415 Friant Street, Grand Haven, MI 49417 · Ottawa County · (616) 842-4120
34 certified beds, about 27 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235535 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2026, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since January 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
71.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Atrium Centers, an affiliated group of 26 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThis citation is related to intake #2973235Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat two of four residents (Resident # 103 and an unidentified resident) with dignity and respect when assisting them with breakfast.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow contact precautions for one of three resident's (Resident #104) reviewed for infection control practices.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of premises and equipment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living for residents. Findings Include:On 02/09/2026 at 11:46AM, food debris observed on base of a lift, stored in [NAME] hallway. Food debris consisted of food ground into the mat sitting in indented area of base and loose food particles. During facility walkthrough on 02/09/2026 at 2:00PM, with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) T, food debris was observed on matting at base of equipment. It appears this is the same food debris seen in the morning. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #s 2655849 and 2663547. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #10 and #17), and residents in attendance at the resident group meeting, reviewed for resident rights, dignity and respect.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to formulate and complete advanced directives in a timely manner for 4 of 17 residents (R2, R4, R6, and R24) reviewed for advanced directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provider was immediately notified of a change in resident medical condition for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #8, #10, #30, and #5), reviewed for notification of change.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure medications and treatments were administered/completed following the physician order for 6 residents (Resident #21, #18, #6, #31, #17, and #5) out of 12 residents reviewed for nursing professional standards of practice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities for Daily Living (ADL) care was consistently provided for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #17 and #18) and residents in attendance at the resident group meeting, reviewed for ADL care.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #2741552Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and 2.) ensure that controlled pain medications were administered following provider orders and the residents' goals and preferences for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #24, R6, R1, and R20) and residents in attendance at the resident group meeting, reviewed for pain management.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the physician failed to address pharmacy recommendations, the facility failed to implement physician approved pharmacy recommendations, and/or the facility failed to implement physician approved pharmacy recommendations timely for 4 of 5 residents (R2, R3, R12, and R24) reviewed for monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders without errors for 2 (R17 and R5) of the 7 residents observed during the medication administration task. This resulted in a facility medication error rate of 10.34% (3 errors out of 29 opportunities).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired medications and ensure opened medications were dated in one of one medication cart and in one of one medication storage room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices for storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly assess one resident (R9) out of twelve reviewed for self-administration of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for hospital transfers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 Screenings timely for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (R2 and R12).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility policy for pressure injury/wound management for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #21, #17, and #6) reviewed for alterations in skin integrity.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for 3 of 12 sample residents (R2, R3, and R27).
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes 1275497 and 1275498. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1) operationalize policies and procedures, 2) provide services as documented, 3) notify physician of wounds with oversight, 3) timely interventions of wounds, and 4) implement care plan interventions of wounds for 3 residents (R5, R6, and R9) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the development and worsening of pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes 1275500. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure care conferences were completed and 2.) ensure residents/their representatives participated in their cares at the facility for 3 residents (R2, R4, and R8) of 4 residents reviewed for care conferences. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the facility and use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure resident cares and services met the residents needs to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director's involvement in the collaboration, coordination, and oversight of cares and services for 6 residents (R2, R4, R5, R6, R8, and R9), of 6 residents reviewed for physician involvement. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside at the facility. Ancillary Services for Vision CareResident #2 (R2)Review of a Face Sheet for R2 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 7/8/25 at 9:03 AM, Family Member (FM) I reported concerns about R2 needing to see the eye doctor for a few months and as of last month R2 needed new glasses. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 1275499, 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures for an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program by not monitoring, identifying, developing and promptly implementing corrective actions. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) follow physician orders to obtain labs and change medication orders for 1 resident (R2) and 2.) ensure physician supervision of wounds for three residents (R5, R6, and R9), of 5 residents reviewed for physician supervision and the effectiveness of treatments.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) implement systematic documentation and accurate reflection of 2 residents (R2, R5 and R6) of 4 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records and 2.) ensure wound dressing changes were not falsified for 1 resident (R5) of 4 residents reviewed for treatment administration.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 1275499 and 1275500. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures and report allegations of neglect for 1 resident (R8) of 2 residents who complained of not receiving afternoon medications during resident council. Findings Include:Review of an Abuse Prevention Program Policy & Procedure last reviewed 1/2025 revealed: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and corporal punishment of any type by staff or anyone. Neglect, is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. REPORTING/RESPONSE: [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) operationalize policies and procedures, to 2) investigate and address allegations of neglect for two residents (R8 and another unknown resident from resident council) who alleged they did not receive afternoon medications, 3) ensure the alleged staff had current abuse/neglect training, and 4) continue to monitor, correct, and prevent further neglect of dressing changes and wound care not being provided, for three residents (R5, R6, and R9) of 4 residents reviewed for wound care after a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was reported to the State Agency on 5/10/25.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 1275500. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate and provide vision services for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for ancillary services.