Home / Pennsylvania / Everett
208 Pennknoll Road, Everett, PA 15537 · Bedford County · (814) 623-3200
133 certified beds, about 87 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395422 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 23, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 60 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $17,345 in the last three years; the largest was $8,673, and the latest is dated May 29, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.69 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.51 of those hours.
35.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Avardis Health, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 60 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions. The facility's policy for food preparation, dated January 20, 2026, revealed that all utensils, food contact equipment, and food contact surfaces would be cleaned and sanitized after every use. The facility's policy for staff attire, dated January 20, 2026, revealed that all staff members would have facial hair properly restrained. Observations in the main kitchen on June 16, 2026, at 10:26 a.m. revealed the large bin of flour had the plastic scoop stored in the container, and the sugar bin had a plastic bowel stored in the container. Observations of the main kitchen floor revealed sugar packets, removable dried food debris, and other nonfood removable debris (a piece of black plastic). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non pharmalogical interventions were attempted prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Food Committee minutes, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to perform essential kitchen duties in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of planned, written menus, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their pre-approved planned menu, and failed to inform residents of menu changes.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, as well as observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at proper temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food stored in the kitchen was labeled, dated and secured.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 20).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 15, 86, 88,).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, and clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with dental care as scheduled for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards by failing to ensure care-planned interventions were in place for two of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 17, 57) who were at risk for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications properly for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 47).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with assistive devices for eating as ordered by the physician for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the proper hand-washing procedures were followed, and that proper infection control practices were followed for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 47, 80).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and investigation reports, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect which resulted in harm as evidenced by a fall with fracture for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and investigation reports, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe environment was provided for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3) resulting in a fall with fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve palatable food that was at appropriate temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and Food Committee meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make ongoing efforts to resolve resident grievances regarding cold food.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 40, 53).
Inspectors wroteBased on review facility policy, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to store and serve food under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in resident rooms for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of policies, clinical records, personnel files, and investigative reports, as well as interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the abuse policy was followed for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 28), and failed to complete a professional licensure verification with the Pennsylvania State Board of Nursing prior to hire for one of four employees reviewed (Registered Nurse 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident, responsible party, and Ombudsman, in writing, regarding the reason for hospitalization for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 68, 70).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate parties were notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 68, 70).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate, ongoing activities designed to meet the needs of residents for seven of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 14, 20, 24, 36, 63, 66).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's transfer status was followed for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 68).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff available to transport residents to activities and to provide licensed nursing staff in the facility's main dining area for the lunch and dinner meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 10).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' drink and food preferences were honored.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistive devices to eat in accordance with occupational therapy recommendations for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcers were assessed and documented on for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's job descriptions and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consistent services of a full-time Director of Nursing (35 or more hours a week) in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's job descriptions, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consistent services of a full-time Director of Nursing (35 or more hours a week) in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and grievance records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make ongoing efforts to resolve a grievance regarding dietary complaints.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weights were obtained and documented as ordered for residents with weight loss for two of 51 residents reviewed (Residents 12, 42) and failed to ensure supplements were provided and documented as ordered for two of 51 residents reviewed (Residents 77, 97).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 51 residents reviewed (Residents 15, 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on individual resident interviews and an interview with a group of residents, as well as a meal test tray, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of a resident's needs by failing to ensure that the call bell was within reach for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 31).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's attending physician was notified about changes in weight for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 19), failed to notify the physician regarding an elevated blood sugar and change in skin condition for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 47), and failed to notify the physician of purulent drainage from a resident's nephrostomy tube for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 97) .
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans for individualized resident care needs for three of 51 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 42, 68).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 33) and failed to prevent a delay in care for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 97) resulting in his hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 42).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide suprapubic urinary catheter changes as ordered by the physician for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 35).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 95).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to verify registry verification prior to allowing individuals to work as a nurse aide for one of five newly hired nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for four of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 5, 6, 7, 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician or designee responded timely to a pharmacy recommendation for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 15).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to offer routine dental services for one of 51 residents reviewed (Resident 91).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while providing care for two of 51 residents reviewed (Residents 12, 109).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy and observations, as well as family, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable and at proper temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff followed proper infection control practices during wound care for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise residents' care plans for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards by failing to follow physician's orders and care-planned interventions for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2), who was at risk for falls.
8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 23, 2026, 2 on January 15, 2025, 5 on February 23, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2025 | Fine | $8,672 |
| May 29, 2025 | Fine | $8,673 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.69 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.51 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.37 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.4% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 23.1% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.81 on weekdays and 3.37 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.69 in April to June 2025 to 3.69 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.51 | 3.81 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 87 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.64 | 0.65 | 3.74 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.64 | 0.69 | 3.76 | 3.35 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 87 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.69 | 0.62 | 3.81 | 3.40 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.7 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.8 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.3 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.5 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.8 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pennknoll Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (41.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
41.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 47 eligible stays.
30.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
5.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 208 PENNKNOLL ROAD OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Avardis Health, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everett Parentco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2025 |
| Bedford Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Paop Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Everett Re Owner, LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Clark, Alyssa | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Clark, Alyssa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Dilling, Duane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Jones, Tequilla | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Marinski, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Swartz, Jana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Everett Re Owner, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/20/2025 | |
| Clark, Alyssa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Dilling, Duane | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Jones, Tequilla | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Marinski, Ashley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Swartz, Jana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.