Find a nursing home

Home / Wisconsin / Sparta

Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr

14400 Cty Hwy B, Sparta, WI 54656 · Monroe County · (608) 269-8800

50 certified beds, about 48 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525430 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 24 health citations since January 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.36 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.99 of those hours.

35.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
18D
2E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 21, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. J
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) for 1 of 19 sampled Residents (R2) and 1 of 1 supplemental Residents (R58) reviewed for change of condition. R58 was diagnosed with Covid 19 on [DATE] and then pneumonia on [DATE]. On [DATE], R58 had noted oxygen saturation levels in the low 80s, complained of shortness of breath (SOB), labored breathing and was also noted to be more fatigued than the day prior and disoriented at times. There is no evidence comprehensive assessment or R58's physician being updated of R58s condition changes and R58 expired [DATE]. [...]
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 49 residents who reside in the facility. Surveyor observed [NAME] U not allow thermometer to air dry before probing food. Surveyor observed [NAME] U reheat mashed potatoes in the microwave and then serve them without getting the internal temperature to 165 degrees F (Fahrenheit). Surveyor observed the facility's mixer to have food particles on the undercarriage. Surveyor observed [NAME] BB remove gloves, use a marker to label a plastic bag and then go back to working with food without washing his hands. Evidenced by:Example 1Facility policy, titled Food Handling, reviewed 5/7/26, includes: [...]
  3. F
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    F868 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting of the required members to identify issues through the committee. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 49 residents currently in the facility. The IPC (Infection Prevention and Control nurse) did not attend Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings on 2 out of 4 quarterly meetings. This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Quality Assurance/Assessment and Performance Improvement Plan, undated, includes: The Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee consist of the Director of Nursing Services, the Medical Director, the Administrator, at least two other members of the facility staff, and the infection control and prevention officer. [...]
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure advance directive paperwork was on file for 1 of 19 sampled residents (R7) reviewed for advance directives. R7's chart did not contain a copy of her advance directive paperwork specifying her designated power of attorney. This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, titled Heath Care Power of Attorney, Advanced Directives and POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) Form Use, revised 5/8/26, states, in part: Policy: Rolling Hills Rehab Center recognizes the desires of a resident who is capable of making his/her own health care decisions supersedes the effect of an advance directive at all times. Advanced Directives can be a Health Care Power of Attorney (HCPOA) form, a POST Form, or a Living Will form. Procedure: 1. [...]
  5. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not notify and consult with a resident's physician when there was a change in condition. This occurred for 1 of 19 Residents (R25) reviewed for notification of change in condition. R25 had unwitnessed falls on 1/2/26 and 3/26/26 with no notification to the medical provider. Evidenced by: Facility Policy Subject: Falls Assessment Procedure: 3. CONSULT WITH Physician if head injury or injury caused a significant change in status. R25 was admitted to the facility on the 10/29/24. Her diagnoses include: Hallucinations(a false sensory experience that feels readl, even though it is created by the mind), Generalized anxiety disorder(chronic uncontrollable and excessive worrying about everyday things that feels impossible to turn off). [...]
  6. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents while an investigation was in process for 1 of 3 residents (R7) investigated for an incident involving alleged abuse. A staff member involved in a facility reported incident was not directly supervised at all times while working to ensure protection of other residents after the facility became aware of an allegation of abuse made by R7. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy, titled Misconduct Investigation & Reporting, reviewed 2/24/25, states, in part: Policy: Rolling Hills Senior Living prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. [...]
  7. D
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    F675 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 19 Residents (R25) received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. R25 requested side rails to aid in bed mobility and the facility did not provide the side rails to R25 timely. This is evidenced by:R25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system), restless leg syndrome (a neurological disorder characterized by an irresistible urge to move the legs), rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic autoimmune disorder where the immune system attacks the joint lining causing inflammation, swelling, and stiffness) and chronic pain. [...]
  8. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided with such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for oxygen. R6 did not have oxygen tubing/nasal cannula changed on a monthly basis. Evidenced by:The facility's Oxygen Therapy policy, dated 1/2026, states, in part: .8. Replace nasal cannula monthly. R6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (a condition when the lungs cannot adequately supply oxygen to the blood or remove carbon dioxide); Cor pulmonale, chronic (the enlargement and failure of the right ventricle of the heart caused by high pressure in the lungs arteries, linked to lung disease); [...]
January 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for one of five sampled residents (Resident (R)2) reviewed for allegations of abuse. The facility failed to notify the State Agency (SA) in a timely manner regarding an alleged incident involving R2.
February 20, 2025Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections that has the ability to affect all 50 residents (R). -Facility staff failed to transport linens in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. -Facility staff did not properly doff personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). -Facility staff demonstrated poor hand hygiene during medication administration. -Facility staff did not prep skin prior to administering a subcutaneous injection of insulin. This is evidenced by: [...]
  2. E
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to maintain range of motion (ROM). This had the potential to affect four residents (R) reviewed for mobility (R25, R26, R30, and R31). -R25 was not provided restorative services at least three times per week as identified in her care plan. -R26's care plan did not identify the frequency and duration of restorative services needed. -R30 was not provided restorative services daily as identified in her care plan. -R31 was not provided restorative services five times per week as identified in her care plan. This is evidenced by: Per Appendix PP of the State Operations Manual (SOM), regulation F688 reads in part . [...]
