255 West 69th Street, Chicago, IL 60621 · Cook County · (773) 224-5900
225 certified beds, about 191 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145688 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 18, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 49 health citations since September 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $4,888 in the last three years; the largest was $4,888, and the latest is dated June 20, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.64 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
47.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to The Alden Network, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 49 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteF600Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to affirm the right of residents (R4 and R5) to be free from abuse. On May 16, 2026, R4 hit/struck R5 on the face and head, resulting in R4 sustaining a fracture of the right hand fifth metacarpal. A total of six residents were reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure resident right to maintain family authorized oversight by covering an in-room electronic monitoring device for one resident (R5) of five reviewed during patient care in a sample if 15.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper food safety procedures (did not clean the thermometer with alcohol between uses). This failure have the potential to affect all 181 residents receiving an oral diet in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to failed to ensure a homelike environment for three residents (R34, R77 and R192). Additionaly, the facility failed to ensure the lint trap was in good repair; and failed to empty the lint compartment in an effort to provide a safe environment to residents. These failures have the potential to affect 188 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents had a privacy curtain which extended around the bed. This failure affected four residents (R141, R146, R157, and R159) in the total sample of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for activities for one resident for the individualized activity care plan. This failure affected one resident (R140) reviewed for activities care plans in a sample of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that two residents (R6, and R192) who depend on staff's assistance for their ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care received shaving. This failure affected two out of 67 residents reviewed for ADL care.
Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities for one resident with cognitive impairment . This failure affected one resident (R140) reviewed for activities and programming in a sample of 67 residents
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interviews, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent weight loss for 1 out of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for nutritional care. These failures are not in accordance with facility's nutrition policy and affected 1 resident (R3) who sustained multiple significant weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents in the facility were free from abuse. This failure affected one of three (R4) residents reviewed for abuse and resulting in R4 acquiring a laceration to the head requiring sutures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable home like environment [A] failed to maintain adequate running water for one [R1] resident on the third floor and [B] failed to maintain a dry home like environment due to leaking roof. This failure has the potential affect all sixty residents residing on the third floor. Findings Include:Maintenance Log indicates the following in part:1/23/25 R1's room ceiling. [third floor].3/31/25 R1's room no running water in bathroom. [third floor]5/27/25 Next door to R1's room ceil tile wet and falling [third floor]5/30/25 R1's room no running water in bathroom. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy to obtain informed consent and develop plan of care for psychotropic medication use. These failures affected five (R1, R6, R7, R10 and R11) out of six residents reviewed for improper nursing care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a resident (R2) who required a physical and occupational therapy evaluation. This failure affected 1 resident out of 3 residents reviewed for therapy services.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to implement care plan interventions, and failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care to one of three dependent residents (R3) reviewed for quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide, (A) incontinence care, (B) assistance with oral hygiene for five [R1, R3, R4, R5, R6] out of five residents who requires assistance with activities of daily living in a total sample of seven residents Findings Include, R1's clinical record indicates in part: R1'a medical diagnosis includes but not limited to dysplasia of anus, syphilis, gastrostomy, asthma, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute chronic congestive heart failure, seizure disorder, human immunodeficiency virus HIV disease, pulmonary embolism, tachycardia, cerebral infarction stroke, constipation, vitamin D deficiency, anemia, depressive mood disorder, sepsis, hypotension, and essential hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to a.) follow a physician's order and b.) failed to relay the need for a physician order and implement a system to ensure that specific treatments or procedures, which requires a physician's order, were being carried out for 1 (R1) of 3 (R5, R7) residents reviewed for therapy services. This failure has the potential to affect the effectiveness of patient care and lead to improper/delayed treatment. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 (R116 and R159) residents' call lights main plates were attached, failed to ensure 5 residents' (R112, R133, R136, R179 and R434) bathroom sinks were functioning properly and failed to ensure 1 resident's (R133) room was well-maintained/in good repair. These failures have the potential to affect 7 residents (R112, R116, R133, R136, R159, R179 and R434) reviewed for safe and clean homelike environment, in a total sample of 66 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily living) care for 5 dependent residents (R30, R34, R70, R91, R95). This failure affected 5 residents out of a sample size of 66 residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assure that emergency medical equipment stored to be used in emergency basic life support was checked daily. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all sixty one residents that reside on the 3rd floor of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the janitor closet was locked at all times where residents with a diagnosis of dementia reside. This failure has the potential to affect all the 25 residents on the 2nd floor [NAME] Wing of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label opened multi dose vials. This failure has the potential to affect 2 residents (R43 and R109) reviewed for medications in the sample of 66 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the container of the multi blood glucose test strips was labeled with an open date. These failures have the potential to affect 10 residents (R23, R36, R41, R43, R59, R68, R72, R88, R109, and R435) on team 2 who receive blood glucose monitoring tests on the first floor, reviewed for medication storage in storage in the sample of 66 residents
