815 East 63 Street, Savannah, GA 31405 · Chatham County · (912) 352-8615
120 certified beds, about 108 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1972
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115120 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 15, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 37 health citations since May 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $5,446 in the last three years; the largest was $5,446, and the latest is dated April 12, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.34 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
57.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
CMS links it to Elevation Healthcare, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plans, the facility failed to implement a care plan to monitor for adverse effects from anticoagulant medication for one of three sampled residents (R) (R8). This deficient practice had the potential to place R8 at increased risk of medical complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure that phenytoin (a medication used to prevent and control seizures) was not administered at the same time as a high-protein supplement for one of five residents (R) (R9) observed during medication pass observation. This deficient practice had the potential to place R9 at risk of medical complications related to potential reduced medication absorption.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's document titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes Algorithm, the facility failed to ensure respiratory staff followed infection control practices during tracheostomy care for one of two residents (R) (R13) with a tracheostomy. The deficient practice had the potential to place R13 at risk of respiratory illness and infection due to cross-contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to promote care in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity and respect for one of 49 sampled residents (R) (R72). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the correct size brief was available to prevent incontinence leakage. This deficient practice had the potential to place R72 at risk of a diminished quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriations, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for one of seven residents (R) (R20) reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold and Returns Policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 49 residents (R) (R72) was provided with a written bed hold notice. This failure had the potential to place the resident or resident representative at risk of being uninformed about their rights related to their return to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for one of five sampled residents (R) (R24) with a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R) (R10) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II assessment was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for review. This deficient practice had the potential to place R10 at risk of not receiving services or care according to their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Person Centered Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one of 11 residents (R) (R24) who received oxygen (O2). In addition, the facility failed to implement the care plan for two of 11 R (R45 and R49) who received O2. These deficient practices had the potential to place R24, R45, and R49 at risk of respiratory complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 49 sampled residents (R) (R12) received services to maintain or improve their functional abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a supportive footrest/leg rest was secured to R12's wheelchair. This deficient practice had the potential to place R12 at risk of unmet needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure that three of 11 sampled residents (R) (R24, R45, and R49) were administered oxygen (O2) therapy in accordance with the physician's orders. This failure had the potential to place R24, R45, and R49 at risk of respiratory complications and unmet needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Menus, the facility failed to ensure four of 49 sampled residents (R) (R90, R106, R103, and R72) were offered meal choices. In addition, the facility failed to ensure meal menus were followed for one of 49 sampled R (R72).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Person Centered Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of four sampled residents (R) (R1) with a history of wandering and exit-seeking behaviors. This failure increased the potential for R1 to not receive treatment and/or care according to their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Elopement Risk and Prevention Program, the facility failed to provide protective oversight and supervision to prevent elopement when one of four sampled residents (R) (R1) exited the facility and was unaccounted for by staff for over one hour.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, a review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, and a review of the facility document titled Facility Assessment Tool 2024, the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff for the first quarter of 2024. The deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the care and services provided to the residents residing in the facility. The census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and a review of the facility document titled Certified Medication Aide Bi-Annual Checklist, the facility failed to ensure that services provided by Certified Medication Aides (CMA) met professional standards of quality. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that three of four CMAs completed a Medication Administration Competency Skills Checklist for CMAs before being allowed to administer medications to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse outcomes for residents related to medication administration. The census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Equipment and Environment, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen walls, floors, and equipment were clean and free of rust, debris, and grease buildup and failed to use un-expired quaternary test strips in the three-compartment sink. The deficient practices had the potential to place all residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk of contracting a foodborne illness. The census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policies titled Dispose of Garbage and Refuse and Environment, the facility failed to ensure the outdoor garbage and refuse area was free of litter and maintained in a sanitary manner for two of two dumpsters. The deficient practice had the potential to promote the harboring of pests, insects, and other organisms and create the potential for disease transmission by pests and rodents. The census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Infection Control and Prevention Policy and COVID-19 Employee