115 Oregonia Road, Lebanon, OH 45036 · Warren County · (513) 932-1121
83 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365690 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 19, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 29 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.32 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.89 of those hours.
54.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Cch Healthcare, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the medication error log, review of the incident report, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #25) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 70. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 10/03/25 with diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25 dated 01/22/26 revealed the resident had moderate intact cognition. Resident was also assessed to be dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility document Stability of Common Insulins in Vials and Pens, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of insulin. This affected two (Resident #07 and #19 ) out of 17 residents with insulin orders. In addition, the facility failed to ensure ophthalmic medication was labeled with an open date. This affected one (Resident #39) out of 12 residents with ophthalmic orders. The facility census was 70. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 01/20/26. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, and schizophrenia. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #07 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administered medications to residents as ordered. The medication administration observation identified four medication errors out of 39 medications administered for a medication error rate of 10.26 percent. This affected three (#19, #26, and #27) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were assisted with repositioning to prevent skin impairment. This affected three (#46, #53, #72) of three residents reviewed for repositioning. The census was 74.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate skin assessment. This affected one (#72) of three residents reviewed for skin assessments. The census was 74.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a manner to protect against the potential spread of food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified 13 residents who were NPO (nothing by mouth) and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition. This affected one (#22) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual, review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Completion and Submission Timeframe's policy and procedure, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS discharge assessment was completed within 14 days of discharge. This affected one (#60) of one resident reviewed for MDS discharge assessments. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual, review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Completion and Submission Timeframe's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion date. This affected three (#25, # 50, and #59) of three residents reviewed for MDS assessment submissions. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority of a significant change in condition for residents with mental disorders. This affected two (#9 and #49) of five residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, (PASARR) admission process. The total facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review,and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care reflected the fluid restriction as ordered by the physician. The affected one (#61) of one resident reviewed for fluid restriction. The total facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for assistive devices to prevent further contracture. This affected one (#52) of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's significant weight loss was addressed in an accurate and timely manner. This affected one (#42) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility also failed to ensure weights were completed per the physician's order. This affected two (#09 and #22) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing was changed and dated as ordered by the physician. This affected for two (#19 and #61) of two residents reviewed for oxygen administration orders. The total facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide full visual privacy for resident. This affected for two (#48 and #61) of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The total facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information that included the total number worked daily of Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and State Tested Nurse Aides. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents in the building. The census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, medical record review, and review of pharmacy board website, the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids per professional standards when they allowed a company who was not licensed in Ohio by the State Pharmacy Board to administer dangerous intravenous (IV) fluid medications to residents. This affected three (Resident #46, #48 and #65) of three reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility identified 13 former residents, (Residents #70,#71,#72,#73,#74,#75,#76,#77,#78,#79,#80,#81 and #82) and 32 residents who currently reside in the facility, (Residents #65,#2,#3,#5,#7,#10,#11,#48,#12,#15,#17,#18,#19,#21,#23,#26,#46, #28,#30,#31,#33,#38,#41,#42,#45,#51,#55,#57,#60,#62,#63,and #64) who received intravenous fluids through the unlicensed company. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, medical record review, and review of pharmacy board website, the facility failed to provide pharmaceuticals services that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of drugs when they allowed a company who was not licensed in Ohio by the State Pharmacy Board to administer dangerous intravenous (IV) fluid medications. This affected three (Resident #46, #48 and #65) of three reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility identified 13 former residents, (Residents #70,#71,#72,#73,#74,#75,#76,#77,#78,#79,#80,#81 and #82) and 32 residents who currently reside in the facility, (Residents #65,#2,#3,#5,#7,#10,#11,#48,#12,#46,#15,#17,#18,#19,#21,#23,#26,#28,#30,#31,#33,#38,#41,#42,#45,#51,#55,#57,#60,#62,#63,and #64) who received intravenous fluids through the unlicensed company. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, medical record review, and pharmacy board website review, the facility failed to ensure an outside Intravenous (IV) company (IV Company #700) had a proper license to provide services to residents. This affected three (Resident #46, #48 and #65) of three reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility identified 13 former residents, (Residents #70,#71,#72,#73,#74,#75,#76,#77,#78,#79,#80,#81 and #82) and 32 residents who currently reside in the facility, (Residents #65,#2,#3,#5,#7,#10,#11,#48,#46, #12,#15,#17,#18,#19,#21,#23,#26,#28,#30,#31,#33,#38,#41,#42,#45,#51,#55,#57,#60,#62,#63,and #64) who received intravenous fluids through the unlicensed company. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prepare puree foods as planned in the facility's spreadsheet and recipes. This had the potential to affect all nine residents (Residents #1, #7, #9, #20, #23, #26, #27, #56, and #59) receiving pureed food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to store foods, discard expired foods and maintain food equipment in good repair. This had the potential to affect 63 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a full visual privacy of each resident. This affected six (Residents #7, #40, #50, #65, #68, and #226) of 56 residents residing in double occupancy rooms. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity when they posted care information on the door of a resident's room. This affected one (Resident #22) of two residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, policy review, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of a call light that adapted to the needs of the resident. This affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation of a resident's credit card to administration and the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #49) of one resident reviewed for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance from staff with activities of daily received bathing as scheduled. This affected one (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified all 72 residents required assistance from staff with bathing. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to have ensure the resident's pressure ulcers were documented accurately upon re-admission to the facility. This affected one (#28) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete hand hygiene after removing gloves during a resident's wound treatment. This affected one (Resident #58) of three residents reviewed for infections. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the resident assessment instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure the residents' completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's (CMS) system within 14 days after completion of the assessment. This affected four (#4, #40, #42, and #51) of 18 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 72.
32 fire safety citations on file: 7 on March 19, 2026, 9 on April 18, 2024, 16 on June 28, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 15, 2024 | Payment Denial | 6 days from May 10, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.32 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.89 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.45 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.32 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.12 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 44.4% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.17 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.68 on weekdays and 3.45 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 18.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.34 in April to June 2025 to 4.32 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.32 | 0.89 | 4.68 | 3.45 | 18.0% | 0 of 90 | 71 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.13 | 0.80 | 4.46 | 3.29 | 15.2% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.35 | 0.91 | 4.71 | 3.42 | 15.4% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.34 | 0.91 | 4.71 | 3.42 | 20.7% | 0 of 91 | 69 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.8 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cedarview Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (40.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
40.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
74.3% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CV HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to Cch Healthcare, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Finance LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/14/2015 | |
| Jordan, Jennifer | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Polsky, Elliott | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Stern, Jacob | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.