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call lights, in the third floor shower room, were functioning properly. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all sixty one residents that reside on the 3rd floor of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to maintain effective pest control on the third floor. This failure has the potential to affect three (R4, R7, and R30) of three residents observed in a census of 61 residents on the third-floor unit. Findings Include: On 02/23/25 at 11:30 AM, V27, observed a brown creature crawling across the floor and Housekeeper verified that it is a live roach crawling across the floor where R4, R7, and R30 reside. On 2/23/25 at 11:33 am V27(Housekeeper) walked to R4, R7 and R30's room and verified with surveyor multiple dead roaches on glue traps and mouse traps under a wall heater. V27, (housekeeper) stated that she reports any findings of pests or rodents to maintenance and maintenance will take care of it. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light device was within reach to use for staff assistance for two residents (R59, R84) in the sample of 66 residents reviewed for accommodations of needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview,observation and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident was scheduled for his follow up appointment for hearing for one (R91) of one resident reviewed for hearing and vision in a sample of 60 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the oxygen tubing was labeled with dates when changed, failed to ensure the oxygen tubing was contained when not in use, failed to contain a Bipap (Bilevel positive airway pressure) mask when not in use, and failed to obtain an order for oxygen per nasal cannula. These failures affected one resident (R43) reviewed in a sample of 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor personal refrigerator temperature logs for one resident. This failure affected one resident (R43) out of 66 residents in the total sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing staffing information was accurate. These failures affected all 185 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility is free of pests and rodents. This deficiency has the potential of affecting all 178 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Low Air Loss Mattress (LALM) for pressure ulcer prevention is functional for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers. This failure affected one resident, R1, who is at high risk for pressure ulcers, of four residents, reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention interventions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a second staff member was present to assist in a mechanical lift transfer for three resident (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed for accidents and incidents in the sample. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to the right foot requiring five sutures and a fracture to the right great toe.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the facility is free of cockroaches. This failure has the potential to affect all 159 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that (R138's) call light was functioning properly, failed to ensure that (R55's) noisy heater was repaired, failed to ensure that (R55's) screen was repaired, and failed to provide and/or repair damaged furniture for six of 63 residents (R37, R55, R98, R126, R136, R138) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care to five dependent residents (R7, R37, R55, R78, R138) in the sample of 63.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement (R55, R136, R138) fall prevention interventions, and failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were provided to meet the individualized needs for six of 52 (3rd floor) dependent residents (R7, R37, R55, R98, R136, R138). These failures have the potential to affect 52 (3rd floor) residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two licensed personnel conducted a physical inventory of controlled substances at each change of shift. These failures have the potential to affect nine residents (R45, R86, R130, R201, R202, R203, R204, R205, R206) receiving controlled substances residing on the second floor. The facility also failed to follow physician's order for one resident (R14) during an observation of medicatoin administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to label an opened multi dose vial. This failure has the potential to affect 1 resident (R132) reviewed for medications in the sample of 63 residents. The facility also failed to ensure that the (3rd floor) medication cart was locked while unattended, this failure has the potential to affect 52 (3rd floor) floor residents
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the container of the multi blood glucose test strips were labeled with the open date. These failures have the potential to affect 6 residents (R45, R103, R204, R207, R208 and R209) who receive blood glucose monitoring tests.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a mobility device for one of 63 residents (R55) in the sample reviewed for range of motion/mobility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to take prevantative safety measures to ensure a resident's bed reduced the risk of a fall or injury for two of 63 residents (R55, R138) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders, implement care plan interventions, ensure staff are aware of policy procedures, follow policy procedures, and failed to provide catheter care for one of 63 residents (R98) in the sample reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure nebulizer masks were labeled and contained, failed to ensure the nebulizer tubing was off the floor, failed to ensure nasal cannula was dated, and failed to ensure a resident's nebulizer machine and CPAP (Continuous positive airway pressure) Mask were not on roommate's dresser. These failures affected two (R78 and R136) residents reviewed for respiratory care in the total sample of 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%. There were two medication errors out of 26 opportunities, resulting in a 7.69% medication error rate. Two of 13 residents (R14, R100) in the medication administration sample were affected.