Home / Virginia / Bowling Green
120 Anderson Avenue, Bowling Green, VA 22427 · Caroline County · (804) 633-4839
120 certified beds, about 113 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495297 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 28, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since February 2020, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated May 29, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.
44.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Lifeworks Rehab, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide safety during incontinence care for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #10. The facility staff failed to utilize two staff members to change Resident #10's soiled brief on 5/28/25. Resident #10 fell out of bed and sustained a broken femur. The facility's failure resulted in harm to Resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the care plan for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide nutritional care and services consistent with a resident's comprehensive plan of care for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from an unnecessary medication for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during ADL (activities of daily living) care for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for two of five residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to serve food at a palatable temperature on one of two units, Unit A.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one kitchen and on one of two units.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of one kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide notification to the responsible party of a change in resident treatment for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #309.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a pressure injury for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #97.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide urinary catheter care and services for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #97.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide urostomy care and services for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #259.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide medically related social services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for two of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #86 and #62.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide complete and accurate documentation for one of 33 residents, Resident #15.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence bed inspections for three of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #15, #38 and #54.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the required notification, to the Ombudsman, for a facility-initiated transfer for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #92 (R92).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for three of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 93 (R93), Resident #15 (R15) and Resident #75 (R75). The facility staff failed to monitor a fluid restriction for R93; and failed to provide care and services for a central venous access (central line) for R15 and R75.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the menu for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #309; and for the dinner meal on 4/19/22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of two refrigerators in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain one of one dumpsters in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to allow one of 37 residents in the survey sample to withdraw more than twenty dollars from their personal fund account at a time, Resident #99 (R99).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for 2 of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #33 and #97. The facility staff failed to administer oxygen to Resident #33 (R33) per the physician prescribed rate of three liters per minute. The facility staff failed to store a nebulizer mask in a sanitary manner for Resident # 97 (R97).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, the facility staff failed to perform annual performance evaluations on two of five CNA (certified nursing assistant) record reviews.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to honor a resident's preferences for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #309 (R309).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for one of nine residents during the medication administration observation, Resident #105. The facility staff failed to administer oral medication to Resident #105 (R105) in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to have an registered nurse (RN), other than the director of nursing, on duty on 4/2/2022.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to meet the requirements for advanced directives for four of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #24, #116, # 84, and #40). The facility staff failed to obtain a copy of Resident #24's Appointment of Agent to Make Healthcare Decision as documented on the resident's admission paperwork. The facility staff failed to periodically review, Resident 116's, Resident #84's and Resident #40's decisions regarding advance directives.
Inspectors wrote4. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: dementia, quadriplegia (Paralysis affecting all four limbs and the trunk of the body below the level of spinal cord injury. Trauma is the usual cause.) (1), diabetes, gastrointestinal bleed, and high blood pressure. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/14/2020 coded the resident as unable to answer the question for the BIMS and had both short and long-term memory difficulties. [...]
Inspectors wrote3. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: dementia, quadriplegia (Paralysis affecting all four limbs and the trunk of the body below the level of spinal cord injury. Trauma is the usual cause.) (1), diabetes, gastrointestinal bleed, and high blood pressure. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/14/2020 coded the resident as unable to answer the question for the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) and had both short and long-term memory difficulties. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for five of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #4, #40, #15, #62, and #61). The facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan to offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication for Resident #4, failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address Resident #40's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) and failed to implement Resident #40's comprehensive care plan for palm guards. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the care of Resident #15's PICC. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for eight of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #24, #4, #25, #31, #28, #21, #13 and #38.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice to clarify physician orders for two of 59 residents in the survey sample, Residents #111 and Resident #23. The facility staff failed to clarify a physician order for Lorazepam for Resident #23, which lead to the resident receiving more than double the prescribed dose of medication. The facility staff failed to clarify physician orders for multiple as needed pain medications for Resident #23 to determine which and when each medication should be administered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for two of 59 residents in the survey sample with a central venous access, (Residents #40 and #15). Resident #40 had a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) (1) in place in her right arm during the time of the survey. There were no orders or documentation for the maintenance and care of the PICC. The dressing on the PICC was dated 1/29/2020, and had not been changed in 14 days. Resident #15 had a PICC in place in her right arm during the time of the survey. The dressing on the PICC was dated 1/30/2020; the dressing had not been changed in 13 days.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for eight of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #267, #21, #24, #116, #55, #8, #317 and #320). The facility staff failed to review risks and benefits, failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails and failed to evidence that appropriate alternatives were attempted prior to the resident's use of bed rails for Resident #267, Resident #21, Resident #24, Resident #116, Resident #55, Resident #8, Resident #317 and Resident #320.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #111. Based on the comprehensive assessment the facility staff failed to ensure duplicate antianxiety medication was not administered to Resident #111.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #111) of 59 sampled residents was free of a significant medication errors. The facility staff administered both Lorazepam tablet (1 mg) twice daily and Lorazepam concentrate three times a day resulting in Resident #111 receiving a total of two milligrams of Lorazepam per day from 2/1/2020 through 2/7/2020, and a total of 5 mg per day, from 2/8/2020 through 2/12/2020.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature. The facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature during lunch on 2/12/20.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for three of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #40, #15, and #318); and in one of two dining rooms, (Dining Room B); and in two of 62 resident rooms, (Rooms #35 and #36). The facility staff failed to ensure PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) care was provided including dressing changes, to prevent infection for Resident #40 who had a PICC in place in her right arm, and Resident #15, who had a PICC in place in her right arm. The facility staff failed to store Resident #318's nebulizer mask with a protective covering, to prevent infection on 2/12/2020. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure three of 59 sampled residents, (Residents #25, #21 and #13) were free from abuse. On 11/15/18, Resident #25 was hit in the chest by Resident #31. On 12/22/19, Resident #21 was hit in the face by Resident #28 and on 7/5/19, Resident #38 was observed with his hand inside Resident #13's brief and was caressing Resident #13's buttocks.
