2026 East 54th St., Indianapolis, IN 46220 · Marion County · (317) 253-6950
150 certified beds, about 133 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155292 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 25, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since January 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.37 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
54.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to American Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and mental abuse by another resident when one resident grabbed another resident's neck. Using the reasonable person concept, this action would likely lead to fear and distress for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 127)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents with fingernail care and facial hair removal for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (Resident J and Resident K).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' pain were assessed, monitored and addressed for 2 of 3 residents for pain management. (Resident C and Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely updated the individualized plan of care for residents who displayed behaviors, document non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to the administration of an as needed anti-anxiety medications, and to document effectiveness of interventions attempted to alleviate behaviors for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident 6 and Resident 97).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct medications for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 51)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure gloves were doffed and hand hygiene was performed timely during incontinent care and that a resident's urinary catheter tubing was not dragging on the floor for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident 54 and Resident 102).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely have the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determine and document self-administration of medications and treatments were clinically appropriate for 2 of 2 randomly observed residents. (Resident 10 and Resident 20)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove discontinued resident medications, refrigerate a medication requiring refrigeration, and label open medications in 2 of 3 medication carts observed (Residents 22, 49, 60, 75, 76, 105).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental services, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for skin conditions (Resident 22, Resident 49, and Resident 329).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan timely for refusal to change clothes for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident 19)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure lidocaine patches were administered as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain, and to obtain weights three times weekly and inform the physician of weight changes, as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema (Resident 3 and Resident 63).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply splints, as care-planned, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM) (Resident 40).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely develop a person-centered behavior management care plan with individualized interventions and document approaches to care for a resident with dementia who exhibited behaviors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for behaviors. (Resident 62)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate social services follow-up, related to a previous allegation of abuse of a resident by a family member, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dementia care. (Resident 62)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to a wound dressing for 1 of 1 random observation. (Resident 5)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care services in a manner that promoted privacy, respect, and dignity, and to provide an environment where residents were able to express grievances without fear of reprisal for 11 of 12 residents reviewed for dignity. (Residents' B, C, D, S, T, SS, 45, 69, 80, 85 and an Anonymous Resident)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assistance was provided with eating, nail care, incontinent care, residents getting out of bed, and ensure residents that need assistance with incontinence was provided 1 incontinent brief at a time for 8 of 12 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Residents' B, H, J, K, M, R, S and SS)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 4 of 5 randomly reviewed residents' for medications administrations; ensure physician orders were followed regarding elevation of bilateral lower extremities (BLE) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers, and to timely update and administer a physician's order for a wound treatment and to apply podus (pressure relief) boots as ordered by a physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters.(Residents' B, H, T, 40, 44, 83 and 118,)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies or skill sets to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided in accordance with the plan of care for 8 of 12 residents reviewed for ADL care (Residents B, H, J, K, M, R, S, and SS) and physician orders were effectively provided in accordance with the plan of care for 7 of 14 reviewed for medication administration and treatments (Residents' B, H, T, 40, 44, 83 and 118)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications stored in the facility's medication carts were not expired and/or had current orders for their use and/or were labeled with an opened date; a medication lock box was permanently affixed for narcotics in the medication fridge; and a medication cart remained locked during medication administration for 3 of 6 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed within the facility. (Facility)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control by not ensuring gloves were changed and hand hygiene was completed appropriately during incontinent care, while assisting residents to eat, and while passing medications for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for ADL care, 3 of 5 residents randomly observed during medication pass, 3 residents randomly observed for 1 of 1 dinning observations. (Residents' 8, 10, 22, 80, 108, 111 and R).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review, the facility failed to timely have the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determine and document that self-administration of medications and treatments were clinically appropriate for 2 of 2 randomly observed residents. (Resident 58 and Resident P)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents got out of bed and showered as preference for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident B and Resident 105)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the necessary foot care for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living.) (Resident G)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair had 2 functioning anti-tippers and ensure fall interventions were in place for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents' K, L and Y)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a urinary catheter had physician orders for such catheters; staff were monitoring and documenting the urinary outputs, and to timely notify the physician of decreased urinary output and urine leaking from a urinary catheter for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Residents' 75 and T).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure weights were obtained accurately for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident BB).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a resident's oxygen, as ordered, and ensure accuracy of his current oxygen orders in the clinical record for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication labels were not altered (Resident 103); facility stock of clear needleless connectors and leur lock caps were not expired (Facility); the disposition medications for discharged and/or expired residents was completed timely (Residents 330 and 331); and a resident's home medications were stored appropriately (Resident 119).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate justification was in place for the continued utilization of an antipsychotic medication, follow up with the family in regards to side effects of antipsychotic medication, and follow up with an abnormal AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale) assessment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident L)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely notify hospice of a resident's falls for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice. (Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure trash was contained in receptacles for 124 of 124 residents in the facility
39 fire safety citations on file: 15 on March 25, 2026, 5 on February 25, 2025, 19 on January 10, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.37 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.83 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.23 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.58 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.4% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.1% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.17 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.59 on weekdays and 2.83 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.58 in April to June 2025 to 3.37 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.37 | 0.56 | 3.59 | 2.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 133 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.34 | 0.52 | 3.52 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 134 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.45 | 0.61 | 3.67 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 127 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.58 | 0.63 | 3.79 | 3.05 | 2.2% | 0 of 91 | 121 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.5 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.0 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for American Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 110 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 119 eligible stays.
8.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
64.6% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY. CMS links this home to American Senior Communities, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drummer, Carl | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Fehribach, Gregory | Corporate director | Individual | 12/14/2004 | |
| Hanify, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Lazard, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2021 | |
| Mantravadi, Geeta | Corporate director | Individual | 07/21/2021 | |
| Mukes-Gaither, Beverly | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Payne, Monica | Corporate director | Individual | 08/09/2021 | |
| Babcock, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/30/2020 | |
| Caine, Virginia | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/1994 | |
| Harris, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/22/2003 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2005 | |
| Couch, Gina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/11/2022 | |
| Dice, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Ferguson, Nikki | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/11/2022 | |
| Solito, Leo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/09/2026 | |
| Couch, Gina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/09/2026 | |
| Dice, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Solito, Leo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/09/2026 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.