Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites
5600 Woodlands Trail, Denison, TX 75020 · Grayson County · (903) 462-1200
133 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2015
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676394 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 26, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since November 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $109,954 in the last three years; the largest was $109,954, and the latest is dated April 18, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.
44.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Fundamental Healthcare, an affiliated group of 66 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
February 26, 2026Standard inspection · 9 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment including clean bed linen in good condition for seven (Resident #55, Resident #11, and 5 confidential residents in group interview) of 16 residents and 4 of 4 bed linen closets reviewed for resident rights and homelike environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 and #11's and 5 confidential residents' in group interview fitted bed sheets were in good condition free of holes, tears and threadbare areas. 2. The facility failed to ensure 4 of 4 bed linen closets on resident halls did not have clean fitted bed sheets with holes, tears and threadbare areas. These failures place residents at risk of an unsanitary environment and a decline in quality of life.
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 4 residents (Resident #47, Resident #66, Resident #84, and Resident #55) of 20 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #s 47, 66, and 84 had their fingernails trimmed on 2/24/26. The facility failed to provide timely incontinent care for Resident #55 on 2/24/26. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and skin breakdown, and a decreased quality of life.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the facility's only kitchen in that:The facility failed to ensure food items in the walk-in refrigerator were covered and sealed on 2/24/2026. This failure could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, if consumed and food contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #15, Resident #51, Resident #55 and Resident #86) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Agency RN H prevented cross contamination of the multi-resident use glucometer test strips and failed to maintain a clean and dirty side of diabetic caddy used for supplies to obtain fingerstick blood for Resident #15 on 02/24/26, when she placed the contaminated glucometer back in the clean side of the caddy next to the bottle of glucose test strips. 2. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was care planned for limited range of motion related to his contracture. This failure could put Residents at risk of receiving unnecessary treatments, not receiving care or services and further decline of their physical health. Review of Resident #7's Face sheet dated 2/26/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 10/20/22 and readmission date of 9/9/25. The resident had the following active diagnoses: [...]
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #7's contracture to his left hand upon discharge from therapy services on 9/3/25. This failure could place residents at risk for decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, and worsening of contractures. Review of Resident #7's Face sheet dated 2/26/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 10/20/22 and readmission date of 9/9/25. The resident had the following active diagnoses: [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for one of six residents (Resident #15) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Agency RN H followed the manufacturer's instructions to prime (means removing the air from the needle and cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensures that the pen is working correctly) the Humalog pen (Insulin Lispro) (Hormone) prior to dialing in required amount of Insulin to be administered to Resident #15. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving full dosage of medication.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for the facility's one (hall 300 cart) of four medication carts reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 15's Lispro Insulin (Hormone) Pen, that was used on [DATE], was dated when opened. These failures could affect residents resulting in diminished effectiveness and not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the medications.
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident call system was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area from each resident's beside and toilet and bathing facilities for one (Resident #23) of six residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's toilet and shower call button were working in resident's bathroom. This failure placed residents at risk of a delay in resident getting assistance from staff.
December 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's responsible party had the right to exercise the resident's rights for one (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's representative was involved in the decision making before inserting a catheter. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferred responsible party represent them in care decisions. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's face sheet identified his representatives were family members. Diagnosis included: [...]
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with indwelling urinary catheters receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter or Urinary Tract Infection.-The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4 received care and services to avoid catheter-associated urinary tract infections to the extent possible as evidenced by not demonstrating sterile technique during indwelling urinary catheterization of Resident #4. This failure could place all residents requiring indwelling urinary catheters and catheter care at risk for catheter associated urinary tract infections or complications that could lead to serious harm. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 12.23.2025 at 12:30 p.m. [...]
October 22, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA A and the dietary staff checked the temperature and sealed Resident #1's cup of hot tea, which resulted in Resident #1 spilling tea in her lap on 10/13/25 acquiring a second-degree burn (partial thickness burn, damages the outer and middle layers of skin. Characterized by blistering-typically heal in 7 to 21 days) to her left upper thigh. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The non-compliance began on 10/13/25 and ended on 10/14/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
December 5, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store and label food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that: The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility refrigerator and freezer were dated or labeled. The facility failed to take the temperature of the soup after re-heating the soup in the microwave. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed and food contamination. Findings Include: *At 8:45am revealed an opened box of slice smoked ham had two plastic 3-pound bags of sliced smoked ham without a date received or date used by. *At 8:49am revealed an unopened loaf of white sliced bread in non-labeled clear bag without a date used by or label of contents. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #21, Resident #63, and Resident #45) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN B prepared Resident 21's medication without cross contaminating her medications on 12/04/24 2. The facility failed to ensure that CNA D performed hand hygiene after providing dressing assistance and transfer of Resident # 63 and before leaving the resident's room on 12/04/24. 3. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for one of six residents (Residents #8) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed the Physician orders and facility procedures for checking residual before administering Resident #8's medication through his g-tube on 12/04/24. This failure placed the residents at risk of aspiration, vomiting or incomplete administration of medication if tube was blocked or obstructed.
