Home / Florida / Pompano Beach
51 W Sample Road, Pompano Beach, FL 33064 · Broward County · (954) 942-5530
127 certified beds, about 122 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105572 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 2, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 44 health citations since May 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.37 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
30.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Florida Institute for Long-Term Care, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 44 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to address and resolve a resident representative's grievances related to transportation and billing for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep food safety requirements in accordance with the professional standard of food service safety 2 visits to the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for advance directives for 5 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #10, Resident #27, Resident #60, Resident #72 and Resident #99; and failed to initiate care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for catheter, Resident #126.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 of 27 sampled residents, (Resident #44, Resident #90, and Resident #104), whose call lights were not within their reach.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to support the choices, activities, and schedules for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for choices, Resident #8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and failed to ensure that fall interventions were followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accidents, Resident #90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding orders were followed as per the physicians' orders and failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in a manner consistent with physician orders for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #85 and #46) reviewed for respiratory and failed to assure resident care policies and procedures for respiratory care and services are developed affecting 1 of 3 tracheostomy residents (Resident #85.)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain dialysis communication sheets for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #117).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify triggers and implement care plans with triggers for residents with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorders) for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #3. The fundings included:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included of the Psychosocial History and Assessment for Resident #3 dated 07/16/25 documented the following, resident has been diagnosed with PTSD. Is there a smell, sound, touch, taste, sight or other sensation that causes a flashback or trigger was answered yes. If yes, what causes flashbacks or triggers was answered being in situations where he feels anxiety. When asked what happens when the resident experiences a trigger was answered Increased anxiety. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate medication for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #39, reviewed for medication reconciliation.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication were secured, for 1 of 27 sampled residents, Residents #99, reviewed for medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed ensure they implemented an effective infection control program, as evidenced by failure to follow enhanced barrier precautions guidelines for 1 of 42 residents on enhanced barrier precautions, Resident #25.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for 2 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #60 and Resident #126.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for a special study was scheduled and completed in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled resident reviewed, Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain the residents' medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 3 sampled resident reviewed, Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it obtained a current physician order for an Intravenous (IV) dressing and IV site; and failed to change the Intravenous (IV) dressing to the right upper chest for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed, Resident #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policy and procedure, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it posted the current date for the Nurse Staffing Information for 2 of 5 posting areas observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 3 wings in the facility, [NAME] wing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly document and thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin discoloration, Resident #120.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a comprehensive care plan for psychotropic medications with measurable objectives and interventions for 2 of 25 sampled residents, Resident #40 and Resident #63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive wound care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for wound care, Resident #48.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper indwelling (foley) catheter care consistent with accepted standards of practice; failed to insert the appropriate catheter size and failed to date the urinary drainage bag as per physician order for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheter care review during foley care provided for Resident #48.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance medication reconciliations were accurate for 4 of 6 sampled residents reviewed during the controlled substance record review at the facility's west and south wings, for Residents #48, #82, #93 and #117; failed to obtain a physician's order for a psychotropic medication for Resident #93, reviewed for controlled substance use; failed to properly dispose of a controlled substance medication for Resident #117; failed to provide and document a scheduled medication as ordered for sampled Resident #83, as evidenced by it not being available; and failed to administer a scheduled medication to 1 of 3 residents observed for medicaiton administration, Resident #6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor residents' behaviors for those residents receiving psychotropic medications for 4 of 25 sampled residents, Residents #63, #40, #99 and #113.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to address physician ordered 'As Needed' (PRN) psychotropic medications that had 'no stop date' in a timely manner for 3 of 25 sampled residents, Residents #48, #82, and #99.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medications and medication carts in a secure and sanitary manner for 2 of 3 medication carts observed during facility tours and medication administration opportunities; and failed to dispose of expired eyedrops as observed during medication storage tours.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their menus to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 2 observations completed in the main kitchen. This has the potential to affect 40 residents on a regular diet. The cnesus at the time of survey was 124 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food choices and preferences for 3 of 25 sampled residents during dining observations, Resident #28, Resident #64, and Resident #110.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct fluid restriction for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident #58.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 2 observations conducted in the central kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare an approved menu in advance and follow an approved menu to ensure the residents' nutritional needs are met for 109 facility residents in the facility, that included potentially 30 of 30 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that potentially affected 109 of the 113 facility residents and included 30 of 30 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #36 & Resident #43, received the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) informing them of their rights to appeal termination of Medicare supported skilled services.
Inspectors wroteBased on records review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for activities that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the needs for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #103, reviewed for psychosocial needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment to maintain, restore or improve the functional abilities of 2 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #45 and Resident #103, as evidenced by: no splint for Resident #103, and no weighted utensils and lip plate for Resident #45.
Inspectors wroteBased upon interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to provide fingernail care for 2 of 2 sampled residents observed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), related to lack of fingernail care for Resident #103, and Resident #315.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to provide ongoing person-centered activities designed to meet the interest and the psychosocial well-being of 3 of 20 residents, Residents #35, #36 and #103, reviewed for activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequate supervision and assistance to prevent smoking accidents, for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #20.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to perform catheter care using appropriate professional technique, for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #315.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policy and procedure, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it secured the resident's medications for 2 of 5 sampled medications carts observed, the North and South medication carts; failed to secure loose pills in one (1) of five (5) medications carts observed [NAME] medication cart; failed to discard expired wound care dressing in one (1) of three (3) treatment carts, [NAME] wing; and failed to discard expired Sunscreen lotion in Central Supply Room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing dental services to 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #103.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate individual food preferences for 5 of 5 sampled residents, Residents' #10, #13, #40, #55, and #86.
12 fire safety citations on file: 7 on October 2, 2025, 3 on May 31, 2024, 2 on May 4, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.37 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.14 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.72 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 30.3% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 56.5% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 3.14 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.40 in April to June 2025 to 3.37 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.37 | 0.58 | 3.47 | 3.14 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 122 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.54 | 0.56 | 3.62 | 3.35 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 119 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.46 | 0.56 | 3.54 | 3.24 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.40 | 0.46 | 3.49 | 3.17 | 1.0% | 0 of 91 | 121 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.1 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.7 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pompano Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (40.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
40.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 80 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 70 eligible stays.
42.3% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 159 residents counted.
3.9% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 159 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FI-POMPANO REHAB, LLC. CMS links this home to Florida Institute for Long-Term Care, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fi-Pompano Rehab, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/30/2012 |
| Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/23/2002 |
| Jaffe, Howard | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Katz-Hall, Kathy | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Mullarkey, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Richmond, Penny | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Anu Health Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2009 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/28/2011 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/13/2010 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/06/2012 | |
| Holness, Hyacinth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/16/2018 | |
| Izquierdo, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/07/2022 | |
| Anu Health Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/07/2025 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/07/2025 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/20/2025 | |
| Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/18/2025 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/20/2025 | |
| Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2003 | |
| Select Rehabilitation, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/19/2016 | |
| Holness, Hyacinth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/16/2018 | |
| Izquierdo, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/07/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.