Home / Rhode Island / Pascoag
999 South Main Street, Pascoag, RI 02859 · Providence County · (401) 568-3091
71 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 415099 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Rhode Island average is 9.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 59 health citations since July 2023, 8 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 15 fines totaling $306,656 in the last three years; the largest was $105,651, and the latest is dated September 25, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.71 across Rhode Island and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.04 of those hours.
57.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Rhode Island average 40.6%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 59 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies which must be reviewed and updated as necessary, and at least annually.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking, Resident ID #s 10 and 42, and 3 of 3 residents reviewed for restraints, Resident ID #s 9, 10, and 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for appointments, Resident ID #25.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of practice relative to insulin administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly provide notice to residents and/or representatives informing them of when changes in coverage are made to items and services covered by Medicare and/or by the Medicaid State plan related to the Skilled Nursing Facility Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), in a timely manner for 3 of 4 residents reviewed who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining, Resident ID #s 353, 354, and 355.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 of 1 staff reviewed, Staff A.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician's orders for 8 of 8 residents reviewed relative to failing to check blood sugars as ordered, Resident ID #s 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep all residents free from significant medication errors for 5 of 6 residents reviewed relative to failing to administer insulin as ordered, Resident ID #s 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for the transcription of admissions orders, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, witness, resident, and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive adequate supervision to prevent an accident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pudding thick liquids (thickest of fluid consistency to resemble pudding), Resident ID #s 19 and 16 and 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nectar thick liquids (thicker than water, falls slowly from a spoon), Resident ID #s 12, and 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for the utilization of the facility bowel protocol, Resident ID #s 47 and 39, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound care observation, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure nourishing snacks were offered to residents who desired them outside of scheduled meal service times for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for bedtime snacks, Resident ID #s 3, 7, 14, 21, and 99.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety relative to the main kitchen and kitchenette.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, surveyor observation, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed requiring pudding thick liquids, Resident ID #s 19 and 16 , for 40 of 48 residents reviewed relative to medication administration, Resident ID #s 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 99, 100, and 199, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for foley catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder in order to drain urine) care, Resident ID #33.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to the disinfection of glucometers (a device used to monitor blood glucose). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that staff utilized Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) properly for 2 of 2 residents reviewed relative to foley catheter (a device that drains urine from your bladder into a collection bag) care and multi drug resistant organism (MDRO), Resident ID #2 and #33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident ID #s 26, 29, and 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a minimum of 12 hours per year of in-service training to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides for 3 of 3 Nurse Aides (NA) reviewed, Staff H, I and J.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 1 resident assessed for falls, with major injury, Resident ID #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 11 resident's reviewed, Resident ID #s 4, 29, and 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 3 of 3 residents reviewed diagnosed with urinary tract infections (UTI), Residents ID #s 26, 29, and 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care for 3 of 3 nurses reviewed, Staff E, R, and S and for 3 of 3 Nursing Assistants (NA's) reviewed, Staff H, I, and J.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives and is provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for initial psychiatric evaluation, Resident ID #39.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 35 opportunities for error observed during the medication administration task, there were 10 errors resulting in an error rate of 28.57%, involving Resident ID #s 19, 20, 29, 45, and 99.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors for 40 of 48 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #s 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 99, 100, and 199.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity in an environment that promotes maintenance of his or her quality of life for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to foley catheter (a tube that is placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) care, Resident ID #33.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following a physician's order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for double portions, Resident ID #7.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen use, Resident ID #s 1 and 29, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for suctioning, Resident ID #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 2 nursing carts and 1 of 1 medication room observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to lung sound documentation and suctioning, Resident #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to update the results of the most recent surveys of the facility conducted by Federal or State Surveyors, or post the survey results in a readily accessible area for the residents, staff, and general public.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who successfully eloped, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, and resident representative interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident for 5 of 5 residents reviewed who had their picture posted on social media, Resident ID #s 5,6, 7, 8, and 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) for 5 of 5 residents reviewed who are not independent with transfers and/or ambulation, Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 new admissions reviewed, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services relative to Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) and/or Indwelling catheters (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag), for 3 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 2 and 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an ordered dermatology consult, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity in an environment that promotes maintenance of his or her quality of life for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, and resident interview it has been determined that the facility failed to respect the residents right to personal privacy for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who receive mail at the facility, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, relative to individualizing the physical environment relative to the resident's bedroom and bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID # 1, who is visually impaired.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident or resident representative, prior to the transfer of the resident to the hospital, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteReview of the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities last revised 2/3/2023 states in part, The facility must provide the resident with access to personal and medical records pertaining to him or herself, upon an oral or written request, in the form and format requested by the individual, if it is readily producible in such form and format (including in an electronic form or format when such records are maintained electronically), or, if not, in a readable hard copy form or such other form and format as agreed to by the facility and the individual, within 24 hours (excluding weekends and holidays) .The facility must allow the resident to obtain a copy of the records or any portions thereof (including in an electronic form or format when such records are maintained electronically) upon request and 2 working days advance notice to the [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to assure residents who have authorized the facility in writing to manage any personal funds have ready and reasonable access to those funds, relative to petty cash.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives and is provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, and that his/her care plan is reviewed and revised accordingly for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program which includes group activities and/or one-on-one visits (1:1), on 1 of 4 units reviewed for activities for residents with cognitive impairment that resided on the Subacute Unit, including those residents that were admitted on the unit and recently discharged , Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all newly hired employees, consistent with their expected roles, relative to orientation education involving abuse, dementia and behavioral health management per the facility assessment, for 4 of 5 newly hired employees, Staff G, H, I, and J.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents are free from neglect for 11 of 14 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed related to an as needed blood pressure medication, Resident ID #20.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life relative to assistance with eating during meals, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #34.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following a physician's order for a fluid restriction for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #213.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to the failure to administer an as needed blood pressure medication, Resident ID #20.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a residents environment remains as free from accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #34.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to following contact precautions for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #47.
9 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 17, 2025, 6 on May 8, 2024, 1 on July 14, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 25, 2024 | Fine | $29,328 |
| June 13, 2024 | Fine | $27,213 |
| February 27, 2024 | Fine | $9,318 |
| February 27, 2024 | Fine | $10,845 |
| February 27, 2024 | Fine | $105,651 |
| February 27, 2024 | Payment Denial | 2 days from May 27, 2024 |
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $14,814 |
| January 8, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 2, 2024 | Fine | $4,545 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
| December 7, 2023 | Fine | $53,430 |
| December 7, 2023 | Payment Denial | 8 days from December 29, 2023 |
| November 20, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| November 13, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 23, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.58 | 3.71 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.04 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.13 | 3.34 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.23 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.31 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.6% | 40.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 37.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.91 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.76 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.74 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 1.04 | 3.76 | 3.13 | 11.4% | 0 of 90 | 45 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.58 | 0.92 | 3.77 | 3.10 | 7.1% | 0 of 92 | 41 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.80 | 0.96 | 3.96 | 3.38 | 11.8% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.74 | 0.88 | 3.91 | 3.31 | 21.7% | 0 of 91 | 47 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Rhode Island, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.69 | 3.82 | 3.30 | 5.4% | 1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.33 | $21.52 to $22.82 | 10,220 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.51 | $37.45 to $39.02 | 1,290 |
| Registered nurses | $48.39 | $39.35 to $51.49 | 10,090 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.5 | 19.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 16.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.7 | 22.5 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Crystal Lake Rehabilitation and Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Rhode Island: 24 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Rhode Island59.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Rhode Island0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Rhode Island2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Rhode Island100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CL OPERATING LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fink, Boruch | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 04/01/2019 |
| Leifer, Joel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 48% | 04/01/2019 |
| Oberlander, David | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 48% | 04/01/2019 |
| Hermann, Edward | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Stern, Samuel | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Rhode Island. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.