5199 East Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43213 · Franklin County · (614) 751-5700
126 certified beds, about 119 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365436 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 29, 2025, inspectors cited 26 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 51 health citations since June 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.09 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.92 of those hours.
48.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Carmelite Sisters for the Aged & Infirm, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 51 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of medical records, observation, interview, policy review and review of provided videos and pictures, the facility failed to ensure residents with trauma received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected one resident (#55) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident medical record, observations, staff interview, CDC website review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 116 out of 117 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #72) as not eating food from the kitchen. The facility also failed to thoroughly perform legionella surveillance. This had the potential to affect all 117 residents residing in the facility. The facility also failed to provide designated disposal bins for used personal protective equipment in a resident's room when the resident was under contact precautions. This affected one resident (#125) out of three residents (#48, #72 and #125) reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medications and to identify target behaviors and monitor the target behaviors for the use of antipsychotic medications. This affected five residents (#12, #45, #71, #93 and #106) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 117. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an initial admission date of 02/23/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dependence on wheelchair, dementia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, restless leg syndrome, major depressive disorder, constipation, overactive bladder, insomnia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate coordination with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process by submitting an incorrect list of mental health diagnoses. This affected four (Resident #6, #12, #79 and #90) out of five residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the state mental health authority was notified of updated and accurate mental health diagnoses. This affected four (Resident #6, #12, #79 and #90) out of five residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper skin monitoring for Residents #79, #95, and #58; failed to remove medication patches as ordered for Resident #50; failed to ensure Geri sleeves and related care plans were implemented for Resident #58; and failed to monitor and implement dental care recommendations following the extraction of seven teeth for Resident #49. These failures affected five (Residents #79, #95, #58, #50, and #49) out of 26 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure air mattress bed settings were appropriate and ordered for four (Residents #2, #8, #53 and #70) of four residents who were at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident medical records, observations, staff interviews and review of company policies, the facility failed to provide supervision with dining for residents that were identified as choking risks. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and 18) out of thirty three residents that the facility identified as at risk for choking. The facility also failed to ensure that transfers were completed as required for Resident #116 and that the call light cord wiring was not exposed for Resident #79. These affected two residents (Resident #79 and #116) out of six residents that were reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 117 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management monitoring, evaluations and indication for usage for residents. This affected four (Resident #58, #9, #50 and #13) out of five residents reviewed for pain. The facility also failed to ensure Dexcom (continuous glucose monitoring system) was not expired, this affected one (Resident #114) out of one reviewed for insulin usage. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary method. This had the potential to affect 116 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #72) who did not eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 117 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment in multiple resident areas. This affected one (Resident #50) out of six residents reviewed for environmental concerns. Additionally the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of common areas this had the potential to affect 40 residents (#40, #14, #58, #2, #41, #93, #85, #24, #95, #13, #75, #114, #115, #99, #30, #80, #97, #10, #89, #49, #131, #6, #73, #69, #104, #86, #1, #51, #76, #71, #26, #9, #62, #34, #21, #60, #79, #50, #64, and #74) identified using the affected areas. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach for Resident #03. This affected one resident (#03) of four residents reviewed for call light accessibility. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure private medical record information for Resident #03 was not visible to facility visitors. This affected one resident (#03) of four residents reviewed for privacy concerns. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident medical record, family interview, staff interviews, dentist interview, review of facility self-reported incident investigation, review of hospital notes, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin. This affected one resident (Resident #48) that was reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 117 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to perform oral assessments on a resident. This affected one resident out (Resident #58) out of twenty nine residents reviewed. The facility census was 117 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure documented diagnoses were accurate for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) out of five residents reviewed. Facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) Level I screenings for residents with qualifying mental health diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #90) out of five residents reviewed for PASRR screenings accuracy. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected resident care needs. This affected three residents (#12, #45, and #114) out of four reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 117.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a weeklong hospitalization. On 07/24/25 at 8:46 A.M., a review of the medical record via the electronic charting system Point Click Care (PCC) revealed Resident #12 had a primary ICD admitting diagnosis F28 which was listed as, other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition with a start date of 05/07/24 and entry date of 05/09/25. Additional diagnoses included spinal stenosis; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure shaving needs were completed for two residents (#79 and #120) who required assistance with needs for personal care. Four residents were reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop an individualized activity program to meet one resident (#45) needs. This affected one (Resident #45) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 117. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an initial admission date of 02/23/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dependence on wheelchair, dementia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, restless leg syndrome, major depressive disorder, constipation, overactive bladder, insomnia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment for a contracture and plan of care was in place for one Resident (#95) of one that was reviewed for position and mobility. