6400 Trinity Drive, Pine Bluff, AR 71603 · Jefferson County · (870) 879-3117
94 certified beds, about 75 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 045438 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 24, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Arkansas average is 2.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 31 health citations since July 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.18 hours per resident per day, against 4.02 across Arkansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.34 of those hours.
46.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arkansas average 49.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans were updated for two (Resident #11 and Resident #12) of two residents reviewed for Care Plan accuracy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the freezer and dry storage area were covered or sealed, one of one ice scoop holder was maintained in a sanitary manner, and dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment for one of one meal observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a smoking assessment was completed for one (Resident #12) of two residents reviewed for smoking safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed during high contact care to prevent the risk of cross contamination and infection for one (Resident #41) of one resident observed. Specifically, nursing staff failed to wear a gown while administering medication, feeding, and flushing a gastrostomy tube with water.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the personal and medical information was protected for 3 (Resident #1, #40, #236) of 4 sampled residents potentially violating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to reflect residents' most recent care needs for 2 (Residents #24 and #45) of 18 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use of a physical restraint was used to treat a resident's medical symptoms, and was not being used for staff convenience for 1 (Resident #28) of 2 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #28) reviewed for physical restraint use and failed to perform a side rail assessment prior to installing side rails for 2 (Residents #1 and #28) of 2 (Residents #1 and #28) sampled residents reviewed for side rail use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than 5%. The Medication error occurred with 2 (Resident #44, #6) of 4 sampled residents observed for medication administration. Medication error rate was calculated at 7.14%.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #44) of 1 sampled resident who was administered the wrong dose of [calcium channel blocker medication name] for the entire month of January 2025 and failed to ensure [long acting insulin name] insulin was not administered past 28 days of use for 1 (Resident #66) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for insulin use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologics were securely stored away at all times to prevent unauthorized individuals from potentially gaining access to the medication and/or biologics and failed to discard insulin after 28 days in use for 1 (Resident #66) 1 sampled resident reviewed for [long-acting insulin name] insulin use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator, freezer and storage room were covered, and sealed; leftovers meat products were used in a manner to maintain food quality; dented cans were promptly removed from stock; 1 of 2 ice machines was maintained in clean and sanitary condition; dietary staff washed their hands before handling food or clean equipment; ceiling tiles, air vents, dish washer wall , kitchen door frames were free of, debris, dirt, rust, stains, baseboards were secured, and hot food items were maintained at temperature of 135 degrees or above for 1 of 1 meal observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were being followed to prevent the spread of possible infection for one (Resident #28) of four sampled residents who were on EBP.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the care planned positioning device was in place to prevent further contracture for 1 of 1 sampled (Resident #27) resident reviewed for positioning.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure gradual psychotropic (anti-anxiety) dose reductions (GDR) were attempted in the absence of a physician's documented evaluation of the specific risks versus benefits of continuing the as needed (PRN) medication past 14 days and a documented explanation as to why a dose reduction attempt would be contraindicated, in order to ascertain the smallest effective dose and minimize the potential for adverse drug effects for 1 (Resident #27) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 1 of 1 meal observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dirty trash cans were stored away from the food storage racks; kitchen sink was free of leaks; the walk-in freezer floor was free of ice buildup; the ice machine and ice scoop were maintained in clean and sanitary conditions to prevent potential growth of harmful bacteria that could be transferred to the residents food; opened food items in the refrigerator, freezer and storage room were covered, sealed, and dated; and expired foods were promptly removed from stock to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination; dietary staff practiced good hand hygiene to prevent potential cross contamination of food and clean dishes; and hot food item was maintained at the required temperature on the steam table and serving line to prevent potential foodborne illness. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a refund was received by the resident or responsible party within 30 days from the date of discharge for 2 (Residents #230 and #231) sampled residents within 30 days from the date of discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the G Hall shower room and the beauty shop were locked to prevent residents from being harmed from the ingestion of the chemicals present.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the physician ordered rate to prevent respiratory complications for 2 (Residents #25 and #60) of 2 sampled residents who received oxygen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained on how to monitor residents on a high-risk medication (anticoagulants), Apixaban (Eliquis), for 1 (Resident #37) of 1 sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to show a monthly Medication Regimen Review was completed on a monthly basis as required for 4 (Residents #3, #24, #25, and #41) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored behind a locked door; medications were not left at the bedside for 2 (Resident #13 and Resident #56) of 2 residents reviewed for medication storage at the bedside; and narcotic medications were stored in a permanently affixed compartment to prevent the potential of misappropriation of resident property.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. The failed practices had the potential to affect 11 residents who received pureed diets, and 6 residents who received mechanical soft diets from 1 of 1 kitchen according to a list provided by the Dietary Manager on 07/17/2024 at 3:11 PM.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 1 of 1 meal observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 11 residents who received pureed diet, as documented on the list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 07/17/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician's plan of care for chopped meat was followed for 8 residents who had a physician's order for chopped meat diets. The failed practice had the potential to affect 8 residents who had physician orders for chopped meat diets (census of 78), according to a list provided by the Dietary Manager on 07/17/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement stated the resident or resident representative were not required to sign the binding arbitration agreement as a condition of admission or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a water management program was put in place to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the water system or ways to intervene in the instance of a Legionella outbreak for 1 of 1 facility; failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place for 1 (Resident #29) of 1 sampled resident with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube and open wound; failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during meal service to prevent cross contamination for 1 (Resident #15) to prevent cross contamination; failed to ensure upper dentures were stored in a closed container with denture cleaner to prevent infection, and germs for 1 (Resident #71); [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions for a hand device was consistently used for 1 (Resident #39) of 1 sampled resident who had a hand contracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental care was provided for 1 (Resident #71) of 1 sampled (Resident #71) to promote good oral hygiene.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all bodily areas were cleansed during incontinent care to promote cleanliness and good personal hygiene to prevent the potential infection for 1 (Resident #277) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for incontinent care.
6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 16, 2025, 3 on July 18, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.18 | 4.02 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.56 | 3.45 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.50 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.35 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.1% | 49.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.5% | 44.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.44 on weekdays and 3.56 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.68 in April to June 2025 to 4.18 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.18 | 0.34 | 4.44 | 3.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 75 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.16 | 0.31 | 4.35 | 3.69 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 76 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.18 | 0.29 | 4.37 | 3.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.68 | 0.36 | 4.89 | 4.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 77 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arkansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.05 | 0.40 | 4.28 | 3.47 | 2.0% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $16.55 | $14.52 to $17.34 | 17,260 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.22 | $23.82 to $29.43 | 10,010 |
| Registered nurses | $37.95 | $32.04 to $43.40 | 29,400 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 9.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 10.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 10.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.4 | 24.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.2 | 12.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Trinity Village Medical Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (26.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
26.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Arkansas: 7 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
11.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Arkansas: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 94 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arkansas: 0 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
55.4% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas64.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 94 residents counted.
5.4% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas2.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 94 residents counted.
97.4% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas98.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: TRINITY VILLAGE, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunn, Valerie | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2023 | |
| Atkinson, Catherine | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/25/2024 | |
| Brown, Laurel | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/08/2022 | |
| Brown, Thomas | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Carr, Jacquisue | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Clement, Joe | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Cosner, Zachary | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Cromwell, Kay | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Hardin, Barrie | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Harris, Don | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Harris, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2013 | |
| House, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Morgan, Cappi | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/25/2024 | |
| Powell, Ron | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2008 | |
| Self, Sabrina | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Trotter, Henry | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Whitaker, Deborah | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Powell, Ron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Dunn, Valerie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Harris, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Tolbert, Marty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arkansas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.