Home / Louisiana / Church Point
830 S. Broadway St., Church Point, LA 70525 · Acadia County · (337) 684-6316
134 certified beds, about 127 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195564 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 11, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since November 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $268,528 in the last three years; the largest was $164,824, and the latest is dated February 12, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.12 of those hours.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician of a major injury for 1 resident (#1) of 3 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to 3 (#83, #88, #89) residents of 4 (#64, #83, #88, #89) residents investigated for personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure call systems in resident bathrooms were functional and accessible to residents at all times for 7 residents (#4, #23, #75, #112, #130, #132, and #133) out of a final sample of 48 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient space in the dining room to accommodate residents who required assistance with feeding. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 14 residents who required assistance with feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care/physician orders were implemented for 1 (Residents #2) out of 48 sampled residents. The facility failed to apply topical cream to a suprapubic site, irrigate a suprapubic catheter, and document suprapubic catheter output for Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for 2 (#7 and #54) out of 48 sampled residents as evidenced by:1. Failing to ensure Resident #7 swallowed all medications before the nurse exited the room, and2. Failing to ensure Resident #54's tube feeding bottle was labeled with the date and time it was hung and the nurse's initials.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received the necessary care and treatment for a pressure ulcer consistent with professional standards of practice evidenced by the nurse failing to conduct accurate weekly skin/ body audit assessment, and complete comprehensive weekly wound assessments for 1 (Resident #9) out of 3 (#9, #10, #109) residents investigated for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 48 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of records and policies and procedures, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to ensure the resident's environment remained free of hazards for 1(#66) out of 9 residents investigated for accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs as evidenced by failing to adequately monitor for anticoagulant side effects for 1 (#5) out of 5 residents investigated for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen by failing to ensure all staff wore a hair covering when entering the kitchen.127 residents consumed foods from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 (#105) of 39 sampled residents. S8CNA failed to obtain the appropriate number of persons required to utilize a mechanical lift to transfer Resident #105. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #105 on 09/13/2024 at approximately 6:35 AM when S8CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) moved the resident from a lying position to sitting position in preparation to transfer him into a chair without the assistance of a second person or a mechanical lifter as required by his plan of care. When S8CNA turned away from the resident to get his chair, he fell on the floor and hit his head resulting in a laceration to his right eyebrow and right cheek that required stitches.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received mail on Saturdays. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 121 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by: 1. having loose pills in 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 2 medication carts checked for safe and secure storage; 2. failing to ensure expired medications were not available for administration to residents in 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 2 medication carts checked for safe and secure storage; and 3. failing to ensure medications were stored at the proper temperatures to preserve their integrity. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 121 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and store and serve meals in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The deficient practice had the potential to effect the 118 residents who consumed meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. On 02/10/2025 at 8:35 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with S17DM (Dietary Manager) and revealed the following: 1. Food storage: A. Refrigerated items: 1. One bottle of lemon juice with an expiration date of 12/14/2024 2. One bottle of barbecue sauce with an expiration date of 09/11/2024 3. One bottle of whipped topping with an expiration date of 06/27/2024 4. One container of sour cream with an expiration date of 01/27/2025 5. One container of sour cream with an expiration date of 01/27/2025 6. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure the well-being of residents by failing to provide oversight of the kitchen's cleanliness, sanitation, and practices for safe food service. The deficient practice had the potential to effect the 118 residents who consumed meals prepared from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to ensure contact precautions were followed for 1 (#74) of 4 (#21, #27, #74 and #273) residents on contact precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's change in condition was immediately reported for 2 (#43, #82) of 2 (#43, #82) residents as evidenced by: 1. Staff failing to report bilateral lower extremity edema for Resident #43 and; 2. S10T (Transportation) failing to notify the physician of failed attempts to complete a consult for Resident #82's left shoulder pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly diagnosed mental disorders or had a significant change in their mental condition to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for evaluation and determination for 2 (#22, #74) of 3 (#22, #74 and #89) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 39 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was implemented for 1 (#107) out of 1 (#107) resident out of 39 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #107's weekly weights were completed as ordered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide form CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) 10123- Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) as required for 1 Resident (#97) out of 3 (#13, #97 and #107) residents reviewed for SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Notification. The facility had a census of 121 residents. A review of Resident #97's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed that the facility initiated the resident's discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. Resident #97 was discharged from Medicare Part A services on 1/31/2025. Further review of Resident #97's EHR failed to reveal that a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) form was provided to the resident. On 02/12/2025 at 3:19 PM, an interview was conducted with S19MDS/LPN (Minimum Data Set/Licensed Practical Nurse). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to provide a communication aid for 1 (#88) out of 3 (#65, #88, and #115) residents reviewed for communication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility through use of dialysis communication forms for 1 (#8) out of 2 (#8 and #223) residents sampled for dialysis services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were capable of using call bells were able to reach the call bell for 1 (#60) of 39 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for foot care and treatment for a diabetic resident for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a cognitively impaired diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] without preventative food care ordered. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . Resident #3 was assessed by S3NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 11/22/2024, who evaluated the second digit of the right foot and noted Resident #3 had a fungus skin/nail over the nail bed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review,and observation the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure nursing staff identified skin changes timely for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Review of the resident's weekly skin evaluations 9/1/2024 through 11/18/2024 revealed the resident did not have any skin issues. