Home / California / Banning
Sunrise Post Acute
3476 W. Wilson St., Banning, CA 92220 · Riverside County · (951) 849-4723
64 certified beds, about 62 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555319 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 52 health citations since November 2021, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $76,434 in the last three years; the largest was $62,810, and the latest is dated May 14, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.31 of those hours.
21.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 52 health citations on file.
June 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the State agency immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, for one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to delay investigation of the allegation and implementation of measures necessary to ensure resident safety and prevent further abuse.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address a resident's behavioral symptoms for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in staff lacking appropriate guidance and interventions to consistently address the resident's behavioral symptoms and monitor the effectiveness of interventions.
September 11, 2025Standard inspection · 14 citations
- F Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and updated annually and as needed. This failure resulted in an inaccurate evaluation of the facility's population and resources needed to provide the necessary care and services for the residents.
- F Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to identify and address their deficient practice involving physician visits (cross reference F0712). This failure has the potential to put residents at risk for unidentified medical conditions which could result in inadequate quality of care and services.
- E Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fluid intake and output in 24 hours was accurately monitored, recorded, and evaluated as ordered by the physician for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 19). This failure had the potential for the resident to experience complications associated with fluid deficit and/or fluid overload.
- E Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician conducted the initial visit for five of ten sampled residents (Residents 28, 35, 26, 22, 47). These failures had the potential to result in unidentified medical conditions and/or insufficient provision of medical treatment.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' right to self-administer medications for one of two residents (Resident 26) reviewed, when one opened box of Systane (eyedrops to prevent dryness of the eyes), a box of Lmnoop eczema relief cream (eczema-skin condition causing itching and dryness), and a bottle of Migrastil pain roll-on (pain relief cream) were observed on top of the resident's bedside table. This failure had the potential for Resident 26 to self-administer medications without a physician's order.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 6) was free from unnecessary medications when adequate indications (clinical rationale) for antipsychotic (drug to reduce disordered thinking) use were not documented. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience adverse outcomes from the unnecessary use of the antipsychotic medication such as Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (life-threatening reaction), tardive dyskinesia (chronic, involuntary movements), and increased risk of falls that could impair their ability to function at their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, a left elbow skin discoloration, identified on September 9, 2025, was reported and referred to the physician in a timely manner for treatment orders, for one of eight resident's reviewed (Resident 8). This failure has the potential for the resident to experience complications due to the delay in monitoring and treatment.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and treatment for one resident reviewed for oxygen administration (Resident 4), when the physician's order for oxygen administration was not followed. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oxygen therapy, respiratory distress, and decline in the resident's health condition.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, an assessment was conducted by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, prior to obtaining a pain medication order to treat migraine ( severe headache) for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 35). This failure has the potential to result to inadequate pain management for Resident 35.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services when: 1. For two of two residents (Resident 34 and Resident 35), inhalers were not appropriately administered. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience preventable breathing problems and/or other adverse clinical outcomes. 2. One of one opened blood glucose (sugar) test strip vial stored in the medication cart was undated in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. This failure had the potential for unusable test strips to be used to measure residents' fingerstick blood glucose levels to determine the dose of insulin to be administered.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective medication labeling and controlled (narcotics) drug storage when: 1. Three of three artificial tears (drug to lubricate dry eyes) medication bottles were not properly labeled with sufficient information to identify the specific resident. This failure had to potential to cause preventable infections from cross-contamination from eye drops were inadvertently mixed up with other residents. 2. The keys to the discontinued controlled substances were stored in an unlocked drawer in the half-opened Director of Nursing (DON) office. This failure had the potential for drug diversion (theft or preventable loss) and impaired (under the influence) staff providing care for a universe of 62 residents.