  3. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures and did not protect 2 of 3 residents from abuse. (R43, R35). R43 was not protected from verbal abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D threatened R43 by stating CNA D would throw R43 over shoulder and carry out of room if R43 didn't do what CNA D wanted R43 to do. R36 was not protected from physical abuse when R35 grabbed R36's walker and then swung at R36, hitting R36 and grabbing R36's wrist.
  4. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not report 2 of 3 (R43, R36) potential misconduct incidents to the State's Office of Caregiver Quality (OCQ) via the State's Misconduct Incident Reporting (MIR) system immediately upon learning of the incident. *CNA D threatened R43 by stating CNA D would throw R43 over shoulder and carry out of room if R43 didn't do what CNA D wanted R43 to do. *R35 grabbed R36's walker and then swung at R36, hitting R36 and grabbing R36's wrist.
  5. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased upon interview, policy review and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of verbal and physical abuse were thoroughly investigated or prevent further potential abuse from occurring while the investigation was in progress for residents (R) (R43, R36) and other undocumented residents, which has the potential to affect all 19 residents on the Birchwood unit. Facility did not protect R43 when allowing Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D to continue to work with R43 when accused of verbal abuse. Facility allowed CNA D to continue to work with R43 during complaints of rough cares was being investigated. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Misconduct Investigation and Reporting, last revised 08/20/24, stated in part, .-2. [...]
  6. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of completion for 3 residents (R) (R40, R47, and R31) out of 12 sampled residents. R40 had a Quarterly (Q) MDS assessment completed on 10/02/24 and a Quarterly MDS assessment completed on 12/31/25. Both assessments had not been transmitted as of end of survey, 02/20/25. R47 had a Prospective Payment System (PPS) discharge assessment completed 11/08/24 and a Quarterly MDS completed 12/23/24. MDS assessments had not been transmitted. R31 had a Quarterly MDS assessment completed on 10/02/24 and another Quarterly MDS completed on 12/31/24 which were not submitted by the facility. This is evidenced by: The requirements for the RAI are found at 42 CFR 483.20 and are applicable to all residents in Medicare and/or Medicaid certified long-term care facilities. [...]
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 15 residents (R13, R35) reviewed. R13 was left unattended while connected to mechanical lift equipment. R35 did not have increased supervision to prevent resident to resident altercations after incidents on 06/22/24, 09/16/24, 01/10/25, and 01/28/25. This is evidenced by: Example 1 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safety Information guidance provided in Kwikpoints Patient Lifts Safety Guide, states in part: Do not leave patient unattended while in lift. Never keep patient suspended in sling for more than a few minutes. [...]
  8. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less. During the medication administration task, Surveyors observed 4 errors out of 35 medication opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 11.4%. This affected 2 out of 4 residents (R) observed for medication administration sample. (R11 and R39) R11 received two insulin injections by using injectable pens that were not primed before administration. R39's insulin was not primed prior to administration of insulin.
  9. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologics were stored in accordance with current accepted professional practice. This had the potential to affect 2 out of 2 residents (R) for proper labeling. (R29 and R39) This is evidenced by: According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), insulin pens should be discarded 28 days after opening the pen to ensure effectiveness of the medication. According to the American Diabetes Association, insulin products contained in vials or cartridges supplied by the manufacturers (opened or unopened) may be left unrefrigerated at a temperature between 59 and 86 degrees F for up to 28 days and continue to work. After 28 days the insulin should be discarded. On 3/29/21, R29 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including type 2 diabetes mellitus. [...]
August 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation of a resident-to-resident altercation by interviewing all residents who were in area at time of incident, did not provide follow up supervision for 48 hours per facility report to protect other residents, and did not provide staff education following an incident for 1 of 4 residents (R1). This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Misconduct Investigation & Reporting last reviewed on 08/23/11 and states in part under section 14 of policy: All resident witnesses/victims should be interviewed as part of the investigation. Nursing or Social Services will assess the resident(s) and make official entries in client charts indicating any behavioral, emotional or changes from their baseline and recommend follow-up or longer if deemed necessary. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision to reduce risk of wandering/elopement for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed (R1). R1 left the facility without staff's knowledge and was not added to the facility's Wanderer's List for increased supervision after incident per facility policy. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled, Wanders-Identification, Observation, and Possible Search For, with most recent revision dated 08/2022 stated in part that required follow up following a wandering/elopement event nursing staff must include resident on Wanderer's List. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of hemiplegia (impaired body function) on right side due to cerebral infarction (blood clot in brain) and aphasia (impaired speech). [...]
January 11, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff touched ready to eat foods with potentially contaminated gloves and did not wash hands between glove changes during two meal service observations on Pine View unit. This affected 10 of 16 residents (R) on the Pine View unit. (R15, R9, R4, R149, R30, R2, R36, R31, R12, and R13). This affected 11 of 17 residents on the Birchwood unit. (R39, R40, R10, R26, R44, R41, R18, R25, R8, R38, R17). This affected 8 residents on [NAME] Lane (R34, R24, R7, R19, R46, R6, R21, and R3).
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident is treated with dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes enhancement of his or her quality of life. This occurred for two of three residents (R) being assisted with eating during lunch on the Pine View unit. (R14 and R20)
  3. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure the privacy and confidentiality of resident medical records. This occurred for 2 of 10 residents (R) during medication administration. (R31 and R13)
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff observed not performing hand hygiene with glove changes during cares. This affected 2 of 5 residents (R) observed for cares. (R13 and R8) Staff observed touching medications with bare hands during medication administration. This affected 2 of 10 residents observed for medication administration. (R150 and R38)

