6884 Maple Avenue, Sodus, NY 14551 · Wayne County · (315) 483-9118
130 certified beds, about 115 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335378 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 11, 2024, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 25 health citations since September 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.60 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
52.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Personal Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/07/2024 to 10/11/2024, for one of one main kitchen and one (Cortland/[NAME]) of two satellite serveries, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically: there were dirty food and non-food contact surfaces, perishable food items were kept longer than 3-days per facility policies, and a sanitizer cleaning bucket with solution and a cleaning rag was dirty and not replaced between meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from [DATE] to [DATE], for 54 of 102 residents, the facility did not ensure residents' right to privacy related to their medical records in that advanced directives wishes were not kept confidential. Specifically, there was a list of advanced directives information (such as wishes for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of an acute cardiac or respiratory event) that included the names of 44 residents with their wishes posted in plain sight in the facility library, which all residents and visitors have access to. In addition, there was a large picture frame hanging in the front lobby of the facility with 17 resident's pictures and names in view of the public; nine residents were listed in an elopement group (at risk for unsafe wandering outside the building) and eight residents an explorer group. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/07/2024 to 10/11/2024, for one (Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for food and nutrition, the facility did not ensure services were provided to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Specifically, Resident #35 was not consistently monitored for significant weight loss, and the facility could not provide documented evidence of consistent meal monitoring or interventions despite a significant weight loss. The finding is: The undated facility policy Weights documented each resident will be carefully monitored on a regular basis (monthly or weekly), or as otherwise specified by the provider, so that appropriate timely interventions may be initiated. [...]
Inspectors wroteSodus F760D Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00338097) from 10/07/2024 to 10/11/2024, the facility did not ensure that two (Residents #43 and #66) of six residents reviewed were free of significant medication errors. Specifically, Resident #43 received several medications prescribed to treat Parkinson's disease and seizures one to three hours after scheduled times and a second medication to treat Parkinson's was administered too closely to the next dose. Resident #66 did not receive their insulin administration as ordered. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Administration of Medications, dated September 2020, included that medications will be administered to residents in a timely and accurate manner. Administer medications within one hour before or after prescribed time. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review completed during an Abbreviated Survey (#NY00337643), for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated. Specifically, a staff member reported on 3/25/24 that they witnessed a potential abuse incident on 3/20/24 between another staff member and Resident #1. The facility's investigation to rule out any abuse, neglect or mistreatment concluded no abuse occurred but did not include any interviews with staff members who were working at the time of the alleged incident and witnessed the incident. Additionally, the facility did not report the alleged abuse until 13 days after it occurred. This was evidenced by the following: Resident #1 had diagnoses including dementia, depression, and diabetes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (#NY00320671) completed 10/12/23 to 10/13/23, it was determined that for one of one main kitchen the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food service operations were conducted in the area of an active wastewater backup and the incident was not reported to New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00304512) completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Empire) of three residential care units reviewed and one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards. Specifically, hot water temperatures exceeding 120 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) were accessible to residents at point of use. Additionally, Resident #27 was observed with unlabeled and unsupervised medications at the resident's bedside. This is evidenced by the following: 1. Observations, interviews, and record reviews on 10/27/22 from 10:33 a.m. to 5:15 p.m. included the following: a. Water temperatures observed in the Empire Unit using a ThermoWorks Thermapen One digital thermometer: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for two (Resident #81 and #220) of two residents reviewed for tube feedings (TF), the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications. Specifically, there was no process for tracking and monitoring the daily total intakes of TF for either resident to ensure the resident's nutritional needs were being met. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Gastrostomy Tube Feeding, dated April 2022 directed that when an intermittent feeding was completed to document administration in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 1. Resident # 81 has diagnoses including a stroke with left side hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and malnutrition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #54) of five residents reviewed the facility did not ensure that the attending physician documented that the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) that was completed by the pharmacist was reviewed for irregularities/recommendations and action taken if any and/or a rationale if no action taken. Specifically, the pharmacist had consistently noted irregularities on the MRR reports related to a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of an antipsychotic medication and recommendations for other medications and there was no evidence that the irregularities were addressed by the by the physician or the Director of Nursing (DON) per the regulations. This is evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for two (Empire and [NAME]) of three resident units, one of one service wing, and one of one basement, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, exhaust ventilation was not working, a water softener tank and circulating pump was leaking, soiled towels were present on a windowsill, and there was a leak in a water hose behind a washer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #22) of one resident reviewed for restraints and one (Resident #117) of one resident reviewed for a discharge from the facility, the facility did not accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment to reflect the resident's status. Specifically, for Resident #22, the MDS Assessment did not accurately reflect the use of a restraint, and that the resident was on an antipsychotic and antidepressant medication. For Resident #117, the MDS Assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's discharge disposition. This is evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey, completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Resdient #22) of five residents reviewed the facility did not review and revise the resident's care plan to reflect the resident's current status. Specifically, Resident #22's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was not revised to reflect the discontinued use of an antipsychotic medications. This was evidenced by: The facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning, dated 12/5/21, included the interdisciplinary team will review and revise the care plan quarterly following MDS completion, with a significant change, return following hospital admission, annually, and as needed. The CCP will be kept current by all disciplines on an ongoing basis. Disciplines will be responsible for updating their respective care plans on a continual basis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey completed 11/2/22 it was determined that for one (Resident #86) of one resident reviewed, the facility did not provide an ongoing program of activities based on the comprehensive assessment, the comprehensive care plan (CCP) and the preferences of each resident in order to support the resident in their choice of activities and to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility could not provide evidence Resident #86 was provided activities based on their preferences and needs. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Activity Programs, dated 3/22/22, included activity programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey, completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #92) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility did not ensure that the resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice, and that the resident received the necessary treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, the facility did not administer treatments as ordered by the medical team. This was evidenced by the following: Review of the facility policy 'PRESSURE INJURY PREVENTION & MANAGEMENT WOUND ROUNDS' dated December 2021, revealed that the nurse is responsible for the following when a pressure ulcer is identified: To administer the treatment as ordered. [...]
