Home / Mississippi / McComb
501 South Locust Street, McComb, MS 39648 · Pike County · (601) 684-8111
145 certified beds, about 110 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255145 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 9, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since October 2019, 10 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (10 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $26,939 in the last three years; the largest was $14,511, and the latest is dated October 20, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.46 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
44.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).
CMS links it to Avardis Health, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for five (5) of seven (7) sampled residents, Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Spanish-speaking resident had access to language assistance services to prevent cultural and language barriers to care and quality of life for one (1) of (1) Spanish-speaking resident reviewed for communication needs. Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, facility policy review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that staff followed standard and transmission-based precautions to prevent spread of infections, when an Registered Nurse (RN) did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during direct care/replacement of the resident's leaking catheter drainage and collection component for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents with indwelling catheters. Resident #6. Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy titled, Standard Precautions Infection Control with Revision Date 11/14/25 revealed the policy stated, All staff are to assume that all residents are potentially infected or colonized with an organism that could be transmitted during the course of providing resident care services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse, neglect, and intimidation when it admitted and retained a resident with known aggressive and violent behaviors (Resident #1) without implementing adequate supervision, behavioral interventions, or protective measures for other residents. The facility's failure to provide necessary psychiatric intervention or to relocate vulnerable roommates placed residents at risk for serious injury, harm, impairment, or death, resulting in an immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. This deficient practice directly affected three (3) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from a resident who was admitted with known aggressive behaviors and failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions for that resident. The facility admitted and continued to retain Resident #1 without ensuring appropriate psychiatric care, enhanced supervision, or reassignment of vulnerable roommates. This systemic failure directly affected three (3) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent the exhibited aggressive and combative behaviors of Resident #1 placed this resident, and other residents at risk, in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide supervision and implement effective elopement prevention strategies for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a known cognitive impairment and elopement risk, resulting in an incident of elopement. The facility's failure to ensure supervision and implement interventions-including failure to detect the resident's absence promptly, and failure to secure exit doors-resulted in Resident #1 exiting the facility through the front entrance without staff knowledge and being unsupervised in the community for approximately one (1) hour and twenty-nine (29) minutes. The resident was found approximately two (2) miles away at a local business after receiving a ride from an unknown individual. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to securely safeguard hazardous chemicals in two unlocked janitor's closets for one (1) of four (4) days of survey. Findings Include: Review of the facility ' s policy, Overview of Proper Chemical Use, revised 6/2016, revealed, In order to help prevent accidents from occurring you must follow the following guidelines: 6. If you leave chemicals in the janitor's closet the door must be locked . An observation on 01/06/25 at 10:30 AM, revealed the Janitor Closet on the 200 hall was unlocked and there was a full bottle of 3M Concentrated Glass Cleaner in the closet. An observation on 01/06/25 at 11:19 AM, revealed the Janitor Closet on the Intermediate Care (IC) Hall was unlocked and unattended and there were containers of 3M Concentrated Glass Cleaner and 3M Quat Disinfectant. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff supported and respected a resident's right to make choices about his or her meal preferences for one (1) of twenty-six (26) sampled residents. Resident #40. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Menus revised 10/2022, revealed, .Procedures .2. Menus will be periodically presented for resident review, including the resident council, menu review meetings, or other review board as indicated by the center. The menu will identify the primary meal, the alternate meal, and any always offered food and beverage items . An observation on 1/6/25 at 10:52 AM, revealed a menu hanging in both dining areas that did not include alternate options. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide palatable, appropriately temperature-controlled foods for one (1) of (43) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of the spread of infection as evidenced by improper hand hygiene practices and wound care for three (3) of six (6) direct care observations. (Resident #3, Resident #64 and #66)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the dignity and respect of residents are upheld when feeding during mealtimes for one (1) of 26 sample residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to wound care when a nurse cleaned a resident's pressure ulcer wound without patting it dry for one (1) of 43 resident care plans reviewed (Resident #64)
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented, as evidenced by failure to provide oral care during Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #3 and Resident #6 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Plans of Care, revised 9/25/17, revealed, .Procedure .The Individualized Person-Centered plan of care may include but is not limited to the following .Services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required by state and federal regulatory requirements . Individualized interventions that honor the resident's preferences and promote achievement of the resident's goals . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received Activites of Daily Living (ADL) care to include oral hygiene for two (2) or six (6) sampled residents. Residents #3 and #6 Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated 2/1/22, revealed, Policy: To encourage resident choice and participation in activities of daily living (ADL) and provide oversight, cuing and assistance as necessary. ADLs include bathing, dressing, grooming, hygiene, toileting and eating. Procedure: 1. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) will review the resident [NAME] (facility software that includes individualized resident care) for information on individual care needs and preferences . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services in a manner to promote the healing and prevent complications of a pressure ulcer for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents with pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed. Residents #2 and #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility neglected to provide physician ordered services that were necessary for five (5) of 24 sampled residents. This resulted in actual harm for Residents #31, #75, #87, and #254 and had the likelihood of serious harm for Resident # 34. The facility's failure to provide services necessary to avoid physical harm caused serious harm as Resident #31 experienced decreased range of motion and mobility, Resident #75 was hospitalized for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Resident #87 developed a infection of a vascular stent placement, and Resident #254 was hospitalized due to sepsis. There was likelihood of harm for Resident #34 due to a delay in follow-up appointment for a supra pubic catheter placement. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and job description review, the facility's administration failed to use its resources effectively to ensure residents received physician-ordered services for five (5) of 24 residents reviewed, with the likelihood to affected any resident who needed outside transportation. Resident #31, Resident #34, Resident #75, Resident #87, and Resident #254. Serious harm occurred as a result of the facility's Administration's failure to ensure residents received physician-ordered services which caused Resident #31 to have decreased mobility, Resident #75 to be hospitalized , Resident #87 to have a wound infection, and Resident #254 to have sepsis. There was a likelihood of harm for Resident #34 due to a delay in changing a newly placed supra pubic catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure transportation was provided for outside medical services for five (5) of 24 sampled residents, with the likelihood to affect any resident who required outside transportation. The facility's failure to maintain an effective QAPI program placed residents who require outside transportation at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. This caused Resident #31 to experience decreased mobility, Resident #75 to be hospitalized , Resident #87 to develop a wound infection, and Resident #254 to become septic. There was a likelihood of harm for Resident #34 due to the delay in changing a newly placed supra pubic catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive care plan for residents with a Supra-Pubic Catheter, diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Range-of-Motion (ROM) related to an Orthopedic Brace, Treatment related to a Vascular Implant, and Orthopedic, Wound and Vascular Appointments for five (5) of 24 care plans reviewed. Resident #31, Resident #34, Resident #75, Resident #87, and Resident #254. Serious harm occurred as a result of the facility's failure to develop or implement a Comprehensive Care Plan which resulted in decreased mobility for Resident #31, hospitalization for Resident #75, a wound infection for Resident #87, and sepsis for Resident #254. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 24 sampled residents received outside medical services as ordered to prevent complications and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and/or psychosocial wellbeing. Residents #75 and #87. The facility's failure to provide required outside medical services led to the hospitalization of Resident #75 due to Congested Heart Failure (CHF) and Pneumonia and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and wound infection for Resident #87 caused serious injury, serious harm, and serious impairment to Resident #75 and Resident #87 and placed other residents in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment or death. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medical services to prevent an avoidable reduction in range-of-motion (ROM) and loss of mobility for one (1) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for ROM. Resident #31. The facility's failure to provide services to prevent the avoidable loss of ROM for Resident #31 resulted in serious injury, serious harm, and serious impairment and placed other residents in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 2/14/23 when Resident #31 missed the first post operative appointment with an orthopedic surgeon. The Facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/5/23 at 12:23 PM and provided an IJ Template. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning call light system was available for residents' bathrooms for 18 residents out of 107 residents that reside in the facility. (Residents #4, #5, #12, #21, #32, #37, #38, #44, #46, #49, #57, #60 #65, #69, #71, #81, #87, and #96) The facility's failure to ensure a functioning call light system was available for residents' bathrooms for 18 residents residing in the facility placed these residents, and other residents, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 4/16/23 when a maintenance work order was completed for call light issues but was not acted upon. The facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/2/23 at 5:38 PM and provided an IJ Template. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have lids sealed on the Biohazard Trash Cans for Seven (7) of seven (7) trash cans in the Biohazard Room, where staff placed medical waste.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe smoking environment as evidenced by plastic trash cans and plastic bags were used in the smoking area for cigarette butt disposal, for three (3) of four (4) observations during survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 28 resident records reviewed, Resident #122. Findings Include: Review of the facility's Policies and Procedure policy, revised 9/25/17, revealed to maintain all resident assessments completed within the previous 15 months in the resident's active clinical record, or in a centralized location that is easily and readily accessible. Each person completing a section or portion of MDS signs the Attestation Statement indicating accuracy/completeness. Review of the Discharge MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/20/19, revealed acute hospital was documented as the discharge destination for Resident #122. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Level II Preassessment Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), for a resident with mental illness diagnoses, for one (1) of 28 records reviewed, Resident #53.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the Comprehensive Care Plan related to Catheter Care, for one (1) of five (5) care plans reviewed, Resident #15. Findings Include: A review of the facility's Plans of Care policy, revised 9/25/17, revealed the procedure is to develop a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Resident #15 Review of Resident #15's Comprehensive Care Plan, with a focus of Elimination, implemented 3/18/19, with a target date of 11/15/19, revealed Resident #15 with altered bladder elimination and an intervention to perform catheter care, as ordered, per Nursing Aide. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during catheter care as evidence by incorrect cleaning technique of the catheter tubing for one (1) of five (5) catheter care observations, Resident #15. Findings Include: A review of facility policy titled Catheter care, Urinary revised 9/5/17, revealed the procedure for catheter care was to clean the catheter tubing with soap and water, starting close to the urinary meatus, cleaning in a circular motion along its length for about four (4) inches, moving away from the body. Rinse well using the same motion. Resident #15 An observation on 10/21/19 at 10:45 AM, revealed Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #1, assisted by CNA #2, entered the room to perform catheter care on Resident #15. [...]
Inspectors wroteMS #16272 Based on staff interview, record review, facility policy, and resident interview, the facility failed to obtain and provide Resident #61's pain medication in a timely manner for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for pain. Resident #61 did not have Norco available for pain, as ordered by the physician, for nine (9) scheduled doses. Findings Include: A review of the facility's, LTC Receiving Pharmacy Products and Services from Pharmacy, revised 10/31/16, revealed new orders for Schedule II controlled substances required a written prescription prior to dispensing, unless there is an emergency situation. An emergency situation is one in which the prescribing Practioner determines that immediate administration of the Schedule II controlled substance is necessary for proper treatment of the intended ultimate user. [...]
6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 9, 2025, 1 on May 9, 2023, 4 on October 24, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 20, 2025 | Fine | $14,511 |
| August 13, 2025 | Fine | $12,428 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.46 | 4.18 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.13 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.93 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.17 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.9% | 45.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 38.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.14 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.60 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.57 in April to June 2025 to 3.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.46 | 0.37 | 3.60 | 3.13 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 110 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.59 | 0.42 | 3.72 | 3.26 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.45 | 0.45 | 3.56 | 3.16 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.57 | 0.42 | 3.72 | 3.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 120 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Mississippi, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.60 | 4.35 | 3.44 | 6.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $15.15 | $14.19 to $16.92 | 14,200 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $24.14 | $22.50 to $27.90 | 9,850 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $31.22 to $40.62 | 29,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.5 | 20.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.7 | 19.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 44.5 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 40.3 | 27.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.5 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Courtyard Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
43.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 63 eligible stays.
9.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 82 eligible stays.
8.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 56 eligible stays.
48.4% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 62 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 96 residents counted.
5.5% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 96 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 501 SOUTH LOCUST STREET OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Avardis Health, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McComb Parentco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2025 |
| Pike Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2025 |
| Zenith Holdco II LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Fc Encore McComb LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Thomas, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Davis, Charles | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/26/2026 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Jenkins, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Jones, Tequilla | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Lampton, Lucius | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Thomas, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Fc Encore McComb LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2026 | |
| Davis, Charles | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/26/2026 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Jenkins, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Jones, Tequilla | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Lampton, Lucius | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Thomas, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.