Home / Pennsylvania / Latrobe
535 McFarland Road, Latrobe, PA 15650 · Westmoreland County · (724) 537-5500
143 certified beds, about 77 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395860 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 62 health citations since January 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.82 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.08 of those hours.
57.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 62 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory results as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 6), failed to ensure that bowel protocols were followed as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 8), and failed to provide pain medication as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 9).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, facility contracts, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain records relating to dialysis communication and collaboration for two of three residents reviewed for dialysis (Residents 6 and 86), and failed to provide a hemodialysis bedside emergency kit for bleeding (a kit that contains several items including a tourniquet, dressings and gloves) for one of three dialysis residents reviewed (Resident 86).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for four of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 4, 76, 86).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, resident interviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received foods that were served at appetizing temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the proper food consistency was prepared for residents receiving a pureed diet as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 94) who had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 28, 35).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteReview of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise/update care plans for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 28, 76).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bowel received appropriate treatment and services to restore as much normal bowel function as possible for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 3), and failed to ensure that physician's orders for an indwelling urinary catheter were followed for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while providing medications for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 67).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, investigation reports, clinical records, and staff education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of five residents reviewed (Residents 2), resulting in a fall with a fractured hip. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards for residents who were at risk for falls for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2) resulting in a fall with a hip fracture. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with the proper food consistency as ordered by the physician for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1), who choked, requiring a hospital admission for hypoxia and aspiration.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 21, 75).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to flush a peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC- catheter inserted in a vein used to deliver fluids and/or medications) and a midline catheter (a type of peripheral catheter inserted into a large vein in the upper arm used to deliver fluids and/or medications) prior to and/or after medication administration for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 283).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label insulin with the date it was opened, failed to discard an expired insulin pen in one of two medication carts reviewed (North Hall), and failed to provide a separately-locked, permanently-affixed compartment in the refrigerator for the storage of controlled drugs (medications that can be abused).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor a resident's right regarding diet consistency for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for three of 36 residents reviewed (Resident's 12, 21, 75).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, a well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 46).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 17) and failed to ensure that a licensed registered nurse followed professional standards regarding the administration of medications for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 75).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policies, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that gastrostomy tube care was provided as ordered by the physician for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 17). The facility's policy regarding gastrostomy tubes (a tube inserted through the belly that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach), dated January 13, 2025, revealed that the facility would ensure that gastrostomy flushes were provided as ordered by the physician. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a resident's continuous oxygen order when not in use for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responded timely to a pharmacy recommendation for four of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 23, 66, 68).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, by failing to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) behavioral interventions (individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care), were attempted prior to the administration of as needed antianxiety medications for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 66).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 53).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 75, 283).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written notice regarding emergency transfer to the hospital was provided to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and failed to ensure that a written notice was provided to the resident and the resident's representative regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital for eight of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 6, 12, 15, 20, 23, 32, 33).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical records reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to bowel medications for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents maintained acceptable parameters for nutritional status by failing to ensure timely notification of the dietician and physician about significant weight losses for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2), resulting in a delay in treatment for Resident 2, and failing to ensure timely notification of the physician about a decline in hydration consumption for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential safety hazards related to the facility's hot water temperatures and failed to monitor temperatures weekly as per policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had a clean and homelike environment on the South and North halls of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers/baths as scheduled for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, Resident Council meeting minutes, and grievance records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make ongoing efforts to resolve grievances for the residents. The deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and information provided by the facility, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' rooms for 10 of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for two of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1) and failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect caused by a failure to administer medications as ordered by the physician for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, job descriptions, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse administered medications as ordered by the physician for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility investigations and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address specific care needs for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 61).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 11).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a physician's order for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 51).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide suprapubic urinary catheter care as ordered by the physician for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policies, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that gastrostomy tube care was provided as ordered by the physician for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 60). The facility's policy regarding gastrostomy tubes (a tube inserted through the belly that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach), dated January 1, 2024, revealed that the facility would ensure that gastrostomy flushes were provided as ordered by the physician. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy as ordered for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 51).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to verify registry verification prior to allowing individuals to work as a nurse aide for two of three newly hired nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 3, 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 51, 61).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain the freezers in two of two medication rooms (North and South), and failed to discard expired medical supplies in one of two medication rooms (South).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff followed proper infection control practices during wound care for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 22).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at palatable temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and the facility's investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible and failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care-planned interventions for advanced directives were consistently implemented for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments performed were documented by the nurse who performed the treatment for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2).
16 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 2, 2026, 1 on March 20, 2025, 12 on April 11, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.82 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.08 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.49 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.22 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.52 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 70.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.80 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.95 on weekdays and 3.49 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.74 in April to June 2025 to 3.82 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.82 | 1.08 | 3.95 | 3.49 | 8.6% | 0 of 90 | 77 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.72 | 0.99 | 3.90 | 3.28 | 11.5% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.85 | 0.98 | 4.01 | 3.45 | 8.4% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.74 | 1.03 | 3.84 | 3.48 | 7.3% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.2 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 42.1 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.2 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Loyalhanna Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (58.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 49 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
29.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LOYALHANNA HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATES.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quest Healthcare Development Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 73% | 01/01/1990 |
| Quest Healthcare Development Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Soohey, Matthew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Quest Healthcare Development Inc | General partnership interest | Organization | 01/15/2009 | |
| Wukich, Daniel | General partnership interest | Individual | 01/15/2009 | |
| Quest Healthcare Development Inc | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Wukich, Daniel | Limited partnership interest | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Quest Healthcare Development Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/29/2025 | |
| Soohey, Matthew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.