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 garbage dumpster's had lids to properly contain disposable waste. Findings Include: On 12/21/23 at 09:00 AM, V27 (Maintenance Director/Building Manager) and the surveyor conducted an exterior tour of the facility. There was a gap observed to the lower bracket of the southeast delivery door number 6. The extension door was observed to have rust to the lower right corner with a visible gap. V27 stated, This is the delivery door where the garbage is stored in the trash roller bins. Three- large, uncovered garbage bins with no lids, full of multiple filled with bags of garbage, were observed in the area near door number 6 next to the wall. On 12/21/23 at 09:54 AM, the surveyor entered the garbage room with V32 (Housekeeping Supervisor). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the pest control recommendations to help prevent pest from gaining access to the facilities interior. This failure has the potential to affect 159 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 12/19/23 at 12:25 PM, V29 (Resident Assistant) stated, Residents have complained about seeing mice, but I have not seen any. On 12/19/23 at 12:29 PM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, People say they see mice, but I have not seen any. On 12/19/23 at 12:54 PM, V31 (Housekeeping) stated, I have seen mice in rooms. If the mouse is dead on a trap, we clean up and get the trap out of the room. I have only seen one dead mouse; it was on the sticky trap. On 12/19/21 at 1:02 PM, V18 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated, Residents will tell me what happened on the 11 pm - 7 am shift as far as seeing mice. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a cognitively impaired resident (R1); failed to visually check every two hours for the presence of one of four residents (R1) reviewed who were at risk for elopement and wandering; and failed to ensure the facility entrance/exit was secure. As a result, R1 eloped from the facility on the night of 8/07/23, without the facility staff being aware the resident (R1) was missing until the morning of 8/08/23. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy which began on 8/07/2023, when R1 eloped from the facility unnoticed and was unaccounted for. V1 (Administrator) was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on 8/28/2023. On 8/31/23, an acceptable removal plan was received after revision from the original plan submitted 8/28/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (R1) remains free from abuse/neglect, and failed to appropriately follow the abuse/ neglect policy and the elopement policy and procedure. As a result, R1 eloped from the facility on 08/07/23 during the night shift (11pm to 7am shift) and facility was unaware that she had eloped for approximately 11 hours. These failures had the potential to affect other residents residing on the 1st floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards by documenting medication as given when the resident was not in the facility. This affected one resident (R1) reviewed for professional standards.
34 fire safety citations on file: 9 on March 18, 2026, 14 on February 26, 2025, 11 on April 17, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,888 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.64 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.37 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.59 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.58 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.1% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.0% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.75 on weekdays and 2.37 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.71 in April to June 2025 to 2.64 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.64 | 0.47 | 2.75 | 2.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 191 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.63 | 0.46 | 2.76 | 2.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 193 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.64 | 0.42 | 2.80 | 2.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 189 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.71 | 0.37 | 2.84 | 2.41 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 189 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 36.6 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.5 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Princeton Rehab & HCC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
7.1% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ALDEN-PRINCETON REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC.. CMS links this home to The Alden Network, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Alden Group, Ltd. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2008 |
| Audra Elisco Grantor Tr Dated 11/02/2004 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 21% | 03/01/2018 |
| Lauren Magnusson Grantor Tr Dated 11/02/2004 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 21% | 02/28/2018 |
| Randi Schullo Grantor Tr Dated 11/02/2004 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 21% | 02/28/2018 |
| Elisco, Arin | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 07/01/2013 |
| Elisco, Charles | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 07/01/2013 |
| Magnusson, Garrett | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 07/01/2013 |
| Magnusson, Paige | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 07/01/2013 |
| Schullo, Joseph | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 07/01/2013 |
| Schullo, Nicole | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 07/01/2013 |
| Midcap Funding IV Trust | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 07/10/2010 | |
| Davis, Esther | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/15/2012 | |
| Perryman-Johnson, Carolyn | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Carl, Joan | Corporate director | Individual | 08/24/1990 | |
| Schlossberg, Floyd | Corporate director | Individual | 08/24/1990 | |
| Carl, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/24/1990 | |
| Schlossberg, Floyd | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/24/1990 | |
| Schullo, Randi | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/16/2010 | |
| Alden Management Services, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/10/1990 | |
| Molitor, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/16/2008 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.