- D Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nutrition services were provided for two of three residents (Resident 22 and Resident 26) reviewed, when:1. Resident 22, dietary preferences were not met; and2. Resident 26 annual (yearly) nutritional assessment had not been conducted. These failures had the potential for Resident 22 and Resident 26 to have inadequate dietary intake because reasonable efforts were not made to accommodate Resident 22's food preferences and Resident 26's annual nutritional assessment were not performed.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were not stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to a vulnerable facility population.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed and implemented when two employees from a consulting doctor's office did not follow an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that required use of gown and glove during high contact resident care activities) for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 59). This failure had the potential to increase the spread of pathogens (germs) and infections by staff to the residents.
May 14, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2), to protect the resident ' s rights to be free from physical abuse by a resident, when a resident (Resident 1), diagnosed with dementia, and anxiety with no identified behavioral triggers, was moved rooms multiple times due to intolerance to noise without assessing the resident ' s individual needs. The failure of the facility in assessing resident ' s need for appropriate room placement resulted in Resident 1 assaulting Resident 2 who exhibited frequent moaning, mumbling, and yelling. Resident 2 sustained lacerations (a cut in the skin) to the head, extensive facial fractures (a break in a bone), two right rib fractures and L1 vertebra fracture (a break on the first bone on the lower back) and later passed away in the hospital. [...]
- G Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan (a document that outlines a patient's current health status, diagnoses, treatment goals, and interventions) to address the potential risk for physical agression related to the resident's preference for a quiet environment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being placed in a room with a resident (Resident 2), who exhibits behaviors of moaning and yelling, which subsequently resulted in Resident 1 assaulting Resident 2, with Resident 2 sustaining lacerations, extensive facial fractures, rib fractures and vertebra fracture. Resident 2 was transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH), where the resident expired.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a report with sufficient information to describe the alleged physical abuse that occurred between two residents (Residents 1 and 2) was provided to the State Agency (SA) and Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a resident advocate) on May 8, 2025. This failure had the potential for the SA and other officials to receive misleading informations which could negatively affect the investigation compromising the safety of the residents at the facility.
January 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed, for one of three residents (Resident 1), to ensure an Advance Directive Acknowledgement (AD- written instruction such as living will or durable power of attorney for health care about the provision of care and services the resident preferred when he is no longer able to decide for himself), Consent to Treat, POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment - a physician's order that outlines a plan for end of life care reflecting both a resident's preference and a physician's judgement based on medical evaluation), and Bed Hold Notification Policy were initiated and/or discussed with the resident, family member, and/or legal representative upon admission to the facility. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary care/treatment and services.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, for two of three residents (Residents 1 and 2) a discharge plan was developed upon admission to meet the individual discharge planning needs. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive necessary care and services to address resident's discharge needs and goals.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate medical transfer to an acute hospital emergency department was provided to one of two residents reviewed (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in actual or potential harm to Resident 3's physical, mental, and/or psychosocial well-being.
December 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
October 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' mail was protected for privacy and confidentiality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the mailbox was not locked. This deficient practice had the potential for confidential information's, personnel letters, sensitive documents to be accessed by unauthorized individual.
August 8, 2024Standard inspection · 12 citations
- K Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable environment was provided, for eight of eight residents (Residents 40, 36, 28, 15, 17, 32, 48, and 53), when the temperature in the resident's rooms were above 81 degrees Fahrenheit. On August 5, 2024, at 7:51 p.m., the Administrator (ADM), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Director of Staff Development (DSD), were verbally notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death, to a resident), due to the facility's failure to provide a comfortable environment for eight residents (Residents 40, 36, 28, 15, 17, 32, 48, and 53) when the resident's room temperature were above 81 degrees Fahrenheit. [...]
- E Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed, for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Residents 5, 53, and 56), to ensure: a. An assessment was conducted for the continued use of antipsychotic medications (medication to treat mental disorders) for Residents 5, 53 and 56; and b. Monitoring for the use of hypnotic medication (medication use to help people fall asleep) for Resident 56. These failures had the potential for Residents 5, 53 and 56 to not be properly monitored and to receive unnecessary medications that could cause harm and or death.
