5504 E Johnson Ave, Jonesboro, AR 72401 · Craighead County · (870) 932-3271
135 certified beds, about 110 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 045327 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 12, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Arkansas average is 2.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 42 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 4.02 across Arkansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
67.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arkansas average 49.5%).
CMS links it to Anthony & Bryan Adams, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 42 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined the facility failed to administer medications within the recommended time frame for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident # 1, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to not administer medications that were pulled by another nurse for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident # 1, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff practiced good hand washing to prevent potential cross contamination for the residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 103 residents who received meals from the kitchen (Total Census: 105), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Manager on 7/31/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained while performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 2 (Resident # 22 and # 66) of two residents receiving personal care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure curtains were pulled to provide privacy, and that soiled items were not passed over a resident's face during incontinence care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two (Resident #36 and #103) sample mix residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that base line care planning completed with interventions upon admission for pressure ulcers, enhanced barrier precautions, and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) lines for 4 residents out of the sample residents (Resident #363, #366, #367, and #371). A review of the Order Summary reveals that Resident #363 had diagnosis of malnutrition, and pressure ulcer at an unspecified site and an unspecified stage. A review of the Order Summary reveals that Resident #363 had an order for Treatment to unstageable pressure injury to coccyx: cleanse with wound cleanser or sterile water. Apply thin layer of [named brand of burn gel] cover with calcium alginate. Cover with 6 X 6 border foam daily and PRN until resolved. Every day shift for wound treatment may substitute as necessary. Reassess in 14 days. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for one out of one sampled resident. (Resident #71); to ensure proper Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) was provided for 1 (Resident #22) of 1 sampled resident who were dependent on staff for ADLs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to set up wound assessment upon admission to ensure healing and improvement of wounds for 4 out of the sample residents (Resident #363, #366, #367, and #371); failed to follow physician orders for a scheduled wound care treatment for 1 (Resident #367) of 1 resident reviewed for wound care treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and facility document review, it is determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the competencies and skills to provide care and respond to individualized needs as identified in baseline care plan, comprehensive care plan and care plan revision, setting up enhance barrier precautions for wound care, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) lines, contact isolation, wound care assessments, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and medication administration specifically the facility: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all pharmaceuticals were available for the residents during medication administration.
Inspectors wrotebBased on observation, record review and facility policy, review of medication pass on 7/30/2024, and 7/31/2024 it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to maintain a medication rate of less than 5% to prevent complications for 2 (Residents # 31, and #28) of 3 residents observed during medication pass resulting in medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written quantified recipe and menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 2 residents who received pureed diets and 10 residents who received enhanced food diets from 1 of 1 kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that maintained flavor, appearance; hot foods were served hot and cold foods were served cold to maintain palatability and encourage adequate nutritional intake for 1 of 1 meal observed on the 400 Hall, 600 Hall, and 700 Hall. The failed practice had the potential to affect 9 residents who received meal trays in their room on 100 Hall 9 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 200 Hall, 8 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 300 Hall, 26 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 400 Hall, 13 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 500 [NAME]. 29 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 600 Hall and 9 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 700 Hall. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is on contact isolation does not have a roommate and that staff wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while entering the room for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 sample mix resident reviewed for contact isolation; ensure staff while providing care to a resident in an enhanced barrier precautions room wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for 4 (Resident #363, #366, #367, #371) of 4 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions; ensure staff while providing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) medication administration and tube feeding wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and sanitized hands for 1 (Resident #28) of 1 sample mix residents reviewed for medication pass; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure accommodation needs were met by not ensuring the call light was within reach for one (Resident #366) of one sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed in a timely manner for one (Resident #371) of one sampled resident. On 07/29/2024, an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/11/2024 was reviewed. The admission MDS was started on 07/08/2024 and was currently 18 days overdue for completion. A review of the policy Resident Assessment Instrument revealed l. The Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Interdisciplinary Assessment Team conduct(s) timely resident assessments and reviews according to the following schedule: a. Within fourteen (14) days of the resident's admission to the facility; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed and individualized appropriate care and services for 1 (Resident #103) of 1 sample mix residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update person-centered care plans to reflect the residents needs for three Residents (Residents #45, #23, and #462) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to accurately document code status on the care plan which could result in a negative outcome as staff could provide lifesaving measures contradictory to the residents' choice. The facility failed to develop and implement any interventions for the moderate hearing loss for Resident #45. The facility failed to update the care plan to include elopement interventions for one (Residents #462) who had attempted to elope from the facility as documented in the progress notes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure necessary foot/toenail treatment and care was provided to keep toenails trimmed and dry and to prevent flaky skin to decrease the potential for foot complications for 1 (Resident #22) of 1 sampled resident who were dependent on staff for foot/toenail care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that Registered Dietitian recommendations were following in a timely manner for an enteral bolus feeding for one (Resident #28) of one sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure enteral water flush was administered per physicians' orders for a resident with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube during medication administration based on professional standards of care for 1 (Resident #28) of 1 sample mix resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to maintain records of their program that developed and implemented effective improvement plans to correct identified areas of concern. The facility failed to ensure the facility was able to provide its QAPI plan to the State surveyors during recertification survey or upon request. On 8/2/24 10:30 AM, Administrator states he is unable to provide records of the QA (Quality Assurance) committee meetings when requested. The administrator states, We can't find them, I've been here a week, and I don't have them.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to knock on doors prior to entering resident rooms for 4 resident rooms (Rooms 609, 610, 612, and 613) viewed for protecting and valuing the resident's private space.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the knowledge, competencies, and skill sets to provide care and respond to each resident's individualized needs as identified in resident assessment, care plans, and physician orders for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #7) of 2 residents reviewed for assessments, care plans, and competent staff. Specifically, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS)was completed in accordance with guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument for Resident #6. 2. Failed to ensure that care plans were revised and updated according to the resident's current physician orders, assessments, and resident's current individualized needs for Resident #6 and Resident #7. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented to prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failure to perform hand hygiene between residents, during perineal care and wound care to prevent cross contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a comfortable, sanitary, clean, and homelike environment was provided in facility hallways and in room [ROOM NUMBER].
