Home / Oklahoma / Oklahoma City
6500 North Portland Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73116 · Oklahoma County · (405) 767-6500
142 certified beds, about 126 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375349 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 18, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 19 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
50.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 18 dietary contract employees received abuse training. The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. walls and paint were in good repair for 2 (#3 and #6), and b. a resident's bed was in good repair for 1 (#3) of 28 sampled residents reviewed for a safe home like environment. The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not ensuring all staff working in the facility were trained on identifying and reporting abuse for 18 of 18 dietary contractor staff members. The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure there were enough trained staff at set meal times for 4 of 4 dining observations. The DON identified 138 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure:a. prepared food items were labelled with the preparation and use-by dates,b. food items were discarded after the expiration date,c. fresh food items with visible mold, discoloration, or soft to touch were discarded,d. opened food items were stored in airtight packaging,e. monitoring of temperatures for refrigerators and freezers containing food, andf. food was prepared in a sanitary environment for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The DON identified 138 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathrooms accessible to residents had call lights for 2 of 2 bathrooms observed accessible to residents. The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to handle and process linens to prevent the spread of infection for residents on contact isolation in the laundry room. The infection preventionist identified five residents on contact precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan intervention for transfers for 2 (#12 and #13) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified 152 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer O2 according to physician orders and/or label O2 tubing for two (#13 and #54) of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified 29 residents received O2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete ongoing assessments of a resident pre and post dialysis for one (#67) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff used personal protective equipment and sanitized a blood pressure cuff for a resident with contact precautions for one (#93) of two sampled residents reviewed for transmission based precautions; b. staff used personal protective equipment for a resident with enhanced barrier precautions for one (#56) of one enhanced barrier precaution observation; and c. staff maintain infection control practices during incontinent care for one (#52) of seven incontinent care observation. The infection preventionist identified eight residents who were on transmission based precautions and 31 residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions resided in the facility. The DON identified 45 residents required assistance with incontinent care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide double portions as ordered for one (#52) of three residents observed for meal service. The DON identified 143 residents received meal service from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an enteral tube feeding bottle was properly labeled for one (#54) of two sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding management. The DON identified three residents received enteral tube feeding via continuous pump.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one (#24) of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified 148 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. physician orders were in place for wound care and dressing changes, b. a surgical wound was assessed and monitored, and c. a resident was monitored as ordered for side effects related to a medication error for one (#269) of three sampled residents reviewed for wound care and medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility. The ADON identified four residents with surgical wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for three (#62, 70 and #269) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: A. ensure hands were washed/sanitized during resident medication pass for two (#13 and #53) of two sampled resident observed during medication pass, and B. provide wound care in a manner which prevented cross contamination for one (#222) of one sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/24/23, reported 143 residents resided in facility and 16 of those residents had pressure ulcers. Findings A Dressings policy, revised 09/13, read in parts, .Cleanse the wound with ordered cleanser. If using gauze, use clean gauze for each cleansing stroke. Clean from the least contaminated area to the most contaminated area . 1. On 04/25/23 at 3:28 p.m., CMA #1 was observed administering oral medications to resident #13. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate advance directives and a code status had been determined for one (#15) of 32 sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives and code status. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure (CMA #5) had completed a clinical skills check prior to passing medications for one (#269) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility.
8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 5, 2024, 3 on April 28, 2023, 4 on February 22, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.56 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.12 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.83 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.36 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.3% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 27.3% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.71 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.73 on weekdays and 4.12 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.31 in April to June 2025 to 4.56 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.56 | 0.37 | 4.73 | 4.12 | 1.0% | 0 of 90 | 126 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.68 | 0.34 | 4.85 | 4.25 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 127 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.53 | 0.35 | 4.66 | 4.20 | 1.1% | 0 of 92 | 128 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.31 | 0.38 | 4.55 | 3.69 | 1.9% | 0 of 91 | 133 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.6 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.9 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bellevue Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
62.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 589 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 657 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 405 eligible stays.
52.4% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 393 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 566 residents counted.
2.5% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 566 residents counted.
99.4% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 331 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BELLEVUE NORTHWEST NURSING CENTER LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellevue Northwest Nursing Center LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/14/2023 |
| Bellevue Convalescent Hospital, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Robert a. Thompson 2000 Irrevocable Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Burgess, Diane | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Fuechsel, Kelley | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Hardeman, Nancy | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Stuart, Hollie | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Stuart, Matt | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Thompson, Norman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Thompson, Stephen | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Thompson, Tara | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Thompson, Turner | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Botello, Haley | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/02/2021 | |
| Gfeller, Healther | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/02/2021 | |
| Stuart, Matt | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/02/2021 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/15/2008 | |
| Botello, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Botello, Haley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/02/2021 | |
| Deaver, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Fuechsel, Kelley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Gfeller, Healther | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/02/2021 | |
| Meadows, Tamara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Rangel, Oscar | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Shirey, Brianne | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Waxman, Kathleen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Bellevue Re Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/24/2025 | |
| Hirecall | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/08/2022 | |
| Robert a. Thompson 2000 Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Botello, Haley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/02/2021 | |
| Finch, Corey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Fuechsel, Kelley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Gfeller, Healther | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/24/2025 | |
| Stuart, Matt | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/02/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.