Home / Oklahoma / Oklahoma City
5301 North Brookline, Oklahoma City, OK 73112 · Oklahoma County · (405) 251-2847
132 certified beds, about 46 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2018
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375574 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 6, 2024, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 44 health citations since March 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $25,057 in the last three years; the largest was $25,057, and the latest is dated July 10, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.83 of those hours.
CMS links it to Skyblue Healthcare, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 44 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteOn [DATE] an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a Resident #4 received timely CPR per the physician's order when the resident was found unresponsive and without vital signs. The resident was pronounced deceased by EMS.On [DATE] at 11:26 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On [DATE] at 11:43 a.m., the administrator and DON were notified of the existence of the IJ situation and was provided the IJ template. On [DATE] at 4:28 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, [DATE] 3:58pm1. The facility failed to initiate CPR immediately when a resident with a full code status was found without signs of life.2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. urinary catheter care was completed as ordered for 1 (#7); andb. orders for urinary catheter care were transcribed and completed for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The administrator identified three residents with urinary catheters resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for PEG tube care were transcribed and completed for 2 (#6 and #7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PEG tube care. The administrator identified five residents had PEG tubes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for 3 (#1, 6, and #7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accurate records. The administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to promote pressure ulcer healing were implemented for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The administrator identified three residents with pressure ulcers resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure PICC/central line care was provided and the site was assessed for 1 (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for PICC lines. The administrator identified no residents with PICC lines resided in the facility at the time of the survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received their pain medication as ordered by the physician for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for medications provided accurately. The administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure grievance forms were posted in the designated location per facility policy. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a MDS was coded accurately for one (#5) of six sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility. They identified one resident received noninvasive ventilator services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan included the use of a noninvasive ventilator for one (#5) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory services. The administrator identified 16 residents received respiratory services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician order for the use of a noninvasive ventilator for one (#5) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory services. The administrator identified 16 residents received respiratory services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency call cord was available in a resident's bathroom for one (#2) of three sampled residents whose emergency bathroom call system was observed. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secured when not in use for three observations at random times throughout the survey on hall 400. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate dishwasher temperature and sanitization concentration levels were reached on a high temperature dishwasher. The ED identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. enhanced barrier precautions were utilized for two of two (#2 and #21) residents observed with indwelling devices and open wounds, b. infection control practices were adhered to after providing resident care. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility. The Resident Matrix, dated 09/03/24, documented five residents that resided in the facility had gastric tubes, three of which had urinary catheters, and two also had pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for one (#44) of 12 sampled residents whose advance directive acknowledgements were reviewed. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. privacy was maintained during provision of care for two (Resident #25, and an unidentified resident) of four residents whose protected health information and privacy was reviewed during a tour of the facility, and b. protected health information was secure, for two, (Resident #21 and #40). The Executive Director identified 43 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident Assessments were accurately coded for two (#21 and #34) of 13 residents reviewed for assessments. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed in a timely manner for one (#38) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were conducted and monitored after an unwitnessed fall for one (Resident #29) reviewed for falls. The ED identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information, which included the facility name, date, actual hours worked for RNs, LPNs, CMAs, and CNAs, and the resident census was updated. The ED identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to physician orders for one (#16) of five residents reviewed for medications. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency call cords were within reach for one dependent resident (#21) while lying in bed of 13 sampled residents reviewed for access to call light. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain finger stick blood sugars in a manner to prevent cross contamination for three of four observations. The administrator identified 15 residents who received finger sick blood sugars.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to address and document a grievnaces of clothing and medical equipment for one (#1) of four sampled residents reviewed for grievnaces. The administrator identified 43 residents currently resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary with a recapitulation of stay for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed. The administrator identified eight residents who have discharged from the he facility since 04/02/24.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a SNF ABN form was provided when a resident discharged from Medicare Part A stay with benefit days remaining for two (#11 and #49) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The MDS Coordinator identified 10 residents who had discharged from Medicare Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past six months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for one (#13) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents required assistance with bathing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the count was verified for controlled medications awaiting destruction for eight (#24, 49, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 and #106), and b. the count was verified when controlled medications were acquired from pharmacy for three (#49, 101, and #102) of eight sampled residents whose narcotic sheets were reviewed during medication storage. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate did not exceed five percent. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one (#24) of 15 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had an appropriate diagnosis for use of an antipsychotic medication for one (#36) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 33 residents received psychoactive medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was not a significant medication error for one (#22) of four residents observed during medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts left unattended were securely locked at all times for one of two medication carts observed. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteA past noncompliance immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective [DATE] related to the facility's failure to immediately perform Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on a Resident (Res) with full code status who was found not breathing and without a detectable heart beat. Res #42 was found by an unidentified Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) in bed and appeared not to be breathing. The unidentified CNA reported the findings to the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) immediately at approximately 6:00 a.m., who then assessed the resident and found him to have no signs of life. The LPN then notified the resident's family member, the administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Police. The LPN did not initiate CPR on Res #42 who had on file an order for full code. Approximately 53 minutes later, EMSA and the fire department arrived to initiate CPR. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a 48 hour base line care plan for two, (#29 and #31) of 13 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 37 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for four (#29, 30, 31, and #41) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 37 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wrote2. Res #33 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included COPD, diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A MMR, dated 7/22/21, documented the pharmacist requested a reduction of Buspirone and/or Mirtazapine. The physician documented ''No'' to a dose reduction on 08/18/21. The physician did not provide a rational to the request. A MMR, dated 01/22/22, documented the pharmacist requested a reduction for Lexapro and/or Remeron. The physician's response to the MRR was not available in the resident's EHR. On 03/09/22 at 3:04 p.m., the administrator stated she was not able to find a response from the physician for the MMR form dated 01/22/22. The administrator stated she was not aware if the form had been sent or seen by the physician. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled drugs along with other drugs subject to abuse were stored in locked compartments with a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment. The census and conditions form documented 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 37 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and sanitary environment for one (31) of 16 residents reviewed for environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 37 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge minimum data set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for one (#2) of one resident sampled for transmission of assessments. The Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers or baths to dependent residents for one (#34) of three residents reviewed for ADL assistance. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 37 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer and observe the resident taking medication for one (#1) of 16 sampled residents observed on initial tour. The administrator identified 37 residents who resided in the facility.
12 fire safety citations on file: 4 on September 6, 2024, 3 on August 3, 2023, 5 on March 10, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 10, 2025 | Fine | $25,057 |
| July 10, 2025 | Payment Denial | 7 days from August 27, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.56 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.83 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.25 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.12 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.61 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.69 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.84 in April to June 2025 to 3.56 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.83 | 3.69 | 3.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 46 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.95 | 0.84 | 3.99 | 3.84 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.41 | 0.69 | 4.66 | 3.76 | 10.1% | 0 of 92 | 49 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.84 | 0.48 | 4.18 | 3.00 | 12.3% | 0 of 91 | 53 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.0 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.5 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.0 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.0 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Lodge at Brookline's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
11.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
8.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.
66.7% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LODGE AT BROOKLINE OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Skyblue Healthcare, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivers Edge Operations III LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Rivers Edge Partners II LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Ganz, David | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hanover, Yaacov | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Kravetz, Avrohom | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Retter, S. Aryeh | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Lodge at Brookline Realty LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Ganz, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Retter, S. Aryeh | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Skyblue Healthcare Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Ganz, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Maxwell, Christine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Raju, Senthil | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Retter, S. Aryeh | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Lodge at Brookline Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Rivers Edge Property Holdings III LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Skyblue Healthcare Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/22/2026 | |
| Ganz, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hanover, Yaacov | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Maxwell, Christine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Raju, Senthil | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Retter, S. Aryeh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.