3625 St. Joseph Rd, New Albany, IN 47150 · Floyd County · (812) 948-0670
115 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155488 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 8, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 36 health citations since March 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.09 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.42 of those hours.
34.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure parameters for a resident (Resident B) were followed, as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings Include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/23/26 at 10:45 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypotension (low blood pressure) The physician's order, dated 2/6/26, indicated the resident was to receive Midodrine HCl (hydrochloride) 2.5 mg (milligrams) three times a day at 8:00 a.m.,12:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. for hypotension. The medication was to be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (top number measuring the pressure in arteries when the heart contracts) was above 130. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory assessments and respiratory care equipment were in place for a resident (Resident B) who received breathing treatments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the hot water temperatures were between 100 and 120 degrees. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 82 of 82 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to document medication administration for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an intravenous ( IV) antibiotic was given in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents 2 and 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the food was disposed of once expired, the vents were cleaned and repaired, the refrigerator thermostat and drip pan under the stove top were repaired. This had the potential to affect 93 of 95 residents who consume meals from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified when long acting insulin was held and when blood pressure, cardiac and blood thinner medications were refused for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification. (Resident 49)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 243) Findings Include: The record for Resident 243 was reviewed on 5/5/25 at 11:17 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy without gangrene, and sepsis due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, and hyperglycemia. The physician's order, dated 4/9/25, indicated the resident was to receive Lispro 100 units per mg before meals for diabeties. The staff were to administer the rsident's insulin based on a sliding scale. The staff were to notifiy the physician if the resident's blood surgar level was less the 70 or grater than 400. If the resident's blood sugar level was 151 to 200 staff were to administer 2 units; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions and treatments were completed for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 53).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient information related to a resident's blood sugar was rechecked; and physician notification and verbal orders were documented in the resident's clinical record for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for Documentation. (Resident 243)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were not signed out prior to administration times for 7 of 11 residents reviewed for medication storage. (Resident E, Resident M, Resident N, Resident R, Resident S, Resident T and Resident U)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration records reflected the administration of narcotic medications for 4 of 11 residents reviewed for medical records. (Resident M, Resident N, Resident O and Resident V)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Indwelling catheter care orders were implemented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Indwelling catheters. (Resident M)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the anti-psychotic medication was documented as administered (Resident G) and failed to ensure resident's (Resident C and Resident E) medication administration records reflected the administration of narcotic medication for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for medical records.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behaviors were care planned and monitored for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for behavior management. (Residents B, D, and G)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure affective interventions were in place for a resident with increased sexually inappropriate behaviors for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's call lights were within reach for 10 of 108 residents observed for call light placement. (Residents 20, 77, 256, 60, 47, 91, 11, 38, 46 and 94)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure Administration was taking resident concerns seriously or being visible to the residents for 11 of 13 Resident Council meetings (3/23, 4/23, 5/23, 6/23, 7/23, 9/23, 10/23, 1/24, 3/24. 4/24, and 5/24). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 108 of 108 residents currently residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) tested for their licensure, prior to 120 days after of employment and worked past the 120 days for 6 of 33 CNAs reviewed. (CNAs 13, 14, 16, 15, 19, and 17)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were at appropriate temperatures and palatable for residents, during 3 of 3 meal test trays. This had the potential to affect 106 of 108 residents who ate meals at the facility. (100, 400, and 200 Hall Test Trays)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was cleaned and in good repair 2 of 2 observations. This had the potential to affect 106 of 108 residents who consumed meals at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident's right heel pressure ulcer prior to the wound being first identified as an open blister, no longer holding fluid for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 8)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing which contributed to the lack of resident care, the distribution of fluids, and supervision. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 104 of 104 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were healthy and appetizing for residents, during 1 of 2 meal test trays. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents who ate meals at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms were clean and free of debris for 4 of 5 random observations of the facility environment and for 5 of 104 residents that reside in the facility. (Residents 81, 105, 67, 20, and 33)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rooms were free of hazards related to multiple medications, including controlled substances, were found on the bedroom floors in 5 of 61 resident rooms. (Residents 15, 32, 86, 20, and 97)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was cleaned and in good repair, and food was stored properly in the dry goods room and refrigerator. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents who consumed meals at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were COVID-19 tested in accordance with their policy for 6 of 12 residents reviewed for COVID testing. (Residents 80, 76, 89, 70, 87 and 92).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents B, H, and J)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of a resident's property had not occurred, related to a missing narcotic card for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident 71)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure preventative interventions were implemented for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents E, O, and F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper perineal and catheter care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Residents M and D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored for weight loss and provided with assistance for eating for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents 89, 59, and 70)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented to prevent recurrent resident to resident aggressive behaviors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident 45)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Infection Control practices related to transmission-based precautions (TBP) were implemented related to Aerosol-Generating Procedures (AGP's) for 2 of 2 random observations of care. (Resident 87)
46 fire safety citations on file: 16 on May 8, 2025, 17 on May 16, 2024, 13 on March 3, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.09 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.42 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.83 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.60 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 34.2% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.20 on weekdays and 2.83 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.16 in April to June 2025 to 3.09 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.09 | 0.42 | 3.20 | 2.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.18 | 0.52 | 3.30 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.12 | 0.52 | 3.26 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.16 | 0.52 | 3.31 | 2.79 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 96 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.7 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.7 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Rolling Hills Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (40.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
40.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 56 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
80.8% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Lehman, Scott | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Macklin, Larry | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| McIntire, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Smith, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Sprunger, Kyle | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Wheeler, Dane | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Adams County Memorial Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| St. Joseph Mgt Co LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2017 | |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Jenkins, Stefanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Lehman, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Macklin, Larry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Masroor, Muhammad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| McIntire, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Smith, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Sprunger, Kyle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Wheeler, Dane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Blue Management Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| First Bank of Berne | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Omega Healthcare Investors Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2017 | |
| Omg in Mstr Lsco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/18/2025 | |
| St. Joseph Mgt Co LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2017 | |
| Jenkins, Stefanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Masroor, Muhammad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/18/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.