Home / Kansas / Prairie Village
7105 Mission Road, Prairie Village, KS 66208 · Johnson County · (913) 262-1611
60 certified beds, about 50 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175499 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 25, 2023, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since July 2020, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $29,281 in the last three years; the largest was $14,901, and the latest is dated June 4, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.00 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.60 of those hours.
51.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Tutera Senior Living & Health Care, an affiliated group of 25 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure R1 received toileting assistance for Resident (R) 1 in accordance to her plan of care when staff left to sit in a soiled brief for over hours and failed to offer toileting assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accidents when staff failed to use a gait belt during a transfer for Resident (R) 1, which resulted in a fractured right femur (thigh bone). Additionally, the facility failed to place an appropriate wheelchair cushion for R2, and instead used a bed pillow which caused the resident to slide out of her wheelchair during a van transport, resulting in bilateral hematomas to her knees.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included nine residents reviewed for Advanced Directives (a legal document that provides instructions for medical care when a person is unable to communicate their wishes). Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident (R) 1, who elected a full code status. On [DATE] at 05:10 PM, R1's family member reported to the nurse R1 had died. Licensed Nurse (LN) G did not check R1's code status until prompted by a hospice nurse and LN I, approximately 45 minutes later, and then the LNs started resuscitative measures. The facility's failure to initiate CPR on a full-code resident placed R1 and all residents with full code status in immediate jeopardy.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were covered, labeled, and dated, and failed to ensure consistent temperature monitoring for walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the risk to spread foodborne illness to the residents.
Inspectors wrote- R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, history transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), seizure (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. R52's Care Area Assessment (CAA) had not been completed and was in progress. R52's Care Plan dated 10/16/23 documented staff would encourage R52 to participate in activities that promoted exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based of observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and handling of the resident's medications. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication and administration errors. Findings Included: - On 10/26/23 at 07:10AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed with the following observations: An unsecured treatment cart located across from the dining room was inspected. The top drawer contained Bactroban (topical ointment used to treat bacterial infections) and Nystatin (topical ointment used to treat fungal infections) cream for Resident (R)106; and Nystatin cream for R105. The drawer also contained Voltaren cream (topical cream used to treat inflammation) and betamethasone (medication used to treat inflammation) for R151. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. The facility identified three COVID-19 (highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory virus) positive residents. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were followed related to isolation precautions signage, water management for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium which can cause pneumonia in vulnerable populations), and laundry services. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 10/23/23 at 08:30AM an inspection was completed on the facility's laundry service room. An inspection of the facility's water temperature logs for the washing machine revealed no temperature testing was conducted after March 2023. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample include 14 with one reviewed for privacy. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure privacy for Resident (R)108 when staff audio recorded medical treatment without consent. This deficient practice placed R108 at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing and impaired rights. Findings Included- - The Medical Diagnosis section within R108's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), acute respiratory failure, and acute kidney failure. R108's EMR indicated she admitted the facility on 10/12/23 and expired (passed away) on 10/21/23 at the facility. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not yet completed or due. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 53 related to his limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). This deficient practice placed R53 at risk of loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and development or worsening contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) due to uncommunicated care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for Resident (R)104 and R53. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for skin complications and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R104's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of acute kidney failure, morbid obesity (severely overweight), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and history of brain hemorrhages (bleeding of the brain). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete physician ordered daily weights for Residents (R)106 and R51. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for complications related to edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a ROM program to help maintain and prevent a decrease in ROM/mobility for Resident (R) 53. This deficient practice placed R53 at risk of loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and development of worsening contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle).
