Home / Oklahoma / Oklahoma City
2801 Northwest 61st Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73112 · Oklahoma County · (405) 842-6601
100 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375520 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 23, 2025, inspectors cited 16 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.37 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.21 of those hours.
63.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
CMS links it to Southwest LTC, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment had been completed when hospice services were elected for 2 (#4 and #75) of 19 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 11 residents on hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for 3 (#20, 29, and #69) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for 3 (#61, 69, and #73) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure range of motion was provided to residents for 3 (#2, 13, and #61) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for position and mobility. The administrator identified 12 residents had limited range of motion resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who received dialysis services were assessed before and after dialysis for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. Corporate Nurse Consultant #1 identified two residents who required dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure anticoagulant monitoring was in place for a high-risk medication for 1 (#69) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The administrator identified 62 residents resided at the facility, and 30 residents received anticoagulant therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an annual comprehensive assessment was completed within 366 days of the previous annual comprehensive assessment for 1 (#9) of 19 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion for 1 (#7) of 19 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment was accurate for 1 (#20) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a diagnosis on a PASARR form for a mental health illness for 1 (#20) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for the need of a level II screening. The administrator identified 13 residents with mental illness resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan had been revised for 1 (#7) of 19 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide bathing for 1 (#41) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The administrator identified 43 residents required assistance with bathing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to physician orders for 1 (#69) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 62 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained:a. during provision of incontinent care for 1 (#13) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for ADL care, andb. appropriate personal protective equipment was worn for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for 2 (#7 and #13) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for infection control practices. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility, 16 incontinent residents, and 12 residents on EBP.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the influenza vaccine was offered to a resident for 1 (#4) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunization. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 vaccine was offered to residents for 3 (#4, 29, and #61) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunization. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facilityFindings:The Vaccination of Residents policy, dated 2001, read in part, All residents will be offered vaccines that aid in preventing infectious diseases unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated.1. A care plan, revised 06/09/25, showed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE].2. Resident #29's admission resident assessment, dated 05/23/25, showed the resident was admitted on [DATE].3. A care plan, dated 07/14/25, showed Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE]. There was no documentation the residents above had been offered the COVID-19 vaccine. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accident did not occur for a resident during facility transport for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards. The administrator identified eight residents used the facility van for transportation.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident:a. received appropriate care for a dehisced surgical incision for 1 (#54) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization; andb. had an order for hospice services for 2 (#75 and #4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospiceThe administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility and 11 residents received hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse/mistreatment was reported to the appropriate licensing board in a timely manner for 5 (#23, 40, 53, 72, and #77) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure notification of a bed hold was provided upon transfer for 1 (#73) of 4 sampled residents who were reviewed for hospitalization. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. meal consumption percentages were documented on a resident who experienced weight loss for two (#3 and #7); and b. weights were documented on a resident who experienced weight loss for three (#2, 3, and #5) of three sampled residents reviewed for weight loss. The Administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner regarding abnormal lab results for one (#8) of eight sampled residents reviewed for weight loss. The Administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteA past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 01/08/23 related to the facility's failure to ensure an elopement assessment was completed on admission and a resident was free from accident hazards for a resident who had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and history of stimulant abuse. The facility failed to prevent Resident #102 from eloping from the facility which had the potential to result in serious injury or harm. On 09/11/23, the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to protect and prevent accident hazards related to elopement. The past noncompliance IJ was removed effective 05/09/23 after the facility put measures in place to prevent recurrence. On 01/09/23 staff was in-serviced about the policy and procedure on elopement. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to: a. assess a resident's cognition, mood, and pain on a quarterly resident assessment for one (#1); b. assess a resident's cognition and mood on an admission resident assessment for one (#1); and c. assess a resident's pain on a significant change resident assessment for one (#25) of 22 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. The Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a bath/shower as scheduled for one (#103) of six sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23 documented 10 residents were independent, 21 residents required one or two staff members assistance, and 20 residents were dependent on staff for the task of bathing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor nutritional intake for one (#103) of three sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. It documented 29 independent residents, 14 residents who required one or two staff members, and eight resident who were dependent on staff for the task of eating.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to: a. administer medication as ordered by the physician for one (#25) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications; and b. ensure expired medications were removed from circulation for two of two medication carts observed during the medication pass and storage observation. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN order which included an antipsychotic medication and an antianxiety medication was reassessed after 14 days and the duration of use was identified for one (#102) of fourteen sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility and 33 residents were receiving psychoactive medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for one (#13) of 24 sampled residents observed for call lights in reach. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a pre-employment background check for one (CNA #5) of five employee records reviewed for background checks. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. The administrator reported there were 54 employees.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to fully develop a comprehensive care plan for one (#25) of 22 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility and seven residents received antipsychotic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a wandering assessment accurately for one (#102) of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The DON identified three residents at risk for elopement resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to remove a moderate amount of lint for two of two dryers observed in the laundry room for lint. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/06/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.37 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.13 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.12 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.9% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.08 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.13 in April to June 2025 to 3.37 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.37 | 0.21 | 3.47 | 3.13 | 0.3% | 0 of 90 | 59 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.57 | 0.20 | 3.81 | 2.98 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.28 | 3.64 | 2.89 | 4.7% | 0 of 92 | 60 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.13 | 0.24 | 3.13 | 3.14 | 4.7% | 2 of 91 | 71 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.6 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.7 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.8 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.2 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Northwest Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 3 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 3 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SOUTHWEST LTC - NW OKC, LLC. CMS links this home to Southwest LTC, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Care Givers Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/27/2015 | |
| Ronald R Payne PC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/27/2015 | |
| Southwest LTC, Ltd | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/27/2015 | |
| Baronet, Rod | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/27/2015 | |
| Brashier, Craig | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/27/2015 | |
| Payne, Ronald | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/27/2015 | |
| Southwest LTC Management Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2016 | |
| Payne, Ronald | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.