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided is a safe manner to prevent a resident from sliding out of the bed resulting in the resident receiving a fracture of the femur for 1 (Resident #2) of 1 sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate care to include, completing admission assessment, completing initial body audit and failed to ensure treatment and services were in place to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 resident. R#1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was answered in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #5) and fingers were clean and trimmed for 4 (Residents #6, #7, #8 and #9) of 16 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15 and #16) sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs of residents who required assistance with activities of daily living. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 111 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practice had the potential to affect 109 residents who received meals from the kitchen, (total census: 111), as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor #1 on 09/13/23 at 11:55 PM.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a clean and homelike manner for 6 (Rooms 401, 408, 413, 508, 601 and 610) of 41 (Rooms 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615 and 616) resident rooms on the 400 Hall, 500 Hall and 600 Hall.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly resident assessments were completed no later than the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) plus 14 calendar days and were submitted within 14 days after completion to meet the requirements for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for 4 (Residents #66, #84, #67 and #90) of 4 sampled residents whose Quarterly Assessments were reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance and at temperatures that were acceptable to the residents during 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 10 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on the 100 Hall, 10 residents who received meal trays on the 200 Hall, 14 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 300 Hall, 24 residents who received meal trays in their room on 400 Hall, 13 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 500 hall, 24 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 600 Hall, and 11 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 700 hall as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor #1 on 09/13/23 at 9:36 AM.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a trust account had access to their personal funds after business hours and on weekends for 2 (Residents #32 and #73) of 2 (Residents #32, #73,) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided for 4 (Residents #26, #59, #75 and #81) of 13 (Residents #4, #14, #26, #37, #48, #49, #59, #73, #75, #81, #83, #94 and #307) sampled residents who were dependent or required assistance with ADL care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administered by a family member was ordered by the attending physician for 1 (Resident #357) of 1 sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended in resident rooms for 2 (Resident #14, #48) of 2 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer Oxygen at the Physician ordered flow rate for 1 (Residents #57) and failed to ensure the nebulizer mouthpiece was stored in a bag for 1 (Resident #48) of 14 (Residents #4, #32, #33, #41, #42, #48, #49, #52, #57, #59, #75, #81, #90 and #357) sampled residents who received respiratory therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened vials of insulin were dated, medication carts were locked, and medications were not left on top of the medication carts when out of the line of the nurse's sight.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to prevent repeated deficiencies with maintaining a clean, comfortable homelike environment, with distributing and serving food in a sanitary manner, preventing accidents and hazards, and providing respiratory care. These failed practices had the potential to affect all 111 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and washed hands during wound care for 1 (Resident #307), failed to maintain a bath table free of cracks, staff failed to perfume hand hygiene during medication administration, and laundry staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and clean technique when providing laundry services. These failed practices have the potential to affect 31 residents who received wound care, 24 residents who used the bath table, and all 111 residents who resided in the facility.
6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 12, 2025, 3 on August 2, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.94 | 4.02 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.26 | 3.45 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.74 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.84 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 67.1% | 49.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 76.5% | 44.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.22 on weekdays and 3.26 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.15 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.94 | 0.36 | 4.22 | 3.26 | 0.6% | 0 of 90 | 110 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.27 | 0.42 | 4.61 | 3.43 | 0.7% | 0 of 92 | 106 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.50 | 0.41 | 4.85 | 3.61 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.15 | 0.46 | 4.47 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arkansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.05 | 0.40 | 4.28 | 3.47 | 2.0% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $16.55 | $14.52 to $17.34 | 17,260 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.22 | $23.82 to $29.43 | 10,010 |
| Registered nurses | $37.95 | $32.04 to $43.40 | 29,400 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 10.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 10.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.5 | 24.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.4 | 12.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ridgecrest Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Arkansas: 7 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 235 eligible stays.
12.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Arkansas: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 248 eligible stays.
7.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arkansas: 0 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 141 eligible stays.
75.3% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas64.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 101 residents counted.
0.5% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 200 residents counted.
6.0% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas2.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 200 residents counted.
90.8% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas98.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: JBNC, INC.. CMS links this home to Anthony & Bryan Adams, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 3.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3b Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 46% | 01/01/2017 |
| Adams, Anthony | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2008 | |
| Simmons First National Corporation | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 01/01/2017 | |
| Cahoone, Patricia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Talbot, Lauren | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Thompson, Marlisa | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/16/2026 | |
| Talbot, Lauren | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Adams, Anthony | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/26/2007 | |
| Adams, Bryan | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/26/2007 | |
| Ellis, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Koehler, Tobey | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/14/2008 | |
| Thompson, Marlisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/16/2026 | |
| 3b Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2017 | |
| Chc Re LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2017 | |
| LTC Systems/Rx, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2008 | |
| Pharmacy Consults, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2008 | |
| Reliance Health Care, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2008 | |
| Simmons First National Corporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2017 | |
| Adams, Anthony | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Adams, Bryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Cahoone, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Ellis, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Koehler, Tobey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2008 | |
| McGinnis, Larry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2008 | |
| Talbot, Lauren | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Thompson, Marlisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/16/2026 | |
| Treece, Brannon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arkansas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.