431 West Remington Boulevard, Bolingbrook, IL 60440 · Will County · (630) 759-1112
298 certified beds, about 230 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145710 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 31, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since September 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $160,635 in the last three years; the largest was $130,546, and the latest is dated July 11, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.79 of those hours.
52.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow sanitary practices during food storage in freezer, pots and pans storage and meal service. This apples to 225 residents that receive food prepared in the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents, who were identified as needing assistance with incontinence care and nail care. This applies to 4 of 7 residents (R13, R30, R74, and R178) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date medications to determine its expiration date and failed to store unopened insulins in the refrigerator. This applies to 7 of 7 residents (R176, R182, R207, R220, R226, R231, R232) reviewed for medication storage and labeling in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve portion sizes of pureed chili as planned for the lunch meal. This applies to 5 of 5 (R17, R41, R46, R72, R223) residents reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices related to EBP (Enhance Barrier Precaution) policy, hand hygiene, and glove use during provisions of care and medication administration. This applies to 7of 35 residents (R2, R13, R127, R162, R176, R178, R204) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to offer and administer influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in accordance with CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R13, R63, R90, and R126) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident that was receiving hemodialysis was weighed daily as ordered by the medical provider. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R16) reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to educate a resident regarding the consequences of refusal of wound treatment, for a resident with a worsening facility acquired pressure injury. This applies to 1 of 9 residents (R11) reviewed for pressure injury in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate diet consistency for a resident with risk for aspiration and failed to implement safety intervention for a resident identified with high- fall risk. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R6 and R13) reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident with cognitive deficits for risk of entrapment prior to installation of bed rails. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed for bed rails in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician order with regards to dosage of a resident's nasal spray and failed to follow medication administration policy and procedures during medications pass. There were 26 medication opportunities with 6 errors resulting to 23.07% error rate. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R6, R95) reviewed for medication pass in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received dental care for teeth that were painful and decaying. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R236) reviewed for dental care in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education and offer a resident the COVID-19 immunization. This apples to 1 of 5 residents (R126) reviewed for immunization in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement safety interventions and provide supervision to prevent two residents from injury. These failures resulted in R2 sustaining a laceration and a displaced bilateral nasal bone fracture and acute fracture of the bony nasal septum and R3 sustaining a head laceration requiring 5 staples and being admitted to the hospital. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for falls in a sample of 12.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect when the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained and hospice orders were followed for 2 (R1, R2) residents, admitted to the facility for a hospice respite stay. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing seizures after not receiving anticonvulsant medications and requiring hospitalization. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for neglect in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hospice resident, admitted to the facility for a respite stay, was administered anticonvulsant medication and insulin as shown on the hospice records and provided by the resident's family. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing seizures after not receiving anticonvulsant medications and requiring hospitalization. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive unnecessary medications. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive showers as shown on the facility's shower schedule, and failed to ensure residents receive assistance with shaving and fingernail care. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from sexual abuse from a housekeeper (V4). This failure resulted in R1 and R2 being sexually abused by V4 on January 25, 2025. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 22. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on January 25, 2025 when R2 reported to the facility that she was sexually assaulted by V4. V1 (Administrator), V3 (acting Director of Nursing) and V15 (Part-time Nursing Consultant) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on February 18, 2025 at 10:37 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on February 18, 2025, but non-compliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of sexual abuse made by R1 and R2. R1 and R2 had consistently expressed being sexually assaulted by a housekeeper (V4) and the facility failed to investigate allegations after obtaining additional information, initially not substantiating R1 and R2's allegations of sexual abuse on January 25, 2025. These failures have the potential to affect all 237 residents who reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance to residents who required staff assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. This applies to 4 of 6 residents (R2, R11, R12 and R13) reviewed for ADL care in a sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the care needs of facility residents. This applies to 4 of 6 residents (R2, R11, R12 and R13) reviewed for staffing in a sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to change a resident's rectal tube collection bag according to manufacturer guidelines. This failure effects 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatments to pressure ulcers as ordered by the physician for 2 (R1, R5) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer treatments in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to fully investigate a grievance/concern and ensure grievances by family members are resolved. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for grievances in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to conduct a thorough abuse investigation following a resident-to-resident physical altercation. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to a resident who is dependent on facility staff for all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), including toilet hygiene. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for timely incontinence care in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to assess a resident for elopement risk within the first 24 hours and implement interventions to prevent elopement and exit seeking. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for supervision and elopement in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the dishwashing machine was maintained at temperatures to properly sanitize the dishes. This applies to all 245 residents that receive foods prepared in the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold quarterly and as needed QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) committee meetings and failed to have the required members in attendance. This applies to all 250 residents who reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the Covid-19 vaccine to residents and/or staff members. This applies to all 250 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify in writing the resident/resident's representatives that their Medicare Part A services were ending. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R18, R103, R142, R231) reviewed for SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage) in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date medications after being opened to determine expiration dates, failed to remove medications that were expired based on the date that it was opened, failed to remove the used medications of residents that no longer reside in the facility, and failed to ensure that unused insulin was stored in the refrigerator as recommended by the pharmacy. This applies to 8 of 10 (R44, R75, R95, R114, R132, R140, R153, R217) residents reviewed for medication storage and labeling.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use serving scoop sizes as shown on facility menu spread sheet for mechanical soft and pureed consistency beef cubed steak. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R23, R54, R76, R84, R123, R147, R156, R188, R216 and R241) reviewed for dining in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during provisions of care. In addition, the facility also failed to handle soiled linens in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter bag is not touching the floor. This applies to 4 of 35 (R1, R21, R67, R214) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a residents health care information was protected from view by unauthorized individuals. This applies to 1 of 35 residents (R123) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance in grooming for residents that need assistance with personal hygiene. This apples to 3 of 3 residents (R127, R183, R12) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care as needed for a resident who has a stage 4 ulcer with heavy drainage. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R181) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to timely address recommendations from the pharmacist. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for monthly medication reviews.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for transfers to prevent falls. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow fall precaution interventions for residents who were at high risk for falls. The facility also failed to create safe environments to decrease the risk of falls and failed to supervise and reassess a resident who smoked. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R3, R4, R5, R8, R9) reviewed for accidents and supervision.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a resident dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for incontinence care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an alleged allegation of verbal abuse was investigated. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to wash dishes in a sanitary manner. This applies to 228 residents receiving oral diet at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene and incontinence care. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R16, R33, R62, R136, R159 and R173) reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living) in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence and indwelling urinary catheter care in a manner that would prevent infection. In addition, the facility also failed to ensure that a urinary bag was not touching the floor. This applies to 4 of 7 residents (R106, R185, R191, R343), reviewed for incontinence and urinary catheter care in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wrote5. R92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], according to his face sheet. R92's diagnoses included left femur fracture, diabetes, and the need for assistance with personal care, according to his physician's order summary report. R92 was noted cognitively intact and cooperative during care. R92's most recent minimum data set assessment (dated August 8, 2023) noted R92 was always incontinent of bowels. R92's care plan documented multiple current focus problems including, a high risk of infection due to his suprapubic (abdominally inserted) urinary catheter, a potential for infection due to his peripheral intravenous site (noted at his left hand), and pressure injuries of his skin with open areas to his buttocks. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and provide supportive device/splint to a resident, to prevent further reduction in ROM (range of motion). This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R62) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the port of entry of the PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central) line was visible for assessment. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R191, R343) reviewed for PICC lines in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to administer medication and failed to follow the pharmacy recommendation of not crushing a delayed release medication. There were 2 errors out of 26 opportunities resulting to 7.69% medication error rate. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R74, R141) reviewed for medication pass in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve diets as ordered by the Physician. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R11, R166, R183) reviewed for diet orders in the sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents about the State Ombudsman program and provided erroneous information regarding the State Public Health Hotline. This applies to all 234 residents in the facility.
29 fire safety citations on file: 8 on June 27, 2024, 7 on September 14, 2023, 14 on December 8, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 11, 2025 | Fine | $16,790 |
| June 11, 2025 | Fine | $13,299 |
| February 21, 2025 | Fine | $130,546 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.47 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.00 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.97 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.71 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.1% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.9% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.50 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.65 on weekdays and 3.00 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.56 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.47 | 0.79 | 3.65 | 3.00 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 230 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.44 | 0.74 | 3.60 | 3.03 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 236 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.86 | 3.79 | 3.13 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 232 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.56 | 0.87 | 3.71 | 3.19 | 0.4% | 0 of 91 | 236 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.3 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.3 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.5 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Meadowbrook Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 318 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 337 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 211 eligible stays.
28.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 118 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 175 residents counted.
2.7% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 175 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BUTTERFIELD HEALTH CARE, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Descendants S Corp Fbo Ashley Maria Dimas | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 07/11/1989 |
| Descendants S Corp Trust Fbo Sasha Eva Dimas | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 07/11/1989 |
| Descendants S Corp Trust Fbo Sean William Dimas | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 07/11/1989 |
| Dorothy Vangel Qss Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 8% | 07/11/1989 |
| Jafari, Kianoosh | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 13% | 07/11/1989 |
| Jafari, Robert | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 07/11/1989 |
| Jafari, Soussan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 13% | 07/11/1989 |
| Vangel, Dorothy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 07/11/1989 |
| Vangel, Nicholas | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 07/11/1989 |
| Jafari, Kianoosh | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/11/1989 | |
| Koshy, Elizabeth | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/03/2018 | |
| Jafari, Kianoosh | Corporate director | Individual | 07/11/1989 | |
| Vangel, Christopher | Corporate director | Individual | 07/11/1989 | |
| Vangel, Dorothy | Corporate director | Individual | 07/11/1989 | |
| Vangel, Nicholas | Corporate director | Individual | 07/11/1989 | |
| Koshy, Elizabeth | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/03/2018 | |
| Vangel, Christopher | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/11/1989 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.