- E Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when [NAME] (CK) 1 and Dietary Aide (DA) 1 were unable to accurately verbalize the cool down process for hot food and ambient food temperatures. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness resulting from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment, prepare, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when multiple sheet pans were found with brown-black discoloration. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death.
- E Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee monitored and re-evaluated identified concern regarding hot temperature levels in resident rooms (rooms 22, 23, 24 and 25). This failure resulted in unsafe and uncomfortable temperature levels (above 81 degrees Fahrenheit) in resident rooms, affecting the quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety (cross-reference F584).
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure education and resources regarding Advance Directive (AD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) were provided to the residents and/or resident reresentatives, for three of eight residents reviewed for Advance Directives (Residents 40, 46, and 54). This failure had the potential for Residents 40, 46, and 54 and the resident representatives uninformed about AD which could result in the facility being unable to know and honor the residents' wishes regarding their medical treatment.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 32), the resident was able to voice a grievance without feeling uncomfortable. This failure had the potential for Resident 32's concerns to go unaddressed, leading to ongoing dissatisfaction and affecting the resident's quality of life.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication Carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) was administered as directed by the licensed nurse, for one of nine residents observed for medication administration (Resident 47). This failure has the potential for the resident to experience adverse effects of the medication if not taken as directed.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facilty failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was provided adequate training in the documentation of a narcotic pain medication administration for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 14). This failure has the potential to result in inaccurate assessment of the resident's pain and documentation of pain medication administration.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record, review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse documented the medication Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (controlled drug pain medication) as administered for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 34). This failure resulted to the delay in the identification of drug discrepancies and possible medication diversion of controlled medications.
- D Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely dental services for one of nine residents, (Resident 21). This failure had the potential to lead to mouth pain, infection, and/or complications related to dental and nutritional needs for Resident 21 if left untreated.
- D Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure for one of one resident (Resident 54) a pest free environment when one fly was observed on resident 54's lunch meal. This failure had the potential to place Resident 54 at risk for food borne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria) that can cause sickness and or death.
May 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a doctor's concern regarding ongoing weekly telephone appointment for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted for Resident 1 not receiving necessary care that he needed to achieve his highest level of physical well-being.
March 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's rights were respected, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1), when the facility cordless phone was not accessible for private conversations. This failure increased the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's psychosocial well-being.
January 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interveiw and record review, the facility failed to: 1) Administer medications as prescribed to 3 out of 3 Residents (Resident 1,2 and 3). 2) Order controled drug Xanax (An anti-anxiety medication) and failed to assure the medication was made available to Resident 1 as per Physician orders. This failure had the potential to: 1) Subject Resident ' s 1, 2 & 3 to negative health effects, due to not receiving their medications, as prescribed by the physician. 2) Subject Resident 1 to untreated feelings of anxiety, and withdrawl side effects from anti-anxiety medication Xanax.
November 28, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made, for one of five residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse for Resident 1, affecting the resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being.
October 26, 2023Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of four residents, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's care plans were reviewed and updated to meet the resident needs, and is made readily accessible for the staff to implement a consistent approach in keeping the resident free from fall and accident. The facility failure had resulted for Resident 1 to experience a fall when intervention in place was not meeting the resident's need to keep herself supervised, safe, and free from accident on July 27, 2023, at 2:22 a.m. Furthermore, the facility had failed to make Resident 1's care plan readily accessible to staff to provide a consistent approach in keeping Resident 1 safe and free from accident/injury.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of four residents, the facility failed to ensure services that meet standards of care for resident supervision was met when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA) went on a break and had not properly endorsed Resident 1 was confused and disoriented. The facility failure had resulted for Resident 1 to fall on July 27, 2023, at 2:22 a.m. while CNA 1 was on her break.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of four residents, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's psycho-active medications were reviewed to be kept at a minimum to prevent excessive doses and to minimize adverse consequences. The facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience potential risks (i.e., sedation) associated with over medication and duplication.
October 23, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when the facility failed to obtain the signatures for disposition of resident's belongings at discharge. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to lose personal property.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not record input for Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause fluid imbalance for Resident 1.
