165 Winston Drive, Athens, GA 30607 · Clarke County · (706) 549-6013
72 certified beds, about 65 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115631 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 17, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 10 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.13 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.25 of those hours.
18.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
CMS links it to Pruitthealth, an affiliated group of 96 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Monitoring of Antiplatelet/Anticoagulant Therapy and Care Plans, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for one of 15 residents (R) (R52) receiving anticoagulant therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to place R52 at increased risk of unmet care needs, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility- provided documents titled Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) Preventative Maintenance Guide and Heating Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC): Clean Air Filters details the following steps, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment as evidenced by dirty PTAC filters for 42 out of 42 residents' rooms on three Halls (Hall A, Hall B and Hall C) and the C Hall Dayroom. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the health and safety of all 60 residents and staff by increasing the risk of respiratory and allergy symptoms due to inadequate air filtration and reduced fresh air circulation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: Insulin Injections, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with accepted professional standards for two of 19 Residents (R) (R34 and R57) receiving insulin pens. Specifically, the facility failed to sanitize the insulin pen before attaching a new needle prior to use for R34 and by not properly administering the insulin pen for R57.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policies titled, Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings and Infection Prevention and Control Plan the facility failed to have a documented water management program that included measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic water-borne pathogens and how to monitor for them. This had the potential to affect 61 of 61 residents that resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the RAI 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for five out of 23 Residents (R) 36, R18, R31, R33, and R58. This failure had the potential for the residents not to receive the necessary care and services related to the inaccurate data reflective of the residents status at the time of the assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care plan conferences in a timely manner for 12 out of 23 Residents (R) 19, R39, R3, R14, R26, R37, R5, R6, R18, R31, R33, and R58. This failure had the potential for staff, residents, and resident representatives (RP) not to be informed of the care and treatment to meet the resident's needs in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, and facility policy titled, Bed Rails, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for the medical symptoms being treated by using bed rails, attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 14 of 23 Residents (R) 19, R29, R36, R39, R14, R37, R55, R5, R6, R18, R31, R33, R56, and R57 reviewed for accident hazards. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of entrapment resulting in injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention- Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure the stove hood was maintained in good condition, adhere to hand hygiene practices when handling food and to ensure food was handled in a manner to prevent the potential spread of food borne illness for 58 or 61 residents that were provided meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for one of one Resident (R) 63 reviewed for baseline care plans. The deficient practice increased the potential for R63 to not receive effective and person-centered care according to her needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Physician Orders, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for two of 23 Residents (R) 45 and R64. The deficient practice placed residents at risk to not receive needed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice.
5 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 17, 2026, 1 on March 20, 2025, 1 on October 5, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.13 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.51 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.58 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.30 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 18.4% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.38 on weekdays and 2.51 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.81 in April to June 2025 to 3.13 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.13 | 0.25 | 3.38 | 2.51 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 65 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.91 | 0.26 | 3.13 | 2.35 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.98 | 0.31 | 3.18 | 2.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.81 | 0.29 | 2.94 | 2.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 63 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.12 | $17.06 to $20.66 | 43,440 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.82 | $25.43 to $33.99 | 21,060 |
| Registered nurses | $44.98 | $38.02 to $51.12 | 100,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.1 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.9 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.2 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pruitthealth - Grandview's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Georgia: 49 better, 27 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
12.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Georgia: 2 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Georgia: 0 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia46.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia97.4% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - GRANDVIEW, LLC. CMS links this home to Pruitthealth, a group of 96 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cain, Sarbrinia | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/12/2017 | |
| Pruitt, Neil | Corporate director | Individual | 09/19/2007 | |
| Pruitt, Neil | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/19/2007 | |
| Pruitthealth Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/19/2007 | |
| Pruitt, Neil | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/19/2007 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.