April 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority the resident representative when there was a a significant change in the resident's physical status for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for change of condition. ADON A failed to read Resident #1's x-ray results received at the facility on 01/18/24 and failed to notify/consult the Physician about the resident's femur (thigh bone) fracture and change of condition using the facility's approved notification methods leaving Resident #1 with an undiagnosed/untreated fracture for 29 days (01/18/24 to 02/13/24). Resident #1 fell on [DATE] at 03:15 a.m. with no apparent injury, but when attempting to get up, the resident's legs kept giving way. [...]
- J Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from neglect for one of six residents(Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. 1. ADON A failed to follow the facility's process for documentation, transcription and notifications when she failed to transcribe the physician's order on 01/18/24 for an X-ray request for Resident #1's left femur (thigh bone), failed to document an assessment of Resident #1's pain to determine the location, duration, and scale of Resident #1's pain, failed to place the X-ray request for 01/18/24 on the 24-hour report for follow-up, and failed to notify the responsible party of the X-ray request and results. 2. [...]
- J Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for diagnostic services in that. 1. ADON A failed to read Resident #1's x-ray results received at the facility on 01/18/24 and failed to notify/consult the Physician about the resident's femur (thigh bone) fracture and change of condition using the facility's approved notification methods leaving Resident #1 with an undiagnosed/untreated fracture for 29 days (01/18/24 to 02/13/24). 2. The facility failed to have a system in place to ensure verbal notification was promptly received from the contracted Radiology company. Resident #1 fell on [DATE] at 03:15 a.m. [...]
November 16, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of six residents (Resident #39, Resident # 33, Resident # 385 and Resident # 336) and eight of 13 rooms (Rooms #201, #202, #203, #204, #205, #207, #208 and #209) reviewed for infection control. 1. LVN C failed to perform hand hygiene after completion of insulin injection on Resident # 39. 2. LVN D failed to clean Resident #33's administration site with an alcohol wipe prior to giving her an insulin injection. 3. CNA J failed to use hand hygiene while passing lunch trays on the 200 hall, Rooms #201, #202, #203, #204, #205, #207, #208 and #209. 4. [...]
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #79) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #79's call light was placed within his reach. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries and unmet needs.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Residents #15) of two resident reviewed for feeding tubes. 1. LVN E failed to check for residual of Resident #15's G-tube prior to medication administration. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's G-tube was flushed with 35 cc's water prior to and after medication administration per physician orders. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's G-tube was flushed with water between each medication administration. 4. The facility failed to ensure medication was dissolved completely prior to Resident #15's medication administration. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving full dosage of medication, abdominal discomfort, medication incompatibility, tube obstruction, nausea, and risk of aspiration.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of three residents (Resident #285) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure the supplemental O2 was provided at the physician ordered liter amount for Resident #285. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving an incorrect amount of oxygen and the risk of oxygen toxicity.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for two of eight residents (Resident #2 and Resident # 51) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, and Resident #51 did not have unsecured medication in their rooms on 11/14/23. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being monitored for their medications, adverse reactions, and drug diversion.
- D Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for one of 24 residents (Residents #26) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to assist in providing dental services for Resident #26. This failure could place residents at risk of oral complications, dental pain, and diminished quality of life.
Fire safety inspections
11 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 26, 2026, 7 on December 5, 2024, 2 on November 16, 2023.
Every fire safety citation11 citations
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 18, 2024 | Fine | $109,954 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.28 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.99 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.6% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 22.2% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.07 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.40 on weekdays and 2.99 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.31 in April to June 2025 to 3.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.28 | 0.49 | 3.40 | 2.99 | 13.2% | 0 of 90 | 91 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.23 | 0.43 | 3.35 | 2.92 | 12.8% | 0 of 92 | 96 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.29 | 0.55 | 3.41 | 2.98 | 10.7% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.31 | 0.50 | 3.41 | 3.07 | 12.8% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.6 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Fundamental Healthcare, a group of 66 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fannin County Hospital Authority | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/01/2024 |
| Sanderson, Clark | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Denison Long Term Care, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Garvin, Clifford | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Forman, Murray | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2025 | |
| Fundamental Administrative Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Fundamental Clinical and Operational Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2015 | |
| Garvin, Clifford | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Walker, Barry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avir at Memorial Denison, 1.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Denison Nursing and Rehab Denison, 1.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- The Homestead of Denison Denison, 1.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Beacon Hill Denison, 2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Avir at Sherman Sherman, 5.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Texoma Healthcare Center Sherman, 6.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Southern Pointe Living Center Colbert, 7.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Focused Care at Sherman Sherman, 9.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 48 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 26, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $109,954 in the last three years.
- Does Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites?
- CMS lists 9 owners and managers, and links the home to Fundamental Healthcare. Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.