October 12, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made, for one of four residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse for Resident 1, affecting the resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being.
September 11, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's room temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level (between 71-81 degrees) for 15 out of 32 rooms, when the rooms were found with temperatures above 81 degrees. This failure had the potential for the residents to feel uncomfortable and had the potential to increase the risk of dehydration and heat exhaustion in an already vulnerable population.
September 5, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on personal belongings when: 1. Personal inventory forms were not completed for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 & Resident 3); and 2. Resident's personal clothing items were not labeled. These failures resulted in the sample residents losing personal items and had the potential for the facility residents receiving laundry service to lose personal clothing.
November 4, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations
- L Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen, for 51 of 53 residents receiving an oral diet, when the ice machine's evaporator (where ice was formed) was noted to have brown residue build-up, and the ice chute had slimy yellowish-brown residue build-up. In addition, the facility was not monitoring the cleanliness of the ice machine. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 51 out of 53 residents who were on an oral diet. [...]
- F Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when: 1. Six of six residents on a puree (smooth consistency foods) diet, received 1/3 cup of the meat but should have received 1/2 cup. 2. 11 of 11 residents on mechanical soft (a texture-modified diet that restricts foods that are difficult to chew or swallow) diet, received three ounces of meat and 1/3 cup of vegetable but should have received four ounces of meat and a 1/2 cup of vegetables. 3. Ten of ten residents on regular (not include any dietary restrictions) diet, received 1/3 cup of the vegetables but should have received 1/2 cup. 4. [...]
- F Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were able to receive and consume food brought by family and visitors. This failure limited residents from enjoying favorite foods and reduced resident food options and choices that could lead to weight loss for a medically compromised population of 53 residents.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control program to prevent transmission of communicable disease and infection, when: 1. One licensed nurse was observed entering the PUI (person under investigation due to unknown COVID-19 [Corona Virus Disease 2019- an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, that can be transmitted from person to person]) room without appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE-gown, mask, shield/goggles, gloves and N95 mask, used in combination or alone). ; 2. The Treatment Nurse (TN) was observed donning and doffing gloves multiple times without performing hand hygiene in-between, while performing wound care to Resident 32's wound on the right heel. ; 3. [...]
Fire safety inspections
21 fire safety citations on file: 8 on September 11, 2025, 2 on August 8, 2024, 11 on November 4, 2021.
Every fire safety citation21 citations
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
- C Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- D Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- D Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
- D Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- D List the names and contact information of those in the facility.
- D Provide emergency officials' contact information.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2025 | Fine | $62,810 |
| August 8, 2024 | Fine | $13,624 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.94 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.31 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.61 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.54 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.09 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 21.3% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.08 on weekdays and 3.61 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.98 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.94 | 0.31 | 4.08 | 3.61 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 62 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.93 | 0.25 | 4.05 | 3.63 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.95 | 0.32 | 4.06 | 3.67 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.98 | 0.29 | 4.11 | 3.65 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 61 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.3 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.9 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BANNING SNF HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sitanggang, Novie | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/15/2023 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2023 | |
| Hancock, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2023 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2023 | |
| Murray, Jason | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2023 | |
| Sitanggang, Novie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/15/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on June 23, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.61 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Sundance Creek Post Acute Banning, 1.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 72 citations
- Vista Real Post Acute Beaumont, 2.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Highland Springs Care Center Beaumont, 3.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Oak Glen Post Acute Cherry Valley, 4.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Yucaipa Hills Post Acute Yucaipa, 9.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Creekside Post Acute Yucaipa, 9.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Cedar Mountain Post Acute Yucaipa, 10.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- The Bradley Gardens San Jacinto, 11.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 49 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Sunrise Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Sunrise Post Acute 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Sunrise Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 14 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 11, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Sunrise Post Acute been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $76,434 in the last three years.
- Does Sunrise Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Sunrise Post Acute?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: BANNING SNF HEALTHCARE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.