741 E Water Street, Urbana, OH 43078 · Champaign County · (937) 652-1381
50 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365365 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2025, inspectors cited 19 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 39 health citations since November 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.55 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.91 of those hours.
31.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 39 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, review of maintenance work order log, and review of the facility work order process form, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were without holes in the drywall or torn wallpaper. This affected three (#09, #12, and #13) residents out of the four residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Council Minutes, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were addressed in a timely manner or resolved. This affected three (#24, #35, #29) of three residents who attended a surveyor led Resident Council Meeting during the annual survey. The facility identified there were 13 residents who regularly attend resident council meetings. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who reside in the facility. The census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a medication error rate less than five percent. This affected two residents (#15 and #43) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Observation on 06/04/25 of medication pass revealed 30 opportunities were observed with two errors for a medication error rate of 6.67%. 1. Review of medical records for Resident #43 revealed an admission date 07/18/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, pneumonia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 that indicated he was cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepared palatable food. This affected 29 residents, (#20, #39, #35, #5, #28, #2, #34, #12, #33, #198, #38, #8, #17, #27, #43, #29, #3, #13, #32, #198, #22, #10, #26, #31, #25, #24, #7, #23, and #37) who were served regular consistency textured diets. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of medical records revealed the following residents had a physician order for a regular consistency textured diet, Resident #20, #39, #35, #5, #28, #2, #34, #12, #33, #198, #38, #8, #17, #27, #43, #29, #3, #13, #32, #198, #22, #10, #26, #31, #25, #24, #7, #23, and #37. Observation on 06/02/25 at 11:46 A.M. revealed Residents #11, #2, and #24 received popcorn shrimp at the lunch meal in the dining room. The shrimp had a white coating and was not browned. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepare food in a sanitary manner. This affected 45 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 06/02/25 at 10:05 A.M. of Diet Manger, (DM) #208 revealed white flakes of skin surrounded with bright reddened ring of skin on bilateral underside of forearms, measuring approximately four inches by two inches. When DM #208 touched the skin areas, flaky skin was removed. Interview on 06/02/25 at 10:05 A.M. with DM #208 verified the skin areas were diagnosed as a noncommunicable skin condition. DM #208 verified the skin areas should be covered due to the flaky skin. DM #208 verified her job duties include food preparation, food service and dishwashing/sanitizing. Observation on 06/04/25 at 11:17 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure facility staff performed hand hygiene. This affected one resident (#15) observed during medication pass and additionally affected three residents (#98, #5, and #99) who had their meal trays delivered by staff without hand hygiene being performed. The census was 46.
Inspectors wrote3. Observation of Resident #29's room on 06/03/25 at 11:26 A.M., revealed the toilet was dirty and had a metal piece on the back of the toilet to hold the seat in place that had built up yellowish gray substance on it. The handwashing sink was rusted, there was tape holding the light cover in place behind her bed, the floor was dirty and sticky and the corners of the floor had a build up gray substance in the corners. Interview with Resident #29 on 06/03/25 at 11:28 A.M., revealed she didn't like her floors looking the way they do and didn't like her toilet and sink with the rust and thought they were dirty. 4. [...]
Inspectors wrote2. Medical record review for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/04/18. Her medical diagnoses included a stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. She was independent for eating, toileting, bed mobility and required a Hoyer lift for transfers. Resident #29 was always incontinent for bowel and bladder. Review of the facility provided designated smoke times revealed the residents are allowed to smoke at: 9:00 A.M., 11:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. daily. Review of Resident/family Council Agenda/Minutes dated 02/11/25 revealed the council wanted the facility to add another smoke break to the smoke between the times of 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided dignity and respect to two residents (#22 and #21) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Review of record for Resident #22 revealed admission dated 07/03/24. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, depression, and nicotine dependence using cigarettes. Review of plan of care dated 08/01/24 revealed Resident #22 had risk for altered mood related to depression. Interventions included assisting residents in identify strengths, positive coping skills, anger management, approach in a calm relaxed manner, and collaborative care. Interview on 06/04/25 at 3:30 P.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, resident council meeting, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were safe from abuse. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, Resident Council meeting, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, resident council meeting, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an investigation was initiated for a allegation of abuse. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for residents who had hospice services. This affected two residents, (Residents #3 and #14) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: 1. Record review of Resident #3 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #3 include dementia, anxiety, stage four kidney disease, heart disease, and shortness of breath. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers and mobility. The resident received hospice services starting on 11/23/24. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, review of the care conferences and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine care conferences. This affected two (#29 and #39) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe homelike environment was free on unsecured potential poisonous chemicals. This affected one (#37) of 46 residents observed in the facility for potential hazards. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a restricted liquid diet was honored. This affected one (#39) of two reviewed for hydration during the annual survey. The census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on record, observation, interview, pharmacy interview, policy, the facility failed to provide safe delivery of medication by crushing potassium 20 Milliequivalent for one resident (#15) out of residents reviewed on annual. The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Review of record revealed that Resident #15 had admission date 08/21/24. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure, depression, vascular dementia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of Quarter MDS dated [DATE] revealed that BIMS was 1 that indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of plan of care dated 08/21/24 revealed that Resident #15 had a risk for cardiac that had arteriosclerotic heart disease. Intervention was to provide small meals or frequent rather than three large meals, encourage activity level, and administer medications as ordered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired and the facility failed to provide safe storage and delivery of medication for one resident (#28). The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Observation on [DATE] at 8:40 A.M. of the overstock medication room, revealed there were seven bottles of Folic Acid 400 micrograms (mcg) with an expiration date was 02/2025. Interview on [DATE] at 8:40 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #204 it was verified the seven bottles of Folic Acid 400 mcg expired 02/2025. Each bottle was unopened and contained 250 tablets. Review of the facility document titled In House Stock dated unknown revealed that the facility did have Folic Acid 400 micrograms (mcg) over the counter for stock. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a follow-up appointment was made for a resident who had a tooth that was broke off at the gum line. This affected one (#29) of four residents reviewed for dental services during the annual survey. The census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and resident interview, family member interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a pest free environment. This affected one (#11) of 46 resident rooms observed for pest. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews with staff and the resident's emergency contact, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an effectivprovide a resident and/or emergency contact training on a mechanical lift and meal arrangements for a safe discharge. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 45.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary care conference was held and the resident's were invited to attend. This affected one (Resident #42) of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide a spend-down notification to a resident or representative and assist the resident in spending their balance before returning it to the State of Ohio. This affected one (Resident #22) of one resident reviewed for spend-down notifications. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, review of the facility's policy, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was created related to resident's oxygen use and behaviors. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility's policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to timely implement a wound treatment for a resident's new pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for pressure wounds. The facility identified two current residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff placed a splint device on a resident according to the therapy recommendations and physician order. This affected one (Resident #30) of one resident reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility identified two residents with a physician-ordered splint device. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the facility policy, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure smokeless tobacco products were secured. This affected one (Resident #23) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility identified one resident who wandered and had cognitive impairment. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to timely act on pharmacy recommendations for three (#2, #10, and #14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or provide a rationale for not attempting a GDR for a resident receiving an antidepressant. This affected one (Resident #14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's fund accounts were provided a monthly interest. This affected three (Residents #26, #38, and #42) of six residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteThe following deficiency represents an incident of past non-compliance that was subsequently corrected prior to this survey. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of radiology report, review of fall investigation, review of facility policies and procedures, and review of the facility's corrective action the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to a resident during a transfer using a sit to stand lift mechanical device. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #02 fell from the sit to stand lift mechanical device and subsequently sustained a fracture to the right intertrochanteric (hip). This affected one (Resident #02) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility's infection policies and infection control log, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to correct a concern with urinary tract infections as well as complete infection surveillance for August 2019. This affected 11 Residents (#14, #18, #27, #35, #39, #40, #41, #46, #98, #99, and #147) of 11 reviewed for infections. In addition the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during wound care. This affected one (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed for wound care. The facility also failed to ensure proper food handling, related to hand hygiene, before touching residents food. This directly affected one (Resident #13) of one resident observed during a lunch observation. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, review of Resident Council Meeting records, review of the activity calendar, and review of facility policies; the facility failed to act promptly, respond to, and provide a rationale to Resident Council concerns in the areas of activities and appointment reminders. This affected two Resident's (#15 and #37) of three residents reviewed for Resident Council concerns. The census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident medical records and staff interviews the facility failed to complete pain interviews on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This affected two Resident's (#24 and #40) of 14 residents reviewed for comprehensive MDS assessments. The census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident medical records, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to screen a resident for serious mental illness and developmental disability. This affected one (Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for appropriate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) completion. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident medical records, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority and the intellectual disability authority after a significant change and a psychiatric hospitalization for residents who had mental illness and/or intellectual disability. This affected two Resident's (#36 and #37) of three residents reviewed for appropriate Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) completion. The facility identified one resident who had a developmental disability and 20 residents with a documented psychiatric diagnoses. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of medical record, observation, resident and staff interview, review of activity records and review of facility's activity policy, the facility failed to provide activities as scheduled to meet the activity preferences and needs of residents. This affected two Resident's (#21 and #36) of two residents reviewed for activities. The census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of medical records, interview with facility staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center and failed to assess residents post dialysis. This affected one (Resident #40) of one resident reviewed for appropriate dialysis care. The facility identified Resident #40 was the only resident receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure non pharmacological interventions were implemented before giving an as needed narcotic (Percocet). This affected one (Resident #40) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 50.
3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on November 6, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.55 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.16 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.94 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.70 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.0% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 16.7% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.67 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.71 on weekdays and 3.16 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.55 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.91 | 3.71 | 3.16 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 42 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.53 | 3.47 | 3.05 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 46 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.52 | 3.43 | 3.09 | 0.5% | 1 of 92 | 45 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.51 | 3.45 | 3.03 | 0.6% | 0 of 91 | 46 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.2 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.6 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Urbana Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 47 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
2.4% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: URBANA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wwbv Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/30/2019 |
| Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020 | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Shh Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2019 | |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2020 | |
| Hohlefelder, Jason | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/25/2024 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Blumenschein, Tonya | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/14/2021 | |
| Hohlefelder, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/19/2022 | |
| Bnv Dynasty LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 01/01/2020 | |
| Weisberg, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2025 | |
| Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020) | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Bnv Dynasty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2016 | |
| Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2016 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Urbana Re Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2016 | |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2020 | |
| Blumenschein, Tonya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/14/2021 | |
| Hohlefelder, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/25/2024 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Scott, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.