Home / Massachusetts / Waltham
66 Newton Street, Waltham, MA 02453 · Middlesex County · (781) 755-2020
123 certified beds, about 88 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225408 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 25, 2025, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since October 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,496 in the last three years; the largest was $9,496, and the latest is dated February 24, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.90 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.20 of those hours.
15.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
CMS links it to Covenant Health, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for 5 Residents (#56, #82, #62, #73 and #2) out of sample of 30 residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #56, the facility failed to set oxygen as ordered by the physician.2. For Resident #82, the facility failed to clean the concentrator filter as ordered by the physician.3. For Resident #62, the facility failed to clean the concentrator filter.4. For Resident #73, the facility failed to clean the concentrator filter, keep the water bottle off the floor and keep an oxygen cannula clean.5. For Resident #2, the facility failed to clean the concentrator filter and keep an oxygen cannula clean.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards on three of three units. Specifically,1. The facility failed to ensure medications were labeled in accordance with acceptable professional standards, to include open dates on medications with shortened expiration dates in three medication carts on three of three units.2. The facility failed to secure and lock an unattended medication cart on the first-floor unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the faciliy failed to 1. provide appropriate hand hygiene after glove changes and 2. appropriately label and date items in the unit kitchenettes on 2 of 3 units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while caring for a resident with a gastrostomy tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to assess two Residents (#10 and #18), out of a total sample of 30 residents, for the ability to self-administer medications and determine if it was clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assess the use of an abdominal binder as a potential restraint for one Resident (#40) out of a total sample of 30 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#27) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by ensuring a reassessment of an as needed (PRN) dose of Haldol (an antipsychotic medication) after 14 days, out of a total sample of 30 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a person- centered comprehensive care plan for one Resident (#53) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Resident #53, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a pacemaker.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#40) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice, out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Resident #40, the facility failed to ensure nursing completed a weekly skin assessment per the physician order.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#40) who was assessed to be at high risk for developing pressure ulcers, out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Resident #40, the facility failed to notify the provider of an open skin lesion of his/her left heel.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate care and services for one Resident (#53) with a gastrostomy tube (a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal incision for administration of nutrition, fluids, and medication), out of 30 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the head of the bed was elevated to prevent potential aspiration while receiving enteral feedings.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record and interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health care services in a person-centered environment for one Resident # 88 out of a sample of 30 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement psychiatric recommendations provided after the Resident expressed suicidal ideations.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who required assistance from staff with personal hygiene, the Facility failed to ensure that during the provision of personal care that staff took necessary steps to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident resulting in an injury, when on 01/22/25, a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) used an electric curling iron to curl Resident #1's hair, he/she sustained a second-degree burn (partial thickness, involves both the outer (epidermis) and underlying layer (dermis) of skin, they cause pain, redness, swelling, and blistering) to the upper left side of his/her forehead, which required treatment. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement treatment orders recommended by the Wound Physician for three Residents (#74, #40 and #55) out of a total of 22 sampled Residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #74, the facility failed to implement the Wound Physician's treatment order for offloading heels while in bed. 2. For Resident #40, the facility failed to implement the Wound Physician's treatment order for offloading heels while in bed. 3. For Resident #55, the facility failed to transcribe and consistently implement a treatment order for wound care to the coccyx as ordered by the Wound Physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. Review of the facility policy titled, General Food Preparation and Handling, dated 2021, indicated the following: -Bare hands must never touch ready to eat raw food directly. Disposable gloves are single use item and must be discarded after each use. Employees must wash hands prior to putting gloves on and off after removing gloves. On 10/8/24 at 8:12 A.M., the following was observed on the third-floor unit during the breakfast meal: -The server changed gloves twice without washing his hands in between. -The server touched the serving utensils, plastic wrap, plates and toaster buttons potentially contaminating his gloves. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency within two hours as required for one Resident (#65) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, on 10/8/24 at 9:00 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware of Resident #65's allegations of abuse. The DON did not report to the state agency until 10/9/24 at 11:15 P.M., when the surveyor inquired about the follow up, more than 24 hours after becoming aware of the allegations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screen to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability (ID or DD) and/or serious mental illness (SMI) and needed further evaluation for one Resident (#61), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #61, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level 1 PASARR indicating that the Resident had a diagnosis of schizotypal disorder which is a SMI, resulting in a Level II PASARR evaluation not being completed as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident centered care plan was developed for one Resident (#63) out of a total sample of 22 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop an individualized comprehensive resident centered care plan related to the monitoring and care of a pacemaker for Resident #63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice for one Resident #55 out of a sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #55 the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented Teds (compression) stockings according to the physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for dependent residents for one Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide assistance with weekly showers for Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure standards of quality of care were implemented for one Resident (#32), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify a skin injury on the Resident's left upper arm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper treatment to maintain hearing and ensure assistive devices to maintain hearing and enhance communication were utilized for one Resident (#63), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #63, the facility failed to consistently implement his/her hearing aids. Finding Included: Review of the facility policy titled, Hearing Impaired Resident, Care of, last revised 2/18, indicated the following: Policy: -Staff will assist hearing impaired residents to maintain effective communication with clinicians, caregivers, other residents, and visitors. -Staff will assist residents with care and maintenance of hearing devices. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who required respiratory care (continuous oxygen) received care consistent with professional standard of practice for one Resident (#27) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for supplemental oxygen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed for Trauma-Informed Care for one Resident (#16), who was admitted with the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), out of a total sample of 22 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for two Residents (#55) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, Nurses documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that Resident #55 wore teds stocking while in bed, contrary to direct observation of the teds stockings not being worn.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assess for eligibility, and offer pneumococcal vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for one Resident (#6) out of a total of five residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure food was handled in a manner to prevent the risk for potential foodborne illness in the kitchen and during the meal service on one of three resident care units. Specifically, 1) A Diet Aide #3 handled cups with her fingers inside the cup and eating utensils by the end that touches food and enters the mouth. 2) Diet Aide #1 and Diet Aide #2 touched ready to eat food directly with potentially contaminated gloves during meal service on the C unit. 3)Cook #1 and [NAME] #2 were observed preparing food without hair restraints. Review of the 2022 Food Code, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, indicated the following: 110.10 Personnel. The plant management shall take all reasonable measures and precautions to ensure the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for one Resident (#19) out of a total sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure, for one Resident (#77), was free from the use of a restraint, out of a total sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for three Residents (#18, #1 and #55), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #18 the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented a physician's order for medications ordered to be administered with breakfast and supper (with meals). 2. For Resident #55 the facility failed to ensure an order was obtained for the use, including the proper setting, and plan for monitoring the setting and function of the air mattress in use. 3. For Resident #1 the facility failed to implement a physician's order for contact precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure quality care was provided for two Residents (#44 and #33) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #44 the facility failed to ensure geri sleeves were placed on the resident, as ordered by the Physician, on all days of survey. 2.) For Resident #33 the facility failed to identify and investigate bruising.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure measures were in place to address the risk for pressure ulcers for three Residents (#53, #2, and #19) out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically: 1. Wound physician recommendations were not addressed and transcribed resulting in a delay of treatment for a skin injury on the right heel for Resident #53. 2. The physician orders for management/prevention of a pressure ulcer for Residents #2, and #19 were not followed. 3. The physician orders for the application of a bunny boot and the air mattress pressure setting was not followed for Resident #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the plan of care for an indwelling urinary catheter/Foley (a flexible tube that passes through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine) for one Resident (#19) out of a total sample of 21 Residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure the correct size indwelling urinary catheter was in place for Resident #19 as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care and maintain oxygen equipment for 2 Residents (#61 and #25) out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #61 the facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filter was clean and free of dust build up. 2) For Resident #25 the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of an oxygen concentrator, oxygen liter amount to be given, and ensure the oxygen concentrator filter was clean and free of dust build up.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to: assess for the use of an installed bed rail, obtain informed consent or a physician's order, for one Resident (#25) out of 21 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a licensed Registered Nurse (RN) had the appropriate competency and skill set to provide the necessary care and treatment for one Resident (#19) with skin protocol in place out of total sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the attending physician for one Resident (#53), out of 21 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner documents a rational to extend the medication for two Residents (#18 and #84), in a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, 1.) For Resident #18 the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) alprazolam (psychotropic medication) had a stop date as required. 2.) For Resident #84 the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) diazepam (psychotropic medication) had a stop date as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure: 1. medications were secured and stored for one Resident (#55) out of a total sample of 21 residents and 2. failed to ensure that insulin (vials/flex pen), and lancets were stored safely on one of three resident care units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for three Residents (#84, #19 and #44) out of a total sample of 21 Residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #84 nursing failed to accurately update the physician's order for tube feedings. 2. For Resident #19 nursing failed to accurately document in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) regarding bunny boots and the air mattress setting. 3. For Resident #44 nursing failed to accurately document in the TAR regarding geri sleeves.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to adhere to standards of practice to prevent the spread of potential infection on two of three resident care units. Specifically, housekeeping staff failed to perform hand hygiene when exiting resident rooms, between glove changes, and wore potentially contaminated gloves in the hall when disposing of soiled items.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided education on the pneumococcal vaccine, were assessed for the eligibility for the administration of a pneumococcal vaccine and that the medical record for 2 out of 5 residents had documentation of the administration of the pneumococcal vaccine.
29 fire safety citations on file: 12 on November 25, 2025, 9 on October 10, 2024, 8 on October 4, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 24, 2025 | Fine | $9,496 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.90 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.20 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.57 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.17 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.54 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 15.3% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 9.5% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.03 on weekdays and 3.57 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.62 in April to June 2025 to 3.90 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.90 | 1.20 | 4.03 | 3.57 | 9.6% | 0 of 90 | 88 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.76 | 1.10 | 3.89 | 3.43 | 6.3% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.70 | 1.08 | 3.82 | 3.39 | 8.7% | 0 of 92 | 92 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.62 | 1.02 | 3.73 | 3.34 | 6.0% | 0 of 91 | 92 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $21.32 to $23.94 | 38,130 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.57 | $34.91 to $40.66 | 13,210 |
| Registered nurses | $50.27 | $42.05 to $65.44 | 88,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.0 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.3 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.0 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.9 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.2 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Maristhill Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 181 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 213 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 111 eligible stays.
37.1% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
2.4% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHS OF WALTHAM INC. CMS links this home to Covenant Health, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Castillo, Nicole | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/18/2018 | |
| Castillo, Nicole | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/18/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.