434 Monroe Avenue, Hornell, NY 14843 · Steuben County · (607) 324-7740
114 certified beds, about 109 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1971
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335322 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 23, 2024, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since November 2019, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $62,207 in the last three years; the largest was $62,207, and the latest is dated August 23, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.01 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
57.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Hurlbut Care, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and readily accessible for three of five residents reviewed (Residents #2, #4 and #5). Specifically, the facility could not readily access medical records maintained in its prior electronic medical record system prior to May 2023 due to transition to a new electronic medical record program for Residents #2, #4, and #5. In addition, the facility could not provide the preadmission screening information for Resident #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (Resident #59 and #71) of two residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #59 was readmitted from the hospital on [DATE] following surgical treatment of an abscess (a painful, swollen lump filled with pus) and did not have a follow up evaluation as ordered in a timely manner. Resident #71, who had a contracture (a shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that prevent normal joint movement which is often painful) of the left hand did not have a care plan in place that included measurable goals, interventions, or monitoring which resulted in multiple pressure ulcers and a decrease in range of motion. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility did not allow a resident the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident for one (Resident #31) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #31's side rails that were used to increase their independence and mobility in bed were removed by the facility as considered being a restraint without an appropriate assessment resulting in a fall out of bed with injury. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #31 that was not Immediate Jeopardy and is evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for 24 (Residents #1, #5, #22, #25, #27, #28, #37, #49, #58, #59, #61, #69, #73, #76, #79, #82, #83, #84, #85, #100, #109, #110, #161, #311) of 24 residents, the facility did not ensure that the baseline care plan (care plan developed within 48 hours of admission that includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of the resident) was completed within the required timeframe and that a summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or their representative. Specifically, for Residents #73 and #82, the facility could not provide evidence that a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00345323) from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for two (first and second floors) of two resident-use floors, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, there were roof leaks, missing ceiling tiles, and resident care equipment was dirty.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in accordance with State and Federal Laws for two (Unit One Hall A and Unit Two Hall A) of two medication carts and one (Unit Two) of two medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, medication carts contained expired medications, insulin without an open or expiration date, and one bottle of eye drops without any resident identifiers. Additionally, the medication room contained expired medications. This is evidenced by but not limited to the following: The undated facility policy and procedure, Storage of Medications, included drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one of one main kitchen, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, non-food contact surfaces were dirty, utensils and dishware were dirty, floors were dirty, there was missing grout between floor tiles, a reach-in cooler was dirty, and food items were not stored 6 inches above the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00338206) from 08/18/2024 through 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #5) of ten residents, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, Resident #5 was observed over several days with debris underneath their fingernails including while eating. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Care of Fingernails/Toenails, dated January 2024, documented that nail care included daily cleaning and regular trimming. The policy included to remove dirt from around and under each nail. Resident #5 had diagnoses that included muscle weakness, depression, and arthritis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #16) of one resident, the facility did not ensure the resident received treatment and/or assistive devices to maintain hearing. Specifically, Resident #16 was hard of hearing, had a documented request to be seen for hearing aids, and the facility did not arrange for an audiology (hearing) evaluation. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #16 had diagnoses including diabetes, depression, and bilateral hearing loss. The Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment, dated 07/03/2024, included the resident was cognitively intact, was able to hear with minimal difficulty, and did not have hearing aids. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigations (NY00338206 and NY00337318) from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided to prevent urinary tract infections for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag) for one (Resident #25) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #25 had a history of urinary tract infections and was observed on multiple occasions with their urinary catheter drainage bag, catheter drainage port, and catheter tubing lying directly on the floor without a barrier, and with the drainage bag completely full of urine resulting in a backup of urine in the tubing. This is evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #59) of one resident reviewed for tube feedings (nutrition administered via a tube inserted directly into the stomach via the abdomen due to the residents' inability to consume food and drink by mouth), the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #59's total daily intake of tube feedings was being monitored to ensure their nutritional needs were being met, physician's orders regarding administration of the tube feedings while consuming food were unclear, and free water flushes and nutritional supplements were not administered as ordered by the physician. This is evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/19/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #85) of three residents, the facility did not ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #85 was observed wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula (a device that delivers oxygen through a person's nose), did not have a physician order in place for oxygen use via a nasal cannula, and there was no documentation in the Medication Administration and Treatment Administration Records that reflected the use of oxygen via nasal cannula each shift. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Oxygen Administration. dated January 2024, included to verify and review a physician's order for oxygen administration. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records review conducted during a Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00345323) from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one of one kitchen, the facility did not ensure there was an effective pest control program. Specifically, small brown flies and fruit flies were present and untreated.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for six (#52, #312, #313, #314, #315, and #317) of seven residents reviewed, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries at the termination of their Medicare coverage. Specifically, the facility did not provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) to Residents #314 and #315 and did not provide a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to Residents #52, #312, #313, #317, and/or their representatives informing them of their appeal rights and/or their liability for services. This is evidenced by but not limited to the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility did not ensure the nurse staffing information was posted daily and included the required information. Specifically, the facility did not post the accurate nurse staffing data on 08/18/2024, 08/20/2024, 08/21/2024 or 08/22/2024, as required per the regulations. This is evidenced by the following: During an observation on 08/18/2024 at 8:30 PM, the daily nurse staffing information was not visibly posted. During observations on 08/20/2024 at approximately 11:15 AM, 08/21/2024 at 10:29 AM, and 08/22/2024 at 9:04 AM, the posted daily nurse staffing information was dated 08/19/2024. During an interview on 08/21/2024 at 10:29 AM, Receptionist #1 stated Scheduler #1 was responsible for printing the daily nurse staffing information. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey, (complaint #NY00336027) and completed [DATE], it was determined that the facility could not ensure there were adequate number of personnel in the facility to provide basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR- emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart and/or lungs cease functioning). Specifically, the facility did not maintain an updated list of staff who were currently certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and could not provide evidence that a cardiopulmonary resuscitation certified staff member was in the facility at all times to provide basic life support when needed. This is evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00302380 and NY00321005) 8/3/23 to 10/3/23, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse for three (Residents #3, #4, and #5) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, staff reported potential abusive behavior towards all three residents by one staff member (Registered Nurse (RN) #1). This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy, Abuse Prohibition Program, dated January 2023, documented that all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, and/or theft/misappropriation of resident property are thoroughly investigated by facility management. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey completed on 6/10/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #43) of five residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. Specifically, Resident #43's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was not individualized with goals and interventions to address use of psychotropic medications. This is evidenced by: Resident #43 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia with behaviors, depression, and adult failure to thrive. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey, completed on 6/10/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #36) of two residents reviewed the facility did not ensure that the resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable and that the resident received the necessary treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (#NY00296839), completed on 6/10/22, it was determined that the facility did not ensure the resident's environment was free from accident hazards for one (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #32, who had severe impairment of cognitive function, was able to exit the facility unsupervised due to a door alarm failure. Additionally, the residents care plan was not revised following actual exit seeking behavior and an elopement. This was evidenced by the following: Resident #32 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and a history of repeated falls. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed 6/7/22 to 6/10/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #47) of one resident reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility did not ensure a written notification, which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy, was provided to the resident and/or the resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital. Specifically, Resident #47 was transferred to the hospital and the facility could not provide evidence that a written notice of information regarding the facility's bed-hold policy (including bed reserve policy) was provided to the resident or the resident's representative per the regulation. This was evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for two of two residential living units the facility did not provide housekeeping services that are necessary to maintain sanitary, orderly, and comfortable conditions. This is evidenced by the following: During an observation on 10/30/19 at 4:07 p.m., in the small dining room (TV room) on the first floor six of six recliners had worn bald spots in the fabric and there was no nap left to some areas of the fabric. The recliners were, stained, discolored, and smelled of urine. The finish on the vinyl upright chair was worn through to a lighter color. The fabric was worn on the red cloth chair and all four of the chair legs were scuffed with lighter colored wood visible below the dark brown top stain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one (Resident #9) of one resident reviewed for abuse and for one (Resident #13) of five residents reviewed for accidents, the facility did not report resident-to-resident incidents to the State Survey Agency as required. This is evidenced by the following: Review of the facility policy and procedure, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Prohibition, Training, Investigation, and Reporting, dated December 2016, revealed that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment are reported immediately to the facility Administrator and to other officials, including the New York State Department of Health. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one of one resident reviewed for hydration, the facility did not have a system in place to ensure that daily fluid intakes were consistently or timely monitored or followed physician orders. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, and a history of urinary tract infections. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 10/12/19, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, required set up help for eating, and used a diuretic daily. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Care Plan, dated 6/12/19, directs to set up and supervise at meals, encourage and assist if needed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and an interview conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that the carbon monoxide detection was not provided in compliance with Federal, State, and Local Laws and Professional Standards. The International Fire Code, 2015 Edition Section 915 Carbon Monoxide Detection (adopted by New York State), requires carbon monoxide detection in all areas with fuel burning/gas operated equipment. Specifically, carbon monoxide detection was not installed in the basement levels of Buildings 906 and 918 where there was fuel burning equipment. This is evidenced by the following: Observations conducted between 10/28/19 and 10/29/19 revealed there was no carbon monoxide detection installed within the facility on floor one and the basement. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one (Resident #35) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization, the facility did not ensure that the resident's representative was provided with a written transfer/discharge notice. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, and dementia. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 9/5/19, revealed the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. A nursing progress note, dated 10/24/19, revealed the resident was having trouble breathing and at 11:00 a.m., the resident was transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. [...]
16 fire safety citations on file: 8 on August 23, 2024, 3 on June 10, 2022, 5 on November 1, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 23, 2024 | Fine | $62,207 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.01 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.35 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.69 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.82 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.3% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 78.9% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.27 on weekdays and 2.35 on weekends, 28% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.11 in April to June 2025 to 3.01 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.01 | 0.50 | 3.27 | 2.35 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 109 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.51 | 0.55 | 3.80 | 2.76 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 108 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.28 | 0.47 | 3.56 | 2.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.11 | 0.43 | 3.38 | 2.45 | 0.4% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.1 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.2 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.2 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.8 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.7 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.4 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Maple City Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 120 eligible stays.
9.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 125 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.
41.4% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 108 residents counted.
10.5% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 108 residents counted.
95.5% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HORNELL GARDENS, LLC. CMS links this home to Hurlbut Care, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 3.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chasko, Bridgett | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/02/2014 | |
| Hurlbut, Robert | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2007 | |
| Chasko, Bridgett | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/02/2014 | |
| Chasko, Bridgett | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/02/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.