2921 W 1st Street, Coffeyville, KS 67337 · Montgomery County · (620) 251-5190
100 certified beds, about 68 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175290 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since July 2022, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 5 fines totaling $190,623 in the last three years; the largest was $84,124, and the latest is dated April 9, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.17 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.
43.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Medicalodges, Inc., an affiliated group of 18 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in the kitchen under sanitary conditions which placed the residents of the facility at risk for food borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate activity of daily living (ADL) cares to Resident (R)39 regarding an unshaven face, dried food on face and jagged, dirty fingernails; R6 regarding an unshaven face; R44 regarding an unshaven face and dirty clothing and R51 regarding jagged, dirty fingernails.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident specific activity program for Resident (R)4, R6, R39, R44, and R51.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for Resident (R)4, while she was in her room in bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 3, and R7 a written notification of transfer to the resident and/or his representative as soon as practicable and failed to send a copy of that notification to the ombudsman.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate catheter care within the standards of practice was provided for Resident (R) 59 when staff failed to secure the catheter tubing to R59's thigh to prevent pulling and/or dislodgement and also failed to empty the catheter bag before getting too full, to prevent catheter-related urinary tract infections (UTI).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer non-pharmaceutical interventions for pain for one Resident (R)3, who had acute pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing care. The facility also failed to store respiratory treatment devices in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 65 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 72 residents with four residents sampled and one resident reviewed for neglect. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the neglect of cognitively impaired Resident (R)2, who displayed a recent increase in behaviors. On 08/26/24 at 10:12 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G completed a skin assessment on R2 and documented her skin as clean, dry, intact, and without new skin conditions. On 08/27/24 at 10:45 AM, staff observed blood on a tissue after wiping R2 and failed to notify the LN in charge of R2's care. On 08/27/24 at 11:15 AM, Social Service Staff X and Administrative Staff B took R2 out of town to a senior behavioral unit. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 99 residents with three residents sampled and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the verbal and physical abuse of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 2 on 07/13/24 and again on 07/19/24. On 07/13/24, Non-Certified Staff N observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O grab R2's arms near her wrists and pushed them to R2's chest. CNA O then stated to R2, You are [explicit language] with the wrong person. I will hit you back. CNA O then turned and walked away. Non-certified Staff N failed to report her observation immediately and CNA O continued to work her scheduled shift and additional shifts following 07/13/24. On 07/19/24, CNA M was in the hallway and heard CNA O and R2 yelling back and forth from R2's room. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 99 residents with three residents sampled and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately report incidents of verbal and physical abuse of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 2 on 07/13/24 and again on 07/19/24. On 07/13/24, Non-Certified Staff N observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O grab R2's arms near her wrists and pushed them to R2's chest. CNA O then stated to R2, You are [explicit language] with the wrong person. I will hit you back. CNA O then turned and walked away. Non-certified Staff N failed to report her observation immediately and CNA O continued to work her scheduled shift and additional shifts following 07/13/24. On 07/19/24, CNA M was in the hallway and heard CNA O and R2 yelling back and forth from R2's room. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 99 residents with three residents sampled and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff protected residents from abuse when staff did not immediately report incidents of verbal and physical abuse of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 2 on 07/13/24 and again on 07/19/24. On 07/13/24, Non-Certified Staff N observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O grab R2's arms near her wrists and pushed them to R2's chest. CNA O then stated to R2, You are [explicit language] with the wrong person. I will hit you back. CNA O then turned and walked away. Non-certified Staff N failed to report her observation immediately and CNA O continued to work her scheduled shift and additional shifts following 07/13/24. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents, with 20 in the sample, and two residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pertinent and timely interventions were implemented as ordered to prevent Resident (R)13's significant weight loss of 25.11 percent (%) in 141 days. The facility did not weigh R13 monthly and did not identify and assess R13 when meal intake consistently declined between 10/2023 and 02/2024. This failure resulted in a R13 losing 29.4 pounds (lbs.)/25.11% body weight, in 141 days. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during meals, failed to ensure sanitary storage of oxygen concentrators with tubing, failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during dressing change, failed to ensure sanitary glucometer cleaning for two glucometers used by three residents, and failed to ensure staff provided enhanced barrier precautions for two Residents (R) 5 and R22 with the use of urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility, respond to written requests that resulted from group meetings, consider the views of a resident or family group, and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response to resident's concerns voiced in resident council.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 81 residents, which included 31 residents with active trusts held by the facility. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for the 31 residents in facility. The facility further failed to establish and maintain a system that assured a full complete and separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles, of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to voice grievances with respect to care and treatment, the behavior of staff, other residents, and other concerns regarding their long-term care stay. Additionally, the facility failed to make prompt efforts resolve the grievances the residents had and provide a written decision regarding his or her grievance.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents with 31 residents sampled, including seven residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate and timely ADL cares to four Residents (R) 13, R8, and R46, regarding untrimmed facial hair and R49, regarding untrimmed facial hair and long fingernails.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 81 residents which included 31 residents with active trusts accounts, held by the facility. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)13 with the accurate accounting of her personal funds, when the facility overcharged the residents personal funds account by $51.00.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 81 residents. The facility identified 31 residents with active personal funds accounts. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed ensure the conveyance of personal funds within 30 days of discharged for Resident(R) 192 and within 30 days of death for R193.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents with 31 residents sampled. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one Resident (R) 8, regarding the use of oxygen (O2).