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 21, 2026, 4 on February 20, 2025, 1 on January 11, 2024.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Establish an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 1 · February 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · February 20, 2025 · Waiver
  9. D
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · February 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · February 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.364.213.86
Registered nurses0.990.990.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.183.773.42
Nurse aides2.64
Licensed practical nurses0.73
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)35.9%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover30.8%39.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.44 on weekdays and 4.18 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.17 in April to June 2025 to 4.36 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.360.994.444.18 0.2%0 of 9048
Oct to Dec 20254.320.894.404.13 0.2%0 of 9247
Jul to Sep 20254.210.934.323.92 0.7%0 of 9248
Apr to Jun 20254.170.954.303.85 1.2%0 of 9148
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 20264.190.954.363.748.8%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Wisconsin

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Wisconsin, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.70$19.03 to $22.7528,370
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.67 to $36.067,390
Registered nurses$45.93$39.39 to $49.3368,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.516.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.62.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.32.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.53.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.918.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.35.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.315.815.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.41.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.92.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COUNTY OF MONROE.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
County of Monroe5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%04/15/2011
Broad River RehabilitationOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/01/2025
County of MonroeOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/1975
Cogbill, ElizabethOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
Hanson, MaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2012
Karacson, ChelseaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/30/2022
Osterberg, TinaOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/04/2019
Smith, LindaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/24/2012
Broad River RehabilitationAdp of the SNFOrganization11/19/2025
County of MonroeAdp of the SNFOrganization08/22/2022
Cogbill, ElizabethAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Hanson, MaryAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2012
Karacson, ChelseaAdp of the SNFIndividual06/30/2022
Osterberg, TinaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/04/2019
Smith, LindaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/24/2012

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 21, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr?
CMS lists 15 owners and managers. Legal business name: COUNTY OF MONROE.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection