1709 Taliaferro Ave, Tampa, FL 33602 · Hillsborough County · (813) 223-4623
80 certified beds, about 62 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105891 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 28, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since October 2020, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $13,520 in the last three years; the largest was $13,520, and the latest is dated October 21, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.78 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
50.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Summit Care, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility did not maintain required communication with the dialysis center and did not accurately assess residents before and after dialysis treatments for two of three sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2). As a result, important clinical information was missing or incorrect, scheduled evaluations of dialysis access sites and vital signs were not completed as ordered, and the facility did not provide the dialysis center with the information needed to ensure safe and coordinated care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services by not ensuring transportation was arranged for three of three residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) who required outpatient dialysis. This failure resulted in missed or delayed dialysis treatments, early discontinuation of treatment, and residents experiencing uncertainty or fear about whether they would receive their scheduled dialysis. Findings Included:During an interview on 07/14/2026 at 1:00 p.m., Resident #3 stated she was scheduled for dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. She reported that on 07/13/2026 transportation did not arrive, although she was ready for her appointment. She stated her son helped her locate another transportation service, and the dialysis center moved her chair time so she did not miss treatment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to address a change in condition in a timely manner for one Resident (#1) out of three residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the prevention and development of pressure wounds for one resident (#1) out of three residents reviewed. Fundings included: Review of Resident #1's admission history and physical, dated 11/26/25 showed under chief complaint: R (right) foot infection. History of present illness: [Resident #1] is an [AGE] year-old patient with Alzheimer's, dementia, hx. (history of CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) with R lower and upper contracture, RLE (right Lower Extremity) osteomyelitis, . who presents for worsening right foot wound. Pt. unable to contribute to history due to underlying dementia and fatigue. History obtained from [family member] over the phone. Reportedly patient was put in an ALF (adult Living Facility) on 11/18 as [family member} was out of state. When she returned yesterday she visited [Resident #1]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program related to live pests found in two rooms (210 and 350) located in two halls (200 and 300) out of 4 halls observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor a residents right to refuse medications for one resident (#2) out of four residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed protect a residents right to be free from abuse for one resident (#2) out of four residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured on two units (300 and 400) out of four units in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review. the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to showering for two (#2, #4) of three residents sampled and related to incontinence care for two (#2, #3) of three residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure four (#5, #6, #9, and #10) residents of seventy-three had access to the call light system as evidence by call light pull strings were not within their reach.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide therapy services in a timely manner for one (#2) of three sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review. and interview. the facility failed to maintain the medical record of one (#3) of three residents sampled in an appropriate manner related to complete and accuracy of the records.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for four (250, 310, 330, and 350) of eight rooms observed during four (03/25/2024, 03/26/2024, 03/27/2024, and 03/28/2024) of four days.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations were met for one (#19) of thirty-nine residents on four (03/25/2024, 03/26/2024, 03/27/2024 and 03/28/2024) of four days.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a code status was provided upon admission for one resident ( # 228 ) out of 10 residents sampled. Finding Include: Review of the electronic and paper medical record revealed Resident #228 did not have an advanced directive related to the resident code status for six days after being admitted to the facility. Review of Resident # 228 admission Record dated 03/27/2024 showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to Acute Kidney Failure, unspecified, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate. During an interview on 03/27/2024 at 10:00 AM., with Resident # 228's responsible party. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) for four (#56, #7, #10 and #32) of eleven residents reviewed. Findings Included: 1. Electronic Medical Record (EMR) review revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Bipolar Disorder, Alzheimer's, Other Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Mood Disorder, Anxiety Disorder according to the Face Sheet. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed: -Section C: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 99, indicating resident unable to complete interview. -Section I: Active Diagnosis - Alzheimer's. Anxiety, Depression, Bipolar, Schizophrenia checked. -Section N: Medications administered - Antidepressant and Antianxiety. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (# 24) was provided with Activity of Daily Living, (ADL's) assistance out of 10 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 3/25/2024 at 3: 30 PM., Resident # 24 was observed laying down in his bed with his hair disheveled and facial hair. Resident # 24 said he would like to be shaved but staff won't assist him. During an observation on 03/26/2024 at 10:00 AM., Resident # 24 was observed laying down in bed and appeared with no signs of distress. Review of Resident #24's admission Record dated 03/27/2024 showed he was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, unspecified, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen services, including the safe handling, humidification, cleaning, storage, and dispensing of oxygen, was provided for one resident (#66) out of thirty-nine residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Side Rail evaluation were conducted prior to installation for two residents (# 10, 24) out of 10 residents sampled Findings Included: 1 During an observation on 03/25/2024 at 03:26 PM Resident # 10 was observed laying down in bed fully dressed, well groomed, with no signs of distress. Resident # 10 was observed with two different types of ¼ side rails on his bed. During an observation on 03/27/2024 at 10: 00 AM., Resident #10 was observed laying down in bed with 1/4 side rails up on both sides of his bed. Resident # 10 said he did not know why he had side rails on his bed. Residents were observed with no signs of distress. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-two medication administration opportunities were observed and 3 errors were identified for two residents (#9 and #32) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 9.38% medication error rate. Findings Include: On 3/26/24 at 8:50 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was conducted for Resident #9. Staff C, LPN dispensed the following medications: -Clonazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet -Plavix 75 mg one tablet -Haldol 5 mg one tablet -Paroxetine 40 mg one tablet -D3 50 mg/2,000 International units (IU) one tablet Staff C, LPN was observed continuing medication administration for Resident # 32 with the following medications: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility did not ensure hearing aides were provided for one (Resident #55) of one resident sampled for assistive devices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for a dialysis resident, related to ensuring medications were administered prior to dialysis appointments and ensuring post dialysis orders were followed for one (Resident #58) out of six dialysis residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed and six errors were identified for three (Resident #24, Resident #54, and Resident #31) out of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 24% medication error rate. Findings Included: On 12/21/21 at 9:25 a.m. an observation of medication administration was conducted alongside Staff Member D, Registered Nurse (RND) for Resident #24. He prepared Acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg) two tablets, Amlodipine 50 mg one tablet, Lotensin HCL 20-25 mg one tablet, Clopidogrel 75 mg one, Potassium 20 milliequivalents ([NAME]) ER on e tablet, Multivitamin with mineral one tablet, Senokot one tablet, and Zinc 50 mg one tablet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to honor the choice and desire for showers for four (Residents # 22, 36, 7, and 41) of five residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADLs) out of a total sample of 29 residents.
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 28, 2024, 4 on October 2, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 21, 2025 | Fine | $13,520 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.78 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.42 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.22 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.08 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.6% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 64.3% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.92 on weekdays and 3.42 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.72 in April to June 2025 to 3.78 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.78 | 0.48 | 3.92 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 62 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.81 | 0.39 | 3.93 | 3.52 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.75 | 0.43 | 3.88 | 3.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.72 | 0.54 | 3.84 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.0 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ybor City Center for Rehabilitation and Healing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 98 eligible stays.
8.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.
44.2% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 99 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 99 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: YBOR CITY SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Summit Care, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ybor City SNF Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2020 |
| Drebin, Ezriel | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 02/01/2020 |
| Summit Care II Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2020 | |
| Klein, Solomon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.