Inspectors wrote2. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (1). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/21/19, coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating she was cognitively intact to make daily decisions An interview was conducted with Resident #24 on 2/11/2020 at 4:58 p.m. When asked if anyone had ever cursed at her, hit her or abused her, Resident #24 stated that the gentleman across the hall from her (Resident #41) called her a bitch. Resident #24 stated she had reported it. [...]
Inspectors wrote2. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (1). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/21/19, coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating she was cognitively intact to make daily decisions An interview was conducted with Resident #24 on 2/11/2020 at 4:58 p.m. When asked if anyone had ever cursed at her, hit her or abused her, Resident #24 stated that the gentleman across the hall from her (Resident #41) called her a bitch. Resident #24 stated she had reported it. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence written notification was provided or sent to the resident and/or responsible party regarding the reasons for a transfer to the hospital for three of fifty nine residents in the survey sample, (Residents #74, #89 and #66). The facility staff failed to evidence written notification was provided to Resident #74 or the responsible party (RP) for the residents 12/12/19, hospital transfer, failed to evidence written notification to Resident #89 or the RP for the residents 12/27/29 hospital transfer and to Resident #66 or the RP for the residents 12/20/19 hospital transfer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #318. The facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #318's physician-ordered TED (thromboembolic-deterrent) hose.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the plan of care for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #318. The facility staff failed to apply TED (thromboembolism deterrent) hose to Resident #318's on 2/12/2020, as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries, and to promote healing of a pressure injury for two of 59 residents in the survey sample, Residents #267 and #40. The facility staff failed to assess Resident #267's pressure injuries from 1/16/20 until 2/11/20. The facility staff failed to ensure Bilateral palm guards were in place for Resident #40, per the comprehensive plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #318. The facility staff failed to store a nebulizer mask with a protective covering for Resident #318 on 2/12/2020.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence a complete pain management program for one of fifty nine residents in the survey sample, Residents #23 and Resident #4. The facility staff failed to document the location of pain, pain scale and if any non-pharmacological interventions were provided prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication for Resident #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a drug regimen free of unnecessary medications for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #4). The facility staff administered a physician prescribed as needed narcotic pain medication to Resident #4 for a pain level rating of zero and failed to document non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to administering the as needed pain medication on 1/13/2020 and 2/9/2020.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to store milk in a safe manner in the A unit nourishment room. Two eight ounce cartons of skim milk with a sell by date of 2/4/20 was observed in the refrigerator.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for two of 59 residents in the survey sample, Residents #25 and #21. Resident #31 hit Resident #25 in the chest on 11/15/18 and Resident #28 hit Resident #21 in the face on 12/22/19. The facility staff failed to document these incidents in Resident #25's and Resident #21's clinical records.
13 fire safety citations on file: 7 on April 21, 2022, 6 on February 13, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.38 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.49 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.00 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.91 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.98 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.0% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.69 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.54 on weekdays and 3.00 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.38 | 0.49 | 3.54 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 113 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.20 | 0.39 | 3.35 | 2.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 113 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.06 | 0.44 | 3.23 | 2.62 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.33 | 3.51 | 2.84 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 110 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.6 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.1 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.7% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 165 eligible stays.
11.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 147 eligible stays.
5.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 93 eligible stays.
56.8% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.
95.2% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BOWLING GREEN SNF LLC. CMS links this home to Lifeworks Rehab, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bowling Green Holdings I LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Edward 1998 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ek 2005 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Fay 2014 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Fay 2014 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ll 2013 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mms 2008 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mzr East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Silverstone East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sol 2000 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sol 2000 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 & Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Wood, Janeene | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/28/2021 | |
| Rylbss East Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/28/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.