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . Resident #3 was assessed by S3NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 11/22/2024, who evaluated the second digit of the right foot and noted Resident #3 had a fungus skin/nail over the nail bed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received preventative foot care to avoid complications from the resident's medical condition such as diabetes and circulatory disorders. The facility failed to provide appropriate preventative foot care for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (#Resident #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a cognitively impaired diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] without preventative food care ordered. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's Responsible Party (RP) of a change in skin condition for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Resident #1,#2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and menu review, the facility's kitchen staff failed to follow the menu to ensure residents were served the appropriate portion/serving size of food during meals in order to meet the nutritional needs of the residents as evidenced by kitchen staff failing to use the correct serving utensils for pureed, mechanically soft, and non-mechanically altered foods. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs and weight loss for the 111 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure physician orders/plan of care were implemented as ordered for monitoring a bed alarm for proper functioning Q (every) shift for 1 (#2) of 4 (#1-#4)sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) to the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system within 14 days after completion for 10 (#11, #21, #32, #37, #45, #54, #110, #113, #114 and #115) out of 11 (#11, #21, #32, #37, #45, #54, #110, #113, #114, #115 and #276) resident's investigated for resident assessment submission activities as evidenced by: Failing to submit a Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #45 and submit Discharge MDS assessments for Residents #11, #21, #32, #37, #45, #54, #110, #113, #114, and #115.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the residents' plan of care by not following physician orders and the care plan for 3 (#15, #53, #72) out of a finalized sample of 55 residents as evidenced by: 1. Failing to monitor and document for adverse reactions to an anticoagulant for Resident #15 and Resident #53. 2. Failing to apply hand splint as ordered for Resident #72. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 118 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure recipes for pureed meals were available for staff. This failure had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs, and weight loss for 3 (#28, #35, and #81) out of 3 (#28, #35, and #81) residents who received pureed meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner as evidenced by: 1. staff failing to wear gloves while handling raw meat; and 2. staff failing to discard contaminated meat. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 109 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen. The facility's census was 118.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system of accounting of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf by failing to provide quarterly statements for 1 (# 54) of 3 (#48, #54, and #109) residents investigated for personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of residents' medical records for 2 out of 6 residents observed during medication pass. The facility had a total census of 118 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide residents with a safe, clean and homelike environment for 2 (#13 and # 34) out of 2 (#13 and #34) residents investigated for environment out of a total sample of 55 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to have an RN (Registered Nurse) conduct/coordinate each assessment with other health care professionals; certify that assessments are complete; sign and certify the accuracy of the assessment for 3 (#45, #54 and #276) residents of 55 total sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who need respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards for 1 (#29) of 2 (#29 and #56) residents investigated for respiratory care out of a total of 55 sampled residents, by failing to ensure that the resident's oxygen tubing was stored in a sanitary manner when not in use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater, as evidenced by a calculated medication error rate of 33.33 percent.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and not left unattended on top of the medication cart while administering medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment included any ethnic, cultural, or religious factors that may potentially affect the care provided by the facility. This deficient practice affected 1 resident (#105) with a potential to affect a census of 118 residents currently residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to make efforts to demonstrate diligence and a genuine attempt to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to ensure residents were free from verbal and physical abuse in a timely manner after S6CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) abused 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents were free from abuse as evidenced by the facility failing to protect Resident #3 from physical and verbal abuse by S6CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). The deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 117.
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on January 11, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 12, 2025 | Fine | $164,824 |
| December 9, 2024 | Fine | $103,704 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.29 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.71 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.18 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.53 on weekdays and 2.71 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.36 in April to June 2025 to 3.29 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.29 | 0.12 | 3.53 | 2.71 | 6.3% | 0 of 90 | 127 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.29 | 0.11 | 3.55 | 2.62 | 4.6% | 1 of 92 | 131 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.17 | 0.16 | 3.44 | 2.47 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 127 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.36 | 0.15 | 3.58 | 2.81 | 7.8% | 0 of 91 | 120 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.7 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.1 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.1 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.6 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Acadia St. Landry Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 117 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 156 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 119 eligible stays.
60.7% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 110 residents counted.
9.5% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 110 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 7 PELICANS, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1926 LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 07/15/2022 |
| All Therapy Management LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 07/15/2022 |
| Care Point LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 15% | 07/15/2022 |
| Jcom LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 07/15/2022 |
| Lebleu, Dalton | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 07/15/2022 |
| Castille, Michael | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 07/15/2022 |
| Coon, Steven | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 07/15/2022 |
| Henry, John | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 07/15/2022 |
| Hensgens, Brian | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 07/15/2022 |
| Hensgens, Craig | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 07/15/2022 |
| Lemoine, Shannon | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 07/15/2022 |
| Vanhook, Stephen | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 07/15/2022 |
| Hensgens, Craig | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Hensgens, Craig | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| 1926 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2022 | |
| All Therapy Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2022 | |
| Care Point LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2022 | |
| Jcom LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2022 | |
| Castille, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Coon, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Henry, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Hensgens, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Hensgens, Craig | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Lebleu, Dalton | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Lemoine, Shannon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Price, Teddy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Vanhook, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.