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 1275498, 1275500, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide agency staff training/orientation to the facility prior to starting their shift for 2 of 2 agency nurses reviewed for training and one agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 33 residents who reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 1275498, 1275500, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) received their annual competencies out of 2 CNAs reviewed for sufficient training and continuing competencies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 33 residents who reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living, affecting residents in following areas: During an observation on 12/02/24 at 9:21 AM, the following were noted in the living area of bed 14-2: (a) the window blinds had multiple broken slats, (b) the foot board of the bed had fall off and laid on the floor at the end of the bed on top of the machine that controlled the APM (alternating pressure mattress), and (c) at the foot of the bed a strip of molding that secured and protected a cord had been pulled off the wall and laid on the floor. During an observation on 12/02/24 at 9:59 AM, the following was noted in the east hall dining room: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Guardian of changes for one (R30) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep comfortable temperatures and a homelike environment for 5 (R10, R3, R13, R29, R4) of 5 residents reviewed for comfortable temperatures and homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to account for controlled substances according to professional standards for three of four residents reviewed. (Resident #28, Resident #29, and Resident #32)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food at a palatable temperature to 3 of 16 residents and all residents who consume food resulting in the potential for decreased food consumption and potential nutritional decline. During a tour of lunch service, at 12:08 PM on 12/2/24, an interview with Dietary Manager (DM) D found that the plate warmer has not been working that good since he started a month ago. At this time the plates were found to be 88F. DM D stated that he's only been here a month and has had the plate warmer looked at a couple times. When asked if there was a way to turn it up, DM D stated it only has an on and off switch. Outside of thermal covers, the facility does not use any other equipment to ensure hot food to residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bedtime snacks to four of four residents (Resident #17, Resident #5, Resident #12, and Resident #133) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one resident ( Resident #133) out of four residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to resolve a grievance for missing items for one (R183) of one resident reviewed for missing items.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one (R30) of one resident reviewed for care plans and interventions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care for 1 (R13) of two residents reviewed for foot care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely secure and store an oxygen tank for one (R183) of one resident reviewed for oxygen tank storage. Findings; R183 During an observation and an interview on 12/2/24 at 9:51 AM, R183 was not in her room, and her coat and a bag of belongings sat in a chair. A portable oxygen tank also sat in the chair laying across the arms of the chair. The Director of Nursing (DON) walked by at this time and the placement of the portable oxygen tank was pointed out to her. The DON reported that it should not stored in that manner. Review of an Oxygen Storage policy last reviewed 1/2024 revealed: -[Oxygen] Cylinders must be secured in racks or by chains.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights, provide appropriate nutrition, meals and supplements as ordered, and provide assistance with meals for two (R30 and R29) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and label medications with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1) label medications in the medication cart and the medication room and 2) secure a medication cart when unattended, potentially affecting all facility residents, resulting in the potential for residents to receive another resident's medications, the potential for cross-contamination from the sharing of resident medications, the potential for residents to receive expired/ less effective medications, the potential for expired Tuberculin Protein Derivative being administered, the potential for inaccurate tuberculin test results from possible oxidation and degradation of the solution, and the potential for unauthorized access to the medication cart and misappropriation of resident medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain the seals on the cooler unit and keep it clean; 2. Provide adequate/sufficient cold holding equipment in order to ensure proper thawing, cooling and storage of potentially hazardous and non-potentially hazardous foods; 3. Ensure proper working order of a dish machine; 4. Ensure chemicals are being properly stored; 5. Bulk storage containers are properly labeled; 6. Ensure equipment is maintained and functions in properly. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that can affect 25 residents who consume food and beverages from the kitchen. 1. During a tour of the kitchen, on 1/8/24 at 10:25 AM, the True 2 door cooler unit (only commercial cooler) was observed to have torn door seals. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 of 3 Residents (R84) reviewed for notice of Medicare Non-Coverage with advanced notice of the ending of Medicare coverage, resulting in the potential for R84 to have unexpected medical expenses and financial hardship.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake: MI00140469. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility after being sent to the hospital for psychiatric issues for one resident, Resident #79 (R79), of three reviewed for facility-initiated transfers, resulting in R79 being displaced and denied psychiatric help due to having to be held in the Emergency Department (ED) for 2-3 weeks because he did not have a home to return to.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with dialysis for the medical care of 1 Resident (R9) of 1 Resident reviewed for Dialysis care, resulting in the potential for medical needs to be missed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a monthly pharmacy medication regimen review was performed and/or the pharmacy recommendation was acted upon in a timely manner after the physician approved the recommendation for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (R9 and R15), resulting in the pharmacy not performing a monthly medication regimen review for R9, the pharmacy recommendation not being implemented after the physician approved it in a timely manner for R15, the potential for the physician not being made aware of potentially serious concerns with a resident's medication regimen, and the potential for serious adverse effects from a delay in implementing a physician approved pharmacy recommendation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide collaborative care for 1 hospice Resident (R24) of 1 Resident reviewed for hospice care, resulting in the potential for unmet needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have the required Quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meeting that included key personnel (Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and at least one of who must be: Nursing Home Administrator, a board member or other individual in leadership role and the Infection Preventionist) for 1 of the 4 quarters in 2023, resulting in the potential for quality improvement concerns to be missed.
32 fire safety citations on file: 17 on February 12, 2026, 6 on December 4, 2024, 9 on January 10, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.72 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.33 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.17 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 71.0% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.22 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 18.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.35 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.72 | 0.72 | 3.88 | 3.33 | 18.4% | 0 of 90 | 27 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.57 | 0.76 | 3.73 | 3.16 | 18.3% | 0 of 92 | 31 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.42 | 0.86 | 3.50 | 3.21 | 28.0% | 0 of 92 | 31 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.35 | 0.71 | 3.50 | 2.99 | 9.3% | 0 of 91 | 31 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.0 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.2 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.6 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Riverside Nursing Centre's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ATRIUM HILLCREST, LLC. CMS links this home to Atrium Centers, a group of 26 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrium Centers, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/01/2007 |
| Bailey, Essel | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2007 | |
| Finney, Donald | Corporate director | Individual | 08/22/2012 | |
| McDermott, Thomas | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/13/2019 | |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2007 | |
| Orion Operating Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2007 | |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Lockhart, Dennis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2018 | |
| McGahan, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/25/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.