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents with 31 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for respiratory. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store oxygen tubing in a clean and sanitary manner for Resident (R) 8.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff recorded the resident census on the Daily Staff Postings as required.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents with 20 selected for review including three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of and promote healing of a pressure ulcer diagnosed as a stage three (full thickness loss of skin usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R)41. In addition, the facility failed to perform a dressing change with sanitary conditions related to infection control. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to proactively monitor infections in the facility to ensure to help prevent the spread of infections among the residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility nursing staff followed the principles of antibiotic stewardship in a proactive manner to ensure residents received antibiotics in a safe and effective manner to prevent unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. The facility failed to track and trend infections causative microorganisms throughout the facility and failed to compile antibiotic use data for prescribing practitioners.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the second vaccine booster which became available on May 20,2022 in a timely manner as required.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for residents in the facility on two of five halls.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents which included 20 residents sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete the Care Area Assessment (CAA analysis of findings), related to a Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), for four Residents (R)186, R137, R43, and R19, to address the underlying cause, risk factors, and other contributing factors to ensure the resident received care based on their individual needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents which included 20 residents sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete the Care Area Assessment (CAA-analysis of findings), related to a Significant change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS), for four selected Residents (R)46, R 44, R 4, and R 23, as required. The residents experienced a change of condition in at least two or more activities of daily living (ADL's) with a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition, that had an impact on more than one area of these residents health status.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents with 20 selected for review. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for six of the residents reviewed including; Resident (R)68 and R41 with pressure ulcers, R137 for bladder incontinence and skin issues, R23 and R186 with skin conditions, and R46 for bathing activity.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents with 20 selected for review, which included five residents reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor non-pressure skin issues for three of the five residents (R) 137, 23 and 186 and obtaining physician ordered daily weights for two of the five residents, R 43 and R29.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents and identified 58 residents resided on the below 2 of four resident halls. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate continued accounting system for monitoring and reconciliation of narcotic medications, to prevent misappropriation of 58 residents, identified to reside on these two of affected halls of the four resident halls of the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for the resident's kitchen and outside area.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents with 20 sampled for review, which included one resident reviewed with a urinary catheter. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of the one sampled resident, (R) 4 with a catheter/urine collection bag, with the lack of a cover to prevent full visualization of the resident's urine by anyone present.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents. The sampled of 20 residents included 2 residents for choices related to bathing. Based on observation , interview, and record review the facility failed to provide choices for two Residents (R)46 and R44 related to bathing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents. The sample of 20 residents included one reviewed for abuse. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure submission of an allegation of abuse investigation, for the one sampled resident (R)135, within five days as required.
Inspectors wroteThe census reported a census of 89 residents with 20 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL)s. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of the four, dependent Residents (R)16 and R 41 received appropriate personal hygiene, regarding long, dirty fingernails.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 89 residents with 20 selected for review, which included two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the two residents (R)137 remained as continent as possible with unobstructed access to the bathroom.
Inspectors wrote- Review of resident (R)23's Physician Order Sheet, dated 06/17/22, revealed diagnosis included heart failure, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and chronic stage three kidney disease. The Care Plan, reviewed 06/03/22, instructed staff the resident received medications with Black Box Warnings. Review of the Physician's Order Sheet, dated 06/27/22, instructed staff to administer the following: Start date 04/26/22, Cozaar, 25mg (milligrams), daily for hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Staff instructed staff to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was less than 110 mmHg (milligrams of Mercury) and to notify the physician if staff held the medication for three consecutive days. [...]
45 fire safety citations on file: 12 on May 13, 2024, 17 on July 14, 2022, 16 on February 26, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 9, 2026 | Fine | $27,042 |
| September 9, 2024 | Fine | $84,124 |
| August 14, 2024 | Fine | $24,065 |
| August 14, 2024 | Fine | $24,065 |
| May 13, 2024 | Fine | $31,327 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.17 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.68 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.58 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.88 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.0% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 18.2% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.24 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.36 on weekdays and 3.68 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.57 in April to June 2025 to 4.17 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.17 | 0.71 | 4.36 | 3.68 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 68 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.16 | 0.67 | 4.37 | 3.62 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.53 | 0.80 | 4.76 | 3.93 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.57 | 0.77 | 4.80 | 4.01 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 67 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.8 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.6 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.6 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Medicalodges Coffeyville on Midland's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 132 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 151 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.
75.9% this home
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
5.9% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
97.6% this home
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ML-OP COFFEYVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to Medicalodges, Inc., a group of 18 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicalodges Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2022 |
| McBride, Travis | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Butler, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2003 | |
| Cox, Garen | Corporate director | Individual | 02/26/1998 | |
| Doll, Gayle | Corporate director | Individual | 03/10/2005 | |
| Hines, Scott | Corporate director | Individual | 03/19/2008 | |
| Lager, Shannon | Corporate director | Individual | 06/15/2013 | |
| Marshall, Carol | Corporate director | Individual | 07/27/2006 | |
| Ott, Ron | Corporate director | Individual | 09/15/2006 | |
| Cardenas, Staci | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/28/2013 | |
| Coover, Teresa | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/21/2017 | |
| Hines, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/02/2022 | |
| Lager, Shannon | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2013 | |
| Lantz, Kathleen | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/22/2007 | |
| McBride, Travis | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/15/2012 | |
| Rohling McCord, Catherine | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/09/2000 | |
| Smith, Pamela | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/09/2009 | |
| Waechter Harmon, Lori | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/31/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.