Home / Virginia / Virginia Beach
3750 Sentara Way, Virginia Beach, VA 23452 · Virginia Beach City County · (757) 306-2700
116 certified beds, about 112 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495270 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 22, 2022, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since May 2018, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.48 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
34.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview, clinical record review, review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to administer physician ordered medications for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, complaint investigation, and family and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #297), in the survey sample of 46 residents, was free from sexual assault which resulted in harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on a closed record review, complaint investigation, family and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to preserve evidence following an incident of sexual abuse for one resident (Resident #297) in the survey sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, family interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to convey within 30 days after the resident's discharge from the facility the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds, to the Resident and/or Representative for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #121), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practices for 1 out of 40 residents (Resident #51) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to afford two residents (R#62 and R#38) in the survey sample the opportunity to participate in the care planning process.
Inspectors wroteBased on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, family interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's personal funds which exceeded $100.00 were kept in an interest bearing account until it was distributed to the Resident and/or Representative for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #121), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 40 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #32 and 81) were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Medicare Beneficiary Notices in accordance with applicable Federal regulations, were issued to 2 of 4 residents (Resident #39 and #64) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to send a care plan to include their goals when discharged and admitted to the hospital for 1 of 46 residents (Resident #50), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to send a notice to a representative of the Ombudsman office for 1 of 46 residents (Resident #77), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to send a copy of the facility's bed hold policy for 1 of 46 residents (Resident #50), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to include anticoagulation in the comprehensive care plan, for 1 of 40 resident (Resident #32), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received the application of his right hand splint as ordered by the physician to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 40 residents, (Resident #35), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure one resident did not receive PRN Psychoactive medications for more than 14 days for 1 of 46 residents (Resident #91), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 out of 46 residents (Resident #38) in the survey sample received the services needed to meet their dental needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on a revisit survey conducted 11/15/22 through 11/17/22 to the standard survey that was conducted on 09/18/22 through 09/22/22, the facility staff failed to correct identified quality deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to designate at least one qualified staff member as the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP).
Inspectors wroteBased on a record review, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was given timely prior to the last covered skilled day for 2 of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 238 and Resident #239.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident #288.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of the facility's Medication Administration Record (MAR), the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for 1 of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to obtain an order for the use of a Foley catheter for one of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident #55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that facility staff failed to administer oxygen per physician's order for one of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident #291.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of the facility's Medication Administration Record (MAR), the facility failed to ensure 1 of 39 residents in the survey sample was free from unnecessary medication, Resident #52.
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility's Missing Assessment Report, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure that Discharge Assessments were completed and transmitted timely for 3 of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, closed record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed for one (Resident #379) of 34 residents in the survey sample to notify the responsible party of a fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (#8) in the survey sample of 34 residents. Facility staff failed to maintain an accurate person centered care plan related to transfer needs for Resident #8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, clinical document and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to maintain proper infection control practices for indwelling Foley catheter maintenance for 2 residents (#23) and (#129) in the survey sample of 34 residents. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #23's indwelling Foley catheter urine collection bag was not in contact with the floor. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #129's indwelling catheter bedside drainage bag was emptied and prevented from making contact with the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure non-pharmacological measures were offered prior to the administration of analgesic medications. The facility staff failed to ensure non-pharmacological measures were offered prior to the administration of analgesic medications for one Resident (Resident # 11) of 34 residents in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review facility staff failed to ensure 2 residents (Resident #7 and #52) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #7's as needed Trazodone was reassessed and extended for another 14 days. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #52 received gradual dose reductions in an effort to decrease and/or discontinue psychotropic drugs use.
Inspectors wroteBased on general observation of the nursing facility, staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 1 out of 8 facility medication carts. The facility staff failed to ensure one *Humalog (insulin) vial was dated once open and one Humalog vial was removed from medication cart once expired. *Humalog is a fast-acting insulin that starts to work about 15 minutes after injection, peaks in about 1 hour, and keeps working for 2 to 4 hours. Insulin is a hormone that works by lowering levels of glucose (sugar) in the blood (https://www.drugs.com/humalog.html). On [DATE] at approximately 12:25 p.m., this surveyor inspected the medication cart on Unit 2 (Front Hall) with LPN #1. During the inspection of the insulin stored inside the medication cart; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and review of the Hospice policy; the facility staff failed to ensure the Hospice Agency provided a written agreement describing the provision of services for 1 of 34 residents (Resident #129), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure the Hospice Agency provided the facility staff with the coordinated plan of care for Resident #129, to identify which services the Hospice Agency would provide, when the services would be provided, the communication process, and when or why the nursing facility staff should notify the Hospice Agency.
19 fire safety citations on file: 10 on September 22, 2022, 9 on May 25, 2018.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.48 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.95 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.04 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.07 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 34.9% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.13 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.69 on weekdays and 2.95 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.24 in April to June 2025 to 3.48 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.48 | 0.36 | 3.69 | 2.95 | 8.3% | 0 of 90 | 112 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.36 | 3.61 | 2.98 | 9.2% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.44 | 3.54 | 2.82 | 5.7% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.24 | 0.41 | 3.46 | 2.68 | 3.0% | 0 of 91 | 110 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 33.5 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Rosemont Health & Rehab Center, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
65.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 267 eligible stays.
13.9% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 269 eligible stays.
9.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.
41.3% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 111 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 111 residents counted.
74.1% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ROSEMONT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020) | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Bnv Dynasty LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020 | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Ohi Asset (VA) Virginia Beach LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Hughes, Candice | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/14/2022 | |
| Jackson, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/28/2022 | |
| Salyers, Gary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/13/2021 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Weisberg, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Weisberg, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2026 | |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Ohi Asset (VA) Virginia Beach LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Shg Boa LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/09/2026 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Shg Mt, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/09/2026 | |
| The Huntington National Bank | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/02/2022 | |
| Walker & Associates PC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Hughes, Candice | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/14/2022 | |
| Jackson, Ashley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/28/2022 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Salyers, Gary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/13/2021 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Weisberg, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.