #65 and #72) out of five residents reviewed for nail and oral care. The census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of manufactures instructions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly, not stored with food, and expired medication and laboratory vials were disposed of. This affected nine (Resident #2, #3, #27, #34, #39, #45, #48, #55, and #435) out of 77 residents in the facility. The census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident advanced directives were accurate. This affected one (Resident #53) out of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/04/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, dementia without behaviors, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #53's physician orders dated 12/13/21 revealed an order to change Resident #53's code status to Do Not Rescuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #56) out of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #56) out of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices were provided upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #46) of four residents reviewed for bed hold notices. The census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately complete Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents. This affected two (Resident #53 and #56) of three residents reviewed for PASRR's. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure plans of care were revised to include accurate fall interventions. This affected two (Resident #32 and #72) of four residents reviewed for falls. The census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #66) out of five residents reviewed for weight records. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were documented and interventions were in place. This affected one (Resident #72) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy syringes were rinsed after use and resident's had a dressing around their tube feeding site. This affected two (Resident #65 and #72) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen supplies were dated and tracheostomy (trach) supplies were available at bedside as ordered. This affected one (Resident #65) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 10 Residents who received respiratory treatments. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of pharmacy monthly medication reviews, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident drug allergies were identified and addressed during monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews. This affected two (Resident #32 and #66) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of a dental appointments log, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to residents in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice records including the hospice plan of care were accessible and maintained in the facility. This affected one (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for hospice. The facility census was 77.
8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 21, 2026, 4 on August 12, 2024, 2 on February 14, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.66 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.95 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.32 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.02 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.8% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.82 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.80 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.95 in April to June 2025 to 3.66 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.95 | 3.80 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 84 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.86 | 0.86 | 3.98 | 3.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 87 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.88 | 0.92 | 4.09 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.95 | 0.87 | 4.20 | 3.34 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 82 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.9 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.1 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.3 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mayfair Village Nursing Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
81.4% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
2.8% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH CARE. CMS links this home to Life Care Centers of America, a group of 194 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayfair Medical Investors LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/19/2007 |
| Long, Zofia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/15/2004 | |
| Ollangg, Melissa | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/31/2025 | |
| Cross, Cindy | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/21/1994 | |
| Henry, Terry | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/1999 | |
| Thurmond, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/22/2000 | |
| Consolidated Resources Health Care | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/30/1985 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/19/2007 | |
| Fletcher, Todd | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2001 | |
| Lay, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/24/2017 | |
| Long, Zofia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/15/2004 | |
| Mathur, Deepa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/16/2019 | |
| Ollangg, Melissa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/31/2025 | |
| Preston, Aubrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/06/2025 | |
| Swanker, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Ziegler, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2001 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | General partnership interest | Organization | 12/19/2007 | |
| Mayfair Medical Investors LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 12/19/2007 | |
| Consolidated Resources Health Care | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/29/2018 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/2025 | |
| Mayfair Medical Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/29/2018 | |
| Mathur, Deepa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Ollangg, Melissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/29/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.