Home / Pennsylvania / Greensburg
827 Georges Station Road, Greensburg, PA 15601 · Westmoreland County · (724) 837-7100
48 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395646 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 8, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 60 health citations since April 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.50 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.00 of those hours.
78.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Core Healthcare, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 60 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored and labeled in a medication cart.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required Non- Medical Coverage (NOMNC) notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare A coverage for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 54 and 55).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative, in writing the regarding reason for transfer to the hospital for three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 5, 28).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for two of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 14 and 15).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional practices that support infection prevention and control for two of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 17 and 44).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and a facility investigation, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications (medications with the potential to be abused) in an emergency access box and failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications for two of two residents reviewed (Resident 1 and Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for nine of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 7, 13, 14, 18, 20, 40, 42).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure urinary output was monitored for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 39, 40, 45) who had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), and failed to ensure that physician's orders were obtained for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 45).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with proper ileostomy care for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 42).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 36, 40).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 7).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of planned, written menus, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their pre-approved planned menu.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility cleaning records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that ice was made and stored in sanitary ice machines for one of one ice machines (pantry room) and failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and facility investigations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 29), and that documentation of an incident was part of the clinical records for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to routinely conduct care plan meetings and invite the resident or interested family member to attend for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 20).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 45) who had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare coverage for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 44).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative, in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital and to ensure that a bed-hold notice was provided to the resident's responsible party for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 29, 36).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop individualized care plans for four of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 20, 36, 45).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's orders for a medication for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 13). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and bathing records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers/baths as scheduled for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible by failing to complete an air mattress safety assessment to identify potential safety hazards for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 20, 36).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that long-term intravenous catheters were flushed as ordered by the physician for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 36).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's person-centered care plan for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safety assessment was completed for side rail/enabler use for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of nurse aides' dates of hire and their most recent performance review dates, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an annual nurse aide performance evaluation for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a separately-locked, permanently-affixed compartment in the refrigerator for the storage of controlled drugs in one of one medication rooms reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper hand washing/hand hygiene was completed during wound care and it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 20).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and facility grievance/complaint logs, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written copy of the grievance/complaint decision was provided to the resident and/or resident representative for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nurse Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a questionable physician's order for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for four of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 8, 9, 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 6, 7, 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 11, 20).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document the opportunity to formulate advance directives and failed to document the resident's decision to accept or decline assistance to formulate advance directives for four of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 26, 34, 41).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that notices of Medicare non-coverage were issued timely for two of three discharged residents reviewed (Residents 44, 45).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the status of nursing licenses was checked with the State Board of Nursing for one of two nurses reviewed (Registered Nurse 4) and failed to complete a Nurse Aide Registry verification for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident, the resident's representative, and the state long-term care ombudsman in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital for two of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 26).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a bed-hold notice was provided to the resident's responsible party for two of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 26) who were transferred to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed that included resident-specific information necessary to properly care for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 242).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 41).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure-relieving interventions were in place as care planned for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 4) who was at risk for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete safety assessments for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 11) and failed to provide safe transport in a wheelchair for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 26).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of medications with the date they were opened in one of one medication carts observed (Colonial Wing).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietitian.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of one hospice residents reviewed (Resident 11).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of a list of nurse aides currently employed by the facility, including their hire dates and training hours, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides had 12 hours of in-service training annually for two of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 6, Nurse Aide 7), and failed to ensure that nurse aides received annual in-service training regarding abuse and dementia for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and facility grievance forms, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility had no documented evidence of the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusion regarding the resident's concerns, or any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1).
3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 18, 2025, 2 on June 13, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.50 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.27 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.06 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.44 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 78.8% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.59 on weekdays and 3.27 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.45 in April to June 2025 to 3.50 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 1.00 | 3.59 | 3.27 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 43 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.54 | 1.01 | 3.63 | 3.31 | 2.2% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.58 | 1.08 | 3.71 | 3.27 | 26.1% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.45 | 0.94 | 3.58 | 3.12 | 36.0% | 0 of 91 | 41 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.1 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.4 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Oak Hill Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
11.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OAK HILL REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Core Healthcare, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Pennsylvania Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/13/2024 |
| Eisen, Joshua | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Raintree Consulting Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/13/2024 | |
| Eisen, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Handwerk, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Shipley, Rachel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Eisen, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Handwerk, Amy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Shipley, Rachel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/13/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.