Find a nursing home

Home / Michigan / Grand Rapids

Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard

1700 Leonard Street Ne, Grand Rapids, MI 49505 · Kent County · (616) 885-2118

69 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235261 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).

None of its 27 health citations since March 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.

61.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).

CMS links it to Optalis Health & Rehabilitation, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
17D
9E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 9, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
  1. E
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure menus were consistently followed for 5 (Residents #26, 50, 55, 3, and 63) of 15 residents reviewed for dining and 9 of 11 residents from a confidential resident council meeting with the potential to affect all residents who consume food/beverages from the facility's kitchen resulting in dissatisfaction with meals, being provided incorrect foods, and/or being provided incorrect serving sizes with the potential for decreased oral intake and weight loss.
  2. E
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food preferences were consistently honored for 4 (Residents #26, 1, 24, and 50) of 15 residents reviewed for dining and 11 of 11 residents from a confidential resident council meeting resulting in dissatisfaction with meals and the potential for decreased oral intake and weight loss.
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.) facility staff's use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier and transmission based precautions, 2.) cleaning of shared resident equipment, and 3.) cleaning of respiratory equipment for 5 (Residents #17, #30, #50, #39 and #5 ) of 24 resident reviewed for infection control practices, resulting in the potential for the introduction of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to promote dignity and respect in 1(Resident #39) of 24 residents reviewed for reviewed for dignity and respect ; and 6 of 11 residents from the confidential group meeting resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for feelings of diminished self-worth, sadness, and frustration.
  6. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident preferences for customary routines and activities for 1 (Resident #39) of 24 reviewed for self-determination resulting in feelings of frustration and the potential for diminished quality of life.
  7. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were kept clean and in good repair for 3 (Resident #21, #22 and #30) of 24 Residents reviewed for home-like environment, resulting in emotional distress and a potential for increased risk of infection and/or injury.
  8. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper discharge notifications were completed in 1(Resident #39) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge process, resulting in Resident #39 not receiving written notice of bed hold when she was discharged from the facility to the hospital.
  9. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration that included administration and monitoring of a narcotic medication by a licensed professional in 1 (Resident #20) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for narcotic diversion, unrelieved pain, and the worsening of medical conditions.
  10. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care (provide showers and/or washing hair) for 2 (Residents #39 and Resident #21) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in the potential for avoidable negative physical and psychosocial outcomes for resident's who are dependent on staff for assistance.
  11. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure implementation of resident-specific comprehensive care plans for 2 residents (R13 and R52), and prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for 1 resident (R13) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the development of a pressure ulcer for R13 and the potential for skin breakdown for R52.
June 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00151905 Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision in 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents, reviewed for elopement, when Resident #101, who was actively exit seeking and a high fall risk, exited the facility unattended on 3/27/25 and descended 16 concrete steps to a parking lot, resulting in the potential for serious injury and/or harm.
February 26, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThis deficient practice has two DPS's: DPS A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement posted Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and don required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to providing direct resident care in 4 of 5 residents (Resident #9, #35, #24, & #10) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination and the development and/or spread of infection to a vulnerable population.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the person centered care plan in a timely manner with appropriate interventions for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #25) of 2 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, resulting in inaccurate reflection of the resident's status.
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), specifically personal hygiene (shaving) and changing resident clothes daily were provided for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #54) reviewed for ADL care, resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for avoidable declines in overall health and wellness.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake # MI00146840. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement consistent venous ulcer interventions, monitoring, and treatments consistent with physician orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for wounds, resulting in the potential for worsening of wounds and further skin breakdown.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent worsening of contractures for 1 (Resident #13) of 2 residents reviewed for range of motion resulting in the potential for worsening of contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints).
  7. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequate respiratory care in 1 (Resident #35) of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy (surgical opening in the neck to help with air passage) care, resulting in breathing complications and risk for infection.
  8. D
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    F810 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide or use adaptive feeding equipment correctly for 1 residents (Resident #25) of 1 residents reviewed for adaptive equipment needs, resulting in the potential for decreased independence of consuming food and fluids and weight loss.
May 30, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake MI00144400 Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to safely transfer 1 of 3 residents (Resident #101) resulting in a fall and serious injury requiring a transfer to the hospital, and surgery to treat a distal left femoral (upper leg) fracture.
March 14, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care, including bathing, grooming for 3 residents (Resident #11, Resident #41, and Resident #16) of 15 sampled residents resulting in feelings of frustration, anxiety and self-consciousness.
  2. E
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident needs in 4 of 9 residents (Resident #10, #11, #16, & #41) reviewed for sufficient staffing, resulting in long call light wait times, incontinence with feelings of embarrassment, missed showers/baths, and the potential for additional unmet needs.
  3. E
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to employ either a full time Registered Dietitian or Certified Dietary Manager to provide oversight of kitchen and clinical nutritional services. This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in food service sanitation failures, food borne illness, or inadequate assessment of high-risk residents.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to ensure adequate cleanliness of resident shared equipment (transfer lifts) which was reviewed for infection control resulting in the potential for bacterial harborage, cross contamination, and the spread of disease to a vulnerable population.
  5. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake # MI00139675. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of a residents' narcotic (controlled substances) medications for 1 (Resident #163) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse/misappropriation resulting in missing pain medication, and the potential for uncontrolled pain and discomfort.
  6. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 2 residents (Resident #16 and Resident #40) of a total sample of 15, resulting in a potential for delay in treatment or inappropriate treatment during an emergency.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 9, 2026, 2 on February 26, 2025, 5 on March 14, 2024.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · April 9, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 9, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
    K 711 · April 9, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · February 26, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · February 26, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
    K 232 · March 14, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · March 14, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · March 14, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 14, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · March 14, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.393.993.86
Registered nurses0.540.780.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.133.503.42
Nurse aides1.99
Licensed practical nurses0.87
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)61.5%44.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%39.2%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.80 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.390.543.503.13 6.3%0 of 9060
Oct to Dec 20253.330.543.403.16 11.3%0 of 9264
Jul to Sep 20253.450.573.613.04 5.7%1 of 9262
Apr to Jun 20253.800.734.043.22 0.0%0 of 9161
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Michigan, Jan to Mar 20263.950.704.143.453.3%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Michigan

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Michigan, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$19.03$18.35 to $21.5943,290
LPNs and LVNs$31.47$29.83 to $35.5210,880
Registered nurses$45.34$39.46 to $49.74104,950
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.410.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.90.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.91.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.83.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.71.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.312.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.35.14.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.214.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.924.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.711.712.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 22 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

73.3% this home

Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.4% this home

Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: OPTALIS LEONARD OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Optalis Health & Rehabilitation, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Om Holdco 7 LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%07/01/2025
Patel, RajanManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2025
Patel, RajanCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2025
Optum Management Solutions. IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/01/2025
Bowers, JamesOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2025
Sharon, RobertOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2025
Solarewicz, KrystynaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2025
Ziomkowski, MaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2025
1700 Leonard St. Ne Propco LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization07/01/2025
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization07/01/2025
Optum Management Solutions. IncAdp of the SNFOrganization07/01/2025
Schlaupitz MadhavanAdp of the SNFOrganization07/01/2025
Conner, MarianneAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2025
Solarewicz, KrystynaAdp of the SNFIndividual02/20/2026
Ziomkowski, MaryAdp of the SNFIndividual02/20/2026

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.13 hours per resident per day, below the Michigan average of 3.50.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard get at its last inspection?
11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 9, 2026. The Michigan average is 9.9.
Has Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard?
CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Optalis Health & Rehabilitation. Legal business name: OPTALIS LEONARD OPCO LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection