Home / Minnesota / Little Falls
1200 First Avenue Northeast, Little Falls, MN 56345 · Morrison County · (320) 632-2061
64 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245399 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 30, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 47 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.61 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
52.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to St. Francis Health Services, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 47 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure medications were consistently acquired, received, and administered as ordered for 3 of 3 residents (R20, R4, R22) reviewed. As a result, R20 did not receive hydromorphone (synthetic opioid/narcotic) for seven days and pregabalin (anticonvulsant to treat nerve pain) for four days. This resulted in actual harm when R20 experienced severe withdrawal symptoms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to consistently include the facility census on the daily nurse staff posting. This had the potential to affect all 60 current residents, their families and visitorsThe facility's Staffing Data Submission Payroll Based Journal (PBJ), noted the facility was triggered for survey review of Low Weekend Staffing and Licensed Nurses for 24 hours per day during the 1st quarter of 2026 for the following dates:Saturday 10/26/25Saturday 11/29/25Saturday 12/13/25Sunday 12/14/25Sunday 12/28/25 In addition, the facility's Staffing Data Submission Payroll Based Journal (PBJ), noted the facility was triggered for survey review of Licensed Nurses for 24 hours per day during the 2nd quarter of 2026 for the following dates:Saturday 1/3/26Saturday 1/17/26Sunday 1/18/26Saturday 1/24/26Sunday 1/25/26 In review of the facility's staff [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control procedures when handling soiled linens. This had the potential to affect all residents who used facility laundered linens.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the provider of missed medications for 3 of 3 residents (R4, R20, R22) reviewed for medication errors. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the provider of a change in condition for 1 of 1 resident (R20) who exhibited severe withdrawal symptoms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure meal trays were served in a timely manner for 6 of 6 resident trays sampled to preserve desired temperatures and palatability. This had the potential to affect all residents who chose to eat on the unit or in their rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and/or maintained to ensure proper goals and interventions were in place to maintain adequate nutritional status for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor weights and modify/develop specific interventions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant, unintentional weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were promptly informed of changes to the Nursing Home Resident [NAME] of Rights (RBOR) and failed to ensure the current RBOR was available and displayed for residents, staff, and visitors to review. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 60 residents, as well as staff and visitors who relied on the outdated information.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess a change in bowel status and, if needed, implement interventions to prevent complication (i.e., obstruction, discomfort) for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed. R3 developed consistent loose stools on 6/20/26 which were not evaluated or assessed, and R3 then admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a potential bowel obstruction. In addition, the facility failed to update or communicate the results of completed medical testing (i.e., lab results, urinalysis) with the primary hospice team for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. R1 had multiple laboratory tests ordered on 6/5/26; however, the rationale for testing and subsequent test results were never shared with hospice to ensure appropriate coordination of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure bruising and non-pressure wounds were adequately assessed and monitored for 2 of 3 resident (R2 and R3) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to complete comprehensively assess level of supervision and failed to complete root cause analysis (RCA) following falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow the care plan to ensure safe transfers to eliminate/reduce the risk of an accident during a transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R1). This resulted in actual harm when R1 fell, sustained a significant head injury (brain bleed) that required hospitalization. The facility had implemented actions to prevent reoccurrence prior to the survey; therefore, the citation was issued at past non-compliance (PNC).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify physician and resident representative timely of a new injury for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions for transfers were implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor, review, and analyze underlying causes of resident's anxiety and agitation for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who was reviewed for behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who alleged abuse and the facility failed to have record of the investigation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse immediately (within two hours) to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for allegations of abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the provider and resident representative were notified of a fall for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for pressure ulcer care, and failed to follow infection control practices during a dressing change for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 3 of 3 residents (R24, R34, and R46), reviewed and observed for self-administration of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident's family and/or representative were updated timely for a change in condition related to resident death for 2 of 2 residents (R203 and R205) reviewed for notification of change.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the resident or their representative a written bed hold policy at the time of hospital transfer for 1 of 6 residents (R24) who was reviewed for hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, facility failed to ensure provider orders were followed to monitor vital signs for 1 of 1 residents (R51) reviewed for following physician's orders. In addition, the facility failed to obtain a provider order for a lap positioning belt for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for use of a positioning belt.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess past trauma and implement care plan interventions utilizing a trauma-informed approach for 1 of 1 (R24) residents reviewed who's diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist identified irregularities in the monthly drug regimen reviews for 3 of 5 residents (R11, R21 and R34) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for potential cardiovascular and neurological adverse effects with use of psychotropic medications for 3 of 5 residents (R11, R21 and R34) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R15, R24 and R34) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the Influenza vaccine and/or the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the long-term care (LTC) Ombudsman was notified of hospitalizations (i.e., facility-initiated discharges) for 5 of 6 residents (R11, R15, R24, R34, and R51) reviewed for hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to review and/or revise the infection control programs policies and procedures at least annually. This had the potential to affect all 51 residents, all staff, and all visitors at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner that promoted dignity for 2 of 3 residents (R8, R9) reviewed for call lights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to call lights timely for 2 of 3 residents (R8, R9) reviewed for call light responses and accommodation of needs
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents (R3) who was dependent on staff to provide assistance with a check and change program for incontinence.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and provide appropriate wound care to promote healing and prevent potential worsening of a moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) for 1 of 1 resident (R2) with current MASD.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement recommended influenza A infection control procedures for the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), for masks, during direct cares with residents to prevent the spread of infection for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R7) observed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident representative and physician were notified of falls with and without injuries for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement continuous monitoring for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) and notify physician timely with change in condition and/or worsening symptoms for 1 of 3 residents (R1), who were reviewed for change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively re-assess and revise resident's care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed, who was cognitively impaired and had multiple falls resulting in minor injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors, revise care plans to include non-pharmacological interventions, and monitor effectiveness for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed who were prescribed schedule psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an emergency room (ER) dental referral for follow-up dental services was acted upon and provided for 1 of 1 resident (R1) observed to have numerous missing and broken teeth with dental pain and reported difficulty chewing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure required nurse staffing information was posted daily. This had potential to affect all 56 residents, staff, and visitors who could wish to review this information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure range of motion exercises were completed to prevent further contractures for 4 of 4 residents (R15, R29, R21 and R37) reviewed for range of motion (ROM). In addition, the facility failed to ensure an ordered hand splints was applied consistently to maintain range of motion for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for position and mobility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (R28, R42,R5, R8) were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV20) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 2 of 2 residents (R22 and R37) reviewed who had a seatbelt in their wheelchairs and/or a device in the bed to prevent them from getting up.
Inspectors wroteR21's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for most ADL's. Diagnoses included disease of spinal cord, and upper and lower extremity contractures. R21's care plan dated 12/29/22, indicated R21 was totally dependent on staff for grooming hygiene, dressing, and bathing. During observation and interview on 6/26/23 at 12:20 p.m., R21's face was unshaven, and fingernails were long. R21 stated he had not been shaved in a few days and did not remember the last time he received oral care. R21 stated he was supposed to receive assistance with oral care and shaving every day, but staff did not offer to help him. R21 stated his nails were longer than he preferred and would like them trimmed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess past trauma and implement care plan interventions utilizing a trauma-informed approach for 1 of 1 (R17) resident reviewed who had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure supply and administration of ordered medication for 1 of 5 resident (R19) reviewed for pharmacy services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide occupational therapy as ordered for 1 of 2 residents (R15) reviewed for therapy services.
10 fire safety citations on file: 7 on July 30, 2026, 2 on April 18, 2024, 1 on June 29, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.61 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.36 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.79 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.24 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.6% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 73.3% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.21 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.72 on weekdays and 3.36 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.61 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.61 | 0.59 | 3.72 | 3.36 | 3.6% | 0 of 90 | 59 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.52 | 0.56 | 3.69 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.82 | 0.80 | 4.04 | 3.26 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 53 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.74 | 3.91 | 2.95 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 56 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $19.39 to $23.72 | 29,120 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.65 | $28.83 to $34.26 | 12,840 |
| Registered nurses | $48.80 | $42.76 to $55.17 | 70,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.1 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.4 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.1 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.9 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Little Falls Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.
85.0% this home
Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LITTLE FALLS HEALTH SERVICES. CMS links this home to St. Francis Health Services, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dripps, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Ehlers, Douglas | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Goodnough, Jennifer | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Lair, Michael | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lienemann, Steven | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Luetmer, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Nelson, Patrick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Rentz, Laura | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Rentz, Paul | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Schneider, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2013 | |
| Wiese, Lorraine | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/25/2017 | |
| Bach, Curtis | Corporate director | Individual | 08/28/2024 | |
| Dripps, Daniel | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Ehlers, Douglas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Goodnough, Jennifer | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Gramm, Timothy | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Lair, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lienemann, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 12/31/2011 | |
| Luetmer, John | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Nelson, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Peterson-Devries, Cami | Corporate director | Individual | 05/08/2022 | |
| Raw, Carol | Corporate director | Individual | 08/16/2005 | |
| Rentz, Laura | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Rentz, Paul | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Schneider, Todd | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2013 | |
| Wiese, Lorraine | Corporate director | Individual | 07/25/2017 | |
| Bach, Curtis | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/28/2024 | |
| Peterson-Devries, Cami | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/08/2022 | |
| Raw, Carol | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/2005 | |
| Big Stone Therapies, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/03/2015 | |
| Eide Bailly LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/03/2023 | |
| St. Francis Health Services of Morris, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2014 | |
| Bach, Curtis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/28/2024 | |
| Bakke, Christine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/30/2019 | |
| Caspers, Megan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/29/2014 | |
| Christensen, Jean | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/30/2024 | |
| Dripps, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Ehlers, Douglas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Goodnough, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Gramm, Timothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Hanneken, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/20/2022 | |
| Hejhal, Roxanne | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/10/2023 | |
| Hofmann, Reed | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Huseth, Kendra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Lair, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lienemann, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Luetmer, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Marlow, Jina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/06/2022 | |
| Miller, Kelly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/09/2020 | |
| Nelson - Holien, Kelsi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Nelson, Patrick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Nolting, Stacy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/05/2025 | |
| Peterson-Devries, Cami | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/08/2022 | |
| Raw, Carol | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/16/2005 | |
| Rentz, Laura | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Rentz, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/22/2024 | |
| Rentz, Paul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Rife, Daren | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/17/2025 | |
| Ryan, Ben | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/27/2012 | |
| Schneider, Todd | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2013 | |
| Schyma, Shelia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/18/2020 | |
| Stock, Kelsey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Thompson, Renee | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/10/2018 | |
| Tomoson, April | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/12/2021 | |
| Verley, Kelly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/18/2020 | |
| Walker, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Wiese, Lorraine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/25/2017 | |
| Big Stone Therapies, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/23/2025 | |
| Eide Bailly LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/23/2025 | |
| St. Francis Health Services of Morris, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Bach, Curtis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/28/2024 | |
| Bakke, Christine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/30/2019 | |
| Bausch, Aaron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2025 | |
| Caspers, Megan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/29/2014 | |
| Christensen, Jean | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/30/2024 | |
| Dripps, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Ehlers, Douglas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Goodnough, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Hanneken, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/20/2022 | |
| Hejhal, Roxanne | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/10/2023 | |
| Hofmann, Reed | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Huseth, Kendra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Lair, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lathrop, Carly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/23/2024 | |
| Lienemann, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Luetmer, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Marlow, Jina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/06/2022 | |
| Miller, Kelly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/09/2020 | |
| Nelson - Holien, Kelsi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Nelson, Patrick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Nolting, Stacy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/05/2025 | |
| Peterson-Devries, Cami | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/08/2022 | |
| Raw, Carol | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/16/2005 | |
| Rentz, Laura | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Rentz, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/22/2024 | |
| Rentz, Paul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Rife, Daren | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/17/2025 | |
| Ryan, Ben | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/27/2012 | |
| Schneider, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2013 | |
| Schyma, Shelia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/18/2020 | |
| Stock, Kelsey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Thompson, Renee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/10/2018 | |
| Tomoson, April | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/12/2021 | |
| Verley, Kelly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/18/2020 | |
| Walker, Amy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Wiese, Lorraine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/25/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.