4000 Rodeo Road, Abbeville, LA 70510 · Vermilion County · (337) 892-2332
128 certified beds, about 118 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195567 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 29, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 37 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $5,600 in the last three years; the largest was $5,600, and the latest is dated May 9, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.10 of those hours.
58.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents belongings were secured, by failing to inventory, document, and label clothing upon admission for 1(Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance, received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post daily nursing staffing that included the facility name, date, census, and the total number and actual hours worked by staff responsible for resident care in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 119.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received the proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities by failing to follow up with community resources for 1 (Resident #6) out of 44 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, by failing to ensure:Staff utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) by wearing a gown when providing wound care to Resident #1;Proper infection control techniques were practiced during perineal care (cleaning of the genitals and anal areas) for Resident #75; andFailing to properly store clean bed pads. The facility census was 119.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) of 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) residents investigated for resident to resident abuse. The facility failed to protect:1. Resident #81 from physical abuse by Resident #2; and2. Resident #2 from physical abuse by Resident #81.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) of 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) residents investigated for resident to resident abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 (Resident #123) of 3 closed records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#9) of 2 (#9, #124) residents investigated for ADLs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the provider failed to document, investigate, and maintain documentation of complaints voiced during the facility's resident council meetings that were conducted on 07/09/2024 and 10/08/2024. This had the potential to effect a census of 112 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered careplan for 2 (#17 and #53) residents in a final sample of 35 residents as evidenced by failing to: 1. notify the physician of Resident #17's abnormal CBG (Capillary Blood Glucose) levels as ordered; and 2. develop a focus area and interventions related to a choking incident for Resident #53.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure recipes for pureed diets were followed. This failure had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs, and weight loss for the 12 residents who received pureed meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 2(#17 and #21) of 2 (#17 and #21) residents investigated for hospice services, by failing to: 1. Collaborate with the hospice agency to ensure the hospice nurse's visit notes and certification were up-to-date in Resident #21's hospice binder; and 2. Communicate with the hospice agency of Resident #17's high blood sugars.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#49) of 35 sampled residents was safe to perform self-administration of medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged injury of unknown source was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 2 (#84, #113) out of 3 (#7, #84, #113) sampled residents investigated for falls. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 112 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term care Ombudsman of facility-initiated transfer for 2 (#84, #113) out of 2 (#84, #113) residents in a final sample size of 35. The deficient practice has the potential to affect a census of 112.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the enteral feeding infused at the ordered rate for one (Resident #63) out of 2 Residents (Resident #63 and Resident #66) investigated for tube feeding. This had the potential to effect 3 residents in the facility who had tube feedings.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices by failing to ensure the comprehensive care plan was accurately documented for 1 (#53) resident. The deficient practice has the potential to affect a census of 112. On 12/19/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation with a last review date of 10/09/2024, read in part, All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any change in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The policy also indicated that the following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: Progress toward or changes in the care plan goals and objectives. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by failing to ensure staff used personal protective equipment according to accepted standards of practice during biohazard trash removal.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party (RP), the nurse practitioner, and physician of a deteriorating right foot wound for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents by failing to contact the responsible party (RP), nurse practitioner, and physician in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by: 1. Failing to ensure staff sanitized reusable resident care equipment after each resident use. 2. Failing to perform proper hand hygiene after removing gloves This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 108 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide colostomy care as required by the facility's policy for 1 (Resident #79) of 1 (Resident #79) residnet's reviewed for colostomy care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess and document the location and intensity of pain for 1 (Resident #34) of 1 residents reviewed for pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff demonstrated specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care to meet the residents' needs safely to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (#34) of 43 sampled residents. This was evidenced by S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) leaving Resident #34's medication at the bedside.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and observation the facility failed to ensure all medications were properly stored and labeled as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure Novolog Multidose Insulin Pen was labeled with resident identification; and, 2. Failing to ensure controlled drugs awaiting disposal were stored and separately locked. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), form Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-10055, and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form CMS-10123 was completed prior to the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services (short term skilled nursing care and/or rehabilitation) for 1 (Resident #65) of 3 residents reviewed for termination of Medicare Part A services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean environment as evidenced by unclean floor and medical equipment at the bedside of 1 (#23) out of a final of 43 final sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed within the required time frame for 2 (Resident #14, Resident #90) out of 43 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by failing to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for medications for 1 (Resident #8) out of a finalized sample of 43. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total of 108 residents on the census.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 (Resident #8) resident investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented as ordered for checking oxygen saturations every shift, monitoring blood pressure before and after dialysis, and monitoring for symptoms before and after dialysis for 1 (#10) of 43 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and their representative received assistance in gaining access for hearing services for 1 (#44) out of 2 (#12, #44) residents investigated for hearing impairment out of a total sample of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had a urinary catheter received services to prevent urinary tract infection for 1 (#65) of 43 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask stored properly for 1 (Resident #63) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility through dialysis communication forms for 1 (#10) out of 1 (#10) residents sampled for dialysis services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate food preferences for 1(#7) out of 2 (#7, #55) residents reviewed for food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 107 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards in the kitchen by failing to ensure compromised cans in the dry storage room were disposed and not readily available for use.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | Fine | $5,600 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.71 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.10 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.26 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.66 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.7% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.14 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.89 on weekdays and 3.26 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.95 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.71 | 0.10 | 3.89 | 3.26 | 1.4% | 0 of 90 | 118 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.89 | 0.10 | 4.10 | 3.35 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.15 | 0.15 | 4.42 | 3.46 | 1.9% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.95 | 0.17 | 4.19 | 3.34 | 2.6% | 0 of 91 | 107 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.4 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.0 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.7 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.2 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.8 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Maison Du Monde Living Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 67 eligible stays.
44.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
2.7% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 74 residents counted.
7.3% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 74 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE ABBEVILLE, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May, Brian | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 03/07/2005 |
| Stott, Martin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 03/07/2005 |
| Cassidy, William | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2018 | |
| Diversified Healthcare, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/07/2005 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.