209 Main Street, Tabor, IA 51653 · Fremont County · (712) 629-2645
46 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 165546 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 4, 2026, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Iowa average is 6.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 64 health citations since December 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.76 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Iowa and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
60.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Iowa average 44.0%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 64 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to keep residents free from neglect. On 6/7/2026 the nurse on duty failed to administer Resident #4, #5, #6, #7, and #10 insulins as ordered by their physician. Certified Medication Aides (CMAs) reminded the nurse of those resident's orders not completed and the Electronic Health Record (EHR) changed the orders to red, alerting staff the orders had not been carried out. The facility reported a census of 41 residents.1. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 4/27/2026, documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. A BIMS score of 10 indicated mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he received insulin injections during the last 7 days. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Staff failed to administer Resident #4, #5, #6, #7, #10 insulin as ordered by their physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #6 had a change in condition. The facility also failed to notify the physician as written per orders for Resident #6. The facility reported a census of 41 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, a list of discharged residents, staff interviews and Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual the facility failed to complete a death Minimum Data Set (MDS) after 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) expired. The facility reported a census of 41 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents' (Resident #6) records were accurate. The facility reported a census of 41 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to secure prescribed medications from the possibility of unauthorized access. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #24). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to transport food in accordance with professional standards by stacking food uncovered in bowls on top of each other contaminating the uncovered food. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #4). The facility also maintain confidentiality of residents' records during medication administration. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide dignity and respect by video recording a resident without notifying the resident or asking permission and by failing to remove food from the resident's face and cover the resident's right shoulder in a public area to 2 of 40 residents reviewed (Resident #36 and #24). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN), Form Center for Medicare Services (CMS)-10055 or Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS 10123-NOMNC, for 2/3 residents reviewed (Resident #26, #11). The facility failed to provide the residents notification of the changes as soon as the change in coverage was made available. The facility reported a census of 40.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, resident interview, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide the residents with a homelike environment by serving meals on Styrofoam flatware to residents. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report suspected abuse between two (2) residents (#2 & #37) to the State Agency after being made aware of the incident. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for 1 of 1 resident (#29). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 14 residents (Residents #45). The facility failed to complete/document wound treatments per physician orders and failed to administer oxycodone per physician orders. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 14 residents (Residents #26, #1). The facility failed to complete neurological assessments post falls, and failed to complete wound assessments to ensure healing. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and provider interview, the facility failed to assist the resident to obtain hearing devices through possible available resources for 1 of 1 resident (#29). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor a pressure area in a manner to reduce the risk of wound development and failed to implement offloading procedures to decrease pressure for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to develop programs maintaining residents strength, range of motion (ROM), mobility needs based on the comprehensive assessment and under the direct guidance of a Registered Nurse (RN) for 2 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #26, #45). The facility reported a census of 40.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, policy review, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #24) who required the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility document review, clinical record review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 3 of 16 resident reviewed (Resident #3, #24, and #26). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater by having a medication error rate of 8.33 percent. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care for a resident with a catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, document review, staff interview, family interview and policy review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative / family / Power of Attorney (POA) for change in condition / transfer to Emergency Department (ED) when a resident fell from a full body mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 39 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide weekly skin assessments for 2 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #3) for pressure ulcers. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. MDS also documented Resident #2 had 1 unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #2's EHR titled, Progress Notes documented an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel was discovered on 6/2/25. Progress Notes documented wound assessments with size and description were completed on 6/8/25, 9/15/25, 10/13/25, 11/6/25, and 11/11/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards by not following physician orders for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2, #4, #5) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file review, staff interview and policy and procedure reviews the facility failed to complete the Iowa Criminal History, Iowa Sex Offender Registry, and Iowa Central Abuse Registry prior to employment for 1 of 1 employees reviewed (Staff E). The facility census was 40.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to protect residents from accidents and injuries for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #33, and #193) reviewed for falls. Resident #33 fell on 9/18/24 and sustained a right greater tuberosity of humerus fracture (right upper arm) when his alarm failed to go off alerting staff that he had gotten up without staff assistance. Resident #193 fell on 2/4/25 when he got up out of bed and walked across his room without staff assistance, fell, and sustained a left intertrochanteric fracture (left hip fracture). The facility reported a census of 43.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to post required notifications of State Survey Agencies and other support for advocacy in a form or manner accessible and understandable to residents or representatives. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance available to the residents and make efforts to resolve complaints for 1 resident out of 8 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to safeguard medical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (July 1-September 30, 2024) review, facility staffing reports review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program in place to provide quality care for residents. The facility failed to make good faith attempts to correct quality deficiencies, and maintain and implement a comprehensive QAPI program and plan. The facility identified a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to properly establish and implement written policies and procedures for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain records of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings 1 of the 3 quarters reviewed and the required attendees. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on document review, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to have correct documentation of residents' choice related to advance directives for 3 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #24, Resident #194 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility document review, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy by not completing background checks prior to staff employment and failing to provide annual abuse training. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wrote4. The MDS for Resident #16 dated 1/16/25 identified a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the following high-risk drug classes: antidepressant, diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, hypoglycemic, and anticonvulsant. The MDS identified verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others occurring at a frequency of every 1 to 3 days. Resident #16's Care Plan revised 12/8/23 documented the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive towards staff related to poor impulse control. A desired outcome identified the resident will demonstrate effective coping skills through the review date. However, the interventions/tasks did not include the resident's target behaviors or which coping skills to implement. It also lacked non-pharmacological interventions, ordered medications or other treatments available. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on employee file review, staff interviews, State Agency website, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a hired nurse aide that had worked longer than 4 months had completed a training and competency evaluation program approved by the state. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for psychotropic medication use for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #33, #16, #2, #22 and #194). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards by not dating food items removed from boxes or disposing of expired food items. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or centralized work area by the system having a known issue that prevents the entire call light system from working. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility document review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on employee file review and staff interview the facility failed to complete required in-service training for nurse aides to ensure continued competence no less than 12 hours per year. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect throughout cares provided for 1 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide residents and families with 48 hour notification of financial responsibility when Medicare Part A services were scheduled to be discontinued for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #11, and #15). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, observations, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide the residents with a comfortable homelike environment by leaving feces and urine in a commode without being emptied for at least 8 hours for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #20) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, facility document review and the facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate, prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment and report all results of allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the MDS by not accurately assessing the use of insulin and antianxiety medication for 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #3), who was diagnosed with new mental disorder diagnoses since admission to the facility. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical document review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to update care plans in a timely manner to reflect the resident's condition for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #19, #23, and #33) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, family interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to enter physician's orders into the electronic health record (EHR) and follow physician orders for a resident with an order to wear a mitt/glove for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #22) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews and facility protocol review the facility failed to provide quality of nursing care by not completing an assessment related to the use of a restraint that was ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (resident #22). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, pharmacy documentation review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates and with appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and primary care provider (PCP) interviews, and policy review the facility failed to notify 1 of 3 resident's (Resident #1) PCP of the resident refusing his newly scheduled breathing treatments. The facility reported a census of 39 resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, physician and staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to have 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) PEG tube replaced when it was found to be leaking. The facility also failed to receive a physician's order to administer Resident #1's medications and feedings via Foley catheter. The facility reported a census of 39 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that was reviewed annually. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings incude: Review of the facility provided document titled, Infection Prevention and Control Standard Precautions, revealed the last revision date was completed 1/24/23. On 4/3/24 at 11:45 AM the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (DON/IP), Registered Nurse (RN), stated there was an infection control policy, but was unsure if it had been reviewed and signed by the Medical Director. The DON/IP stated the facility had not had their first Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting of the year with the Medical Director present. The DON/IP stated would look for a signature page for the policy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and guidance from the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to document the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment to accurately reflect the status of 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #25, #1). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 1 resident with a negative Level I result for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 out of 1 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy reviews the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to include a goal for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were reliant on enteral feed nutrition received tube feeding per physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1 of 3 (Resident #5) residents observed for medication pass. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy/protocol review the facility failed to document for 1 of 5 residents (#7) that the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the immunization due to medical contraindications. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to meet a resident's need related to adequately planned transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
28 fire safety citations on file: 11 on February 10, 2025, 11 on April 4, 2024, 6 on December 20, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 10, 2025 | Payment Denial | 4 days from March 6, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.76 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.20 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.53 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.4% | 44.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 71.4% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.44 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.99 on weekdays and 3.20 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.87 in April to June 2025 to 3.76 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.55 | 3.99 | 3.20 | 11.1% | 0 of 90 | 42 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.74 | 0.57 | 3.93 | 3.27 | 12.1% | 1 of 92 | 41 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.59 | 0.33 | 3.82 | 3.00 | 10.8% | 15 of 92 | 42 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.87 | 0.48 | 4.20 | 3.04 | 11.2% | 2 of 91 | 41 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Iowa, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.80 | 0.71 | 3.98 | 3.36 | 4.7% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.92 | $17.96 to $21.95 | 22,670 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.11 | $27.12 to $34.06 | 5,510 |
| Registered nurses | $37.80 | $32.83 to $41.32 | 34,420 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.0 | 17.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.2 | 16.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.5 | 19.4 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Tabor Manor Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Iowa: 28 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Iowa: 1 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Iowa: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Iowa56.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Iowa0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Iowa1.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Iowa100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: TABOR MANOR CARE CENTER INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worcester, Timothy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 33% | 12/20/2018 |
| Worchester, Mitchell | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 67% | 12/20/2018 |
| Worchester, Mitchell | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/20/2018 | |
| Worcester, Timothy | Corporate director | Individual | 12/20/2018 | |
| Worchester, Mitchell | Corporate director | Individual | 12/20/2018 | |
| Worcester, Timothy | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/20/2018 | |
| Worchester, Mitchell | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/20/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Iowa. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.