and Resident Prevention and Control Practices, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to prevent transmission and spread of COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff changed their masks when entering and exiting COVID-19 Transmission-Based Precaution (TBP) rooms and failed to ensure staff closed the doors of two COVID-19 TBP rooms during care. The facility was in an outbreak, with 31 residents and 11 staff tested positive for COVID-19. This deficient practice had the potential to spread COVID-19 to other residents, staff, and visitors. The census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, the facility failed to provide evidence of a process for periodic review of antibiotic prescribing practices and failed to document follow-up measures in response to the data for 12 of 12 months of infection control data reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect any resident who was prescribed an antibiotic. The facility census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility document titled Healthcare Center Infection Preventionist, the facility failed to designate a qualified staff member to the role of Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) for two of the last 12 months and failed to ensure staff assigned to the role of ICP had enough time to perform the ICP responsibilities for six of the last 12 months. These deficient practices had the potential to create an ineffective Infection Prevention program that may contribute to the spread of infectious diseases among all residents in the facility. The census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, the facility failed to thoroughly complete resident grievance forms to provide evidence that resident grievances were resolved in a timely manner and to ensure that residents were satisfied with the final resolutions for 42 of 101 resident grievance forms reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to have an adverse effect on any resident who filed a grievance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to ensure three of 54 sampled residents (R) (R30, R32, and R71) did not have unsecured and unauthorized medication or medicated treatment products at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to cause adverse effects for R30, R32, and R71 and allow unauthorized medication access to other residents and visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to post a complete listing of how to report abuse and the types of abuse, including a mailing address, email address, and information on how to report to the State Agency in a manner accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 109 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act. Specifically, the facility failed to report the misappropriation of property to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for two of four residents (R) (R41 and R45) who were investigated for abuse. This failure had the potential to have a negative impact on the quality of life for R65 and R41. The sample size was 54 residents. A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, revised 9/15/2023, revealed the Policy Statement stated: [...]
Inspectors wrote2. A review of R41's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment documented that R41 had not exhibited behaviors. A review of a Grievance/Concern Form documented that R41 filed a grievance on 3/22/2024 stating that he was missing six hundred dollars. This grievance was documented by the Social Service Assistant (SSA). Findings from the grievance investigation indicated that the facility's safe was checked, and the money or wallet was not found. Further review of the grievance form revealed that the SSA and resident signed the form on 3/22/2024. The form was not signed or dated by the Administrator. In an interview on 4/11/2024 at 10:07 am, R41 revealed that he had recently reported that 600 dollars had been taken from him. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plan, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for three of 54 sampled residents (R) (R11, R60, and R49). Specifically, the facility failed to develop a care plan for contracture management for R11, implement a care plan for oxygen therapy for R11, dialysis care and treatment for R60, and oxygen therapy for R49. The deficient practice had the potential to place R49, R11, and R60 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Bathing-Shower, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), specifically baths or showers, for one resident (R) (R5) of 54 sampled residents. This failure placed R5 at risk for unmet needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to transcribe an antibiotic medication order and administer it as ordered by the physician, resulting in a delay in treatment for one resident (R) (R49) of seven residents receiving antibiotics. This failure had the potential for R49 to not receive medical treatment according to their needs and placed R49 at risk for adverse consequences. Findings Include: A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet revealed that R49 was re-admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 4/5/2024. A review of the facility-provided document titled Internal Medicine Discharge Summary, dated 4/6/2024, revealed that R49 had a current diagnosis of multifocal pneumonia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled Contracture Management, the facility failed to ensure one of 54 sampled residents (R) (R11) reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM) received passive range of motion (PROM) exercises and splint application as needed to address limited ROM in her right upper extremity. This failure created a potential for worsening contracture (fixed resistance to passive stretch), pain, or skin breakdown for R11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Oxygen Administration and Tracheostomy Care-Adults, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for four of seven residents (R) (R11, R39, R22, and R49) receiving respiratory services. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure there was a current physician's order for oxygen therapy and oxygen saturation checks before administering oxygen, to ensure the oxygen concentrator and concentrator filters were clean, and to provide humidification for oxygen therapy for R11. In addition, the facility failed to document daily tracheostomy inner cannula change for R39. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Care, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for one of one resident (R) (R60) reviewed for dialysis services. This deficient practice had the potential to place R60 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a pneumococcal vaccine policy and procedure for the residents; and failed to provide documentation that three of five sampled residents (R) (#77, #24, and # 79) were offered and/or received the pneumococcal vaccine.