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent weekly weight monitoring as required by Resident (R)105's physician's orders. This deficient practice placed R105 at risk for complication related to weight loss and malnutrition (condition that develops when the body is deprived of vitamins, minerals and other nutrients). Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R105's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for trauma informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R)106's childhood sexual abuse and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R106 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with six reviewed for pharmacy services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, The facility failed to establish a system to enable accurate medication reconciliation and maintenance of Resident (R)106's controlled hypnotic medication (a class of medications used to induce sleep) records. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for medication diversion and/or misappropriation. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered chest x-ray results for Resident (R) 53 were signed and scanned into the clinical record. This deficient practice could result in unnecessary tests and delayed treatment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide scheduled bathing for five sampled residents, Resident (R) 9, R17, R32, R23, and R5. This placed these residents at risk for skin problems and poor hygiene.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve palatable food during meals that maintained appetizing temperatures for the residents who resided in the facility and received food from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for nutritional status problems and weight loss.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the 43 residents in the facility, who received their meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for urinary catheters. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter tubing and collection bag did not contact the floor for Resident (R) 8 and R18, and appropriate disinfectant cleaning of the glucometer (device used to measure blood sugar) for R138 and R86. This placed R8 and R18 at risk for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and R138 and R86 at risk for blood borne infections.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for urinary catheters. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to cover urinary catheter bags for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 8 and R18. This placed R8 and R18 at risk for impaired dignity and psychosocial wellbeing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of three sampled residents, Residents (R) 8 and 32. This placed R8 and R32 at risk for skin injuries and falls.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for dialysis. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ongoing communication and assessment of the resident's dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood) treatment, including monitoring for Resident (R) 135. This placed the resident at risk for complications and health decline.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 12, received as needed (PRN) Xanax (an antianxiety medication that calm and relax people with excessive restlessness, nervousness and tension) with a 14 day stop date and rationale for use. This placed R12 at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications that affect the chemical make-up of the brain).
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood.) pens were dated when opened for Resident (R) 2, R28, and R138. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased medication effectiveness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide change of condition notification to one Resident's (R83) representative when he transferred to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect change in code status for Resident (R) 32.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to document a recapitulation of the facility stay upon discharge from the facility for Resident (R) 35 sampled for discharge.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)19 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to follow a physician's order which directed staff to apply compression stocking (specially made socks which help prevent leg swelling and possible blood clots) to R19's lower extremities.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow wound care orders for Resident (R) 32 as ordered by the wound care center provider for a stage four (wound that extends below the subcutaneous [beneath the skin] fat into deep tissues like muscles, tendons, and ligaments) pressure ulcer on the resident's right buttocks/ischium (part of the hip bone).
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents sampled for accidents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure staff implemented interventions to prevent injury from falls when staff failed to provide a floor mat as indicated in R2's plan of care. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for injury due to falls and/or accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for feeding tube (tube for introducing high calorie fluids into the stomach). The facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings when staff failed to date and time the feeding tube administration tubing and feeding formula bag for Resident (R) 32.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 32's pain before, during, and after wound dressing change.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Five residents were sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported a blood pressure medication was given outside of the Primary Care Provider's (PCP) ordered parameters for Resident (R) 14.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Five residents were sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to hold antihypertensive (medication used to treat high blood pressure) medication for Resident (R) 14, when her blood pressures were outside standing order parameters.
44 fire safety citations on file: 13 on October 25, 2023, 20 on February 17, 2022, 11 on July 30, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 4, 2026 | Fine | $14,380 |
| January 27, 2026 | Fine | $14,901 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.00 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.60 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.45 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.2% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.16 on weekdays and 3.60 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.37 in April to June 2025 to 4.00 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.00 | 0.60 | 4.16 | 3.60 | 6.2% | 0 of 90 | 50 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.04 | 0.75 | 4.18 | 3.67 | 3.5% | 0 of 92 | 39 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.07 | 0.74 | 4.28 | 3.55 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.37 | 0.82 | 4.66 | 3.64 | 4.9% | 0 of 91 | 34 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.6 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.9 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Village at Mission's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
54.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 95 eligible stays.
7.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
46.9% this home
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE VILLAGE AT MISSION LLC. CMS links this home to Tutera Senior Living & Health Care, a group of 25 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Village at Mission Property LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 40% | 06/01/2021 |
| Tutera, Joseph | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Tutera, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Brooks, Kiley | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Gannon, Jeff | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Walnut Creek Management Company LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2021 | |
| Brooks, Kiley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Gannon, Jeff | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.