4712 Sw 6th Ave, Topeka, KS 66606 · Shawnee County · (785) 272-6510
68 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175297 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 11, 2024, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 36 health citations since December 2021, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $56,260 in the last three years; the largest was $18,233, and the latest is dated April 6, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.54 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
47.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective controlled substance reconciliation system, which included reconciling Resident (R) 1's narcotic medication upon delivery.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of a narcotic medication for Resident (R) 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when on 06/27/26 at approximately 08:30 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R administered unknown medications to Resident (R) 2 without verifying she had the correct resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide follow-up care and services for Resident (R) 1's fractured wrist when staff failed to make an appointment and take her to a surgeon as ordered by the physician. This resulted in a non-removable device existing for longer than intended without physician oversight, which caused a Stage 3(full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure ulcer on R1's thumb. Findings Included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 68 residents. The sample included four residents, with four reviewed for accidents and supervision. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 1 resulting in an elopement from the facility. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for preventable accidents and injuries.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent weekend activities on Saturdays to promote socialization. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with eight reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to secure electrical panels and cleaning chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the ten cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 33 and follow R43's care-planned fall interventions related to her wheelchair placement. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 12/09/24 at 07:05 AM, a walk-through of the Cedar View halls was completed with the following observations: An inspection of an unsecured housekeeping closet in the 580's hallway revealed numerous heavy-duty 3M brand cleaning products on the wall. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five CNA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents with one kitchen and three dining rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to maintaining a sanitary service environment for food storage and meal service. These deficient practices placed the affected residents at risk related to food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 12/09/24 at 07:21 AM, an inspection of the dining room for Cedar View revealed dirty plates stored on the table next to the kitchenette's serving window from the previous evening's meal service. The table contained a stack of domed plate covers stored in an upward position. Inspection of the condiment shelf in the dining room to the right of the service window revealed a large, uncovered container of instant food thickener with no lid on the top shelf. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The facility identified eight residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to alert staff and visitors of EBP needs and additionally failed to complete hand hygiene during wound care and to ensure the sanitary storage of oxygen therapy equipment. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required resident rights training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required infection control training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two reviewed for accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to utilize and ensure the appropriate use of foot pedals during wheelchair transports for Resident (R) 1, R41, and R47. This placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 12/09/24 at 07:30 AM, R1 (resident with upper and lower extremity impairments) was wheeled out of his room to the medication cart by the nurse's station. R1's foot pedals were not in place as staff pushed him down the hall. At 07:35 AM, staff applied his foot pedals and wheeled him to breakfast. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted Resident (R) 4 with grooming. This deficient practice placed R4 at risk for impaired dignity and a further decline in ADL. Finding Included: - R4's Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of ischemia (decreased supply of oxygenated blood to a body part), heart disease (the heart does not pump as well as it should), myocardial infarction (heart attack), hypertension (high blood pressure), cognitive decline, kidney disease stage four (severe damage to the kidneys and a significant decline in function), and obesity (excessive body fat). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)32's low air-loss mattress was set at the appropriate weight for pressure reduction. This placed R32 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development and delayed healing. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with eight residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 33 had a safety assessment for the use of side rails that acknowledged the risks when used with a low air-loss mattress. This deficient practice placed R33 at risk for uninformed decisions and impaired safety related to the risks associated with the use of side rails. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 41 had a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) approved indication or the required physician-documented rationale including risk versus benefits and nonpharmocologcal attempts prior to the use of the antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication Zyprexa. This placed R41 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for hospice. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice for Resident (R) 43 and R38. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate end-of-life care. Finding Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for influenza (a contagious respiratory illness that infects the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs) and pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) immunizations. Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 51 received the pneumococcal vaccine after consenting to the vaccination. This deficient practice placed R51 at risk for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from the pneumococcal disease.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 remained free from avoidable accident hazards when staff failed to provide safe transfers using the required number of staff and the required equipment per the resident's plan of care. Subsequently, R1 sustained fractures to both her ankles/lower legs. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for increased pain and impaired well-being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide an environment free from safety hazards when staff left Resident (R) 1 in a mechanical recliner, with the footrest raised, without assessing R1's ability to lower the footrest. On 01/10/24 R1 attempted to get out of the recliner by climbing over the footrest and fell. As a result, R1 sustained a fractured sternum (breastbone) and left fourth rib. This also placed R1 at risk for pain, decreased mobility, and impaired quality of life.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from abuse when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M struck R1 on her arm after R1 had physical behaviors towards her. This deficient practice resulted in impaired psychosocial well-being and placed R1 at risk for continued abuse.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included three residents with one reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 1 when the facility failed to ensure CNA M followed care-planned interventions in response to R1's dementia related behaviors. This deficient practice created an environment that affected R1's ability to maintain her highest practicable level for physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and placed the resident at risk for ongoing abuse (See F600).
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five residents reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respond to falls, assess, and identify injury, and apply standards of care for fall follow up for Resident (R)28. On 07/02/23 at 01:30 AM R28, who had severe cognitive impairment, had an unwitnessed fall in her room. Licensed Nurse (LN) K found R28 on the floor at which time R28 stated she was trying to get to her recliner. LN K assessed the resident and noted an abrasion to the left shoulder. R28 complained of left hip pain at that time. LN K assisted R28 to the recliner but failed to notify R28's physician and representative of the incident. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the eleven cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to follow care planned interventions for Residents(R)10 and R36 resulting in non-injury falls for both residents. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. Findings Included: - On 07/24/23 at 07:05AM an inspection of the facility revealed an unsecured room labelled Trash in the southwest hall. The room contained six spray cans of cleaning Spot Remover, room deodorizer, and dry crystal floor cleaner stored on a shelf next to the door. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to storage of food and kitchenware. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to hand hygiene, soiled linen, and trash storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 13 residents reviewed for care plans. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to revise Residents (R)10 and R36's care plans related to the level of staff assistance needed during cares provided by staff. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable falls and injuries to uncommunicated or unmet care needs. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents the sample included 16 residents with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported Resident (R)36's Zyprexa (antipsychotic-a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication had an appropriate indication for use, or the required physician documentation. This deficient practice placed R36 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)36 and R44 had an appropriate indication for use, or the required physician documentation, for their anti-psychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medications. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk of unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. Six residents were observed for medication administration. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of five percent (%) or less when medication administration observations revealed an error rate of 33.33 %.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents, two medication rooms, and four medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly date one insulin pen (a hormone which regulates blood sugar) for Resident (R) 32 when the pen was opened for use. This deficient practice left the resident being administered the insulin at risk for adverse effects or less effective insulin administration.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and observation, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for 58 residents who reside in the facility and receive meals from the facility kitchen placing the residents at risk for food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from use in one of two medication rooms and one of four medication carts. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased or ineffective therapeutic medication effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents with which two reviewed for bathing. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 14 bathing assistance twice a week, placing the resident at risk for poor hygiene and decreased self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 14's as needed Ativan (an antianxiety medication) has a stop date as required, placing the resident at risk for adverse side effects related to psychotropic ( altering mood or mind) medication use.
30 fire safety citations on file: 1 on April 6, 2026, 14 on December 11, 2024, 6 on July 26, 2023, 9 on December 30, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 6, 2026 | Fine | $17,155 |
| April 6, 2026 | Payment Denial | 16 days from April 30, 2026 |
| September 12, 2024 | Fine | $12,048 |
| February 1, 2024 | Fine | $8,824 |
| November 27, 2023 | Fine | $18,233 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.54 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.15 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.91 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.4% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.69 on weekdays and 4.15 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 22.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.70 in April to June 2025 to 4.54 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.54 | 0.58 | 4.69 | 4.15 | 22.9% | 0 of 90 | 60 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.58 | 0.44 | 4.68 | 4.34 | 24.0% | 0 of 92 | 60 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.81 | 0.55 | 4.92 | 4.52 | 19.7% | 0 of 92 | 59 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.70 | 0.53 | 4.82 | 4.40 | 19.6% | 0 of 91 | 59 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.4 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.7 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.7 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Topeka Presbyterian Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
9.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
46.1% this home
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
3.2% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC. CMS links this home to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 3.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Manors Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/30/1989 |
| Pilkinton, Heather | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/12/2016 | |
| Bonney, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 04/23/2019 | |
| Brennecke, Gary | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Cook, James | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2012 | |
| Goodwin, John | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Harris, Daniel | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| McKell, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2012 | |
| Morrison, Aaron | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Nelson, Eleanor | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2010 | |
| Hind, Sherry | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/1989 | |
| Miller, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/1997 | |
| Owens, Melanie | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/10/2017 | |
| Shogren, Bruce | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/05/1996 | |
| Taylor, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/30/1989 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.