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided as ordered by the physician for one (Resident #48) of four residents reviewed for nutritional support. The facility also failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for two (Residents #9 and #13) of four residents reviewed for nutritional support. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer an enteral feeding per physician's orders. The facility also did not date the enteral formula container with the hang date and/or time. This affected one (Resident #72) out of two residents reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 117 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nebulizer medication delivery system as stored in a manner to prevent contamination. This affected one (Resident #116) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 117. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an initial admission date of 06/01/21 with the diagnoses including but not limited to polyosteoarthritis, zoster, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, anemia, congestive heart failure, asthma, dry eye syndrome, myopia, presbyopia, constipation, abdominal aortic aneurysm, seasonal allergic allergies, hyperlipidemia, aortic valve stenosis, overactive bladder, insomnia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure long-acting narcotic pain medication was available for administration. This affected one resident (Resident #15) out of five residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was below 5%. This affected two (Resident #6 and #48) out of four residents observed during medication administration. 27 opportunities of medication administration were observed and 2 of the 27 medications were not administered in accordance with physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. The facility census was 117.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the transfer was documented in the resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 117. Findings Include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #49 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with the diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with psychotic disturbances, dysphagia, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, congestive heart failure, insomnia, major depressive disorder, presence of cardiac pacemaker, hyperlipidemia, anemia, constipation, chronic pain, atrial fibrillation and hypothyroidism. The resident expired on [DATE] at the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview and policy review, the faciliy failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected one (Resident #8) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, document review, and policy review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infections when they failed to follow droplet precautions for Resident #90 and failed to properly clean a blood glucose monitoring machine for Resident #3. This had the potential to affect four (Resident #3, #76, #78, and #79) Residents who received blood glucose monitoring on the two East hallway The facility census was 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of hospital reports, review of facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and proper wheelchair transport resulting in a fall. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of not 5 percent or greater. This affected four (Resident #67, #111, #113 and #131) of six residents observed for medication administration. Five errors were observed out of 35 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 14.2%. The census was 111.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the satellite kitchens were maintained in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 113 of 113 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were dated and appropriate rationale was provided regarding gradual dose reductions. This affected three residents (Resident #43, #74 and #85) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records. This affected five residents (#23, #88, #71, #66, and #85) of 24 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide skilled nursing facility advanced beneficiary notices (SNFABN) with estimated costs upon discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services for two (#101 and #87) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification review. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, review of shower sheets, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #85) hair was washed and one resident's (Resident #88) unwanted facial hair was removed. This affected two (Residents #85 and #88) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 116. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date on 03/22/21 and a readmission date on 04/09/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Type II diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy, stroke, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), colostomy status, fibromyalgia, other chronic pain, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and drug induced subacute dyskinesia (abnormal movements). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have weekend activities and daily independent activities available. This affected two residents (#41 and #62) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of pharmacy delivery receipts, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hospice notes were kept on-site and readily available to staff for one resident (Resident #89). The facility failed to administer as needed (PRN) blood pressure medication as ordered to one resident (Resident #67). The facility failed to timely treat tardive dyskinesia (involuntary, repetitive movements often caused by long-term use of some psychiatric medications) for one resident (Resident #85). This affected one (Resident #89) of two residents reviewed for hospice services and two (Residents #67 and #85) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 116. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an original admission date on 06/17/22 and a readmission date on 07/13/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing interventions were in place for Resident #41. This affected one resident (#41) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to complete assessments for continuation of an appropriate restorative program. This affected two residents (Resident #43 and Resident #74) of two residents reviewed for Restorative Therapy. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following a choking episode for one resident (Resident #89). This affected one (Resident #89) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 116. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an original admission date on 06/17/22 and a readmission date on 07/13/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, pneumonia (07/14/23), esophageal obstruction (07/14/23), type II diabetes mellitus without complications, heart disease, and encounter for palliative care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 has impaired cognition and scored six out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (Resident #361) of one residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of medication administration records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to attempt a variety of non-pharmacological interventions and did not include parameters for administering as needed (PRN) pain medications to one resident (Resident #85). The facility also failed to ensure appropriate monitoring for antipsychotic medication side effects was completed. This affected two residents (Resident #5 and #85) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 116. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date on 03/22/21 and a readmission date on 04/09/21. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one resident (#71) with a documented lactose intolerance received food free from dairy products containing lactose. This affected one resident (#71) out of one resident reviewed for food allergies or food intolerances. The facility census was 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain accurate resident influenza and pneumonia immunization records. This affected two residents (Resident #88 and Resident #361) out of five residents reviewed for accurate immunization documentation. The census was 116. 1. Review of Resident #88 medical record revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admitting diagnosis including dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety, dysphagia, and weakness. Further review revealed Resident #88 had impaired cognition and impaired hearing. Review of Resident #88 immunization record revealed there was no current influenza vaccine received date or a signed refusal consent by Resident #88 or Power of Attorney (POA) for Resident #88. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide all necessary and reasonable accommodations for a resident with mobility impairments. This affected one (Resident #63) of two residents reviewed for mobility. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were unspecified fracture of left humerus, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, venous insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, unspecified dementia, tremor, anxiety disorder, anemia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hypokalemia, and glaucoma. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not calculated due to her inability to answer the questions, which indicated she had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment was completed on 04/21/21. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update and submit new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screenings when one resident (Resident #82) was diagnosed with additional mental health diagnoses. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure an accurate PASRR screening was completed for one resident (Resident #43). This affected two residents (Residents #43 and #82) out of four residents reviewed for PASRR screenings.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident fall. This affected one (Resident #63) of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 100. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were unspecified fracture of left humerus, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, venous insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, unspecified dementia, tremor, anxiety disorder, anemia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hypokalemia, and glaucoma. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not calculated due to her inability to answer the questions, which indicated she had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment was completed on 04/21/21. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without significant medication errors when one resident (Resident #20) was administered an improper dosage of Coumadin (a blood thinning medication) which resulted in a critically high international normalized ratio (INR). This affected one resident (Resident #20) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure insulin was discarded appropriately after being opened. This affected three residents (Residents #1, #6 and #79) and had the potential to affect fifteen residents (#1, #6, #13, #15, #20, #35, #42, #50, #52, #55, #59, #60, #79, #294, #347) who receive insulin in the facility. The facility census is 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident diets, review of dietary spreadsheets, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the dietary spreadsheet when plain chicken with brown gravy instead of barbeque chicken was served to residents who were prescribed a pureed or mechanical soft diet. This had the potential to affect 26 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #9, #10, #12, #13, #16, #26, #27, #31, #33, #34, #35, #43, #47, #50, #51, #54, #57, #62, #65, #75, #83, #86, #92) who received a pureed diet, a mechanical soft diet, or ground/pureed meats. The facility census was 100. Findings Include: Review of the Diet Order Tally Report-All Special Diets, dated 06/01/21, revealed there were 13 residents on a mechanical soft diet (Residents #2, #3, #9, #13, #16, #26, #33, #34, #43, #47, #50, #57, and #62). [...]
19 fire safety citations on file: 11 on July 29, 2025, 6 on September 28, 2023, 2 on June 7, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.09 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.92 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.78 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.55 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.62 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.22 on weekdays and 3.78 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.14 in April to June 2025 to 4.09 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.92 | 4.22 | 3.78 | 9.0% | 0 of 90 | 119 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.14 | 0.84 | 4.22 | 3.93 | 8.3% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.04 | 0.73 | 4.15 | 3.76 | 7.3% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.14 | 0.83 | 4.23 | 3.91 | 5.7% | 0 of 91 | 114 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.2 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mother Angeline McCrory Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 211 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 192 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
44.4% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.
1.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 103 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 103 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MOTHER ANGELINE MCCRORY MANOR, INC.. CMS links this home to Carmelite Sisters for the Aged & Infirm, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baniewicz, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Barbe, Leonard | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Brown, Don | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Domino, Leda | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Fernandes, Earl | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Gathers, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Haley, Margaret | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Kasper, Rose | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| McNamara, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Pfeffer, Theresa | Corporate director | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Seymour, Bert | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Brown, Don | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Haley, Margaret | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Kasper, Rose | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Pfeffer, Theresa | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Seymour, Bert | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| The Carmelite System Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/19/2001 | |
| Brown, Ann | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2020 | |
| Gathers, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Ndife, Anita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| The Carmelite System Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/27/2024 | |
| Brown, Ann | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/14/2004 | |
| Ndife, Anita | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.