1100 West Georgia, Jones, OK 73049 · Oklahoma County · (405) 400-2295
160 certified beds, about 117 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375117 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 21, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 37 health citations since September 2022, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $137,412 in the last three years; the largest was $116,800, and the latest is dated December 3, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.67 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.22 of those hours.
82.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteA past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 11/07/25 related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to prevent elopement. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring increased visual checks was not neglected for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for neglect. LPN #1 identified 119 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 21 residents at risk for elopement.
Inspectors wroteA past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 11/07/25 related to the facility's failure to provide implement interventions for a resident with a known history of elopement. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plan interventions with a known history of elopement risk. LPN #1 identified 119 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 21 residents at risk for elopement.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 115 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) has been removed based on a determination resulting from an Informal Dispute Resolution (IDR). On 09/18/25 at 1:23 p.m., a past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to protect residents from physical abuse. Resident #2 was involved in an altercation with Resident #1 resulting in a fist fight and Resident #1 falling to the ground. Resident #2 continued to sit on and hit Resident #1. Resident #1 lost their balance during the altercation and fell to the floor resulting in a fracture of their left femur. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from physical abuse inflicted by another resident for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 117 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal funds were not misappropriated for 1 (#4) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The assistant director of nursing identified 112 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteOn 01/17/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure Resident #18 was free from abuse by not implementing company policy and procedures. This resulted in Resident #18 experiencing psychosocial harm. A nursing note, dated 12/25/24 at 9:39 a.m., read in part, [Resident #18] was observed walking down 400 hallway. [Resident #54] got mad and started ranting saying that,I will stub them because they didn't like that particular resident. The note also read, [Resident #54] pulled out a rail road track nail with the gestures of attacking [Resident #18]. The note also read, This Nurse yelled for help along side the Nurse aide who was close and witnessed they rushed to intercept and prevent any possible attack to the [Resident #18] who was asked to go back in their room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. wound care was provided as ordered for two (#12 and #57); b. care was coordinated for a non pressure wound for one (#12); c. an order was obtained prior to providing wound care to a resident's wound for one (#12); d. the nurse was notified when the dressing of a wound became dislodged for one (#12); e. staff documented changes in the resident's skin before leaving for the day for one (#12); and f. treatment orders were obtained at the time a new wound was identified for one (#12) of four sampled residents reviewed for non pressure skin conditions. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #12's left gluteal fold wound increased in size after the facility failed to provide treatment as ordered. The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for two (#18 and #54) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The administrator reported the census was 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed timely for two (#67 and #98) of 28 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dishwasher had the appropriate amount of chemicals to sanitize dishes for three of four observations of dishwasher chemical sanitization level checks. ADON #1 identified 112 residents ate meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. wound care was provided in a manner to prevent cross contamination for two (#12 and #57) of three sampled residents observed for wound care; b. a urinary catheter was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#12) of one sampled resident observed with a urinary catheter; and c. infection control logs were completed for five (#22, 25, 54, 81, and #86) of five sampled residents reviewed for staph infections. The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 10 residents with non pressure wounds, two residents with staph infections, and two residents with urinary catheters resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident experienced a change in their skin condition that required medical intervention for one (#12) of four sampled residents reviewed for non pressure skin conditions. The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 10 residents with non pressure wounds resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable shower room in three of the four shower rooms observed. ADON #1 identified the facility had seven shower rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident care plan was revised for one (#57) of one sampled resident observed self-administering a medication. The administrator identifed no residents with orders to self-administer medications resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided as ordered for one (#17) of two sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. ADON #2 identified three residents with pressure ulcers resided in the the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure qualified staff were present during medication administration for one (#57) of one sampled resident observed self-administering a medication. The administrator identifed no residents with orders to self-administer medications resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented for one (#57) of 26 sampled residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 10 residents with non pressure wounds resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility antibiotic stewardship program was implemented for one (#25) of five sampled residents reviewed for staph infections. The DON identified two residents with a current staph infection resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement QAPI for incident reporting of one (#1) of five sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The administrator identified 118 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was securely locked and attended to according to company policy and procedure. The administrator identified 118 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two (#2 and #3) of three sampled residents reviewed for clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The administrator identified 122 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure soiled linen were not placed on the floor to prevent the spread of infection for one of five rooms observed for clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The administrator identified 122 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed report an allegation of abuse to OSDH for one (#5) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 118 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered by the physician for one (#7) of three sampled residents reviewed for lab results. The Administrator identified 118 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an ice machine was maintained in a sanitary manner for one of one ice machine observed. The Administrator identified 117 residents who received nourishment from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from involuntary seclusion for one (#1) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for involuntary seclusion. The administrator identified 119 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not sexually abused by a staff member for one (#12) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator in training identified 118 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of sexual abuse for one (#12) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator in training identified 118 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate portion sizes were served to residents. The Administrator in training identified 118 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to prevent misappropriation of Resident funds for two (#1 and #2) of three residents sampled for misappropriation of property. The Administrator identified 123 Residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to follow physician's orders for wound care prevention for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for wound care prevention. The Administrator identified 123 residents resided in the facility and the facility matrix documented four residents had pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive assessment was completed timely for one (#86) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The Administrator identified 121 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessment was accurate for one (#92) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed for accuracy. The administrator identified 121 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was identified in their clinical record for one (#70) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for code status. The Administrator identified 121 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for one of one treatment carts observed for medication storage. The facility identified 4 medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control during the provision of wound care for one (#92) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The administrator identified 121 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteOn 08/31/22 at 10:16 a.m., LPN #3 was asked how frequently staff screened in. They stated twice a week. They were asked what did the screening process entail. LPN #3 stated they would get their temperature checked, given a nasal swap that they swabbed themselves, and would wait on the results before the start of their shift. On 08/31/22 at 10:18 a.m., CNA #2 was observed wearing a surgical mask, and no eye protection, on memory care unit with Resident #26 (COVID-19 positive) wandering around not in their room. CNA #1 was observed wearing a surgical mask under their nose, and no eye protection, on the memory care unit. They were observed to propel a resident in a wheelchair to the dining room table, walked across memory care unit, got a bag of chips, and took the chips back to the resident, with their mask continually observed under their nose. [...]
22 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 21, 2025, 10 on November 6, 2023, 8 on September 6, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 3, 2025 | Fine | $11,360 |
| September 18, 2025 | Fine | $9,252 |
| January 21, 2025 | Fine | $116,800 |
| January 21, 2025 | Payment Denial | 20 days from February 15, 2025 |
| November 6, 2023 | Payment Denial | 62 days from February 6, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.67 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.22 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.61 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 82.8% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.0% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 2.77 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.26 on weekdays and 2.22 on weekends, 48% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.40 in April to June 2025 to 3.67 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.22 | 4.26 | 2.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 117 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.19 | 3.44 | 3.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.26 | 3.47 | 3.34 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.40 | 0.22 | 3.49 | 3.20 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 117 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.5 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.7 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 58.2 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 39.8 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.7 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Oak Hills Living Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
38.7% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 62 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.
6.5% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OAK HILLS CARE CENTER RECEIVERSHIP, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak Hills Care Center Receivership, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/26/2019 | |
| Goodman, Randy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/26/2019 | |
| Garrett, Alexandra | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/26/2019 | |
| Oak Hills Care Center Receivership, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/26/2019 | |
| Goodman, Randy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/26/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.