Inspectors wroteased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #220) of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence, the facility did not ensure that the resident who required colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy services, received such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #54) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regime was free from unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #54 was prescribed an anti-psychotic medication without evidence of implementation of resident specific non-pharmacological interventions, and without evidence that a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of the medication had been attempted or documentation of a clinical contraindication for a GDR. Additionally, current physician documentation did not accurately reflect the resident's currently prescribed medications. This is evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for three of three residential units, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide evidence of a complete infection control program that consistently identified, tracked, investigated, monitored, and analyzed surveillance data to prevent infections in the facility. This is evidenced by the following : A review of the infection control program was conducted on 9/23/20 at 2:00 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one of two residents reviewed the facility did not thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Specifically, Resident #92 had bruises of unknown origin that were not investigated. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #92 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumonia. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 9/5/20, revealed that the resident had severely impaired cognition. The nursing admission assessment, dated 9/10/20, included no skin issues. The weekly skin check form, dated 9/15/20, documented the resident's skin was intact. The Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 9/15/20, included the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one of two residents the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, Resident #49 did not have a care plan for an actual pressure ulcer and bone infection. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy, Comprehensive Care Planning, dated April 2020, revealed that actual infections and pressure ulcers would be included in the Comprehensive Care Plan. Resident #49 had diagnoses including an unstageable pressure ulcer of the sacral region, fracture of the right femur, and sacral osteomyelitis (bone infection). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that the facility did not provide proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision for one of two residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility was unaware that Resident #11 lost their glasses and would like them replaced. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy, Vision Services and Devices, dated October 2017, directs if a resident loses their devices, the nursing home will assist the resident or designated representative in locating resources including assistance in making appointments and transportation. Resident #11 has diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizophrenia, and nicotine dependence. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that the facility did not provide necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 was not wearing blue booties on both feet at all times and was not repositioned every two hours. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #6 had diagnoses including sacral osteomyelitis (bone infection) and a Stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) pressure ulcer on the sacrum. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one (Resident #84) of two residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited Range of Motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM or to prevent further decrease in ROM. Specifically, Resident #84 had contractures of the left upper extremity, and the facility did not implement interventions to prevent complications related to decreased ROM. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #84 had diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, amputation of the right leg below the knee, and amputation of the left leg above the knee. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one of one resident reviewed, the facility did not ensure that residents received services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, Resident #57's fluid restriction was not consistently monitored, assessed, and documented, there was a lack of consistent ongoing communication between the facility and dialysis, and the facility did not consistently document assessments before and after dialysis treatments. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #57 had diagnoses including diabetes, renal disease with hemodialysis, and cerebral vascular accident. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 8/13/20, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and received dialysis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one of three residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure a resident was promptly referred to dental services for lost dentures. Specifically, the facility did not identify that Resident #57's dentures were missing or provide dental services to replace them. In addition, the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) did not address the resident's dental needs. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #57 had diagnoses that included diabetes, renal disease with hemodialysis, and cerebral vascular accident. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/13/20, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required the extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene (which included oral care). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a qualified dietician carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services. Specifically, the Registered Dietician had not been onsite since March 2020 and had not completed physical nutritional assessments or participated in interdisciplinary care plan meetings. This is evidenced by the following: When interviewed on 9/22/20 at 2:49 p.m., the Director of Nursing said visitors to the building were limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic. She said she considered the Registered Dieticians (RD) contractors and told them not to come onsite. She said that she did not realize that the RDs performed physical nutritional assessments. In an interview on 9/23/20 at 9:45 a.m. [...]
10 fire safety citations on file: 4 on October 11, 2024, 6 on November 2, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.60 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.91 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.28 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.6% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.5% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.07 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 2.91 on weekends, 25% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.41 in April to June 2025 to 3.60 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.60 | 0.46 | 3.88 | 2.91 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 115 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.65 | 0.47 | 3.87 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 106 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.39 | 3.54 | 2.79 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.41 | 0.44 | 3.62 | 2.90 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 105 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: NYS DOH Nurse Aide Training Programs (nursing homes), as of October 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Sodus Rehabilitation & Nursing Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.8 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sodus Rehabilitation & Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (36.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
36.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 110 eligible stays.
6.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 58 eligible stays.
53.7% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BVRNC OPERATING LLC. CMS links this home to Personal Healthcare Management, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barth, Alexander | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 35% | 09/18/2014 |
| Walden, Yehudah | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 09/18/2014 |
| Zagelbaum, Ephraim | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 09/18/2014 |
| Barth, Alexander | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/29/2016 | |
| Oduwa, Felix | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Olton, Shaina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/14/2023 | |
| Barth, Alexander | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/29/2016 | |
| Oduwa, Felix | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/12/2025 | |
| Olton, Shaina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/14/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.