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a concurring Physician's signature for a Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) consents for one residents (R) (#111). The sample size was 34 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that it was maintained in a safe clean and comfortable environment. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain clean privacy curtains in three rooms (102, 107, and 111), and failed to ensure that bathroom walls were in good repair in three resident rooms (106, 107, and 110). The facility census was 109. Findings Include: Initial facility tour conducted on 5/17/22 at 9:00 a.m. revealed observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] privacy curtain by the window of bed B had dark brown stain by the hem of the curtain. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed bathroom wall has chipped paint under towel rack with sheet rock cracked and exposed and also black markings. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] privacy curtain between bed B and C had brown debris noted on the curtain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that treatment orders for one resident (R) (#71) were transcribed and implemented as ordered by the physician, of 10 residents with pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician's Order for one resident (R) (R#68) of five residents who received nutrition via gastric feeding tube.
10 fire safety citations on file: 7 on May 15, 2025, 3 on April 12, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 12, 2024 | Fine | $5,446 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.34 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.80 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.18 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.6% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 62.5% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 4.50 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.56 on weekdays and 2.80 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.91 in April to June 2025 to 3.34 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.36 | 3.56 | 2.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 108 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.29 | 3.60 | 2.73 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.41 | 0.31 | 3.59 | 2.93 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 113 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.91 | 0.41 | 3.18 | 2.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.12 | $17.06 to $20.66 | 43,440 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.82 | $25.43 to $33.99 | 21,060 |
| Registered nurses | $44.98 | $38.02 to $51.12 | 100,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.0 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.3 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.8 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Savannah Post Acute LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Georgia: 49 better, 27 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 92 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Georgia: 2 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.
8.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Georgia: 0 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.
35.2% this home
Median of homes: Georgia46.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 86 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Georgia2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 86 residents counted.
72.7% this home
Median of homes: Georgia97.4% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SAVANNAH POST ACUTE LLC. CMS links this home to Elevation Healthcare, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 1.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation Holdings Georgia LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 02/01/2024 | |
| Elevation Healthcare LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/01/2024 | |
| Kmom LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/01/2024 | |
| Funk, Kenneth | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Funk, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Funk, Kenneth | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Lindsey, Jacob | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Smith, Sterling | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Elevation Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2024 | |
| Brantley, Ke'vin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Briggs, Devin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2025 | |
| Brownlee, Karen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/24/2025 | |
| Eason, Sheree | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Frederickson, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Funk, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Funk, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Gignac, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/16/2025 | |
| Hayward, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/16/2026 | |
| Jones, Tiffany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/07/2024 | |
| Lindsey, Jacob | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Marcus, Theodore | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/02/2026 | |
| Patel, Nand | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Poe-Jones, Eddie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Rice, Gloria | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/11/2025 | |
| Romero, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Smith, Sterling | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Wright, Shakeira | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Elevation Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/02/2026 | |
| Brantley, Ke'vin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Briggs, Devin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2025 | |
| Brownlee, Karen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/24/2025 | |
| Eason, Sheree | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Frederickson, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Funk, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Funk, Kenneth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Gignac, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/16/2025 | |
| Hayward, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/16/2026 | |
| Jones, Tiffany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/07/2024 | |
| Lindsey, Jacob | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Marcus, Theodore | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/02/2026 | |
| Patel, Nand | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Poe-Jones, Eddie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Rice, Gloria | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/11/2025 | |
| Romero, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Smith, Sterling | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Wright, Shakeira | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.