Home / West Virginia / Parkersburg
222 Nicolette Road, Parkersburg, WV 26104 · Wood County · (304) 485-5137
66 certified beds, about 62 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515181 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 18, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since January 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $21,580 in the last three years; the largest was $21,580, and the latest is dated August 28, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.44 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.51 of those hours.
CMS links it to Wvu Medicine, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program which limits the transmission of pathogens and helps prevent the spread of disease, as evidenced by; Not having the correct enhanced barrier protection (EBP) sign indicators for residents rooms. There were lift pads left out on wheelchairs and on lifts. In the laundry room there were no cleaning logs and the air vent was off during the washing/drying process. Finally, the water control / maintenance program was missing logs, diagrams and service checks for the entire system. These were random opportunities for discoveries during the Long Term Survey Process and have the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 62. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement and develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan which includes the measurable side effects of medications treating psychosocial needs, use of a communication board, and a preference to keep the room door closed. This was found during the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process. This was true for (3) three of 19 records reviewed. Resident identifiers: #12, #26 and #42. Facility census: 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was true for five (5) out of five (5) employees reviewed during the long term care survey process. Employee identifiers #18, 62,52,46 and 36. Facility census: 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility assessment failed to state the break down of staffing needed to care for the residents based on their acuity levels. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide the required training for two (2) out of five (5) employees reviewed for training during the long term care survey process. Nursing Aide (NA) identifiers #62 and 18. Facility census: 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure timely notification to the physician of Resident's significant weight loss. This is true for one (1) of three (3) Resident's reviewed for weight loss. Resident identifiers: Resident #5. Facility census: 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on Interviews and record review, the facility failed to update the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a Significant Change is status for Resident #9. No significant change in status assessment was completed within 14 days of a significant change in a resident's medical status as per regulations. This was discovered during the the Long Term Care Survey Process and was true for one (1) of 19 sampled residents. Resident Identifier: Resident #9. Facility Census: 62Findings Include: During an interview with Resident #9 and their roommate on 03/16/26 at approximately 12:51 PM, they stated they had a fall in their room on water on 1/20/26. It was unwitnessed by staff, but was seen by the roommate who alerted the staff Resident #9 had fallen and hit her head after slipping on some water Resident #9 had spilled. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, Resident #42 care plan was found to not be revised to address Resident #42 dental issues. This was true for one (1) of 19 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier #42. Facility Census: 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible. During a random opportunity for discovery, the following issues were identified: A treatment cart was left unlocked and unattended and oxygen tanks were stored improperly. These failed practices had the potential to effect more than a limited number of resident currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 62. Findings Include: a) Treatment Cart On 03/18/26 at 8:50 AM, an observation of an unlocked, unattended treatment cart was made. The cart was in a place easily accessible allowing access to these treatment supplies by residents, unauthorized persons, or visitors. At 8:56 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 confirmed during an interview the treatment cart was left unlocked and unattended. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Resident #42 suffered a severe weight loss and the facility failed to ensure the resident was reviewed by the licensed dietician and/or interventions were put into place to prevent further weight loss. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #42. Facility Census: 62.a) Resident #42 An observation of Resident #42 in her bed on 03/16/26 at approximately 1:30 PM, found her noon time meal was on her over the bed table and was untouched, The resident indicated she did not want to eat. A review of Resident #42's medical record found the following weights: -- 05/30/25 - 170.2 pounds (Lbs.) -- 07/18/25 - 169.5 Lbs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure nurse staff postings were correct. There were seven (7) out of 14 days of incorrect nurse staff postings. This failed practice had the potential to effect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 62. The nurse staff posting was requested from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 03/17/26 for the timeframe of 02/08/26 to 02/22/26. On 03/18/26 the NHA provided the nurse staff posting and the hours per patient day (HPPD) report. This surveyor compared the staff posting to the HPPD report and found on the following days the nurse staff posting was incorrect: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for medication administration. Resident Identifiers: #3 and #13. Facility Census: 42. The state agency notified the Nursing Home Administrator of the immediate jeopardy at 4:30 PM on 08/26/24. The facility submitted a plan of correction (POC) at 6:09 PM. At 6:25 PM, the POC was accepted by the state agency. The state agency verified the POC was implemented by conducting staff interviews and the immediate jeopardy was abated at 10:15 AM on 08/27/24. Findings Include: a) On 08/25/24 at approximately 11:25 AM, the resident was interviewed regarding receiving the wrong medication on 07/01/24. Resident #3 responded, I don't even know what medication I take, there is probably eight (8) or nine (9) of them. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed for nursing staff. This was true for four (4) of five (5) staff members reviewed under the care area of sufficient and competent nurse staffing. Facility Census: 42. Findings Include: a) Annual Performance Reviews On 08/27/24 at 3:00 PM, a review of the staff employment files was completed. The review found the annual performance evaluations were not completed for the following nurse aides (NAs): -NA #71 -NA #50 -NA #72 -NA #14 On 08/28/24 at approximately 9:45 AM, the Administrator was notified of the missing evaluations. The Administrator stated, we will be working on this.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor refrigerator temperatures in the medication room on the 300 hall. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect more than a limited numberof residents. Facility Census: 42. Findings Include: a) Medication Refrigerator On 08/26/24 at 8:10 AM, a tour of the medication room on the 300 hall was completed. The tour found the medication refrigerator temperatures were not monitored and documented on the following dates: --08/02/24 AM --08/02/24 PM --08/03/24 AM --08/04/24 AM --08/04/24 PM --08/05/24 PM --08/07/24 AM --08/08/24 AM --08/10/24 AM --08/11/24 AM --08/12/24 AM --08/13/24 AM --08/13/24 PM --08/15/24 AM --08/16/24 AM --08/17/24 AM --08/17/24 PM --08/18/24 AM --08/18/24 PM --08/19/24 PM --08/21/24 AM --08/22/24 AM On 08/26/24 at 8:18 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for Resident #21. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #21. Facility Census: 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all admitting diagnosis were reflected on the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). This was true on two (2) of four (4) PASRRs reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #36 and #21. Facility Census:
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to comply with the Medical Power of Attorneys' (MPOA) wishes regarding administration of immunizations. This was true for two (2) of six (6) immunizations reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #35 and #36. Facility Census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and accident free environment as possible regarding the disposal of razors. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect no more than an isolated number of residents. Resident Identifier: #43. Facility Census: 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 maintained acceptable perimeters of nutrition by not implementing recommendations made by the registered dietician. This was true of one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #5. Facility Census: 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors and/or side effects for residents prescribed psychotropic medications. This was true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifiers: #43, #21 and #5. Facility Census: 42. Findings Include: a) Resident #43 On 08/27/24 at 12:35 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #43. The review found the resident had three psychiatric diagnoses; Unspecified Dementia, Bipolar Disorder and Depression. The resident was prescribed Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) 2mg (milligram) daily for bipolar disorder. The review also, found no documentation regarding the monitoring of behaviors for the resident who was receiving an antipsychotic medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #18's call light was with in reach. This was true for one (1) of 42 residents currently residing in the facility. Resident identifier: #18. Facility Census: 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure completion of the required staff education for one (1) of five (5) staff members reviewed under the care area of sufficient and competent nurse staffing. Employee identifier: Nurse Aide (NA) #35. Facility Census: 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Dietary Manager. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of Residents that receive their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Items in the kitchen, service area and coffee bar were opened, without being dated to indicate when to discard. This practice has the ability to affect more than a limited number of Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 54 Findings Included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, showed that All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated. a) Kitchen tour During the initial kitchen tour on 01/03/22 at 10:30 AM, the following was found: 1) Kitchen --Walk-in refrigerator - One container of pimento spread, one bag of Organic Blend Vegetables, One bag of Naan Bread opened, not labeled, or dated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report a serious bodily injury after a fall to the proper State authorities for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of abuse. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #12. Facility Census: 54. Findings Included: a) Resident #177 Policy A review of the facility policy entitled Reporting Abuse/The Complaint Procedure was completed on 01/04/23 at 12:15 PM was completed. Section 3 (three) states If the alleged incident is abuse or serious bodily injury (injury involving extreme physical pain, involving substantial risk of death, impairment of a bodily member, organ or mental facility, or requiring medication intervention such as surgery or hospitalization) these allegations must be reported within two hours to the appropriate agencies . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, a physician's order was not obtained for an ace wrap applied to a resident's left wrist and arm . This was true for one (1) of 16 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #56. Facility census: 54. Findings Included: a) Resident #56 During an Interview and observation on 01/03/23 at 12:15 PM, Resident #56 stated that he has a lot of pain in his left wrist from a contracture. Observations found an ace wrap was in place on his left wrist and arm. A medical record review for Resident #56 revealed, there was no physician order for an ace wrap to be in place on his left wrist or arm. [...]
Inspectors wroteased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 16 residents reviewed received services to prevent a decrease in range of motion. Resident identifier: #28. Facility census: 54.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice in regards to monitoring pain levels. This was true for one (1) of 16 residents reviewed during the recertification process. Resident Identifier: #56. Facility census: 54.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely notification to the physician of a Resident's significant weight loss. This is true for one (1) of two (2) Residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident identifiers: R #54. Facility census: 54.
19 fire safety citations on file: 10 on March 18, 2026, 5 on August 28, 2024, 4 on January 5, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 28, 2024 | Fine | $21,580 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.44 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.20 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.82 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.76 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.54 on weekdays and 3.20 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.89 in April to June 2025 to 3.44 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.44 | 0.51 | 3.54 | 3.20 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 62 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.83 | 0.41 | 3.90 | 3.64 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 60 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.80 | 0.41 | 3.90 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 56 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.89 | 0.45 | 4.05 | 3.49 | 1.9% | 5 of 91 | 55 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 36.7 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 42.0 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.0 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.1 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.4 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ohio Valley Health Care's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
43.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 64 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 64 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
20.6% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
2.4% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 42 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 42 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION. CMS links this home to Wvu Medicine, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camden Clark Health Services Inc | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Karlapudi, Mounish | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Lacy, Carlie | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Pierson, Kyle | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Smith, Sean | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Pierson, Kyle | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Smith, Sean | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| McBee, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/18/2024 | |
| Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/13/2024 | |
| West Virginia United Health System, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/24/2025 | |
| Karlapudi, Mounish | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| McBee, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.